Brimstone & Treacle (1982)A strange young man has a sinister effect on the family of a middle-aged writer. Director:Richard Loncraine |
|
| 0Share... |
Brimstone & Treacle (1982)A strange young man has a sinister effect on the family of a middle-aged writer. Director:Richard Loncraine |
|
| 0Share... |
| Complete credited cast: | |||
| Sting | ... | ||
| Denholm Elliott | ... | ||
| Joan Plowright | ... | ||
|
|
Suzanna Hamilton | ... | |
| Benjamin Whitrow | ... |
Businessman
|
|
|
|
Dudley Sutton | ... |
Stroller
|
|
|
Mary MacLeod | ... |
Valerie Holdsworth
|
|
|
Tim Preece | ... |
Clergyman
|
|
|
Elizabeth Bradley | ... |
Woman Passer By
|
|
|
Hugh Walters | ... |
Man
|
|
|
Christopher Fairbanks | ... |
Drunk
|
Brimstone and Treacle is a modern gothic tale about the evil that men do and the price that must be paid to make things right. The film, a remake of a 1976 teleplay that included Denholm Elliot in its original cast as Mr. Bates, the film also included an incredibly cool soundtrack of songs by artists like The Go-Go's, The Police, Squeeze and an irreverently stylish 1930's little diddy called "Spread A Little Happiness", performed by Sting by himself. Written by Gerry Kissell <repdetect@yahoo.com>
Dennis Potter never made a drama that never had a point,its just that his work was so deep the point of his dramas wasn't always obvious,in fact you felt you needed a high IQ level to get your head around his work.The important message of this film is that we shouldn't always be so trusting towards strangers,especially ones who seem so angelic they may have ulterior motives and in this case he did.How many cases have there been where the mentally handicapped have been abused by their carers,its not that often but its enough.Plus cases of the elderly go into nursing homes and end up being shoved about,i think he was making a very strong point.Stings character was a wolf in sheep's clothing,i think in the original version he was played by Micheal Kitchen,who i feel played the part better,the original version has only been on TV once as it had been banned,and may still be.The original version does put the point across better,i feel the remake lacks this, probably because Sting whose much more well known as a singer wasn't a good choice,it just made the film seem bizarre,people went to see this film purely to see what his acting was going to be like,so the point of the story sort of got lost.Dennis Potter was quiet ingenious, he never made a controversial film for the sake of being controversial,there was much more to him than that.Although i must admit its a pretty disturbing film,not one you would easily forget.