Under Capricorn (TV Mini Series 1983) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
All the melodramatic makings of an opera.
emuir-118 March 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I had read the book and seen the 1949 version many years ago, so when I spotted this on Acorn's streaming service I couldn't resist it. The mini series really shows its age. I don't mean that as a put down, quite the opposite, it is just noticeable for its absence of swearing, especially four letter euphemisms for sex, no gay or transgender characters and no graphic sex. What a relief!

The melodramatic story has all the makings of an opera or musical. Transported convicts having served their sentence are paroled (ticket of leave) and encouraged to stay in Australia where they can buy land and start their own businesses. Given that they had to pay their own fare back to England, and that poverty and lack of employment are what drove them to crime in the first place, Australia must seem a land of opportunity especially as there is a desperate need for skilled workers, tradesmen and artisans. Not all emigrants are convicts, however, there is a class distinction between the working class, the former convicts and impoverished aristocrats out to get rich.

The story concerns a couple who have became rich landowners despite the husband having been transported for a crime he did not commit. While waiting for him to serve his sentence his wife who had followed him to Australia has turned to drink and despite her aristocratic lineage, is an outcast. There is an element of 'Gaslight' as the wife is being kept drunk and frightened out of her wits by a scheming housekeeper out to snare the husband, and whose lies drive away the young man trying to help. Letters go missing, false accusations abound, servants pilfer and gossip, misunderstandings, jealousy and thwarted true love, but in the end all is sorted out, the housekeeper is sent packing, and everyone lives happily ever after.

While watching the series I was imagining the opening chorus as the convicts arrive in Australia and are inspected and assigned to the overseers, Then later a dramatic coloratura at the dinner where Lady Henrietta appears worse for drink. Charles Adare is the young bright eyed tenor. Samson Flusky the baritone singing of how he came to be transported. Miss Milly the evil housekeeper a contralto. Comic relief is provided by the servants. Elegant dancing at a governor's ball, energetic Irish jigs and songs as the servants carouse out in the barn. There is a scene at the Aboriginals camp and later back at the house, lots of dramatic arias before all is resolved.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Way Outback
NoDakTatum28 October 2023
Based on a novel by Helen Simpson, and filmed before by Alfred Hitchcock, Rod Hardy and his British and Australian cast do a great job bringing a "Rebecca"-like story to the small screen. Charles (Peter Cousens) is seeking his fortune in 1800's Australia. The nephew of the territorial governor, Charles endears himself to rich landowner Sam Flusky (John Hallam). As Charles and Sam entertain land prospects, Charles meets Sam's alcoholic wife Henrietta (Lisa Harrow). Henrietta is kept inebriated by housekeeper Milly (Julia Blake), who is secretly in love with Sam. Charles moves in with Sam and tries to help Henrietta run her household. Rumors of an affair between Henrietta and Charles begin. Milly is excused from the house, Charles meets his soul mate, Sue (Cathrine Lynch), and things seem to be going hunky-dory. Then, Charles is sent on a hunt for gold with Sam's blessing and a loan. It comes back that Charles is dead, and Henrietta begins to drink again. In a more lucid moment, she invites Sue to live with her and care for her, as Milly is also asked back into the house.

If you find the Prism Entertainment VHS video box to this film, you would think it was a horror film. There is a picture of a shrunken head, essential to the finale, on the cover, and the plot summary makes this sound like a Hammer Studios film. While this is all untrue, that does not make this a bad film. At two hours, this edited version of a three hour TV mini-series does well to touch on all the major characters while keeping the story going. Lisa Harrow is excellent as Lady Henrietta, going from a drunk to a lady and back again, and carries the film. John Hallam as Sam is also good, and film makers play with the audience. One minute, you like Sam, the next you despise him for what he is letting happen to his wife. Julia Blake is creepy as Milly, without going overboard into psychosis. She lets love blind her initial loyalty to Henrietta, and her reasoning sometimes even makes sense. Peter Cousens is good as Charles, although he is a little too wide-eyed and sometimes annoying. Catherine Lynch does her best Eliza Doolittle impression as Sue, and her change to a lady's ward is too quick, possibly as a result of the mini-series' editing. The majority of the scenes work, but sometimes plotholes open as characters simply keep things from each other to drive the story forward. Sam's brazen acceptance of Charles is also strange, and not explored. Hardy's direction is good, and he seems to have had a big budget to work with. His fish eye lenses needs to be retired, but his real strength is with his actors. This plays like a very good episode of "Masterpiece Theater." If that kind of PBS entertainment is not your cup of tea, neither is "Under Capricorn." I enjoyed it, despite its non-genre trappings, and I highly recommend it.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed