The show that made Siskel and Ebert famous. These two Chicago-based movie critics sit around and review movies, giving either "Thumbs up" or "Thumbs down." Noted for the good-natured ... See full summary »
Reviews

Episodes

Seasons


Years



4   3   2   1   Unknown  
1986   1985   1984   1983   1982   Unknown  
Nominated for 2 Primetime Emmys. See more awards »
Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

Siskel & Ebert (1986–2010)
Talk-Show
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.7/10 X  

Chicago critics Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert rate new movies with a thumbs up, or a thumbs down.

Stars: Roger Ebert, Gene Siskel, Richard Roeper
Sneak Previews (1975–1996)
Talk-Show
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.5/10 X  

Two critics review films both old and new.

Stars: Roger Ebert, Gene Siskel, Jeffrey Lyons
Talk-Show
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.4/10 X  

Two film critics review newly-released films, while the renowned critic Roger Ebert presents his own reviews voiced by guest readers.

Stars: Christy Lemire, Ignatiy Vishnevetsky, Roger Ebert
Inside the Actors Studio (TV Series 1994)
Talk-Show
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.8/10 X  

Famous actors, directors and writers reminisce about their careers and the philosophy behind their careers.

Stars: James Lipton, Bradley Cooper, Ellen Burstyn
In Search of... (1976–1982)
Documentary | Sci-Fi
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.6/10 X  

Leonard Nimoy hosts investigations into various mysteries.

Stars: Leonard Nimoy, Peter Byrne, Inger Armour
Documentary | History
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.2/10 X  

The history of American film criticism.

Director: Gerald Peary
Stars: Roger Ebert, Andrew Sarris, Pauline Kael
Antiques Roadshow (TV Series 1997)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.4/10 X  

Appraisers of antiques travel with the show to various cities. Area citizens bring articles for appraisal and often relate the histories of these items. The appraisers then expand on what ... See full summary »

Stars: Mark L. Walberg, Simeon Lipman, Tom Lecky
Dinner for Five (TV Series 2001)
Comedy | Talk-Show
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.4/10 X  

Actor/Director Jon Favreau hosts an evening with four Hollywood friends (four different people or combinations of people each episode), who casually discuss the craft of acting and the ... See full summary »

Stars: Jon Favreau, Faizon Love, Kevin James
Charlie Rose (TV Series 1991)
News | Talk-Show
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8/10 X  

Charlie Rose interviews noteworthy people in fields including politics and government, business and economics, science and technology, media, sports and the arts.

Stars: Charlie Rose, Mark Halperin, Al Hunt
This Old House (TV Series 1979)
Documentary | Reality-TV
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8/10 X  

The host guides various participants as they repair and renovate various houses.

Stars: Kevin O'Connor, Norm Abram, Richard Trethewey
Biography (TV Series 1987)
Documentary | Biography
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.9/10 X  

The life stories of various historical figures and celebrities are told.

Stars: Jack Perkins, Peter Graves, Harry Smith
Pop Up Video (TV Series 1997)
Music
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.1/10 X  

This series features old and new music videos, with a twist: As the video plays, "information bubbles" will "pop up" with facts about the production of the video, things contained in the ... See full summary »

Stars: Michael Penn
Edit

Cast

Complete series cast summary:
...
 Himself - Host / ... (45 episodes, 1982-1986)
...
 Himself - Host / ... (45 episodes, 1982-1986)
Edit

Storyline

The show that made Siskel and Ebert famous. These two Chicago-based movie critics sit around and review movies, giving either "Thumbs up" or "Thumbs down." Noted for the good-natured insults traded by the two reviewers (usually concerning Ebert's weight and Siskel's receding hairline). Written by Afterburner <aburner@erols.com>

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Talk-Show

Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

24 September 1982 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Movie Views  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Color:

See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

After Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert left the series to do Siskel & Ebert (1986), Siskel was suspended by the Chicago Tribune, the newspaper for which he wrote. The series was produced by Tribune Entertainment which, like the newspaper, was owned by the Tribune Company. Siskel began negotiations with the Chicago Sun-Times, the newspaper for which Ebert wrote. When the Chicago Tribune learned of this, they rehired Siskel. See more »

Connections

Referenced in Gilmore Girls: Die, Jerk (2003) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

This could be the most interesting buddy-show ever !

Out of the most prominent duos that the American TV showed in 1982 (Sam and Diane of "Cheers", Laura Holt and Remington Steele of "Remington Steele", or Cagney & Lacey of "Cagney & Lacey") still Siskel & Ebert are one of the most interesting, informative and droll duos ever been in a show not in 1982 only but at all. Thanks for the miracle of internet that made me watch countless episodes of their show.

Gene Siskel, who began working for the Chicago Tribune in 1969, teamed up with Roger Ebert, the film reviewer of the Chicago Sun-Times, in 1975 to host a show which eventually became "Sneak Previews". In 1982 their new show, "At the Movies", was produced. Then after 4 years its commercial version "Siskel & Ebert & the Movies" was made with just more lights in and around the show. Their duo, and not the show, ended with Siskel's death in 1999.

I felt that Siskel was the more charismatic and the less emotional. Ebert with his corpulent presence, baby face, big glasses, and the way he straightens his sitting before saying anything important was more innate and close to a movies nerd who at one moment would suppress his anger with fading low tone.

When asked, on Johnny Carson's The Tonight Show, what he thought was the biggest difference between himself and Ebert, Siskel unhesitatingly replied: "I'm a better reviewer than he is." But a few moments later, he said that anyone who read a Roger Ebert review would read "an extremely well-written review". Thumps Down for that Gene. You should never have said it. This is no sagacity. And even if he was speaking what he thought the truth, then he should've left the viewers to say it, not him.

Siskel and Ebert's "dislike" for each other was well known in the industry. You can see clearly that it was a love/hate relationship. But I felt that Siskel was the bully one. And you can observe how he was starting it. From slightly provocative notices like "Yes, I agree with you, but you forgot that...", instead of "yes, and I think also that…". To explicitly ugly ways to ruin Ebert's attempts to say something funny. And you'd never see Ebert using the same style with Siskel.

There are some of the 1980s outtakes, present at youtube, that touch off that where Siskel even curses Ebert, and begins – what seems as usual joking – a non-stop, running gags about Ebert's love of food. True that Ebert fought fire with fire perfectly, but that was mean to begin in the first place. They both refused to be guest star in movies or TV shows, unless the animated TV series "The Critic" ! I bet they accepted it just for one scene where they fight by bare hands in airplane to smash its door and continue fighting on the wing ! Not for the main plot about them being separated then can't stand a partner else the other.

I liked the show's opening credits and format. For one reason their setting in the empty theater somehow represented that they own the cinema, or that they're the viewers whom stay for more time, than the regular viewer, to discuss, debate, and evaluate. It's easy to notice the show's effect when you find the duo's famous remarks and expressions in numerous other reviews we read.

Richard Roeper, or Ebert's Chicago Sun-Times colleague, was a fine successor after Siskel's death. He's a bit childish, but that's a nice characteristic of all things (In fact neither Ebert nor Siskel looked that young even in their thirties !). You can't decide was it a relationship where Roeper was the funny lead, and Ebert was the wise mentor? Or that Ebert was the old lead, and Roeper was his sidekick ?! I think it was kind of a father/son relationship where both got the same intelligence. After Ebert left for his health problem, I kind of couldn't care less with what the show presents.

Sometimes it wasn't satisfying enough to review a movie in 3 minutes (half of them are for telling the story), but that's the show's specialty and time anyway. And I hated the matter of "I couldn't agree more" !!; there wasn't any drama there, and instead of disagreeing with one of them and agreeing with the other, you find yourself disagreeing with both of them there ! (Pulp Fiction, Titanic; I was mad not to see someone with me on these ?!).

It got its moments. Fun went to extremes at times. Memorably ; "where are your beard and red suit Santa ? You gave them away as gifts ?" that's what Siskel said to Ebert when the last was praising the crappy (Cop and ½). "This movie is starring Jessica Alba's buttocks and Paul Walker's pecs, and if you asked me; Alba's rear end is a much better actor" Roeper about (Into the Blue). Ebert screaming his head off "CAROL ANNE, CAROL ANNE" imitating the way that the lead of (Poltergeist 3) was yelling the heroine's name with for 300 times, then Siskel sorrowful question "why they didn't think for one time to say "Carol" for a change ?!!". "She wasn't good, and I'm talking about her face" Siskel criticizing (Demi Moore) in (The Scarlet Letter) !. And finally Ebert's wicked note : "This is the only movie that none of the 44 reviewers, who were attending the special viewing, went to the bathroom during it !" talking about (Basic Instinct 2) !

These buddies didn't have the sexuality or the stardom of the leads of "Cheers", "Remington Steele","Cagney & Lacey", only their arguments, being more cultural, and believe it or not, more persistent too.


2 of 2 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Discuss At the Movies (1982) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page