| Page 1 of 5: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] |
| Index | 45 reviews in total |
34 out of 38 people found the following review useful:
Honor Without Purpose, 26 September 1999
Author:
Scott A. Frisina (liny4ever@att.net) from Tacoma, Washington
Bunker Hill Military School-An institution males ("Taps" was made in 1981,
adapted from an original novel written prior) ages 12 through 18 attend to
teach them academics, character and leadership in anticipation of the
graduates attending West Point.
Retired U.S. Army General Harlan Bache (George C. Scott) is the commandant
of the school. His curiculum teaches his young charges teamwork, personal
honor, courage and sacrifice. But something is lost in the
translation.
General Bache answers to the schools board of trustees. They have decided
to close the 141 year old institution for the purpose of realizing the full
potential of the real estate. The news is devastating to Bache and his
student body.
Operating on the lessons he has been taught by his mentor, General Bache,
Cadet Major Brian Moreland (Timothy Hutton), Student Body Corps Commander,
decides there is courage and honor in defending the institution with their
very lives if necessary. Together with Calvary Corps Commander Alex Dwyer
(Sean Penn) and elite company commander David Shawn (Tom Cruise), they set
about doing just that.
"Taps", directed with style and class by Harold Becker, is a study of
misdirected honor and courage. The students involved are not much younger
than those who would be sent to distant battlefields by the active duty
military. They are impressionable and taken by uniforms and strict
discipline. They are intelligent but inexperienced. They are the future
leaders being molded by General Bache.
General Bache is a good, fatherly man who has forgotten one thing-personal
honor and courage mean nothing unless these values are supported by the one
ideal worth lives-freedom. This ideal is the reason our military exists and
this is the one, most important lesson General Bache fails to teach his
young future leaders of the United States military. His students overreact
to a situation that does not warrant sacrificing lives
for.
Timothy Hutton is outstanding as the misguided Cadet Commander. Even his
father, a top sergeant in the U.S. Army, can't talk him out of the path he
has chosen for himself and his fellow students. There is also a subtle hint
that his relationship with his father was never the best. Sean Penn turns
in a great performance as the Corps Cavalry Commander and Moreland's right
hand man who doesn't believe things could spin out of control so badly and
comes to realize there is something wrong with the path Moreland has chosen.
And Tom Cruise is powerful as the ultra-disciplined elite company commander
who seems to relish a fight more than anything he's been taught about honor
and courage.
The principles receive wonderful support from Ronny Cox as the commanding
colonel of an Army National Guard unit who desperately attempts to talk
reason to Moreland.
"Taps" is not perfect. I couldn't understand why General Bache would take a
loaded ceremonial pistol to a school military ball. But then again, I have
witnessed one or two acts in my own real life active duty service which took
less common sense than that.
Overall, "Taps" is a well directed story with strong characters and depth.
The film warns us of the dangers of honor without purpose.
51 out of 72 people found the following review useful:
Mixed feelings, 17 November 2004
![]()
Author:
Ben Pasley from Purdue University
Having graduated from a military academy and later joining army ROTC
myself it was almost like I was living back at my high school again.
Especially due to the fact that I was a company commander my senior
year and had my best friends as platoon leaders and XO. I got a much
different take on the movie than most of you. It is one that was much
more prevalent in the military academy I to than ROTC. Rather than a
view of "misguided youths" (I would argue the point that they were
misguided) I saw the movie as fight between the old and the new. The
old conservative ways versus the post Vietnam War era generation.
Whether to preserve conservative tradition or to continue with social
liberalism. In the movie the fight was about tearing down the academy
to build condominiums. In real life where I was, it was about turning
our military academy into a normal prep school. In my case the fight
didn't get violent, however like the cadets in the movie I picked the
losing side.
In the movie I was heart broken that the governor would send troops to
the school rather than try and work out a peaceful compromise when he
saw the measure that people were willing to go to in order to protect
their school. In real life I was very disheartened to see the old cadre
of retired military officers get sacked and replaced by "soft" civilian
administrators. It all hit a climax when one of my life's role models,
a retired USAF Major and our companies tactical officer, spoke out
against some of the changes being made and got himself sacked. For me
that was George C Scott, Penn and Cruise were my friends and platoon
leaders in my company and the crisis between the old ways and the new
ways were very much the same. The movie reached out to me possibly more
than any other. It was seeing my teenage self all over again.
21 out of 23 people found the following review useful:
Once upon a time during the Cold War, 4 August 2001
Author:
dcs84 from Pennan, Scotland
I first saw Taps when I was only 11 and I loved it. But at eleven I liked it
for its militaristic attributes rather than its 'fight for honour' motif.
I recently, aged 31, saw it again, and, predictably, liked it for entirely
different reasons. Firstly, as someone else on this sight mentioned, the
film is quite beautiful to look at. The cinematography is quite stunning
actually, and if you don't believe me, watch it again. Secondly the
direction, writing, and editing is tight, controlled and technically fairly
solid.
But what made this film for me was the impressive, inspired acting by the,
at the time, young cast. I was captivated by the core trio of Cruise, Penn,
and Hutton. If charisma were a concrete substance these three would have
garbage bags of the stuff stowed in their cupboards.
The script was thoughtful, and, importantly, believable. The ending was
very powerful......when I was eleven, but once seen, lost it's effect on
subsequent viewings.
23 out of 29 people found the following review useful:
Changing perspectives, 1 September 2004
![]()
Author:
intcountzero from Toronto
The biggest kick I got was seeing Hutton, Cruise, and Penn as teenagers
turning out amazing performances at such a younger age. I guess some
actors are just destined to rise to the top.
George C. Scott also turned in a great, believable performance as an
old wartime General. However I find it interesting, after seeing this
movie over 20 years later, how it's context has changed for me
personally. While in '81, the story was perhaps designed to generate
sympathy for the General and his plight, I look at his situation today
and feel nothing but pity for him, as I would for any Shakespearean
tragic hero, who because of their narrow-sightedness, could not see the
bigger picture. And in this case, their consequences caused a chain of
events that took on an uncontrollable life of their own. Funny how the
years can sometimes dictate understanding and perspective.
The previous review mentioned for this flick is 100% bang on.
16 out of 17 people found the following review useful:
War games, 13 February 2006
![]()
Author:
jotix100 from New York
"Taps" presents a twist in the way students in a military academy of
certain reputation perceive how honor is, above all, the thing to live
for, even over all other qualities a man could possess. The teachings
of this military institution, molding young men 12 to 18 years old,
have a profound effect, especially in the intense Brian Moreland, who
is a clear favorite of the academy director, General Bache.
Harold Becker directed "Taps", which is based on a novel by Devery
Freeman. The action of the film takes place in the fictional Bunker
Hill Military Academy, that has just been sold to private investors who
want transform the site into condominiums.
With a history of having molded young minds during its distinguished
history, Gen. Bache is horrified by the mere thought of losing the
academy and the young people he has helped to involve in the rich life
of the military. After a tragic incident that involves the killing of a
townie, Bache suffers a heart attack, leaving the academy in the hands
of people that are seen trying to undermine the fallen leader.
Brian Moreland, the serious minded young man, takes it into his own
hands to take care of what he thinks would be Gen. Bache's reaction in
saving the school by getting the rest of the students left at the
academy to hold it hostage and not give in to the upcoming changes, or
to other people who don't have the same purpose in mind.
Timothy Hutton is about the best thing going for the film. This young
actor brought the right amount of seriousness, courage and valor to the
role. This film is basically the big screen debut for Sean Penn and Tom
Cruise, who went to build spectacular careers of their own. George C.
Scott, another excellent actor is seen as Gen. Bache, but
unfortunately, he doesn't have much to do and only appears in the
opening sequences. Other familiar faces in the cast, Billy Van Zandt,
Giancarlo Esposito.
"Taps" is a film that shows how some young minds will act when they
follow to the letter things they have learned in theory in the
classroom. It also recognizes how honor could get a well meaning person
to do things that he will regret later on and how it can cause harm to
innocent young men that go along with these new leaders.
13 out of 17 people found the following review useful:
Filmed in 1981; still applies today, 17 January 2000
Author:
Sundown305 (tdt005@beta.latech.edu) from Ruston, Louisiana, USA
"Taps" is a story of twisted priorities and conflicting ideals of what
honor, valor, and a fighting man really means. This was (and still is) an
unmatched screenplay that is ever so true today. It should be mandatory
viewing for anyone planning a military career so that they can really
evaluate their reasoning for joining the armed services. It should be
especially mandatory for any ROTC cadet in college (I'm in such a program,
so I speak from experience).
Everyone involved played excellent roles and made the viewer make it as if
they were really caught up in such a situation in real life. It didn't seem
to be an "acted" movie; it was just that good. I think that Ronny Cox also
put some feeling into his role, but if it had to be made in the '90s, I'd
pick Dale Dye (who played brief but great roles as a captain in both
Platoon
and Casualties of War).
Again, this movie should get more credit than it has because the movie's
themes and issues still haunt us, even in this "new world order" we're
supposedly in. Great work to all involved!
11 out of 14 people found the following review useful:
Improbable but entertaining...early Hutton, Penn and Cruise..., 11 November 2006
![]()
Author:
Neil Doyle from U.S.A.
Hold the fort seems to be the slogan of these military cadets when they
decide to rally behind TIMOTHY HUTTON who wants an armed defense of the
school from authorities who want to shut it down after an accidental
shooting by the presiding General Bache (GEORGE C. SCOTT). Aiding and
abetting are TOM CRUISE and, in his film debut, SEAN PENN.
The tale seems highly improbable but is played so earnestly, is
scripted so well, and directed so competently that it manages to hold
the attention until the more or less predictable outcome.
The cadets are all extremely well played, from the very young boys to
those who appear to be in their early twenties. When the authorities
are unable to take back the school, the parents appeal to the children
through loud speakers. "Sometimes being accepted by your friends, isn't
worth the price," says one mother.
Unfortunately, the stalemate phase of the movie lasts much too long to
sustain interest. But it's interesting now to watch the very young
Hutton, Penn and Cruise show why they became superstars. I agree with
Maltin who says it "plays its cards too soon, leaving a lot of dead
weight before the outcome."
Summing up: Improbable story, but entertaining in a curious way.
Memorable line from Hutton's father resonates today: "They think you're
home grown terrorists."
6 out of 6 people found the following review useful:
A Time-Capsule Gem, 9 August 2004
Author:
eht5y from United States
'Taps' is an uneven film, burdened somewhat by its ponderousness and
pathological seriousness. But what a time capsule!
Of all of the young actors here, only Timothy Hutton was already a star,
having become the youngest actor ever to win an Oscar for his role in Robert
Redford's 'Ordinary People.' Ironically, among the suporting actors in
'Taps' are Tom Cruise and Sean Penn, one of whom has become the biggest box
office draw of his generation and the other its most respected acting
talent. Also featured are Evan Handler, best-known as Harry Goldenblatt
(Charlotte's divorce lawyer and second husband) on TV's 'Sex and the City,'
and Spike Lee favorite Giancarlo Esposito, whose credits include 'The Usual
Suspects' and the much-underappreciated TV series 'Homicide: Life on the
Streets.'
Even if you find 'Taps' a little overblown and pretentious, it's worth
watching to see these accomplished actors back in their baby-faced
teens.
7 out of 8 people found the following review useful:
The Second Siege of Bunker Hill, 19 June 2007
![]()
Author:
bkoganbing from Buffalo, New York
Taps is about the cadets of Bunker Hill Military Academy and their
commanding officer, George C. Scott, and their reaction to the news of
the closing of the Academy.
Scott announces at the graduation that the next year will be the final
year of Bunker Hill. The Board of Trustees is selling off the place for
its prime real estate value to be used for condominium development.
Certainly an occurrence we've seen all over the country in many places
and not something really desirable in many.
Cadet Major Timothy Hutton knows he will head the last graduating class
at Bunker Hill. He and fellow cadets like Sean Penn and Tom Cruise
aren't taking it lying down. They may be military cadets, but they've
seen and grown up with student protests. Only these students have
weapons and are trained in their use.
Can you really blame the cadets like Hutton who've actually in fact
forgotten that soldiers carry out and don't make policy? I think it was
significant that during the course of Taps it's mentioned that George
C. Scott served with General Douglas MacArthur who gave him a sword for
his service. It's also mentioned that Scott was passed over for
promotion an advancement beyond being a brigadier general and was
retired comfortably out to pasture at the Academy.
Scott's not the same kind of military man you see in Patton. Rather
he's a lot like the Patton you see in that television film, Patton, the
Last Days. A man so totally out of his element that when the accident
and broken neck occurred he'd lost his will to live.
Anyway after a scuffle with some of the town louts who are less than
enamored of Bunker Hill's military tradition. A town kid is
accidentally killed when he tries to get Scott's military issue pistol
and it discharges. In a court of law, the man would have been
acquitted, but Scott answers to a higher law he lives by.
That scuffle threatens to close the school even for the last year and
the kids seize it. It's a confrontation then between idealistic and
wrongheaded youth and the real forces of law enforcement.
Ronny Cox contributes a very nice performance as the commanding general
of the National Guard trying to keep a lid on the situation. His scenes
with the idealistic and obstinate Hutton are the highlight of the film
for me.
Tom Cruise and Sean Penn got their first real notice in this film right
at the start of their respective mega-careers. Hutton has a nice
followup to his Oscar winning performance from Ordinary People. And
George C. Scott is, George C. Scott.
5 out of 6 people found the following review useful:
I saw it when I was 17 and related to it..., 7 August 2002
Author:
ekim-5 from St Louis MO
I'm 37 now but when I first saw it I was able to connect with the story.
You
have most of the different types of young men that you find at that age.
You're still young enough to follow what adults tell you is a way to think
and old enough to act on it.
It wasn't an academy award type movie but it was entertaining. Would I
watch it again, sure. It wouldn't be a theft of two hours of my life.
| Page 1 of 5: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] |
| Plot summary | Amazon.com summary | Ratings |
| Awards | External reviews | Parents Guide |
| Plot keywords | Main details | Your user reviews |
| Your vote history |