MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Up 5,163 this week

Lulu (1980)

6.0
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 6.0/10 from 91 users  
Reviews: 2 user | 1 critic

Add a Plot

Director:

0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 1946 titles
created 15 Sep 2011
 
a list of 960 titles
created 12 Nov 2012
 
list image
a list of 754 titles
created 8 months ago
 
a list of 250 titles
created 3 months ago
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Lulu (1980)

Lulu (1980) on IMDb 6/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Lulu.
Edit

Cast

Complete credited cast:
Anne Bennent ...
...
Schwarz
Jean-Jacques Delbo ...
Doctor Goll
Hans-Jürgen Schatz ...
Alwa Schoen
Bruno Hübner ...
Beate Kopp ...
Carlo Enrici ...
Monsieur Hunidei
Pierre Saintons ...
Kungu Poti
...
Heinz Bennent ...
Dr. Schoen
Rest of cast listed alphabetically:
Carla Angeloni
Edit

Storyline

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis

Certificate:

See all certifications »
Edit

Details

Country:

| |

Language:

Release Date:

11 June 1980 (France)  »

Also Known As:

Lulu  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Sound Mix:

Color:

(Fujicolor)
See  »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
A very rare film with flaws but well worth seeking out, and truer to Wedekind than Pabst was
21 March 2013 | by (United States) – See all my reviews

As somebody who just adapted LULU for comics(or at least the first part of the first play) I have to say the prudish and ignorant review that's up for this is...interesting. While it's true Borowczyk's film is not quite as good a film as PANDORA'S BOX, he doesn't seem to understand the source material, starting with his thinking that LULU was a novel. It wasn't. It was two plays, ERDGEIST & PANDORA'S BOX. The Pabst film only adapts the second of these. So the comparison is not apt.

Secondly, Brooks in PANDORA'S BOX does bare flesh, as much as a film of the time would allow. The reviewer is obviously forgetting a tussle she has with Schoen backstage where a breast gets bared. And besides, he also doesn't seem to realize nudity is common in stagings of the opera version by Alban Berg.

As for the film itself, the main flaw for me is the dubbing. The acting is not the best in the English voice actors(I am only going by this version, as it's almost impossible to find this film and that was the only one I have seen). That is sadly a common problem with films from Europe in this era. Apart from that, the film--for anyone actually familiar either with Wedekind's plays or the intention of them--captures what Wedekind was actually going for. The look of the film is lovely, especially in the opening scene in Schwarz's studio. The amount of flesh is entirely appropriate for the actual story; it fits Lulu's lack of self-consciousness, a central part of her character and the source of the tragedy in the story. Lulu is a free spirit in every way who is also a magnet for self-destructive men who use her as the occasion and excuse for their own downfall--in many ways what is most interesting about her character is that she is an inversion of the femme fatale trope, almost a critique of it. Anne Bennant manages to capture this. It is a little odd that her actual father plays her lover Schoen; fortunately there are no love scenes between them.

There are a number of flaws, chief among them being the speed at which Borowczyk goes through the story(two plays of three acts in less than 90 minutes), but the cuts he makes are in aspects of the story that aren't really missed, like the circus strongman Rodrigo. He also makes the creepiness of her dad, Schilgoch, much clearer than Pabst--who can be argued to have mangled Wedekind's story--does. Pabst makes it cute. But Schilgoch basically pimped his own daughter out and Borowczyk makes this an inescapable fact.And Udo Kier's Jack the Ripper is very much the one Wedekind wrote, Pabst's being far more sympathetic than the one in the play.

I would say the best way to deal with the films is to watch them both and to compare, but with a familiarity with Wedekind and Berg. It's well worth seeking out, and is a worthy entry in Borowczyk's catalog.


2 of 2 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Discuss Lulu (1980) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?