MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Down 62,332 this week

Act of God (1980)

TV Movie  -   -  Documentary | Short
6.7
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 6.7/10 from 103 users  
Reviews: 5 user | 1 critic

Documentary film by Peter Greenaway made for Thames Television, in which people who have survived being struck by lightning relate their experiences against a typically Greenaway backdrop ... See full summary »

Director:

0Check in
0Share...

Editors' Spotlight

IMDb: What to Watch - Guardians of the Galaxy

In the latest episode of IMDb: What to Watch, Keith Simanton talks with director James Gunn and actors Chris Pratt, Zoe Saldana and Vin Diesel about their movie Guardians of the Galaxy.


User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 161 titles
created 15 Dec 2011
 
a list of 1007 titles
created 25 Jan 2012
 
a list of 616 titles
created 07 Jul 2012
 
a list of 461 titles
created 28 Dec 2012
 
a list of 3866 titles
created 16 Mar 2013
 

Related Items

Search for "Act of God" on Amazon.com

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Act of God (TV Movie 1980)

Act of God (TV Movie 1980) on IMDb 6.7/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Act of God.
Edit

Storyline

Documentary film by Peter Greenaway made for Thames Television, in which people who have survived being struck by lightning relate their experiences against a typically Greenaway backdrop of lists, black humour, 'collated statistics', bizarre camera angles and Michael Nyman music. Written by Anonymous

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Documentary | Short

Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Also Known As:

Atto di Dio  »

Company Credits

Production Co:

 »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Color:

Aspect Ratio:

1.33 : 1
See  »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

This kind of commission is a mistake
8 May 2002 | by (Canberra, Australia) – See all my reviews

Documentary makers are NOT artists. The worst kind of documentary maker is the kind who thinks he's an artist, and I suspect that the worst kind of "artistic" documentary maker is the kind who began as a painter (or some such). In painting, aesthetic considerations really are paramount as they are almost nowhere else. Painting is an art form with no social influence whatever, and a painter's ONLY professional obligation is to create beautiful pictures. A documentary maker, unlike a painter, has several potentially conflicting professional obligations; chief among them (listen carefully, Greenaway) IS TO INFORM.

A couple of times Greenaway's film threatens to be informative - as I recall, there's a brief discussion of what happens when a body is struck by lightning, and an even briefer synopsis of the physics. But Greenaway undercuts both moments by letting us know he's an artist. Running across the bottom of the screen, to make it as easy as possible for us to avoid actually learning anything, is something like the following: "Lightning effects are called for in Macbeth, Peer Gynt, The Tempest, King Lear..." I don't want to be given a list of stage works involving lightning; if I wanted such a list, I would compile it myself, which would be fun. On the other hand, how lightning is conducted through a human body is exactly the kind of thing I do want to be told - and which images would help me understand. My eyes drifted to that damned pointless list for a moment, and I missed it.

Greenaway's works of fiction may well be brilliant. Michael Powell, possibly the finest director Britain has ever produced, wasn't any good at documentaries, either. He only made one, at the end of his career, when he couldn't find anything else to do. Watching it you sense exactly the same thing as you sense while watching "Act of God": an artist - whether good or bad, it's impossible to tell - utterly ill at ease, doing what artists were never meant to do, and not knowing how to go about it.

And what's with Greenaway's technique with his interview subjects? He cuts away from them in mid anecdote, sometimes mid SENTENCE, for no reason except to make them look foolish. If they came to him in good faith, he had no right.


0 of 28 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Discuss Act of God (1980) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page