Professional motorcycle racer Bud Clay heads from New Hampshire to California to race again. Along the way he meets various needy women who provide him with the cure to his own loneliness, but only a certain woman from his past will truly satisfy him.
A rich industrialist is brutally kidnapped. While he physically and mentally degenerates in imprisonment, the kidnappers, police and the board of the company of which he is director negotiate about the ransom of 50 million euro.
Irene Wagner, the wife of prominent scientist Albert Wagner, finds herself blackmailed about her affair by her lover's jealous ex-girlfriend. The plot, an experiment in causing fear, drives her into a rage.
The sheriff of Gunlock is planning to hang Sam Hall, who shot three farmers found on cattle land, at sundown. At the casino, betting is 8 to 3 he won't make it. The cattlemen are set to ... See full summary »
This valiant melodrama is the brilliant debut as a moviemaker of the great Japanese actress Kinuyo Tanaka, who also has a small role in the story. Based on a screenplay by Keinosuke ... See full summary »
Wells Fargo stages are being robbed by 'The Poet' and no one can find out who he is. Wylie is a gambler who is found by the sheriff and gives him the option of going back to a questionable ... See full summary »
When Reverend Robert Henley and his sister Faith arrive in the town of Hell's Hinges, saloon owner Silk Miller and his cohorts sense danger to their evil ways. They hire gunman Blaze Tracy ... See full summary »
The unscrupulous intrigues of Charles Denner make him a top industrialist
My opinion of "The Truth on the Savolta Affair" differs drastically from its current 5.6 IMDb rating. I consider this film a truly excellent portrayal of unscrupulous Machiavellian intrigues and manipulations, and therefore of real world political intrigues and practices. I cannot think of another movie that more realistically and with equal detail and thoroughness shows us from start to finish a campaign of lying and manipulation conducted by one man, with his hired help, in order to achieve his goals.
Charles Denner plays the Machiavellian character with the name Lepprince, after Machiavelli's famous book "The Prince".
At first, he seems on the side of the angels and anxious to do what is for the general good in his chosen area, which is as a French contractor for arms manufactured by a Spanish factory during World War I. This factory has labor problems and potential strike problems. There is strong socialist sentiment that is anti-capitalist and there is also anarchist sentiment, which ran strong in Spain at the time. Denner has come to the factory in person and, witnessing the labor troubles, appears anxious to smooth them over by making concessions and without violence.
But his game is far more ambitious than that. By the end of the movie, he has arranged a dizzying set of manipulations of the several players, which include the factory owner, his general manager, a writer on the anarchist and worker side, an anarchist spy in the managerial office, and a factotum in that office. This is a man who quickly sizes up people's characters and weaknesses and devises persuasive stories that get them to further his intentions. He is a master political liar and maneuverer.
There is, I believe, a category of noir films that may be termed political noir, usually involving such intrigues, double-crosses, and manipulations in various contexts, be they business, criminal enterprises, churches, entertainment, the press, universities, armed forces, bureaucracies or governments. No organization is immune to these political doings. Examples include "The Godfather", "The Godfather 2", "The Best Man", "A Ciascuno Il Suo", "The Confession" or "L'aveu", "I as in Icarus", "L'attentat", "State of Siege", and "Sacco e Vanzetti". Some like "Z" and "Missing" have the politics somewhat more in the background. Yves Montand and Gian Maria Volonte have specialized in this kind of film.
This picture belongs in this category of political noir.
1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?