|Page 10 of 28:||               |
|Index||275 reviews in total|
I think that people mistakenly dismiss this movie as pure cheesiness. I
have seen all of the bond films several times and i think that this is my
favorite for several reasons. the locations are fantastic, the villains
(even without jaws) are really interesting, and the way that the plot leads
to outer space, though unrealistic, is just a lot of fun to watch. this
bond film takes all the aspects of a bond film and pushes them to the limit
who would watch a bond film to learn some deep message about life??? if only the new films wouldn't be so serious. If i want a fun film i will watch moonraker, you only live twice, or diamonds are forever. i would pick the evening news over goldeneye or tomorrow never dies anyday.
i like the bond films that make me feel like i am reading a comic book which is what moonraker does best.
WHY? Why all the negative comments about this film? I mean, I'm not trying to be be impartial even though I am a BIG Bond fan and really like Moore's acting ( though he's not as good as Connery or Brosnan ), but I think that this movie deserves more credit than it's getting. It has great action, a great plot and GORGEOUS women!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! So Pleeeeeeeeease give this film more credit than it's getting.
I admit iteven at the tender age of eleven, I had problems with the
laser battle at the climax of Moonraker, recognising it as a lame
attempt by the James Bond camp to jump on the Star Wars bandwagon. I
also had issues with the film's many other unbelievably corny moments,
especially the pigeon doing a double-take, Bond and Holly Goodhead
leaping to safety from a Rio cable car, and the previously emotionless
professional killer Jaws experiencing love at first sight.
Over the years, though, my disdain for Moonraker's abject silliness has waned somewhat, with me eventually accepting the camp nature and tongue-in-cheek humour as part of the Bond series' evolution; as Moore grew obviously too old for the part, self-mockery was inevitable, and besides, after Pierce Brosnan drove an invisible BMW and para-surfed a tidal wave in Die Another Day, nothing that Moore ever did as Bond has seemed quite so stupid again!
Nowadays, I watch this one with an admiration for the spectacular sets, gorgeous women, breath-taking scenery, impressive special effects, and an undeniable sense of fun.
This is another good James bond movie and for all the same reasons it
has lots of action in it it has a good screen play James bond in space
awesome idea roger Moore once again does a great James bond in this
movie the acting is good in and the actors are good in it the villains
are good again and once again Richard Kiel does a great jaws in this
movie. I'm sure you will not be disappointed with moonraker. I'm sure
that you will have a good time watching moonraker and you will watch it
over and over again. Great adaption of moonraker
Overall score ******** out of **********
***1/2 out of *****
A wise man once said "I may not know art, but I know what I like." The
holds true in film, which is why I dismiss the short and scathing reviews
"Moonraker." Roger Moore's fourth outing as Bond certainly seems to be
most polarizing of the series, which is surprising because it has all the
classic Bond elements on a sweeping scope from the opening credits:
skydiving sans parachute, hang-gliding, not one but two boat chases, a
French chateau, Venice, a Concorde ride to Rio, and finally to earth orbit
in a space shuttle. (For you post-Nixon children, the space shuttle was a
big deal in 1979, since NASA's didn't actually fly into space until two
years later.) And of course, the incredible sets. It's not any more
far-fetched than "Die Another Day" (Brosnan's worst!). And it did not
the continuity problems that plagued "Diamonds Are Forever." (Ughh, don't
get me started on that one: the reason Connery said "Never
One of the underlying attractions of the Bond films is that they take the average poor schmoe somewhere they would probably never go otherwise. "Moonraker" has that sweeping scope. Granted, it requires a greater suspension of disbelief to fully enjoy (as opposed to the hard-edged examples of "For Your Eyes Only" and "License To Kill"), but if you can get past some of the silliness (such as the visually-stunning yet implausible space battle finale), you can see the really fantastic job the producers pulled off. A megalomaniacal premise in the Bond tradition, solid (if occasionally uninspired) acting, ILM quality special effects, and superb scoring. It is escapism, pure and simple. But then again, all Bond films are, to one degree or another. The fact is, if you want an edgy, realistic spy flick, see "Ronin" with Robert DeNiro and Jean Reno. Incidentally, Michael Lonsdale, the icy Hugo Drax, is in that one, too, in a more human and humane role. For escapist perfection, you have Bond, with "Moonraker" the most expansive example of escapism the series is likely to ever produce.
I have read all the comments about James Bonds 11th film **Moonraker** and
all I have to say is if you were born after 1962 you should leave this film
alone, I love it when the kids today review movies and they just don't get
it, you have to have lived in the time when all these movies first came out
or you just don't have a clue
I love reading how **Moonraker** ripped off **Star Wars**, actually **Moonraker** was written by Ian Fleming in the late 50's and they adapted the screenplay to make the movie
If you can't enjoy this movie then I truly feel sorry for you, because it has everything you could want in a James Bond film; Beautiful Women, Great Locations, Great Actors, and Great Stunt Work; the opening scene when Jaws pushes James Bond out of an airplane is truly fantastic!!
You young reviewers are truly pathetic!!
Moonraker, released in 1979 is the eleventh film in the James Bond
series and the fourth to star Roger Moore as the fictional British
Secret Service agent James Bond. When the end credits rolled for the
previous Bond film, The Spy Who Loved Me, it said: 'James Bond will
return in For Your Eyes Only; however, the producers chose Moonraker as
the basis for the next film, following the box office success of the
1977 space-themed film Star Wars. For Your Eyes Only was subsequently
delayed and ended up following Moonraker in 1981.
In the film, Bond is set on the trail of a space shuttle that went missing during transport on the back of a plane. He visits the owner of the transport company, Hugo Drax, to investigate further. After befriending space scientist Holly Goodhead and a narrow brush with a centrifuge, Bond follows the trail of clues from California, to Venice, to the Amazon rain forest and finally into outer space in a bid to prevent a genocidal plot to conquer the world.
Moonraker was made in 1979, the last movie of the 1970's, i thought it was a good movie to watch, i thought it was great to see Jaws back in the movie. Roger Moore is a fantastic actor i think but i think Sean Connery is the best james bond actor ever than the others who took the part as playing james bond. Roger Moore played james Bond 7 times as he took over the part of playing james bond in 1973 after Sean Connery. His first james bond movie to starr in was Live and Let die, which was released in 1973. The next one was the man with the golden gun which was released in 1974. The spy who loved me was his 3rd bond movie which was released in 1977, Moonrkaer was of course the next title which was released in 1979 (the last in the 70's) for your eyes only was the next one, the first in the 1980's, this one was released in 1981, the next one was octopussy which was released in 1983, the last james bond movie roger moore did was a view to a kill which was made in 1985. I give Moonraker 10 out of 10.
This James Bond film is cool! the beginning was great! I loved the very
first return scene of Jaws when he pushed 007 out of the plane and I loved how 007 was flying through the air trying to get the bad guy.
I liked how it was edited and how it matched with the Bond theme. Roger Moore was good and Richard Kiel is always good. I was a little surprised when Jaws got his large self a girlfriend and she wasn't bad looking either and I really think Jaws/Kiel is just not a neat person but a handsome man as well. Drax was a good villain. I don't think Moonraker is Star Wars rip off. If you liked all of the other 007 films then you'll really like Moonraker!
I think that Moonraker is one of the best Bond movies. Roger Moore is very good as James Bond. The movie is an adventure. James Bond travels to many different countries, for example Italy. James Bond is also in space. The movie is very very exciting.
|Page 10 of 28:||               |
|Plot summary||Plot synopsis||Ratings|
|Awards||Newsgroup reviews||External reviews|
|Parents Guide||Official site||Plot keywords|
|Main details||Your user reviews||Your vote history|