IMDb > Scott Joplin (1977) (TV) > Reviews & Ratings - IMDb

Reviews & Ratings for
Scott Joplin (TV) More at IMDbPro »

Write review
Filter: Hide Spoilers:
Index 4 reviews in total 

24 out of 25 people found the following review useful:

More fiction than fact, but the music makes it worthwhile

6/10
Author: rnewstead from Appleton, WI
29 July 2004

The man who gave us the Maple Leaf Rag and the Entertainer, Scott Joplin, once said that he would not become known until fifty years after his death.

He wasn't off by much--it took fifty-six. In 1973, Marvin Hamlisch used the then-largely unknown Joplin's music in the movie "The Sting," spurring a ragtime revival and a renewed interest in Joplin specifically. Joplin's work received long-overdue attention from music scholars, and he was awarded a posthumous Pulitzer for his body of work, some fifty known rags, waltzes, marches--and one opera, Treemonisha.

This movie rode the wave of his renewed popularity, but plays so loose with the facts of his life that we end up knowing little more about him. Billy Dee Williams is a superb Joplin, as is Art Carney as his publisher, John Stark. But the movie either ignores or glosses over certain details, such as Joplin's longtime friendship and collaboration with Scott Hayden. Hayden is not even mentioned in the film, which prefers to focus on Joplin and the tragic, unsung musical genius Louis Chauvin, who Joplin barely knew. Chauvin in his prime would compose beautiful rags on the spot, never to be heard again, because he could not write them down. The movie implies they were friends from the earliest days, which they were not. They did collaborate on one piece, "Heliotrope Bouquet", when Chauvin was dying and no longer able to play--this the movie gets right.

It also touches on the growing animosity between Joplin and Stark, but this too is sugarcoated. The movie implies they reconciled, which in reality never happened.

Yet the movie is worth seeing if only for one thing--the wonderful, brooding music of a man for whom recognition was long overdue.

Was the above review useful to you?

12 out of 12 people found the following review useful:

Joplin Opportunity

9/10
Author: pzznrd3 from United States
8 July 2006

I agree with the previous 2 reviewers, but I feel Joplin is still largely unappreciated within the USA. His music will last like that of Chopin, Verdi and the other sublime masters. I have been a professional musician for over 50 years and find Joplin's music as addictive as Bach or Mozart, especially since I am an American with classical, jazz and ragtime chops.

Any producers that can read this might consider a movie of Joplin's opera, which I have heard live and still get chills from thinking about it. In the same vein, the great American composer, Louis Gottschalk is also not widely known and appreciated. Gottschalk out ranked Chopin in Paris, France at one special time in the history of music. Perhaps the Indie film folks might also consider a film on Gottschalk, who was larger than life as was Joplin.

Was the above review useful to you?

4 out of 4 people found the following review useful:

The TV movie of Scott Joplin's life emphasized what was most important about Joplin and his music.

Author: edieb-1 from United States
25 June 2006

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

It has been written that the TV movie of Scott Joplin played loose with the facts. However, the most important aspects were emphasized: That this Master of Classical Ragtime Music wanted to be taken seriously and not have his music debased with improper playing and dismissed as low-class. He literally gave every ounce of his life's blood to the composing of his opera, Treemonisha and died in despair, feeling his music was never recognized the way it deserved to be. However, the movie omitted that the European musical establishment DID recognize his music as an indigenous, classical art form, akin to waltzes by Brahms, or mazurkas by Chopin.

Was the above review useful to you?

1 out of 2 people found the following review useful:

A film that gets harder to watch as it progresses.

6/10
Author: planktonrules from Bradenton, Florida
25 August 2013

"Scott Joplin" is an unusual made for TV film in that it was, briefly, released in theaters just before it aired on TV. It stars Billy Dee Williams as the famed composer. It's also unusual for its choice of Joplin as a subject for the film because the guy died from syphilis (something folks RARELY talked about in 1977) and his later years were spent deteriorating more and more--a tough sort of film to put over to the viewing audience. However, the film DID find an audience and won a Writer's Guild award.

The film picks up with Joplin an adult and playing music in brothels. Soon he meets and befriends Louis Chauvin (Clifton David) and they come to the attention of a music publisher/promoter (Art Carney). For a while, things look great--Joplin marries and he achieves moderate success. But because of his syphilis (which was pretty much untreatable at that time) his career and marriage slowly spiraled downward. His final years were A LOT worse than they show in the movie and his decline lasted far longer--but regardless, he died young in a mental institution--committed due to his dementia.

If you think this movie is a giant downer, you are right. The first half is quite enjoyable and I loved the music. The second half was a chore to watch--and the music portion of the film suffered because Joplin was no longer functional. Well done but hard to watch.

Was the above review useful to you?


Add another review


Related Links

Ratings Awards External reviews
Plot keywords Main details Your user reviews
Your vote history