Pa kuo lien chun (1976)

User Rating:

7.2/10   

Director:

Cheh Chang

Release Date:

29 January 1976 (Hong Kong)

Cast

Li Hua Li	...	Dowager Empress
Sheng Fu	...	Tseng Hsien-han
Ka-Yan Leung	...	Chen Chang (as Liang chia-jen)
Kuan-Chun Chi	...	Shui Feng-yun
Yan Tsan Tang	...	Chang Chen-chiang
Lung Wei Wang	...	Li Chung-ching
Jenny Tseng	...	Hsiao Cho
Chin Hu	...	Sai Chin-hua
Richard Harrison	...	Von Waldersee, the German Commander
rest of cast listed alphabetically:
Li-pao Au
Henry Bolanos	...	Evil Diplomat
Shao Chun Chang
Yi Kuei Chang
Ching Cheng
Shen-lin Chen
Ti-ko Chen
Tao Chiang
Yi Hsiung Chih
Hak On Fung
Xiangting Ge
Alexander Grand
Chiang Han
Wai Hung Ho
Huang Lung Hsiao
Shao Hsiao
Ha Huang
Shu Tong Huang
Kwong Hu
Chang Sheng Ko
Philip Kwok	...	Kung Fu demonstrator / Japanese (as Kuo Chui)
Hui Huang Lin
Hui Lin
Chia Hui Liu	...	Boxer
Weibin Liu	...	Minister Tsai Yi
Kuang Lo
Jamie Luk
Ti Lu
Yukio Someno
Yueh Sun
Liang Tai
Te Hsiang Teng
Fu Sheng Tsui	...	Minister Kang Yi
Li Tsui
Chang Chi Wang
Yao Wang
Kuei Yu Yang
Clement Yip
Stephan Yip

Also Known As:

Bloody Avengers (UK) (USA)
Boxer Rebellion (International: English title)
Shen quan san zhuang shi (Hong Kong: Mandarin title)
Spiritual Fists (Hong Kong: English title)

Runtime:

France:110 min | West Germany:73 min (edited version) | West Germany:91 min | Hong Kong:137 min

Country:

Hong Kong | Taiwan

Language:

Mandarin

Color:

Color (Eastmancolor)

Aspect Ratio:

2.35 : 1

Sound Mix:

Mono

Certification:

France:-12 | West Germany:16 (nf) (cut version) | West Germany:18 (nf) (uncut version) | Germany:BPjM Restricted

Filming Locations:

Taiwan

Company:

Chang's Film Company

Goofs:

Anachronisms: The Evil Diplomat is brandishing a Colt .45 automatic, a handgun that is also called the 1911 Colt, because it was first made in 1911.

A Sino-centric Nonsense

This movie was just another convenient vehicle for Hong Kong movie producers and writers to indulge in their Sino-centric and xenophobic fantasies. ("Once Upon A Time In China I, II, and III" are some other recent examples of these Sino-centric fantasies.) These Sino-centric movies invariably portray Chinese as quasi-saintly, self-sacrificing heroes while portraying most foreigners as black-hearted villains. This movie did just that. The leaders of the Boxer Rebellion were portrayed as pure-hearted heroes while the foreigners (especially Japanese, Russians and Germans) were portrayed as one-dimensional greedy idiots. As many of us know, political struggle and war are not battle between totally good and totally evil. The world is more complex. The real world is filled with shades of gray, not just black and white. It is clear even to the most unsophisticated movie goer that the simplistic, one-dimensional portrayal of the Boxer Rebellion in this movie absolutely lacks credibility. Moreover, this good-guy portrayal of the leadership of the Boxers is contrary to the historical evidence. Historically, although some of the leaders of the Boxer Rebellion were indeed pure-hearted patriots, the barbaric deeds committed by the Boxers and their leadership are historical proof that most of the Boxers and their leaders were merciless zealots who had no scruples about massacring defenseless women, children and babies.

During the screening of this movie, not only did I question the validity of the plot and characterization, but I wondered if Hong Kong movie producers hire historical consultants? I used to think Hollywood's historical inaccuracies were bad, but the historical inaccuracies of some Chinese movies are just awful!! IMDB comment section is just too short to mention all the blatant inaccuracies of this film, but I shall mention some of them: 1) Why were American soldiers and officers wearing Civil War era uniform? The American soldiers who were sent to Beijing during the Boxer Rebellion wore uniform totally different from the ones worn during the Civil War. (They probably wore khaki hat and pants and dark blue shirts, a uniform similar to those of the Rough Riders.) 2) The Russian uniform is totally inaccurate. The uniform in the movie does not even resemble the real uniform. 3) A Japanese naval officer in the movie had shoulder length hair. Japanese naval officers were not allowed to have shoulder length hair. 4) Why were so few Chinese in the movie wearing the so-called "pigtail" (or queue)? In spite of the portrayal of this movie, vast majority of the residents of Beijing during the Boxer Rebellion were required to arrange their hair in the Manchu style (i.e. pigtail). Most Chinese men did not cut their pigtail until 1910's or 1920's.

Many people say a movie goer should not be too rational if he or she wants to enjoy a movie. However, with such a plethora of historical inaccuracies and incredible character portrayals, no logical human being can fully enjoy this kind of movie. Such a cheap plot and shallow characterization should not even belong in a cartoon.