| Cast overview, first billed only: | |||
| Jeff Bridges | ... | ||
| Charles Grodin | ... | ||
| Jessica Lange | ... | ||
| John Randolph | ... | ||
| Rene Auberjonois | ... | ||
| Julius Harris | ... | ||
| Jack O'Halloran | ... | ||
| Dennis Fimple | ... | ||
| Ed Lauter | ... | ||
|
|
Jorge Moreno | ... | |
| Mario Gallo | ... | ||
| John Lone | ... |
Chinese Cook
|
|
|
|
Garry Walberg | ... |
Army General
|
| John Agar | ... |
City Official
|
|
|
|
Keny Long | ... |
Ape Masked Man
|
An expedition of the "Petrox" company, is exploring in search of petrol. A strange island where they arrive is the home of a giant ape, King Kong, that is captured by the expedition in order to make money exhibiting it to the world. When in the U.S. the huge gorilla becomes restless, trying to return home... Written by <lcarvach@lascar.puc.cl>
People seem to jump on the old' bandwagon when bashing Kong '76. It's not that bad!!! For '76 I'd say it was quite an achievement. Lange is great in it (and quite stunningly beautiful) and Bridges always rules. Can't go wrong with this version... don't believe the negative hype. I, for one, appreciate it when someone does a remake and actually interprets the story differently. Carpenter did it with The Thing and Cronenberg did it with the fly and both were amazing. I think this movies gets more negative comments because they are comparing it to the original, which back in its day was the first movie of its kind (Mighty Joe Young is still better!). For movie purists, the thought of remaking a landmark film is always touchy territory. Thus, they rip the remake. The core story is still basically the same, the writers just updated key elements that were pivotal 'classic' moments from the original (empire state building for one). Again the purists cry foul. Bottomline, see it and give it a chance... ignore the pompous so called "experts".