Rage of the Tiger (1971) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
"Hero," "Rage," "Destroyer"... All the Same.
EyeDunno25 November 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Please beware of spoilers. I usually refrain from adding these, but felt the need to add information which may help others who are looking for what they'd like to see.

There is a definite mix-up between "Hero," and several other movie titles in print. After reading one review, I see now that perhaps this movie is put together by using several other movies, editing them together? It's an intriguing argument, because the plot is so mixed up.

Watching this movie (mine is titled "Rage of the Master,") the plot begins where a disgruntled man enters his brother's martial arts school, with a band of thugs, including some unusually- dressed Thai boxers, wearing yellow shirts and red tighties. But that's where the sub plots wind up flowing all over the cellulite:

The brother's thugs destroy the school; The daughter and brother search for a hero for revenge; The hero isn't allowed to fight in part because of an overbearing mother, who is much stronger than she shows for her son; The Thai boxers take part in a boxing match with audience members; A father's daughter is taken by the brother and thugs because the father bet too much; Another father, so indebted to his master, offers his son to be killed instead of his master's son.

Beyond the first several scenes, I got lost through these different stories within the movie. Whatever happened to the daughter, taken by the gang? And where did the father's son turn up, after being mistaken by the gang as the master's son? The holes were wide and deep, but the plot still takes the same path for the usual Hong Kong martial arts plots: Some entity wrongs another, and the revenge ratchets up as each side gets the other. And the blood flows like cheap wine, freely passed around by the victims.

One person claimed there were 87 bodies to bury in Hero, but I had counted at least 152 (it was so late by the time I rounded third on the body count that I passed out). The only reason I tried counting was that I kept seeing people rolling their eyes in the backs of their heads with blood spewing out their chests, necks, or mouths. Even "Terminator" didn't do this much damage; I don't think the trilogy could even come close to the number of 6-foot holes needed to bury the dead!

"YOU KILLED MY MOTHER; YOU'LL PAY WITH YOUR BLOOD!" says Tiger Wong (played by Jimmy Wang Yu), who had already done in another two handfuls of bad guys, pausing before delivering more havoc after his buttons were pushed too hard and too often. He finally added many corpses to the slaughter, perhaps more than halfway through the film!

The dubbing pretty much sucks raw eggs, but I feel that's part of the joy of some of the martial arts films of its day, when the Asian characters mouths move, while British voices are heard instead. The color is really bad in my DVD pressing (one I had gotten at a true dollar store, where everything costs a buck). And there's a serious crop issue with the transfer being made from a standard TV format (4x3), when the film seems as though it were filmed in letterbox (around 2.35:1). That means that about half the original film is cropped in the transfer. But the framing during filming isn't fully exploited (like the composition of the scenes in Star Wars or Jaws, for instance). So, viewing this movie, you'll see more arms cropped out, than essential characters missing in essential scenes.

My version, a dual-sided DVD (with Snake Crane Secret on the flip) was worth the dollar spent. If you purchase any version over a couple bucks, try to make sure it's widescreen and a direct film transfer from the master negative. Otherwise, just get the cheapest DVD possible, so you won't be too frustrated over paying too much for a badly-pressed DVD, and a poorly-edited film.

The things that made this flick fun enough and worthy enough to recommend (if you buy the cheap DVDs): The ways that people can be killed. One would have thought that the double- pronged fork that Tiger Wong carries would have been a killing tool, but no one even used it as a defensive weapon. But check out what Tiger's mother winds up terminating the thugs with. They're classic weapons!
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
One of Jimmy Wang Yu's lesser efforts, but still fun
Leofwine_draca20 June 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Something of a companion piece to the better-known ONE-ARMED BOXER, THE DESTROYER is a Taiwanese martial arts flick with plenty of action, but not a great deal of skill. It's certainly a lesser film that the others that Jimmy Wang Yu is famous for, being very much a middle-of-the-road yarn with a clichéd plot and clichéd action. It's only the occasional touch of inventiveness that makes this engaging – the beach fight, for instance, or the cheesy special effects that pop up from time to time (love that flying axe!).

Saying that, the action is pretty gory. There are holes punched through necks and blood spraying all over the place. Sadly, none of the fighters are particularly skilled; nevertheless the ribcage-pounding and use of slow motion makes for a pretty weird viewing experience. Wang Yu is as stern as ever, tackling his enemies with vigour if not skill, and there are a few actors from ONE-ARMED BOXER returning too, once again typecast as the bad guys. So, if you're not too picky about the action in a film, you'll doubtless enjoy this; but fans looking for quality should go elsewhere.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Hidden Kung Fu Gem!
glocktwentyseven31 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I saw this movie as part of a 4-movie boxed set called "Invincible Warriors", of which "Rage of the Tiger" was the fourth movie. In this boxed-set, "Rage of the Tiger" is erroneously labelled as "Rage of the Master", which is actually a completely different martial arts film, that also incidentally stars Jimmy Wang Yu.

Admittedly (apart from a pretty brutal opening fight scene that first introduces the villain and several of the supporting protagonists), the film takes a while to get off the ground, choosing wisely to spend time on decent character development and storyline.

During this "down time" we are helped to appreciate how truly evil the villain is, how inherently good and noble the villain's main targets are, and how desperately they need the help of the hero, who is himself torn between what he knows to be the right thing, and a son's duty to his widowed mother.

Although the acting itself isn't Oscar worthy, it is safe to say that any emotional investment put into this film by us, the audience, is returned with interest by the film's climax, which is brilliantly staged in a trio of bloody showdowns.

What makes this particular film a great watch is the second of these showdowns, where the hero, hellbent on vengeance, marches into a gambling house teeming with the villain's henchmen with only a pair of daggers in his hands. The hero then proceeds to murder the ENTIRE syndicate, single-handedly. This scene MUST have been one of the inspirations for the bloody fight scene at the House of Blue Leaves, between the Bride and the Crazy 88, in Quentin Tarantino's "Kill Bill, Vol. 1".

Definitely worth checking out!
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Some merit, but not enough
Wizard-89 July 2017
The presence of Jimmy Wang Yu is what makes this particular 1970s kung fu movie stand out a little from most of the countless others made in this period. He's in good form here, and when he is on screen and in action, the movie has enough spark to grab your attention, particularly the awesome action packed last fifteen minutes. Unfortunately, the bulk of the movie simply isn't very good at all. Though it's a quest for vengeance, it's not only an extremely slow-moving quest, it is also a very confusing one. I was paying close attention, but it didn't take long for the plot to become hopelessly muddled to me. To top things off, the fight sequences without Jimmy Wang Yu are not particularly well choreographed or directed. I would only recommend the movie to Jimmy Wang Yu fans, and only if they have fresh batteries in their remote so they can zip past the many drab parts and get to the parts where they can see their idol in action.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed