| Page 1 of 3: | [1] [2] [3] |
| Index | 23 reviews in total |
10 out of 11 people found the following review useful:
Touching story marred by unclear ending, 4 January 2005
![]()
Author:
leczorn (stevenmcatee@yahoo.com) from Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
During one of my frequent raids of the $1 DVD bins, I found this 1976
made for TV movie. When reading the synopsis on the package I saw that
it was "based on a true story" of a boy named Tod Lubitch (played by
John Travolta) who was born without an immune system and had to live in
a sterile environment. That brought to my mind a Houston boy named
David Joseph Vetter III who was in the news a lot when I was growing
up. David had the same problem, lived in the same environment and died
at the age of 12.
Upon my research I discovered that this movie is fictional. There was
no Tod Lubitch. "The Boy in the Plastic Bubble" was inspired by the
aforementioned David but isn't about him. $1 DVDs have a bad habit of
providing false information and the "true story" claim is yet another
example, as is the cover photo of Travolta, which appears to be only a
few years old. He was actually in his early 20s when this movie
originally aired.
Now for the movie. After spending a few minutes each showing Tod's life
as an infant and a four year old - when he begins spending some time at
home, where a sterile room is set up for him - the remainder of the
movie shows him around the age of 17.
Despite the way he's forced live, Tod is a happy kid who has a close
relationship with his parents. But he holds out hope that someday his
body will build up enough immunities for him to leave his sterile
environment.
Gradually, Tod is able to live a more normal life. He is sometimes
wheeled outside in a protective cart. He participates in high school
through televisions and cameras set up in his room and the classroom.
And later he begins attending school in person by wearing a protective
suit much like one an astronaut wears. Tod actually blends in fairly
well with the other students. He is a victim of some insensitivity but
not a lot and he ends up graduating.
As the movie progresses, Tod falls in love with classmate and next door
neighbor Gina Biggs (Glynnis O'Connor). In one scene about midway
through the movie, she pretends to express romantic interest in him but
then he realizes she was just trying to win a bet with two of her male
friends, which devastates Tod. But she later has a change of heart and
falls for Tod, too.
This leaves Tod with a monumental decision - continue to remain in his
sterile environment, in which is only human contact is gloved hands, or
risk his life to be with Gina.
For the most part, I like this movie. It tells a bittersweet story in a
very moving way. Travolta's performance is convincing and he shows
great signs of things to come. I found myself feeling really sorry for
Tod. The supporting cast is also strong and includes the late Robert
Reed ("The Brady Bunch") as Tod's father, Johnny Lubitch. I think this
is the only role I've ever seen Reed play other than Mike Brady. He
displays good serious acting skill.
But the movie is marred by its unclear ending. And I noticed one other
significant flaw - in a scene in which Tod's protective suit runs out
of oxygen, he rushes into the sterile section of his classroom, aided
by classmates, and takes the suit off inside. It seems to me that the
outside of the suit would be carrying germs, which would contaminate
the sterile section and open Tod to germs that very well might kill
him.
The technical quality of the DVD that I have isn't great and looks like
it might have been a direct transfer from a master tape that had been
sitting on a shelf for years. But the quality is decent enough to watch
comfortably.
Overall, this is a very good movie that is well worth the dollar. 7/10.
7 out of 11 people found the following review useful:
"What Would They Say?" (Paul Williams song from movie)., 26 February 2005
![]()
Author:
happipuppi13 from Phx. Arizona ("Arizona Smells Funny"!- Homer Simpson)
Indeed,what would they say? That is,the cast of this film if they could
see how time has only served to treat this above par TV movie,like it's
some sort of 1970's retro-joke?!
I'm sure if Robert Reed were alive today he'd be outraged! My main
thought though,does Travolta know about this? ...and if he does,why
hasn't he done something about it? If I were an actor I'd certainly
find a way!
I bought this on VHS in 1997 after having not seen it for over 18
years. On the cover of mine is a fairly young Travolta wearing a white
turtleneck. (Ick!) It was a mere $2 at Montgomery Wards and here's
why...it was a cheap knock-off recorded off FOX Channel 32 in Chicago!
The stations logo briefly appearing during the scene of Todd's fist day
in High School.
Okay,enough of the tirade! My opinion of the movie itself? I think it's
one of the finest "movies of the week" ever made at the time and in
some cases,since. I saw this in it's initial airing on Nov. 12th,1976
and never forgot it. Travolta gives us a waterfall of emotions in this
film:Joy,Sadness,Anger,Fear,etc. Films about medical conditions usually
would have been preachy or maudlin. This treats Todd's condition like
it should be,not "oh poor Todd,he's an outcast!"
Like Robert Reed says to the reporters,"My son's not a freak!" He turns
in a very good performance as well. He doesn't completely do a 360 from
Mike Brady but it was a good start. The other young actors do a fine
job of being exactly what kids are like when faced with something they
don't understand. They talk about Todd behind his back and Gina plays a
cruel joke on him at a beach outing. I wont say more about them,I don't
want to ruin it for those who haven't seen it.
It's no wonder that Travolta became as big as he did! "Welcome Back
Kotter" was a mere stepping stone compared to this. This was his
spring- board to "Saturday Night Fever" and beyond,in my view. To all
those under 30 who haven't seen this....forget that it's made in the
'70s and watch it for the story alone. I know you will not be
disappointed.
In closing,one amusing thing I remember. Without giving away
anything,when I saw the ending back in '76 at age 8,I thought he was
"all better"! (Ha-ha,talk about innocence).
2 out of 2 people found the following review useful:
I would have cried if i was by myself, 24 September 2002
![]()
Author:
cupboardie from England
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
Spoiler Alerrt
So, me and some mates were bored and my friend wanted to watch this
movie,
and i thought it sounded terrible, especially when 'produced by Aaron
Spelling' came up on the screen! But, i gave it a go, and by the end i
was
so glad I'd stuck it out. At first it had a TV movie feel about it, and
the
early 70's technicolor didn't help. But the powerful performances by
Travolta and his mum made it stand out from the rest. The plot itself is
quite dreary, and the fashion (especially todds orange suit) were
hilarious!
But by the end we were all rooting for him to step out and go get his
girl!
Some people have complained in their comments that there should have been
a
definite ending, but personally i think it was a brave decision to leave
it
open ended. The beauty of this movie is the uncertainty of todds future,
Think about it, if they showed us what happened next, would you still
remember the film today? He could have died, but in my head, todd has
enough
immunities built up over the years to survive. He and the girl marry and
have kids, who are perfectly healthy, and when new drugs are invented for
AIDS victims, he becomes an astronaut!
7 out of 13 people found the following review useful:
Back around the circle to great, 15 August 2001
Author:
bek6c
I caught this movie on HBO late one night recently, after hearing about it
for years as "that John Travolta movie about the boy in the
bubble."
It was bad. No, it was awful. As someone suggested earlier, it's a
wonder
that MST3K never got a hold of it. But a funny thing happened on the
way -
the movie went around the circle of quality until it got to bad. It then
kept going, getting worse and worse, until it made its way full circle
back
to great. I'll admit - Citizen Kane this ain't, but it's great for a
really, really, bad movie.
Just for laughs, imagine Travolta in his Vinnie Barbarino voice saying
"Heyyy... I'm in a bubble heah..."
It's too bad he couldn't have stayed in that bubble, sparing us the agony
of
Battleship Earth and the Look Who's Talking series.
Who has the master?, 9 March 2012
![]()
Author:
hello94960 from United States
1. I truly believe if this is Travolta's best movie.
2. Glynnis O'Conner never got the respect she earned.
3. Plus--she was Adorable.
4. If Twentieth Century Fox could send the Master to Lucas and one of
his Yodas' cleaned up the film technically-- people would pay 10 bucks
to see it.
5. It a shame the celluloid degraded. It almost aged like the actors?
6. If anyone know who owns the master, please email me.
7. I know a non-profit in San Francisco archived the movie, but it's
the same horrid quality.
8. A film like this should have been preserved.
9. I hope someone is preventing this careless destruction of old
movies?
10. Maybe the actors have a better copy?
11. I saw the original as a kid, and it was crystal clear; I think?
A Few Holes In The Story, But A Pretty Good Early Role For John Travolta, 3 November 2009
![]()
Author:
sddavis63 (revsdd@gmail.com) from Niagara Region, Ontario, Canada
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
When this movie was made, John Travolta was at the height of his
popularity as the tough guy sex symbol "sweathog" Vinnie Barbarino from
the TV series "Welcome Back, Kotter." Obviously, he had plans to become
a major star and to do that he would have to demonstrate some range of
ability; he would have to show that he had the capacity to take on a
very different role and make it work. Certainly he managed to do that
as "Tod Lubitch - "The Boy In The Plastic Bubble." This is an obviously
made for TV movie in both budget and quality. In fact, I think I
remember watching it when it first aired. Still, it's a pretty good
movie with an interesting subject. In spite of what it claims, I don't
believe it's really "based on a true story" except in the sense that
there are people who live with this problem. There was no Tod Lubitch,
though. The character is (at best) a composite of people who live with
the condition and an imagining of what their life must be like.
According to the movie, Tod is born with an immune deficiency - in
fact, with no active immune system - so that he has to be constantly
kept in a sterile environment, able to interact with people only
through the plastic walls that constantly surround him. Travolta, who
takes over the role after brief accounts of Tod's life as an infant and
as a 4 year old, does a good job of showing Tod's growing frustration
with the limitation he has to live with and of his desire to be free of
it, as well as of his growing feelings for his neighbour Gina, with
whom he falls in love. Tod experiences a growing independence, up to
and including attending high school in a sort of space suit and
graduating. When Gina makes her decision to go to art school in New
York City, Tod is left with a decision - to stay in his safe but
sterile (in every way) environment, or to take the risk of walking out
into the world. In the end, he enters the world, and the last scene is
of Tod and Gina riding off on a horse together (a bit too romantic a
scene, perhaps) so that Tod's ultimate fate is left unknown to the
viewer. Instead, we're left with a strange combination of hopefulness
but also anxiety - a somewhat unsatisfying ending, I thought.
The supporting cast was good, but this was Travolta's movie. There were
some plot problems created by the scene in which Tod runs out of air in
his suit and has to run back to his "bubble" in the classroom before he
suffocates. He just runs right into the bubble. Wouldn't his suit have
been contaminated? And after he goes in, a classmate - who lost a $10
bet to him - slips the $10 bill right into the bubble. Again, wouldn't
it be contaminated? Plot oversights aside, it's a pretty well done and
interesting story. 7/10
1 out of 2 people found the following review useful:
John Travolta Puts on Protection, 24 April 2010
![]()
Author:
wes-connors from Earth
"John Travolta stars as Tod Lubitsch, a teenager who was born without
disease immunities. Tod is forced to live out his life in incubator
conditions. When he ventures outdoors, he must be encased in a huge
plastic bubble. He falls in love with Gina Biggs (Glynnis O'Connor),
and must decide between following his heart or facing near-certain
death," according to the DVD sleeve description, "Diana Hyland won an
Emmy for her portrayal of Travolta's mother."
Ms. Hyland was nominated posthumously, as "Best supporting Actress";
and, Mr. Travolta accepted the award.
This corny "ABC Friday Night Movie" was, nevertheless, a TV winner.
There seems to be a serious mistake is storytelling as, following Mr.
Travolta's clapping push-up contest with Kelly Ward (as Tom Shuster),
we see Travolta's perfect "bubble" environment contaminated by both his
young co-stars and a dirty $10 bill. You could also point out Travolta
was well past high school age - then again, he spent more years there
on "Welcome Back, Kotter" than he did in reality.
Changing hairstyles and demeanor, Hyland and father Robert Reed (as
Johnny) manage the passing decades well.
This drama is not about the lead character's medical condition. It is
about sex - specifically, about the desire for sex between two young
people who are obviously falling in love. Teenagers who saw this movie
on television in 1976 (and in rerun) surely made the connection.
Travolta looks very sexy in his gym shorts and eye make-up. And, Ms.
O'Connor appears in an eye-popping baby-blue bikini which would have,
if applicable, worn off many a remote's rewind button.
"I wanna be dirty!" Travolta's roommate John Friedrich exclaims, "I
wanna make it with everything that walks!"
The sexual content didn't stop at the cutting room floor, with Travolta
letting known an affair with one of his co-stars. If you're NOT already
"in the know" you'd surely think it was O'Connor. Well, surprise,
you're wrong
You're next guess is Mr. Reed. Good one. But, wrong
again
It was revealed to be movie "mother" Hyland. An familiar
American TV favorite, she tragically died of breast cancer within a
year. This movie was an important part of Travolta's post-"Kotter"
stardom.
Neatly directed by Randal Kleiser, the ending is an exhilaratingly
symbolic release of tension.
***** The Boy in the Plastic Bubble (11/12/76) Randal Kleiser ~ John
Travolta, Glynnis O'Connor, Robert Reed, Diana Hyland
2 out of 4 people found the following review useful:
One of Many, 29 April 2003
Author:
Brian Washington (Sargebri@att.net) from Los Angeles, California
This film will always be one of many in the long line of disease of the week movies that were, and still are, so prevalent. The only thing that differentiates this film from the others is the fact that it introduced John Travolta to the woman whom many have said was his greatest love, Diana Hyland. Its almost weird to think that Travolta would fall in love with the woman who played his mother. The other crazy thing is looking at him all of a sudden playing a sensitive, almost sympathetic character as opposed to the cool, but dumb, Vinnie Barbarino.
2 out of 4 people found the following review useful:
Bubble sputters and deflates, 17 November 2001
Author:
mikhail080 from the ruins beneath the Planet of the Apes
This tv movie provided a big stepping stone for John Travolta, but its 70s
sensibilities provoke more laughter than empathy for the plight of the title
character. The "disease of the week" plot makes Glynnis O'Connor into a
cruel and easy highschool bimbo, smoking cigarettes and parading about in a
bikini. All to the frustration of trapped Travolta, who is desperate for
companionship other than that of his dreary parents.
Does anyone still remember that Travolta had a passionate love affair in
real life with the actress Diana Hyland, who played his mother here? He was
devastated when she died of cancer a few years later. It's riotous fun to
see his pre-"Saturday Night Fever" dance steps as he boogies down inside his
bubble. It's obvious that he had some training before that other
movie!
3 out of 6 people found the following review useful:
One Of Travolta's Best Movies., 24 April 1999
![]()
Author:
Dave Rowland from Markham, Ontario
I can still remember this movie when it
was shown on TV back in 1976. I thought it
was a good story. It still is, but I was
extremely disappointed in the DVD release
of it. It's a really bad transfer & the
packaging that it came in is really
pitiful. I can't understand why they (Essex
Entertainment) would want to cheapen the
best format in the world?
There was also a huge error on
it as well. On the disc they have: "The
Boy In The Bubble".
It's a shame that this great movie had to
be wrecked by a very poor DVD release.
| Page 1 of 3: | [1] [2] [3] |
| Plot summary | Amazon.com summary | Ratings |
| Awards | External reviews | Parents Guide |
| Plot keywords | Main details | Your user reviews |
| Your vote history |