| Index | 2 reviews in total |
24 out of 26 people found the following review useful:
Fascinating Politically Tinged Ghost Story, 22 August 2005
![]()
Author:
Steven_Harrison from GSO, USA
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
(there are a couple of mild spoilers in this review, but *nothing* that
would really "spoil" the film)
This is probably my favorite film out of the number of recently
released Shinoda DVDs (R2 Japan, TOHO ltd. with English subtitles).
Shinoda worked for Shochiku with a few of the other Japanese new wavers
(in my opinion, giants of cinema) before the exodus into a more
independent film-making, and in some ways he's the most conservative of
the bunch (which is to say, not very conservative at all). Written by
the extremely controversial author Sakaguchi Ango (an essay about his
key work will be linked to at the end of the review) but to me this
film didn't seem "politically" very daring at first glance. Though in a
broader auteur context it does, like many Shinoda films, deal with
woman's place in Japanese society in fact, it's largely a ghost story,
fitting into a genre relatively defined (with a few notable examples
being Kobayashi's Kwaidan, Jigoku, Mizoguchi's Ugetsu Monogatari,
Shindo's Onibaba, and Kuroneko). You could call this genre a lyrical
Twilight Zone riff, without the robust voice over work (usually), but
more extremely stylized. Some of it's points are made very clear when
you do some checking, which I'll get to a paragraph down.
Beginning in present day (1975, in a park with people dancing and
singing) with a child's voice telling the viewer that Cherry blossoms
are now celebrated but we're told that before the Edo period, they were
greatly feared, and to be under them alone would lead to madness. We're
then brought hundreds of years into the past, through a forest of
blossoming cherry trees, blossoms blowing in the wind, and breezes
moving the branches as if breathing (unintended plentiful "B" use).
It's easy to understand why they were feared, they seem mystical,
powerful, and Shinoda presents them as a force. The plot is filled with
a beautiful woman (Iwashita Shima, Shinoda's wife) bending a fairly
unattractive, bloodthirsty and blustery man (Tomisaburo Wakayama,
recognizable from Shinoda's Captive's Island a decade earlier) to her
will. Many beheadings, murder, sexual perversion (I won't go into
detail here, but there are some moments that will lead to serious
eyebrow raising and head scratching), and ambitious city-dwelling fill
the story. And falling right in line with the ghost story genre, you
have your twist ending.
You'll find a woman as man-eater ("Spider woman", that is) and man as a
lust-filled animal, with plenty of tragedy thrown around. I call her a
Spider-woman, yet unlike the category defining heroine of Imamura's
Insect Woman, she does placate herself to a man's will at some point.
She also holds up the definition in that she is sexually "free", and
prone to putting pleasure at the foremost of concerns (these concerns
become that of the audience as well, due to the morbid nature of her
beast.) Sakaguchi wrote in his 1946 essay Darakuron ("On Decadence")
that "
both the Emperor System and Bushido state that 'the virtuous
widow never looks at another man.' This prohibition itself is not
merely inhuman, it directly contradicts human nature." At the beginning
of the film, Shima's husband is killed by Wakayama, and she immediately
adapts (in this way she exhibits strongly the qualities of the
"spider-woman") and places herself at the "head of the table" in her
new home. I suppose you could also read the subtext of the trees
bringing madness as the old way of life, and Japaneseness, having a
similar result. This point comes through even more clearly when a
troupe of monks are seen flailing about as if under a spell.
The cinematography is outstanding (maybe there's a listing for the
individual responsible at jmdb), and the Takemitsu score adds to the
dreamy flow of the film. I'll not soon forget the close-up of Iwashita
with blossoms fluttering against her face as she smiles ambiguously.
It's unfortunate that Desser dismisses the film as "minor", in my
opinion it seems one of his best works (extremely accessible to those
in need of exoticism, but a fantastic film no matter how you see it.)
This, Himiko, and Ballad of Orin all seem to have similarities, which
I'll give some thought to (I only have an unsubtitled version of
Himiko, but it's fantastic to look at even though crippled by a
language barrier).
14 out of 16 people found the following review useful:
Head Shot, 30 January 2008
Author:
tedg (tedg@FilmsFolded.com) from Virginia Beach
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
I watched this with "Professional Sweetheart." They have similar
structure: a pretty girl and a rustic get involved in shows and the
thing ends. In this case it ends tragically.
And the show in this case is pretty gruesome. A pretty girl is captured
by a rough robber who works alone. He takes her home for his wife.
She turns into the wife from hell, trading what we see as great sex for
increasingly more difficult favors. Then those favors escalate to
demands to bring more and more severed heads for her to act out plays
with. The heart of the film is her plays, her discovering that she is
missing some character and sending her loutish but charmed husband out
to get the head of a specific character: "the last monk wasn't mean
enough looking."
Meanwhile, we know that the cherry trees, when they blossom, magical
curses affect those who wander through. This happens, and the falling
petals are every bit as wonderful as you'll see in a Zhang film.
The story is slow by western standards, but the structure is a western
folded narrative spliced onto a traditional Japanese ghost story. The
blossoming trees, the curse and the fantastic end with the air filled
with petals and the smiling beauty dead, being caressed by the cherry
blossoms is traditional. The business about explicitly constructed
narrative (the head puppets) within the narrative is from the new wave
influence sweeping Japan in that era.
In both cases, the camera is extremely well managed. Space is
essential, and one gets the idea that the story is only an excuse for
the structure, and the structure is only an excuse for the visions.
These are formally framed, and some of them are amazing. Visually, this
is certifiably worth it.
Ted's Evaluation -- 3 of 3: Worth watching.
| Ratings | External reviews | Plot keywords |
| Main details | Your user reviews | Your vote history |