The Mysterious Monsters (1975) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
24 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
This film is great!
paul_s9822 March 2004
I can remember this movie coming to my local movie house as a child and I begged and begged my dad to take me but he refused knowing I would be scared senseless and I was.

I recently watched this movie again as an adult, and while not quite as scary, it was still charming and informative. The information presented is just as valid today as it was when the movie was made.

Especially entertaining is an ultra-serious Peter Graves who tries to convince the viewer that every bit of info presented is uncontestable proof that Bigfoot, the Yeti, and the Loch Ness Monster actually exist.

The re-enactments are fairly realistic and are not nearly as corny (or scary for that matter) as expected. The film is fast-paced and easy to understand.

While this isn't one of the all time great films ever made, "The Mysterious Monsters" is plenty entertaining, especially for true Sasquatch buffs. It is definitely worth a few hours of your time!
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Laugh now but remember this......
yourthaiguy20 December 2023
I vividly remember seeing this as a 10 year old in the theatre and just recently rewatched it. Yes, it's a cheap production with non actors and no budget it couldn't help but bring me back to that theatre in a wave of nostalgia. Laugh now but remember this cheesy "documentary" scared the &$#* out of me and every other kid in that theatre in 1975. It wasn't what you were watching that scared you but WHAT IF what you were watching actually happened that terrified you. I can't begin to tell you how many times my friends and I scattered when so much as a squirrel would rustle the leaves at night when we were out walking in the woods after dark. Bigfoot was always there in the back of our minds and we had TWO cheezy 70's flicks to blame for it. This and the LEGEND OF BOGGY CREEK. I'd give anything to be living back in that age of innocence again...
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Definitive proof!
MartianOctocretr55 November 2007
There can no longer be any controversy. This film gives definitive proof that such things as Sunn Classic pictures actually existed in the '70's, and they were very cheaply made. They actually did employ inexperienced actors to reenact eyewitness testimony of Bigfoot, Yeti, and Nessie close encounters. They actually did use old Super 8 film with inconsistent sound levels. They actually did have the chutzpah to have some tall guy wander around in a cheap Halloween gorilla suit. They actually did advance the testimony of people like a few frightened boy scouts who were telling campfire ghost stories as irrefutable accounts.

Peter Graves's ultra-serious "Dragnet" type of stoic narration is priceless; his mission to keep a straight face and tone in light of this amateurish production was more difficult than any he had on the Mission: Impossible series. The "scientific experts" he interviews look like they got their academic degrees from a box of Cracker Jack.

Check your belief/skepticism at the door; opinions on the existence of the creatures have nothing at all to do with experiencing this film. This one is just for fun, to laugh at the shoddy production techniques. The film takes itself way too seriously, with various lines of "testimony" that are fun to imitate, and sequences, such as the guy "psychromitizing" a box to discover its contents (um, why not just open it?), which make you laugh so hard you miss half of it. It gets a grade 7 on its laugh value alone.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
TV Documentary turned into Movie
a_l_i_e_n21 April 2006
"The Mysterious Monsters" deals with the search for creatures science is not yet prepared to confirm the reality of. The elusive "stars" of this film are Big Foot, The Abomidable Snowman and The Loch Ness Monster. I actually saw this movie in a theatre in 1976, and one thing I do recall is being astonished to witness for the first time in my life the famous "Patterson film", blown up to a 35 millimeter print and projected on a big screen. "Look at that!" I gushed to my buddy Ian as an actual sasquatch marched across the screen, elongated arms a swingin'. Then, in the film's most famous image (frame 325), "she" turned and looked straight out at all of us in the theatre. That for me was certainly the highlight of this movie, although it did have some other interesting bits. I liked the part where star/narrator Peter Graves takes a brief case to psychic, Peter Herkos. Graves then asks Herkos, who allegedly was told nothing about the contents of the case, to draw a picture based on any "impressions" he received from what was inside. Herkos then draws a picture of a large hairy looking man. So what was in the case? A plaster cast made from an alleged Big Foot track. There was also a couple fairly jolting dramatic recreations. In one, a fisherman discovers a Big Foot "monkeying" with his net. Another depicted an incident in which a woman was visited by a Big Foot that stuck it's hairy arm through her front window. Those were the most memorable original parts of "The Mysterious Monsters." The rest of the movie however seemed to be pretty much all culled from a television special that ran on CBS a couple years before called "Monsters- Mysteries Or Myths?", the true benchmark for documentaries dealing with the strange and paranormal.

Back then it was a widely executed trick to take a television show or made-for-TV-movie and release it to theatres (particularly in Canada) with some extra footage (maybe 10 or 15 minutes worth) not shown for the TV airing. The original "Battlestar Gallactica" is a case in point. Of course we'd pay theatre admission prices to see it cuz, well, because we didn't know the bloody thing would be shown for free on American television in a few months.

That aside, what made this the rare documentary to be re-packaged for theatres was the huge sensation "Monster- Mysteries Or Myths?" caused upon it's initial television airing. Nothing before this show had on so massive a scale spread the word about the possible existence of Big Foot. The Internet and tabloid shows, which today would be the normal route for any new "evidence" about the existence of mysterious creatures simply didn't exist in the 1970's. The National Enquirer was probably the only major source for paranormal news back then so it was like a revelation when this special aired. Plus, the fact it was a professional looking documentary (produced by the Smithsonian Institute no less) that took a serious approach to the subject matter didn't hurt either. Add to the mix some well composed, spooky music and coolest of all, the excellent choice of Rod Serling as narrator, and the result was something that held a massive TV audience it's very grip.

Producer Robert Guenette did not disappoint, globe trotting first to the Himaylas for a look at the mystery of the abominable Snow Man. One portion presented "evidence" from an expedition that recovered a Yeti scalp, hide, and even a mummified Yeti hand. Witnesses included a Sherpa girl who claimed to have been attacked by the Snow Man. How salaciously cool is that?

Next the program shifted to the continuing search for Yeti's North American cousin, Big Foot. This section included interviews with sasquatch hunters prowling the densely wooded areas of Oregon and northern California; verbal accounts by eye witnesses (some of whom really did look like hicks); and a very scary dramatic recreation in which Big Foot pays a late night visit to a boyscout troop. Richard Kiel ("Jaws" from the Bond movies) wearing excellent makeup played the curious sasquatch.

The only disappointing thing about "Monsters- Mysteries Or Myths?" was the absence of the famous "Patterson film", but as mentioned above, they corrected that by featuring it prominently when the documentary was re-packaged for the theatres and released as "The Mysterious Monsters".

Finally, the special traveled to Scotland for a look into the search for the Loch Ness Monster. This segment included strange sonar blips, the famous "Dinsdale Film" (considered the most convincing footage ever taken of "Nessie"), as well as the now discredited "Surgeon's Photo". There was also a shocking piece of film in which a man in a speed boat is killed on the Loch after striking a mysterious turbulence. Of course some Scottish eye witnesses were presented including a vicar who, as you listen to him, you can't help but ask yourself, "how could a man of the cloth who seems as kindly as this chap be lying?"

The original "Monsters- Mysteries or Myths?" became the highest rated documentary in television history. A record that stood until at least the early 1990's, and as far as I know still holds to this day. It certainly posed some fascinating questions but answered none about whether these creatures really do exist. One thing is certain though: "Monsters- Mysteries Or Myths?" did more to educate the public about crypto-zoology than anything before it, inspiring a host of crypto-zoological and paranormal-themed imitators like "Man Beast", "The Outerspace Connection" and "In Search Of Noah's Ark".
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Entertaining.
AaronCapenBanner24 August 2013
I enjoyed this documentary style film for what it is; an interesting bit of nostalgia. Peter Graves hosts, quite capably, as he presents re-enactments of people's encounters with Bigfoot, as well as the Loch Ness monster. It is odd that, despite the title, Bigfoot is the primary focus here, and that is reflected in the on screen title as well! Biggest demerit is how it uses far too many close-ups of the Bigfoot costumes, which do not bear such close scrutiny. They should have been kept in the shadows more! Still, this started off the Schick Sunn Films series of paranormal documentaries that were popular in the 1970's.

On DVD in a grainy print, but that is better than nothing!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
What "The Mysterious Monsters" is about!
quincyspalmd16 December 2001
The movie, "The Mysterious Monsters", is a fantastic movie! It tells the story of the phenomenon known as BIGFOOT. From the beginning of the phenomenon to the current day (As of 1975) history, this documentary movie covers all of the bases! It uses eyewitness evidence, video evidence, film evidence, footprint evidence, as well as alot of other investigative techniques, to establish that our planet is in fact home to these elusive creatures. It asks the question, "If fingerprint evidence can be used to hang someone,why can't footprint evidence be used to prove the existence of someone?" And the evidence does in fact prove that these creatures are real. This is a very interesting movie, and if and when the day comes that Bigfoot and the Loch Ness monster, who is also discussed in this movie, are proven beyond ANY doubt, this movie will make the headlines for being way ahead of it's time! It is a crime that this movie isn't available on video or DVD. It deserves to be! Check it out.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Such a serious film now seems laughable!
AbeStreet30 October 2002
I remember watching this as a kid back in the late 70's and early 80's. As a child I wanted to believe that bigfoot existed and so I bought into all the "supposed" evidence that this documentary brought out. In 1985 I taped this show off of late night tv. The picture is pretty bad, not due to the age of the tape but the condition of the film when it was broadcast. The colors are very muted, everything seems to have a green tint to it and most colors are not identifiable. About once a year I still watch this show. It brings back memories.

However, when I now watch this film I can't help but to chuckle at the so called "evidence" that is displayed. Most of it is open to interpretation and not concrete proof and some of it has been, evidently, proven a hoax since this film was released. I believe most of the so called witnesses either were out and out lying to the interviewers so that they could get their 15 minutes of fame or they so wanted to believe in bigfoot that they convinced themselves that what they saw was a bigfoot. In many ways it's like those who believe they have come in contact with aliens or seen a space ship. Have you ever noticed that most of us never see an alien or space ship but those who have seen one of them once have usually seen one of them more than once.

What I enjoy most about this film is Peter Graves interviews and narration. If you are able to view this film watch and listen to Peter Graves as he creates a fact out of a thin air. For example, Mr. Graves will ask a person who has witnessed a bigfoot sighting about their experience and then he will make a statement of fact something like this: "...now that we've established that bigfoot does exist..." and then he'll move on to his next point. In other words he takes an unverifiable event and treats it as fact. Now, as a 33 year old adult, I can't help but to chuckle at how this film attempts to sway the viewers opinion on the existence of bigfoot.

This so called documentary does try to appear unbiased by interviewing professors and experts in various fields some of which believe in bigfoot and some that do not. Again, this is not what it appears. Watch how the comparisons are made. Peter Graves usually asks someone who believes in bigfoot to explain why he believes and then he asks another person why he doesn't. Once the person who does not believe gives his reasons Mr. Graves goes back to the first person and gives him a chance to refute what the person who does not believe in bigfoot has said but Mr. Graves never gives the person who does not believe in bigfoot a chance to respond to the first persons refute. Thus the person who believes in bigfoot gets the first and last word.

For some reason I still enjoy this film. I guess I don't really believe in Bigfoot or the Lock Ness monster anymore. With today's technology I think we would have more concrete proof that these two entities exist. That being said this documentary is fun to watch. It's kind of like Santa Claus for an adult. You no longer believe but it's still fun to read or watch the stories and remember when you did believe! Not that it will happen anytime soon but I do wish they would release this film in DVD form.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Yeti, Nessie, and Biggie-foot walk into a bar ...
Coventry8 March 2023
... and take place at a table where movie and television star Peter Graves is already sitting. Graves tells them he's personally fascinated by the mysteries surrounding the notorious creatures' existence, and claims that he undertook investigations and research at his own initiative. Hilarious laughter all around the bar.

Why is the first paragraph of this user-comment written as a joke? Because this whole pseudo "documentary" IS a joke! Don't believe for even one second the makers ever had the intention to bring an objective or even remotely scientifically reliable documentary. They simply wanted to cash in on the contemporary very popular trend of bigfoot/sasquatch movies, whereas Peter Graves is just an actor who wanted to earn another easy paycheck. Admittedly, he's a very dedicated actor, because he acts visible annoyed when a so-called "scientist" arrogantly says to him that eyewitness reports of Bigfoot sightings can't be taken serious as evidence.

This thing is American and thus largely revolves around Bigfoot, or whatever you want to call him. The Monster of Loch Ness (Scotland) and Yeti the Abominable Snowman (the Himalayas) are guest stars, and the script even dares to state they are real and that local scientists have confirmed their existence. So why not Bigfoot? Well, maybe because all the eyewitnesses are too obviously random people picked from the streets that are reading their testimonies from a piece of paper held in front of the camera.

"The Mysterious Monsters" is terrible, but hilarious. I can only hope this didn't genuinely petrify too many spectators back in the early 70s. I laughed enormously at the testimony of the "faker". There's a guy who narrates how, after being called a hillbilly by monster hunters, he made Bigfoot-shaped boots in his garage and amused himself with leaving traces in the mud. Now, that I can believe!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great Documentary.
KEVIN91974 July 2005
This is by far the best documentary on the subject of Bigfoot, Nessie and the Yeti ever made. I saw this movie when I was 8 yrs old and even though it scared the bjesus out of me then, I still loved it. I finally found an unedited copy of it on DVD on ebay last month and have watched it several times since then. If you are seriously interested in the subject and not one of those people who only want to laugh and point out the zipper that isn't really there, you'll enjoy this film. It was made in '75 but the f/x are most impressive. This movie presents what has been reported about these creatures and lets you make up your own mind, not like the more recent ones that were only made to point out the afore mentioned non existent zipper. Watch this movie if you can find it, you'll be glad you did.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Joey, Do you like Movies about Sasquatches
Steve_Nyland3 November 2015
Peter Graves sonorously narrates Sunn Classics uproarious Bigfoot documentary with all of the authority of Captain Crunch. The film is best remembered in my circle for a genuinely hair raising segment where Bigfoot rummages through the belongings of a group of "Boy Scouts" out camping without adult supervision. Attention is also given to the Loch Ness Monster and indeed, Graves is able to conclude with authority that it is a population of aquatic dinosaurs who have somehow escaped the ravages of time. He also concludes that Bigfoot is actually a population of 200 or more bipedal creatures who exist at one with nature, and have only come to our attention as mankind has cruelly encroached on their habitat with all our unwelcome riot & clamor.

The same approach is found in Sunn Classic's "In Search of Noah's Ark", which taught us that the Ark split in two and rests half submerged in a glacier on Mount Ararat, just waiting for earnest Christians to free it from the ice. Sunn's "The Lincoln Conspiracy" also finds in favor of a complex conspiracy to assassinate Lincoln centered around super spy / traitor Union Colonel Lafayette Baker, who would have made Oliver Stone blush with embarrassment for his ham-fisted script for "JFK". And the overlooked "The Bermuda Triangle", which posits with authority that ships, airplanes and whole civilizations have been sucked into the very bowels of the Earth itself by a misfired Atlantean particle beam accelerator, lost somewhere off the coast of Bimini.

The films are classic Americana, made with working class families who went to the movies two or three times a year in mind, demanding otherwise wholesome G-rated fare suitable for all-ages and fueled by a bizarre zeal to have it all be true even when flying in the face of common sense. "Mysterious Monsters" succeeds admirably, cashing in early on the Bigfoot craze that even "The Six Million Dollar Man" got caught up in and demanding our acceptance by appealing to our conscience rather than science. Forty years later there's still no hide or bones to study and it's to my personal disappointment that garbage films like this sort of got shoved under the carpet as people realized how stupid it all was. It is the right of earlier eras to be as slack-jawed and backward as they like. I for one marvel at garbage such as this film, celebrating with forthright authority man's unending quest to sucker each other out of a couple dollars — In this case, movie tickets, and it worked brilliantly. These movies all made gobs of money with almost nothing up front, though don't sell the talents of the filmmakers short. They knew exactly what they were doing just like the guy at the carnival sideshow knows what he is doing. It's called show business.

The results are actually highly entertaining, the one slow spot in the film being a sequence where a "psychiatrist" is shown "hypnotizing" his "patient", who relates a tale so filled with mystery as to sound not just poorly scripted, but unrehearsed. Yet that's half the fun. Not just marveling at how bad, dumb or outrageously idiotic the movie is, but in knowing that it was the best they could manage under the circumstances. Which means there's hope for the rest of us, or at least those of us who refuse to stop believing in Bigfoot and the Bermuda Triangle, UFOs or "Ancient Aliens". Take your pick, spark up and just enjoy being smarter than the dimwits who paid money to see this, ate it up whole, and went home wanting more. Now that's funny.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I love this movie!
KEVIN919718 February 2002
This is hands down the best documentary I've ever seen on the subject of Bigfoot, Nessie and the Yeti. It isn't like the more recent ones that say the Patterson film was a guy in a monkey suit, without explaining how the tracks of the creature in the film clearly showed it to have weighed almost a thousand pounds! (I guess that little discrepancy didnt need explaining) Anyway, if your interested in the subject at all and you can find this movie its a very good film and I highly recommend it.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
'70s paranormal documentary
Leofwine_draca6 February 2023
BIGFOOT: THE MYSTERIOUS MONSTER is one of those true-life paranormal documentaries that were all the rage back in the 1970s. I wasn't around then, but I remember a similar boom in the X-FILES obsessed 1990s so these are cute and kitsch for me. Peter Graves shows up as an oh-so-serious narrator, looking at various cryptozoological mysteries around the globe. Bigfoot aka the Sasquatch gets the lion's share of the attention here, and we get plenty of cheesy restagings of supposed sightings and attacks, which are always a hoot. Elsewhere we look at the Yeti, the Loch Ness monster and some other unexplained phenomena like hypnotism. It slows down a bit at the end, but remains novel throughout.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Very interesting......
ridley_6418 February 2002
A very interesting film especially if you are alone one afternoon and have nothing else to do. I remember around Christmas time about 2 years ago I happened to catch this film on television. All I can say is it is a very good movie and keeps the interest in ones mind hoping for the film to never end! You can bet that this film is a definite Cult Classic! I have always been interested ever since I was little in the "unknown" and the "unexplained". This great movie was made in 1975 and we all have to realise that this is when the hype with all that stuff was big. It has even been shown and explained that the largest amount of sightings for Sasquatch, Water Monsters, and U.F.O's was in the 70's. The true "terror abductions" with aliens seems to of started in the late sixties, which was a big change from the previous "abductions of grandeur" from the 1950's. The 80's seems to be the "death" of the sightings for these phenomenon and throughout the 90's and even now these sightings almost hardly ever happen, what does that tell you? Of course one theory (which I agree with) was that when this mysteries were big, others wanted attention themselves and there was a "hoping on the band-wagon" effect. No doubt that some of these people were telling the truth or at least think they did. For example: when people are at a place that is infamous for having some type of monster or phenomenon; if they see something people will automatically jump to the conclusion that it was the monster and ignore the other possible explanations. But this movie overall is very good and nicely done, 'tis quite entertaining and I suggest one to see it one of these days. I still have some belief that there are many animals out there we haven't discovered yet, especially in the oceans! I give this movie 8/10.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Good info circa 1975
chargersouthpaw12 September 2005
I recorded this movie off of TBS years ago & have just about worn out the tape from watching it over & over again. It covers just about everything you want to know about Bigfoot up until 1975. I would love to see Peter Graves do an updated version with all of the new info that has come out in the past 30 years. The Patterson Film is always the best part of any Bigfoot documentary. Even in 2005 there is nobody that has been able to prove that the film is a fake. I really don't see how anybody can think that it is a man in a monkey suit on that film. There is no way on God's green earth that somebody could have done that good of a job making a suit like that in 1967. Also, hoaxes are really hard to keep up for long periods of time because somebody usually gets loose lipped. Patterson died in '72 & swore on his death bed that the film was real. Bob Gimlin has said that he hasn't made a dime off of the film so if it was a fake, you would think that he would blow the whistle & then collect a ton of money going on the talk show circuit. Then there would be the guy who "played" Bigfoot. Bob Heironimus has said that he was the guy in the suit & was paid $1,000 to do it but never received his money so he started telling people around Yakima, Washington that he was Bigfoot. Until either Bob Gimlin says it was a fake or someone finds the "suit", I will always believe that that film is real.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I Love this movie. It should be on DVD and Video!
QMD33316 February 2004
This movie, "The Mysterious Monsters" is awesome! How this movie is ignored so much by the DVD, Video and TV industry is a sin. If that day ever comes when Bigfoot and/or the Loch Ness Monster are proven beyond any doubt to be real, this movie will appear as it truly is........ like a Classic film way ahead of its time. Peter Graves does a wonderful job of narrating the movie. This movie was a classic in the mid 70's Drive In craze. That it appears to have been forgotten since then is a crime. Its a shame. LISTEN UP DVD, VIDEO AND TV BIGWIGS! THIS MOVIE DESERVES TO BE FULLY RESTORED, DIGITALLY REMASTERED AND SHOWN IN ALL ITS GLORY ON DVD, VIDEO AND TV! This is a classic that is MUCH better than the similar film, "The Legend of Boggy Creek". THAT film is on DVD, and rightly so. But this one should be too. Send an email to people in the DVD, Video, and TV industry and tell them that you want to see "The Mysterious Monsters" treated like the clasic film that it is! Only then, will this movie get the credit and attention that it deserves. "THE MYSTERIOUS MONSTERS" Rocks!
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
One of the best monster documentaries
dbborroughs15 October 2009
Warning: Spoilers
One of the handful of truly good Sunn Classics films (many are entertaining even though they aren't very good) about Bigfoot and tangentially some of the other monsters of the world (the Loch Ness Monster). Filled with actual interviews and some recreations this is a solid, look at the question of monsters in our world. It's a nice, and for the most part un-sensational. Its actually one of the few films on the subject that one should really see since it's a good overview. The best thing I can say about the film is that when Bigfoot or other mysterious monsters are mentioned a good number of my friends mention this film. "Hey remember that movie with Peter Graves". Everyone seems to remember this, I'm guessing because its informative and entertaining. Very much worth a look
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Agreed, except...
R Becker20 April 2004
...if you do a little research on the dying Brit, you soon discover that he was himself a hoaxer, while the man who made the "Surgeon's photo" was actually a very sober and upstanding gynecologist... and never given to hoaxes. Many Ness researchers don't believe the photo anyway, but not because it's ever been proven to be a hoax.

It has not been.

The "Loch Ness hoax" rumor is itself an urban legend, much like the so-called debunking of the Patterson Bigfoot film from 1967. A little research shows you that not only did the man (John Chambers) who was supposed to have faked the Bigfoot deny it to his grave, but the primary person who says he did it is filmmaker John Landis -- a known expert on simians, primates, and prehistoric humanoids... er, not quite. (Though he did make SCHLOCK.) Frankly, you only have to compare the Bigfoot material you get in something like MYSTERIOUS MONSTERS with the monkey suits on display in episodes of STAR TREK or KORG 70,000 BC from the same general timeframe to know that there's just no way any makeup artist from the time *could* have faked the suit! (Even the so-called "zipper" on the suit doesn't stand up to rigorous computer analysis. It's just a tuft of fur.)

All this by way of saying: Watch THE MYSTERIOUS MONSTERS and don't be too quick to believe every dying British con artist you read about, or every B-movie director who insists they can analyze film better than naturalists.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
With a name this bad, it has to be good
james-humphrey-113 June 2005
This movie, which appears to take it self very seriously as a scientific documentary, argues its points so poorly and with such 70's flair (see Peter Graves) that it succeeds grandly as a mockumentary of itself and what passed for "science" 30 years ago. It's a laugh riot. Other than the big budget reenactments (which are entertaining in themselves), you'll wonder whether this film was written, directed, and edited for a 7th grade science project. Watch this film with other well-educated 30 somethings and be transported back to the days when you were scared @#$!less by Bigfoot, the Loch Ness Monster, and killer bees. Hey, aren't those killer bees supposed to have overrun America by now? (Disclaimer: killer bees may not appear in this film.)
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
fascinating from start to finish
dtucker8629 September 2001
Sunn Classic Pictures made some wonderful documentaries and this is by far the best. It is absolutely fascinating and i'm amazed at all they managed to cover about Bigfoot and Nessie in one film. The reenactments of the various sightings are very well done but may frighten kids. They frightened me when I was a kid and saw this film. I think the scariest scene was the one where the women is alone in her living room and Bigfoots shadow comes by and his hand crashes thru the window and then her husband opens the door and hes standing right there. This is the only documentary I have seen that includes a really inteligent detailed analysis of Roger Patterson's film of Bigfoot. Next to the Zapruder film, its the most famous home movie ever taken. Its also the only film I have seen that show's Patterson's film in its entirity. The only thing is that when the film talks about the Loch Ness Monster they show the famous "Surgeon's photo" of the head and neck of Nessie. In 1994, there was an old Englishman who confessed on his deathbed that picture was a hoax! Oh well, its still worth a look when it shows up on tv. Peter Graves is an excellent narrator.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Old documentary
Nicky864 October 1999
Well, this film came out when I was 7 and bigfoot, Nessie, Yeti, Bermuda Triangle, UFOs and all that kind of stuff was big. I remember seeing this flick at the theater and it scared the hell out of me, especially when bigfoot's shadow goes by the window while the lady sits there eating popcorn, and then her husband opens the door to see the creature standing there! Of course it has a lot of cheesy scenes of hypnosis and bad witnesses and the old "computer" technology that is so laughable today. But despite lack of evidence of any primate evolution in North America, and the recent conclusion that Roger Patterson's film was most likely a hoax, there is still a fact that disturbs: Native Americans and Himalayan natives matter-of-fact acceptance of these creatures' existence. And what is really making ALL those footprints?? A film worth seeing as both period piece and to get many of the sightings and "facts" up to that time.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
pretty good
kennymacdonald24 December 2002
the film now is dated and some of the proof they show in it has been hoaxed[the famous photo of the loch ness monster]and grover krantz has passed away yet some of the stories that were presented were very good and still hold up[real or otherwise].
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Will You Please Let This Poor Man Sleep?!?!
Ld Corgi18 August 1999
While eating my Wheat Thins two days ago, I smelled a funny odor. Real funny like. You ever smell something and then you just wonder if it was you? Same kinda thing. I always preferred wheat to any other sort of grain. Don't know why. Remember that show, "Love, American Style", from the 70's? Well, me too! Speaking of which (Don't get me started with the "Three's Company" cast!)... Smashing film about the man who would be king of the entire tuna underworld. Just a wonderful French comedy. What a Coup, Rae Dawn Chong!!!
2 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Okay!
rodcorvo21 December 1999
I saw this film on telivision and t was a lot better than I had expected but it wasnt anything special. Its a documentry mostly focused on bigfoot and the yeti. Some of the scenes were bigfoot apears are mildly creepy. Anyway it had a lot of flaws but I'll give it 2 and a half stars.

RECCOMENDED FOR BIGFOOT FANS AND SOMEBODY WHO HAS NOTHING ELSE TO DO.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Decent Look at Bigfoot
Michael_Elliott27 April 2014
The Mysterious Monsters (1975)

** 1/2 (out of 4)

Peter Graves narrates this documentary that takes a look at several mysterious creatures but the main focus is that of Bigfoot. The film uses interviews with people who have seen the creature, scientists as well as re-enactments to explain why so many feel that the legendary creature is real. Throughout the 1970's drive-in screens were full of documentary or doco-dramas that tries to explain why so many monsters were real and out there to be seen. It seems Bigfoot was probably the most popular of these monsters and this here is certainly a memorable one. I think the film's strongest point are the re-enactments because several of the Bigfoot costumes look extremely good. I really liked the look of the children creatures that are shown towards the end of the movie and several of the adult ones also looked quite good. Another major plus is of course the narration of Graves who was simply a master at using his voice. Other creatures are also looked at with the Loch Ness monster getting about five or so minutes worth of footage. The documentary also wants to make it clear that there are common animals that were thought to be extinct or not real including the giant panda bear. There are certainly some major problems with the film including the pacing, which is a bit rough but this here is only a minor thing. Some of the stories also goes against one another including one fact saying that the creatures mostly sleep during the day yet most of the re-enactments are encounters during the day. Still, fans of the genre should enjoy watching this one.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed