|Page 1 of 3:||  |
|Index||22 reviews in total|
So many bad reviews! Why? I loved this as a kid-OK so maybe now it's
not my favorite but being that this movie stayed with me as a kid and
helped fuel my interest in movies I'd say there was plenty of good to
What I liked best about it was the adventure. In these times, a movie like this would never be made at all, or at least not without computer generated monsters chasing the family and lots of car chases. The best thing about this movie is it's earthiness and tranquility. The feeling of being in the middle of nowhere-I can appreciate all types of environments but there is something so beautiful about being in the country when it's perfectly still with just yourself and the environment. In this movie that feeling is created beautifully, it touches the nature and quiet, country feeling. The scenery and country feeling created is beautiful.
It is also not boring at all as this family struggles to make it out in the middle of nowhere.Lots of wildlife and lots of Action packed adventure.Lots of adversities to overcome. And as mentioned, the cinematography is great-you'll feel like your out there in the wilderness too!
I'm not saying this is the best movie in the world-but for those who can appreciate a story revolving around a family and their struggles out in the wilderness it's great. I was enamored as a kid. I wanted to be out there with them! I think this is a good movie and would give it at least an 8. Of coarse it wont appeal to everyone but shouldn't be forgotten either.
I saw this movie as a kid and loved it. Today, I saw it again with my
wife and two kids and loved it.
There are aspects that are completely unrealistic (i.e. a welder knows how to build a very nice log cabin, a fast grizzly does not run down the little girl who happens to be ten feet away, the man is not seriously mangled by the mountain lion, the dog is not killed by the wolves, etc.), but what I loved about it was the fact that the family does what so many families long to do--get out of Dodge and head for the high country.
People weren't meant to be stuck in a box 24/7 because they are enslaved to a house payment, the monster SUV, and all the other trappings of civilization. Families were meant to hang together and kids were meant to learn from parents--not MTV, the druggies on the corner, or their friends at school. Parents, to your children love is spelled TIME. This film reinforces that notion and illustrates that this misguided idea of quality time being more important than quantity is ridiculous. The pragmatic message from this film is for parents to sell the BMW and buy a Chevy, sell the mansion on the hill and buy the house in the valley, chuck the ladder-climbing job and take the one that allows you to be home for dinner every night. After all, nobody every regretted not spending more time at work, but they did regret not spending more time with the kiddos.
I believe that it's a movie that was ahead of its time and I'd love to see a more modern (and more realistic) take on the subject. Besides, it's a good family film, which is a rarity these days. It's not a perfect film by any standard, but the scenery is beautiful and the plot is visionary. That's why I give it an 8 out of 10.
I loved this film as a child - and was brought up in the Rocky
Mountains, backpacking with my Dad, and can relate to the feeling of
wanting to drop everything and "head for the hills."
Have seen the movie and its sequel recently, I can still say it is a movie I would love for my children to watch and love. It is wholesome, family value oriented, and in general, a great joy for kids. It makes you want to go out camping and enjoy what little wilderness we have left in the US.
While I do have to agree with other posters that you simply can't "up and leave" as they do in this film (ie - no preparation re: hunting, fishing, planting, learning, etc.), you just can't fit all that into a film. And it would bore the kids to death. It is a family/children's film, after all, not an adult action flick.
I highly recommend this film to anyone with children.
I thought this movie was a fine, clean motion picture with action and adventure. I appreciated the high moral values portrayed in this entertaining film. If you are looking for a picture to enjoy with your family(small children included) for an evening, then I would recommend this one.
First off, I am very fond of these movies. They remind me of my childhood and how much I love the outdoors. These movies aren't stellar, Oscar types, but, hey, they work when you want young children to see different animals and people who want a better quality of life. Although the action scenes may startle young ones ( they probably WON'T with all the stuff they see in the "movies" today). And, yes, the movies DON'T show all the important stuff (like how they knew how to build a cabin, etc) but it's a MOVIE, not REAL LIFE. If you want REALITY, I would strongly suggest you watch PBS's "Frontier House". That was GREAT and it CHALLENGED 3 families to live an 1883 lifestyle. No easy way out here, folks! These people were REALLY doing it. Otherwise, I will ALWAYS cherish these movies and when I have children of my own, share them with them.
A couple of hippies living in Los Angeles who were forced to grow up
and get jobs when they had kids, decide they've had enough of the
smoggy city and pack up their family to move to the Rocky Mountains.
Once there they play with bears and befriend a grizzled old mountain
man. That is, when they aren't running for their lives from wolves or a
big grizzly named Three Toes.
Ah, the Wilderness Family. Despite its laughable premise, it's actually one of the better of the "getting back to nature" genre of family dramas that popped up in the 1960s and 1970s, when the times they were a-changing and people thought by the 1980s the world would be overpopulated with unbreathable air and no natural resources left. Really, there's not much wrong with the idea of living the natural life and getting away from the crowded cities. But these movies were often so irresponsibly naive, treating living off the land like it' s a cake walk and there are just as many Disney-style friendly wild animals as there are ones that will kill you. Oh and they never talk about bugs. As anyone who has ever been camping can attest, bugs are the worst. Nature's PR guy should get a raise for keeping bugs out of the brochures. And I don't want to even get into understanding why these movies all seem to have old men wandering around the mountains being friendly with kids.
Like I said, this movie is one of the better examples of this genre. At least here it is shown that you have to work to live in the wild and there are some dangers, unlike the completely unrealistic "My Side of the Mountain," where a kid goes to live in the wilderness and befriends animals and a creepy old guy who plays a flute. That kid had it easy but there is some effort made here to portray the struggle it takes to live in the wild, although this is still far from realistic. The cast here is decent, led by Robert Logan as the stubborn hippie dad and George Buck Flower as the mountain man. Corny hippie soundtrack oddly works. As always with these types of films, the best part is the scenery. No sets or cheap CGI fakery going on, just real grass, trees, rivers, mountains, and animals. It adds an authenticity to things missing today. Plus, who doesn't love a good view? This was followed by two sequels that are pretty much more of the same.
I saw this film from what my father told me about it; I like watching
cheese, and from what he'd said, this is CHEESE.
As people started moving into the mid-1970s, they were leaving behind the
hippie-dippy daze, getting into more sophisticated drugs, then becoming
clean corporate slaves. Everyone began forgetting how wonderful the earth
was because they were too busy drilling it for oil or tearing down trees
make room for our growing population.
This film's answer??
Make a senseless decision involving your entire family by moving into a
wooded area you know NOTHING about where there's no help for miles and you
have no skills dealing with wild animals, baking from ABSOLUTE scratch,
hunting, etc. We went from the streets of L.A. to the hills of the Rockies
in less than two minutes. Were there books taken out of the library on
survival techniques in the wilderness? Did the family take shooting
Was there any talk on food, such as how are we going to grow a garden or
bake bread or fish or hunt? If there was, we weren't allowed to see it. We
are supposed to believe that this family knew all this, that they had a
thriving garden in the city, that the woman could bake bread without so
as a wooden spoon, and that the father had been shooting at the neighbor's
The only reason the mother and father had had kids is for the cute factor
alone, though it fails miserably at the feigned feel of it all. The little
boy sounds like he's reading lines but can't read yet, and the daughter
seems drugged into a dazed happiness about everything. Their dog Crust (is
that honestly his name?? Crust???) must have attacked wild animals at home
as well, seeing as he attacks EVERYTHING in this film; it's surprising he
doesn't mutilate flowers if they move too much in the wind, becoming a
threat to the family.
Here are some things that make me refuse to have suspension of
~The father fly-fishes. He is NOT going to feed a family of 4 on fly
fishing. That's called sport, not necessity.
~The dog survives brutal attacks of wolves, bears, and MOUNTAIN LIONS.
Something is wrong when a domestic dog from the city makes it out alive in
those circumstances with barely a scratch.
~How much does a contruction worker make? Enough to ensure a plane to
supplies every so often? How about when he has no more job and makes no
~A 10 to 13 year old girl would never outrun a bear.
~Just from my own opinion, I would have lost all faith in myself, my
and my dog to be able to survive in this place with the attitude and lack
planning that this family accomplished.
Reviews of the plot aside, I'm thinking of starting a drinking game. It's called "Take a shot everytime you see the boom mike."
This is a feel-good, family movie of the television era of Little House on the Prairie. We watched a lot of crap back then and enjoyed it immensely. If you have no preconceived ideas of being thrilled and scared, and understand that this is a movie pushing why so many of us 'up and left' society and joined communes and built squat toilets escaping from the 'burbs'. My 11 year old thoroughly enjoyed it, though she too could see through it (and also see the microphone in heaps of scenes - delightful). We will now watch the second one and be just as delighted, entertained and taken back to a simpler time. Not just in the movie, but remembering the seventies in general.
An urban family looking for getaway from the hassles and tiring of city
life and rush-hour traffic , furthermore an ill daughter , for these
reasons they turn into pioneers on the rugged Rocky mountains . The
film depicts an agreeable family , formed by a father (Robert F Logan)
, mother (Susan Damante Shaw) and sons (Holmes , Larsen) who leave
civilization for the freedom of the Rocky wild . But they soon
encounter troubles in paradise and that the wilderness may be more
harsh than grumpy bosses and the difficulties of the city . As they
must escape some violent animals and learn to survive .
This is an enjoyable film filled with adventures , familiar feeling , beautiful songs , wildlife and breathtaking landscapes with majestic scenarios . The movie is plenty of animals such as bears , moose or elk , mountain goats , deers , raccoon , wolves , some of them are uncultivated and other tamed as a dog that defends and saves them in several occasions . Sensible score with wonderful songs fitting to environment . Spectacular outdoors and acceptable photography , though being necessary an urgent remastering because the film-copy is worn-out .
This movie seems to be the first of a series , these are the following : ¨Further adventures Robinson family (1977)¨ by Frank Zuñiga from the producers of the first part and turns out to be a predictable retread ; ¨Mountain of Robinson family (1979)¨ in which the family is determined to return to wilderness and moves to the Rockies . In similar style and also offering a pleasant scenery are : ¨Sea gypsies ( 1978)¨ in that a sailing crew is shipwrecked off the Aleutian Islands and ¨Across the great divide (1976)¨ in which two orphans must cross the dangerous snow-covered Rocky mountain in order to claim their inheritance , being based on facts happened in 1876 . All films are mostly starred by Robert F. Logan , Susan Damante Shaw and usual appearance as secondary actor the likable George Buck Flowers and being produced by Joseph Raffill ( father of Stewart Raffill who habitually results to be the filmmaker of the series) and also financed by producer Arthur Dobbs . This family-oriented tale about modern-day pioneers who head for life in nature will appeal to wilderness buffs .
The first of 3 episodes that follow the adventures and misadventures of
the Robinson family, which consists of father Skip, mother Pat, 11 year
old Jenny, 5 year old Toby, and Labrador Crust(strange name). In
addition, mountain man Boomer and his mule are occasional guests in
this and subsequent episodes. Some reviewers label Boomer as creepy. I
didn't get that impression at all. Rather he comes across as a
knowledgeable grandfather, who probably likes animals better than most
Some reviewers complain that these episodes have little or no plot. Well, there are so many interesting things happening, that you don't need a complicated plot. The same is true of certain raucous comedies and some musicals. As in the other episodes, there is an alteration between disasters or fights, and periods of play and glee: a good format. I enjoyed the film for the most part. The shots of wild animals and the fights with some of these are spectacular. However, they didn't bring that much equipment and supplies with them, so I have to wonder where they got all that food and equipment ?
Skip seems to have great familiarity with wilderness living. He seems indestructible, and brushes off any disasters or fights with animals as nothing to worry about. In contrast, Pat is often stressed out after a negative experience, and sometimes cries. Canine Crust saves or helps save the situation numerous times throughout the series.
The family gradually adopts several animals as pets, beginning with a nosy raccoon. Soon, they are feeding 2 small bear cubs, whose mother can't be found. The kids discover a pair of cougar kittens which follow them home. Skip takes these back to where they were found, and has a fight with the mother, Skip aided by Crust.
Crust has a fight with a bear, then 3 wolves at once, and miraculously survives these with only minor wounds. Skip scares the wolves away with several shots in the air. Apparently, he didn't want to kill them unless absolutely necessary.
They make a pet of a friendly adult bear, but another bear: "(3- toes") terrorizes them. Maybe he's mad because he lost 2 toes escaping from a trap.
Skip and Toby are nearly crushed by a boulder slide. Then, Skip's canoe capsizes when he's going to find a doctor, when Jenny runs a fever.
If you or your kids enjoyed this film, you might check out "The Further Adventures of the Wilderness Family"(Part 2), and/or "The Mountain Family Robinson"(Part 3). Yes, there is much overlap in what you will see, but each has some unique happenings, as well.
|Page 1 of 3:||  |
|Plot summary||Ratings||External reviews|
|Parents Guide||Plot keywords||Main details|
|Your user reviews||Your vote history|