| Page 1 of 8: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] |
| Index | 79 reviews in total |
38 out of 42 people found the following review useful:
Mesmerizing if not perfect, 25 October 2002
Author:
Blaise_B from Pittsburgh
After hearing all the hype about this film...the latest notorious
Eurotrash
cult film making the rounds...has to be seen to be believed...sex and
violence, sex and violence, etc., I finally got hold of a copy of it and
was
almost afraid that with all the anticipation I'd just be disappointed. To
add to that, the copy I got was of crappy quality as I discovered when I
started watching it--the opening credits were so blurry I couldn't read
them--and the whole affair started to look like nothing more than the
chore
necessary to get the idea of finally seeing this film out of my
head.
All this apprehension disappeared quickly as I got sucked into this simple
yet very engaging story. We all know it's about a chick with one eye who
picks up a shotgun and exacts revenge on her abusers, another entry into a
sub-genre that needs no introduction, and that's what I expected, just
another entry into this sub-genre with maybe enough explicit footage to
give
it the aforementioned notoriety, which alone does not a good film make.
What
I didn't expect was the atmosphere, the occasional insight (witness an
early
semi-rape scene involving rape-by-camera), the genuinely creepy close-ups
of
leering, panting men and all the other quirks that make this such a neat
little flick. There is a lot of experimental sort of storytelling in this
movie, as I guess was the style of the time (early seventies), and some of
it is neat and some of it is downright annoying. But the overall effect,
aided in no small part by the music, and aided also by the main
character's
inability to speak (had to have influenced Ms. .45, which came later) as
well as the fact that I don't speak Swedish and this film is neither
dubbed
nor subtitled, is one of being underwater in a very polluted river. And
that
seems perfectly appropriate, since figuratively that's the story of the
protagonist's life.
The close-up hardcore porn footage is used to better effect than I've ever
seen such footage used, as it is supposed to be disturbing and sickening
(anyone who thinks about impersonal images like that when they think about
real sex, the good kind, has got to be a few beers short of a case).
However, it is somewhat over-used. There are some good scenes of
drawn-out,
methodical drug-administering, shotgun-sawing, martial arts training, etc.
that give the film, at times, an edge of realism. This realism is
shattered,
however, by scenes of cars exploding at the slightest impact and the
nails-on-a-chalkboard slo-mo shooting scenes (not just slo-mo,
sloooooooooo
moooooooooo). Comparing this to Peckinpah is like comparing Green Day to
the
Stooges.
However, the entire film was redeemed for me by the last couple of
sequences...one scene of her walking, all clad in black with her eyepatch
and shotgun, amidst some shacks by a pier was straight out of a very dark
western. The whole look of the film, especially the outdoor footage, is
stark and desolate. Makes me want to go to Sweden. I was not let down by
the
last killing...the guy deserved that and more...it's a testament to the
sort
of infectuous quality of this film and the surprising abilities of porn
star
Christina Lindberg that I cared that much and even savored what happens to
this guy. I've never actually savored the film re-enactment of the torture
of a human being before seeing this film. More important than that,
though,
were the stark landscapes and windy, desolate atmosphere of the whole last
sequence. "One-eye"'s cold-as-ice serenity as she sits and waits for her
macabre plan to take effect is more satisfying than any of what she's
waiting for.
All this stark imagery, simplicity and symbolism, I think, makes this film
more of a subversive feminist allegory than any other of its type that
I've
seen; because it is at times almost mythic, it doesn't have to be taken
literally. It doesn't have to be about pimps kidnapping girls and
force-feeding them drugs, it doesnt have to be about shot guns. It does
make
me wonder how Christina Lindberg felt about the film, and what she did
after.
One more thing: does a black-leather-clad, shotgun toting avenger driving
around in a cop car through barren countryside remind you of
anything?
Definitely check this out if you're not squeemish.
23 out of 29 people found the following review useful:
Very Good Rape/Revenge Film, 15 September 2005
![]()
Author:
EVOL666 from St. John's Abortion Clinic
THRILLER is a very well done rape/revenge film in the same vein as LAST
HOUSE ON THE LEFT or I SPIT ON YOUR GRAVE. The storyline is different
but the results are the same...
Girl is raped as a child which causes her to be mute. She is picked up
by a slick-talking guy and taken out for dinner and drinks. Back at his
house, he drugs her and shoots her up with heroin for several days, so
by the time he allows her to wake up out of her heroin-stupor, she is
an addict. At that point she is turned-out as a prostitute and given
some cash and drugs as "payment". She is given some free time to
herself, where she uses the money earned to take karate,shooting, and
driving classes. Needless to say, when she becomes proficient enough in
these disciplines, she uses her newly honed skills to go after those
that did her wrong...
Christina Lindberg is excellent as the beautiful and seemingly innocent
looking mute girl. She is a real pleasure to look at, and the fact that
she's naked through a good portion of the film doesn't hurt either.
There is some "controversy" surrounding this film due to a couple of
hardcore sex scenes (obviously not Ms. Lindberg, unfortunately...) that
appear to be cut from a bad European porno. The scenes are not
necessary for the film but were obviously added to heighten the shock
value of the film overall. Other than those few scenes, and the famous
scalpel-in-the-eye scene, the violence in THRILLER is relatively tame
by exploitation/horror standards. Overall a really good film, if you
are into the rape/revenge genre - I think it's always cool to see a
strong, sexy, female lead who kicks ass, one of the reasons that I
gravitate toward this type of film. The eyeball and sex scenes may be a
little much for the casual movie-goer, more "extreme" fans should like
this one. Recommended...8.5 out of 10
NOTE: Synapse films now has a "Vengeance" addition in a yellow box
(original cover is red) that is the same film minus the XXX scenes.
22 out of 28 people found the following review useful:
compelling fable of abuse and revenge, 24 December 2004
![]()
Author:
fertilecelluloid from Mountains of Madness
The gorgeous nymph Christina Lindberg is a mute woman who is abducted,
drugged and forced into sexual servitude by a slick criminal.
Notable for its hardcore sex sequences which, in my humble opinion,
lend great gravity to Lindberg's unfortunate personal situation, this
revenge drama has a measured, moderate pace and is quite compelling.
Titled THEY CALL HER ONE-EYE in some markets because our heroine does
get her eye poked out by her captor, the film has rarely been seen
uncut until the advent of Synapse Films' recent DVD.
Some scribes have complained that the hardcore sexual material ruins
the film. I don't see any basis for this complaint. The hardcore
honestly portrays the level of abuse Lindberg receives.
The revenge section of THRILLER is labored and stylized. There's no
clear catharsis and there's no joy for the avenging angel.
Director Bo A Vebenius also wrote and produced.
Though called "the roughest revenge movie ever made" by Quentin
Tarantino, it is not particularly rough compared to fare such as FORCED
ENTRY, CAPTURED FOR SEX 2 or ZOOM UP: RAPE SITE.
It is an art-house revenge pic that is well worth seeing. I'm not sure
I'd want to re-see it regularly, though. It does runs slow.
14 out of 15 people found the following review useful:
Torment plus violence equals up to fierce revenge, 10 October 2006
Author:
Camera Obscura from The Dutch Mountains
THRILLER: THEY CALL HER ONE EYE (Bo Arne Vibenius - Sweden 1974).
This is pretty dark and distressing stuff. Apparently Sweden does have
some other cinematic export products besides Ingmar Bergman and Bo
Widerberg. This strange and quite original exploitation gem by Bo Arne
Vibenius recently got a little more attention (if only a little)
because of Quentin Tarantino, who paid homage to this film with KILL
BILL and called it "the roughest revenge picture ever made". For an
exploitation-flick, it's not that rough at all, but it definitely has
some very potent scenes but nothing really gory, and most of all, the
blood and the fighting look so deliciously fake, I doubt anyone could
take it as very disturbing. Most of the time, nothing really happens at
all, but there's a certain atmosphere that makes the film strangely
compelling.
A young girl (Christina Lindberg) is growing up mute after a childhood
sexual assault and spends years working on a remote farm. After missing
the bus one day, she is picked up by a seedy well-dressed man who
kidnaps the girl, gets her addicted to heroine, cuts her left-eye out,
and forces her into slavery and prostitution. Any other girl would give
in, but not this one. She seeks vengeance, and, fortunately, has the
weekends off, so she can learn martial arts, race-driving and military
weaponry.
In some earlier comments I noticed people were put off by some hardcore
pornography, which there was in the earlier DVD-release under the title
THRILLER: A CRUEL PICTURE. Distributor Synapse decided to release the
tamer, but still quite brutal, American version THRILLER: THEY CALL HER
ONE EYE, which is the only version I have seen. I cannot imagine
hardcore pornography would improve the film, so I suggest watching this
"softer" version instead.
This is not a film for those who want fast-paced action, snappy dialog
or basic storytelling and since the main character is a mute girl who
doesn't have a single line in the entire film, it does require some
patience. And don't expect any ingenious fight scenes because the girl
learned martial arts. The fight scenes are filmed in extreme
slow-motion, quite tedious. The film also bares distinction in having a
very strange sound mix by Ralph Lundsten, who composed a very memorable
music score that one distinctly associates with this film, quite
unique. Needless to say, the film was made on a shoestring, but
Vibenius does show cinematic flair in the use of locations (on Öland)
and some truly magnificent shots. What about that shot with the camera
on top of a police car between the two sirens? Sheer beauty!
Hard to compare this film to anything I've seen. Well, it's a Swedish
revenge-flick, so how many of these are there? It's unlike anything
made before at the time (and up till now, supposedly). A film with some
- mostly budget-related - shortcomings, but by any means, a genuine
original.
Camera Obscura --- 7/10
10 out of 12 people found the following review useful:
Gritty Swedish revenge thriller., 17 February 2005
![]()
Author:
HumanoidOfFlesh from Chyby, Poland
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
Girls are kidnapped by a sadistic pimp,turned into heroin addicts and dumped into a brothel,there to suffer hideous mistreatment in the hands of sweating,overweight customers.A mute girl Madeleine(Christina Lindberg),escapes and finally exterminates her tormentors with a sawed-off shotgun."Thriller:A Cruel Picture" is a notorious Swedish exploitation film which has a strange,almost dreamy feeling.The killings are long and bloody,so I was enthralled.The use of extreme slow motion during death scenes is certainly impressive.Christina Lindberg is simply excellent as a mute girl who becomes a killing machine.The most controversial aspect about "Thriller:A Cruel Picture",aside from the bloody violence,is the presence of several ugly hard-core sex scenes that show the girl's prostitution work in graphic detail.So if you are a fan of grindhouse exploitation stuff give this film a look.Check out also "Breaking Point" by Bo Arne Vibenius which is even more pornographic and demented.7 out of 10.
11 out of 14 people found the following review useful:
Slow, effective, but probably unrepeatable, 3 February 2005
Author:
FilmFlaneur from London
Vengeance, or so the saying goes, is a dish best served cold. This film
certainly exemplifies this maxim, and in the process comes across as if
Bergman had done Deathwish. (Thriller's director had actually worked as
on Persona as an assistant, and indeed some of the Nordic glumness here
reminds one of the greater director) Its one of those titles which,
long unavailable to the interested viewer, provokes a huge amount of
curiosity and its arrival on DVD with some useful extras, is to be
welcomed. It also has the cool cachet of a recommendation by Quentin
Tarantino, who for purposes of reference duly inserted a one-eyed
assassin of his own into Kill Bill.
Seen today Thriller remains a striking film, even much of the shock
value has evaporated - apart from the hard core sequences as the
heroine, by now a unwilling heroine addict, is abused and degraded.
These moments were a principal reason for the film's truncation for the
States and elsewhere, even though now they seem part and parcel of the
message, reinforcing the intimate distress of what is being done. In
fact apart from the opening and discreetly filmed child rape, as well
as the assault on Madeline's eyeball about a third of the way in,
there's hardly much action at all - and which when it does appear,
given director Vibenius' infatuation with slow-mo violence (interesting
at first, avant garde when continued, a tad tedious when it carries on)
tends to slow matters down considerably. Much of the fighting is done
in this same manner, and while the drawn out bullet ballets piercing
shirts lead to certain fascination, the technique also shows up the
cheap special effects on offer, or distractingly emphasises the
illogicality of bodies recoiling *into* bullets and actors reacting too
slowly to the impact. But whether deliberately or not such trick
effects distance the viewer from the emotions of events; instead the
mechanics of retaliation and murder are drawn out in almost fetishistic
fashion, just as Madeline will savour coldly the extended demise of
Tony in the closing scenes.
On the plus side the deliberate nature of it all, and the slow build up
to Madeline's revenge, gives the audience ample time to side with the
central character and contemplate the stages of her increasing torment.
And during the wait, her enforced silence communicates far more than
acres of embittered dialogue might have. The result is a degree of
audience sympathy that's quite a way from the usual exploitation
product, and by virtue of the fact that sometimes less means more,
accumulates considerably more dignity for the victim along the way.
There's still plenty of 70's cheesy decor on show (Madeline's principal
abuser and abductor, Tony, in particular recalls a sleazy Jason King)
but the film is distinguished by its refusal to hurry and draws out the
angst suffered by the main character with quiet understatement, an
effective process which gets under the skin.
Its a film worth seeing for this rather unique flavour; whether or not
it will repay repeated viewings is less certain as, apart from
Christine Lindberg's stoic performance, non of the other actors make
much of an impression. Director Vibernius, who apparently took on this
production to pay for the flop of his last, only made one more film
after this, the even more exploitative Breaking Point. In Thriller,
where perhaps he succeeded for the only time in creating a near art
house style for grind house subject matter, he also appears as a hot
dog salesman.
15 out of 24 people found the following review useful:
woulda been a lot better without the porn inserts, 12 November 2004
Author:
movieman_kev from United States
After being sexually molested as a small child, Frigga (the beautiful
Christina Lindberg) becomes mute. Fast forward about 15 years, and
after missing a bus to go to her therapy she accepts a ride from a
shady character. Before long she's reduced to being a heroin addict
with one eye (courtesy of her new pimp when she claws the face of her
first trick). After a montage of her getting trained in guns, karate
and driving as well as some ill-advised hardcore porn shots, she gets
her revenge.
Let's start with what I liked about this film. Christina Linberg is
very appealing, the ending is pretty damn good and i DID enjoy the film
overall. What I din't like about the movie is those hard-core porn
inserts which detract from the flow of the film and were NOT needed,
the fact that EVERY fight was in
sllllllllllllllloooooooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwww motion
bored me to no end, Despina Tomazani looked like a post-op transvestite
as the lesbian trick, that upset me. But as I said all in all a solid
exploitation film.
My Grade: B-
Synapse DVD Extras: TV spot; Theatrical trailer; "Thriller" trailer;
double-bill trailer for "Hooker's Revenge (the reissue title for this
film) and "Photographer's Models" ( the nonsensical reissue title of
"House of Whipcord"); some outtakes; a few photo montages; a "story in
pictures" segment that runs by at lightning speed; and cast and crew
filmographies
7 out of 10 people found the following review useful:
'Special' in more than one way, 23 April 2005
![]()
Author:
stamper from The Netherlands
Thriller is not your average film. It wasn't in 1974 and it isn't in
2005 (31 years later). I must say, that I find it hard to describe the
film, although the plot is relatively simple. What makes it difficult
to describe this film is the way it is presented. First of all, despite
not being an adult film, there are a hand full of penetration scenes
which neither arouse nor sicken, which are thus basically useless for
the plot or entertainment (if ANY elaborate penetration-scene can
actually add something to ANY film is another question). On the other
side though, this there is little action in this one to qualify as an
action film and I must admit that most action scenes are badly executed
(the spontaneous combustion of cars being one example). The exception
to this is the hand-combat scene at the docks, which is excellent. The
shoot-outs on the other hand however are at times excruciatingly long
and useless. On top of that, the film also suffers a bit from the lack
of dialog, although I must honestly say, that the acting (especially by
Christina Lindberg) was of such quality that you didn't feel like
turning the film off (which is strange for an adult film IF this
qualifies as one).
The film has other qualities as well though. I was especially baffled
by the quality of the special effects and in some way I feel that the
film actually deserves a spot in movie history. Despite being somewhat
slow and really not action-packed, I feel that this film among the
first female-lead action film ever made. I know credit is often given
to Mrs. Weaver and Mr.Scott for that (Alien), but I think this one
might be in for the race, don't you? Of course there are other films in
that race as well, like Coffy, Foxy Brown and perhaps Cleopatra Jones,
which I haven't seen, but this one ranks right up there as a female
version of Death Wish. That fact alone and the fact that this is a
cheap, slightly pornographic Swedish film make this one special - or
maybe just a rarity. I just know what it certainly isn't, a must-see.
6,25 out of 10 (with a 6 given upon voting)
post scriptum: this film isn't cruel in any kind of way and really
doesn't warrant a 20 minute cut to receive an R rating. The adult parts
didn't last that long did they? If you're talking blood, Reservoir Dogs
is much crueler if you ask me.
2 out of 2 people found the following review useful:
She's totally nuts. She should be in a nuthouse., 10 March 2009
![]()
Author:
lastliberal from United States
I glanced at a couple of Bergman films the other day, but couldn't get
into them. This film shows that there is something other than Bergman
out of Sweden.
I heard that this was a predecessor to Baise-moi, and I wanted to see
Christina Lindberg, who I watched recently in Sex & Fury. If you are
not looking for a Baise-moi type movie, then there is a R Rated version
of this film called They Called Her One Eye.
I thought for a moment I was watching Bergman's The Silence, as there
was no dialog. Madeliene (Christina Lindberg) never does talk in this
film. Things don't move very fast either. It is excruciatingly slow.
She is taken by a scumbag (Heinz Hopf) that hooks her on heroin and has
her prostitute herself after he stabbed one of her eyes out.
She gets Mondays off, and apparently, she manages to use them to learn
karate, driving and shooting. Of course, she is still hooked while
doing this, which stretches credulity.
The sex scenes are raw, and you do not know if she is using a double.
Maybe they were just porno clips spliced into the film.
Once she is ready, she gets a shotgun, saws it off and seeks revenge.
The blood effects were really pathetic. Some of the things just didn't
make sense along the way. I guess that is why Bo Arne Vibenius only had
a three-film career.
1 out of 1 people found the following review useful:
Super Seventies: The revenge flick! They Called Her One Eye., 27 August 2005
![]()
Author:
Miyagis_Sweaty_wifebeater (sirjosephu@aol.com) from Sacramento, CA
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
They Called Her One Eye (1974) was a unique entry into the revenge
flick genre. A young woman (Christina Lindberg) get's hooked up with
the wrong guy. She's turned out and becomes his little money maker. Her
life as she knew it was over, After years of abuse and repeated rapes,
she decides their only one thing she can do. Seek revenge! Using her
pillow money and tips that she's earned, the vengeful woman buys the
services of a couple of mercenaries and a race car driver. So, between
turning tricks she learns how to shoot, fight and drive. When she
masters all of these skills she puts her plan into effect.
Her targets are her employers and any trick that get's in her way.
After scoring some meds from a local "pharmacutical distributor", she
starts the blood shed. No one is safe from her pent of fury as she
takes out anyone who gets in her way. Saving the best for last, she has
special plans for her pimp. A torturous death is in store for him. Her
final victim, now she can rest in peace knowing that her tormentors are
dead and buried. Several cuts of this film were made ranging from P.G.
to Adults Only. This highly influential film was pilfered by Quentin
Tarantino for his movie KILL BILL. If you don't believe me then watch
it.
Recommended for revenge flick fans.
| Page 1 of 8: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] |
| Plot summary | Ratings | External reviews |
| Parents Guide | Plot keywords | Main details |
| Your user reviews | Your vote history |