During the Civil War, a young man enthusiastically joins the Union army thirsting to find glory and honor, but his first battle opens his eyes to the reality of how un-glorious and dishonorable war really is.
Keep track of everything you watch; tell your friends.
If your account is linked with Facebook and you have turned on sharing, this will show up in your activity feed. If not, you can turn on sharing
here
.
During the Civil War, a young man enthusiastically joins the Union army thirsting to find glory and honor, but his first battle opens his eyes to the reality of how un-glorious and dishonorable war really is.
Narrator:
Into this wilderness came two great armies - 190,000 men... all of them expendable. The company of the 304th New York was among the smallest, the greenest and the most expendable of all.
See more »
The 1974 TV version directed by Lee Phillips is a fine attempt to bring Crane's novel to life. All the actors are good and the film is generally well-directed. The score by Jack Elliot is a highlight as well.
But this film does not compare favorably with John Huston's great, tragically truncated masterwork from 1951. Even with the supposed great death scene for Royal Dano and other legendary moments lost forever, and its superfluous narration, Huston's film is a great, unforgettable experience. It captures the terrible fear and self-doubt within so many young men in a combat situation. And its visual style is deeply poetic and expressive. As good as Richard Thomas is in 1974, he cannot approach the performance of Audie Murphy (later shown to be a much more limited actor than Thomas) who conveys an amazing immediacy and truth throughout.
This TV version is well worth seeing, but the Huston film must not be ignored in its favor.
8 of 11 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
The 1974 TV version directed by Lee Phillips is a fine attempt to bring Crane's novel to life. All the actors are good and the film is generally well-directed. The score by Jack Elliot is a highlight as well.
But this film does not compare favorably with John Huston's great, tragically truncated masterwork from 1951. Even with the supposed great death scene for Royal Dano and other legendary moments lost forever, and its superfluous narration, Huston's film is a great, unforgettable experience. It captures the terrible fear and self-doubt within so many young men in a combat situation. And its visual style is deeply poetic and expressive. As good as Richard Thomas is in 1974, he cannot approach the performance of Audie Murphy (later shown to be a much more limited actor than Thomas) who conveys an amazing immediacy and truth throughout.
This TV version is well worth seeing, but the Huston film must not be ignored in its favor.