The Clockmaker of St. Paul
(1974)
|
|
| 0Share... |
The Clockmaker of St. Paul
(1974)
|
|
| 0Share... |
| Cast overview, first billed only: | |||
| Philippe Noiret | ... | ||
| Jean Rochefort | ... | ||
|
|
Jacques Denis | ... |
Antoine - un ami de Michel
|
|
|
Yves Afonso | ... |
L'officer de police Bricard
|
|
|
Julien Bertheau | ... |
Edouard - un ami de Michel
|
|
|
Jacques Hilling | ... |
Costes - un journaliste
|
|
|
Clotilde Joano | ... |
Janine Boitard - une journaliste
|
|
|
Andrée Tainsy | ... |
Madeleine Fourmet - qui a élevé Bernard
|
|
|
William Sabatier | ... |
L'avocat
|
|
|
Cécile Vassort | ... |
Martine - une ouvrière
|
|
|
Sylvain Rougerie | ... |
Bernard Descombes - le fils de Michel
|
|
|
Christine Pascal | ... |
Liliane Torrini - la compagne de Bernard
|
|
|
Liza Braconnier | ... |
La femme de ménage
|
|
|
Hervé Morel | ... |
Bricard's assistant
|
|
|
Sacha Bauer | ... |
Le juge d'instruction
|
Michel Descombes is a watchmaker in the district of Saint-Paul, Lyons. He lives quietly, alone with his almost grown-up son, Bernard. One day, the police come and say Bernard murdered a FACTORY OWNER. Superintendent Guiboud asks Michel for help. But Michel realizes how little he knows about his son. He also starts to feel he is unable to blame his son. Written by Yepok
L'HORLOGER is faultless. Based on a Simenon novel, it is a measured take on crime, not from the usual point of view of the criminal or the detective, but the waiting father, who must come to terms with his own past and deceptions as a parent.
In avoiding melodrama, the film follows a determinedly unsensational, grey, flat, mundane route. Tavernier rejected the flashiness of the nouvelle vague, in favour of older traditions of French cinema, with emphasis on character, and milieu, meaningful camera movements, and a literate, complex screenplay, while also linking cinematic tradition to his narrative of fathers and sons.
His recreation of Lyons is novel after a decade of Paris overkill, and you can feel the post-1968 political tension, the alarming shift to the right, and the straying of decent men into violence. Phillipe Noiret, one of Europe's greatest actors, is quietly astounding. Everything about the film is as good as it should be. So why, if I may say so under IMDb guidelines, isn't it very interesting?