| Jeane Manson | ... | Kitty (as Jean Manson) | |
| Ashley Porter | ... | Joanne | |
| Angela Elayne Gibbs | ... | Michelle (as Angela Gibbs) | |
| Zack Taylor | ... | Donahue | |
| Jack La Rue Jr. | ... | Ben | |
| William Joyce | ... | Fairbanks | |
| Allan Arbus | ... | Krebs | |
| Mary Doyle | ... | Nurse Dockett | |
| Don Keefer | ... | Chemist | |
| Linda Towne | ... | Chris Whiting | |
| Jay Burton | ... | Chicken's Manager | |
| John Thompson | ... | Chicken | |
| Kimberly Hyde | ... | Peppermint | |
| Nan Martin | ... | Woman Reporter | |
| Sally Kirkland | ... | Woman at Clinic | |
| Terrill Maguire | ... | Girl at Clinic | |
| Dick Miller | ... | Cop | |
| Samuel Fuller | ... | Doc Haskell (as Sam Fuller) | |
| James Anthony | ... | Male Nurse | |
| Jeff Young | ... | Anesthetist | |
| Tom Baker | ... | Floyd | |
| Caro Kenyatta | ... | Lester | |
| Mantan Moreland | ... | Old Man (as Man Tan Moreland) |
Directed by | |||
| Clint Kimbrough | (as Clinton Kimbro) | ||
Writing credits | ||
| Howard R. Cohen | (screenplay) | |
Produced by | |||
| Julie Corman | .... | producer | |
Original Music by | |||
| Gregory Prestopino | |||
Cinematography by | |||
| Daniel Lacambre | |||
Film Editing by | |||
| Karen Johnson | |||
Production Design by | |||
| Tim Kincaid | |||
Art Direction by | |||
| Barbara Peeters | |||
Makeup Department | |||
| Ron Foreman | .... | makeup artist | |
Production Management | |||
| Nicole Scott | .... | production manager | |
Second Unit Director or Assistant Director | |||
| Pancho Kohner | .... | second unit director | |
| George Van Noy | .... | assistant director | |
Sound Department | |||
| Jim Heinlen | .... | boom operator | |
| James M. Tanenbaum | .... | sound (as James Evergreen) | |
Camera and Electrical Department | |||
| Don Clark | .... | gaffer | |
| Sam Clement | .... | camera operator | |
| Michael Ferris | .... | grip (as Mike Ferris) | |
| Leslie Otis | .... | assistant camera | |
Costume and Wardrobe Department | |||
| Linda Towne | .... | wardrobe | |
Editorial Department | |||
| Hal Harrison | .... | assistant editor (as Hal L. Harrison Jr.) | |
| George Van Noy | .... | editing supervisor | |
Other crew | |||
| Frances Doel | .... | script supervisor | |
| John Murray | .... | location manager (as Johnny Murray) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Night Call Nurses | Candy Stripe Nurses | Felicity | The Student Nurses | Revenge of the Cheerleaders |
|
IMDb User Rating: |
IMDb User Rating: |
IMDb User Rating: |
IMDb User Rating: |
IMDb User Rating: |
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| News articles | IMDb Thriller section | IMDb USA section |
This movie was a follow-up to the hit Roger Corman quickie The Student Nurses and went along similar lines, but had a completely different cast and no story carry-over. Once again, the idea was to weave together a story of young professionals trying to succeed amid the temptations of the swinging early 70s. The cast are attractive but very inexperienced unknowns and the script does them few favors. The story focuses on a drug ring operating out of the hospital where the trainee nurses work, and they decide to investigate, an action that runs counter to the usual anti-establishment tone of the series. Beyond that nothing much of interest happens. Mostly this was just another exercise in soft-core titillation, with the camera following the girls in their tight uniforms along hospital corridors, and then off to parties where they smoke dope, take off their tops and have sex.
The problem here is that the series creators were pretty much out of fresh ideas and so just recycled the same old character conflicts from earlier in the series: sexist doctors, older nurses who aren't with it and rigid administrators who are more concerned with protocol than patient care. Yawn. As a result this movie is now not very entertaining, except perhaps as camp. The dialogue probably sounded fairly hip at the time (or maybe it didn't) but it is pretty laughable now, and unless the viewer couldn't get enough of 1973 and is looking for a groovy, mod era experience, and any old one will do, I would avoid this type of movie at this point. It's cheap-jack, not very well or very imaginatively made and even fails to satisfy as exploitation, since very little sensationalistic happens and nothing happens that we hadn't already seen in the earlier installments.