The Triple Echo (1972) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
13 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Cult Movies 20
TYLERdurden748 November 1998
20. THE TRIPLE ECHO (war-drama, 1973) England, WW2: Homesteader Alice (Glenda Jackson) has been left a widow by the war so now has to work the farm on her own. Soldier Barton offers to help her out. They eventually become friends then lovers. Not wanting to go back to the front, Barton goes AWOL. Alice helps him by disguising him as her 'sister Katy'. Successfully fleeing detection, their relationship turns sour, as Barton becomes accustomed to his new femininity. Even worse when visiting 'Sergeant' (Oliver Reed) takes an interest at 'Katy'.

Critique: Bizarre, at times unpleasant little film has stuck with me ever since I saw it. Maybe my impressionable age at the time contributed to its lasting impact but after watching it for only the second time, I find it very original, exciting and tragic. It also reminded me of Ed Wood's infamous 'Glen or Glenda' (one of the earliest cross-dressing films), and of Sydney Pollack's Oscar winning 'Tootsie' (starring Dustin Hoffman). In those, and many others since, the emphasis is based on the whole plot's comedy-plus value. The interplay struggle to inhibit their natural desires, disgust at dressing up, and shedding their 'machismo'.

Our film's hero, however, is further enticed into the role and even his personality changes. Jealousy, drama and a sisterly-type relation develops. It is only too late that he discovers what a mess this has gotten him into.

Perplexing study of isolation benefits from a good cast. Oliver Reed's brutish 'Sergeant' is the standout. The surprising ending adds to the film's abstract nature.
14 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Unusually plotted psychological drama
Leofwine_draca19 August 2016
THE TRIPLE ECHO is a sedate, slow paced psychological drama with a few characters interacting in a barren and isolated landscape. It's a one-of-a-kind type film that offers up some interesting characterisation and an unusual storyline. The film was directed by Hollywood director Michael Apted (GORILLAS IN THE MIST) as one of the first things he made outside of television.

The unknown-to-me actor Brian Deacon plays a frustrated young soldier who happens by a lonely farmhouse occupied by grieving widow Glenda Jackson. The two embark on an affair, although it transpires that Jackson is a little disturbed by her history. For his part, Deacon's had enough of the army, so he decides to go A.W.O.L., masquerading as Jackson's sister. Their happiness is short-lived when other local soldiers call by and one of them takes a shine to Deacon, mistaking him for a woman.

The cross-dressing aspect of the tale is what makes this unusual. It's hard to believe that the rugged Oliver Reed would genuinely mistake Deacon for a woman, but there you go. The climax has an air of inevitable tragedy to it, so a sense of foreboding seeps over the latter stages of the film. The central performances are subtle and effective, although Reed is something of a scene-stealer as the flamboyant and utterly horrid army sergeant.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Unusual love story is seldom certain what tone to take
moonspinner5524 July 2017
Glenda Jackson once again proves to be the British equivalent of Bette Davis--in fact, "The Triple Echo" might have been an ideal vehicle for Davis had it been produced two decades earlier. In 1942 Wiltshire, a farm woman mourning the capture of her husband by the Japanese befriends a young soldier passing across her land; after several visits, they become intimate and he decides to go "over the hill," but their affair is complicated by his being cooped up, hiding in the house all day. What's more, she has dressed him in her clothes and begins telling the people in town that her sister is now staying with her. Maddening story begins as jaunty fare, takes a turn into melodrama and ends on a tragic note, with the young soldier now in full drag and fending off the advances of a randy tank sergeant. Jackson retains her stubbornly sensible dignity, even when the plot goes off the rails. She's a decent, forthright, romantic-minded woman, a salt-of-the-earth type who can be mother, big sister and lover at different intervals. As the pushy sergeant who won't take no for an answer, Oliver Reed has a one-note bullying role, and director Michael Apted never steps in to scale him back. ** from ****
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
curious, but could have been better
didi-510 August 2003
An unusual little feature which teams Glenda Jackson and Oliver Reed with, making his debut, Brian Deacon.

Deacon plays an AWOL soldier who goes to Jackson for help and ends up posing as her visiting sister, a role he grows to identify with. Reed plays a sneery officer who becomes interested in the the 'sister'. Cue a rather convoluted plot which inevitably ends in tragedy.

Jackson is the best thing in this - a tired, lonely farmer looking for companionship and making tough decisions. But the film is - although fascinating - ultimately unsatisfying and seems to step back from the scenario it took such care to create just as it gets interesting.
11 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Paranthetical Reed/Jackson Flick
TheFearmakers21 May 2022
In any movie where a man has to dress up like a woman, for whatever reason, there's the one genuine manly male who wants to give that so-called female a test ride wherein the truth will be discovered...

So when it's stocky firebrand Oliver Reed as a World War II era tank sergeant, lusting after a deserted soldier hiding out in widowed Glenda Jackson's rural chicken farm while (romancing her and) posing as his sister, this otherwise searing romantic drama turns into a heated thriller...

That's because Reed (reunited with his WOMEN IN LOVE co-star Jackson yet sharing more scenes opposite fitfully feminine/literal pretty boy Brian Deacon) is like a bomb ready to explode: in more ways than one...

And he's never been so frightening and formidable, also providing Michael Apted's THE TRIPLE ECHO a sense of horror/exploitation in a bizarre curio that, while predictable, you'll have to squirm through till the end.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An echo of three lonely souls
EJverh22 February 2013
I have loved this film ever since I first saw it, so much so that I had bought a VHS tape AND the player, as this forgotten gem is unfortunately still not available on DVD. I will not explain the plot, as the synopsis is covered rather detailed on the first page, but concentrate on the specifics. Michael Apted, from the first shot, creates a certain mood of the film which is very effective that once in, the viewer is fully engaged to the end (despite certain plot and screenplay shortcomings) and that is isolation and loneliness. And this emotion is shared by all three central characters, shaping their decisions and actions. A fitting title, as well, as we do have a three-way character development here. They all want the same things. Brian Deacon's loneliness is in his alienation and is very much a need to belong. Oliver Reed's is purely physical and Glenda shares both. All the actors are very good in their portrayals. However, Glenda Jackson's performance is what glues the whole story together. A brilliant turn, and probably her most subtle that I have seen. The silent looks that she gives are priceless. Alas, this is a forgotten gem. I don't think it will ever get a DVD release, unfortunately. But a must see, for sure. Especially if you like for those rare, character and performance driven dramas, all too rare in today's market. 8 1/2 out of 10
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Alice: Prisoner of War (Movie: Intended as a tragedy, marketed as a comedy, sabotaged)
CarlNaamanBrown7 September 2015
Warning: Spoilers
(I have found "triple echo" referenced in cardiology, architecture, but most searches give returns to this movie or to the book it is based on. In square dance calling, a Triple Echo is to do concepts 1, 2, 3, then concepts 2 & 3, then concept 3. I do not recall an explanation by H.E. Bates even though I remember reading his essay on writing the book.)

"Triple Echo" UK 1972 was sold in the US as "Soldier in Skirts" 1973. US audiences expected a drag farce (maybe a "Some Like It Hot" in uniform) but instead were served a very dark tragedy. It did not go over well. Leonard Maltin gave "Triple Echo" 3 of 4 stars as drama; other reviewers gave "Soldier in Skirts" a dud bomb. I'll compromise at five stars.

The setting is the English countryside in 1943, the 5th year of WWII for the British. Farmwife Alice's husband is a POW of the Japanese and she is working their farm alone. The soldier Barton stops by the farm wandering about on leave from the Army.

Alice and Barton get romantically involved. He doesn't want to return to the Army. She doesn't want him to leave. They decide that he'll go AWOL.

She can't have a man living at the farm (too many questions) and the Army looks for runaway soldiers especially in wartime. So Alice disguises him as her sister Cathy from the big city. He grows into accepting the sister role living full time as Cathy.

Then the blustering sergeant from the local Army base shows up at the farm scouting for a date for the base Christmas dance (but expecting sex afterward). Cathy tries to persuade Alice it would be fun to get out of the coop and go to the dance. When Alice won't go, Cathy goes him/herself and tragedy descends. People expecting a farce or comedy were not prepared for the ending.*

Throughout the movie there are symbols like dark storms, birds free and confined, an ailing dog that has to be put down. People who like to study such things in films liked "Triple Echo"--people expecting a comedy hated "Soldier in Skirts".

What most people notice about the movie is that Barton starts off reluctantly being groomed and dressed by Alice as her sister, then grows accustomed to being presented as Cathy, finally becoming her enthusiastically. Barton's role reversal is obvious. I wonder what is going on in Alice's head. Reviewer Pauline Kael brought up an interesting point: groomed and dressed by Alice, Cathy is more feminine than Alice who is stern, drab and mannish for most of the movie.

Part of the book and movie is about traditional male roles and their impact on Alice's life. Alice is alone because her husband took up his manly duties and went off to war becoming a prisoner of war. The sergeant is a blustering male stereotype (the only comic element in the movie). Barton is AWOL--away without leave shirking his manly duties. Ultimately the story is about a lonely woman who has lost her husband to the intrusion of war into her life, then loses her lover to the intrusion of war into her life and then symbolically declares war on war itself.

______________

*SPOILER ALERT -- even though the movie ending is very different and more violent. In the book, at the dance the sergeant suspects "Cathy" is a man but says and does nothing; the next day Sarge comes to the farm to arrest the AWOL Barton and Alice shoots both of them. The movie ending is bloodier. It is tragedy, not comedy.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Enjoyable, almost unbelievable, film about army deserter in WW2.
dennis-42231 July 2006
Triple Echo, based on the H E Bates story, is a well-directed and well-acted film about a lonely woman (Jackson) on a farm who is visited by a young soldier (Deacon) and they soon become lovers. He decides to avoid being captured as a deserter by dressing as a woman and pretending he is Jackson's sister. A surly sergeant-major (Reed) falls for her (his) charms and invites the 'sisters' to a Christmas dance at the barracks. In a back room, Reed discovers 'her' real sex. The soldier escapes but is eventually caught. It is one of Reed's best performances, and although the plot is barely believable, the film is highly entertaining.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A rather odd film
christopher-underwood14 March 2022
A rather odd film. Glenda Jackson is on a small farm as her husband is lost in WW2 in Japan and a young man starting live with her and he is going AWOL locally. For a while all seems fine and then there is the wonderful idea that he dresses up as a girl so that he will not attract attention from the army. Then comes Oliver Reed who thinks him a girl and fancies him/her. It is really silly and I rather think that Reed has decided to treat the thing as a laugh and is well over the top. In actual fact as it happens the terrible Xmas party where he takes the young man along and the scene is excellent and reminds me of Milos Forman's The Fireman's Ball (1967).
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Sexual Triangle
JamesHitchcock17 August 2018
"The Triple Echo" is one of those films with different names on opposite sides of the Atlantic. Its original British title is a mysterious one, the significance of which is never made clear in the film itself. In America, however, it was released as "Soldier in Skirts", apparently as part of a misleading advertising campaign to persuade audiences that it is a comedy. (It is nothing of the sort). Although I am reasonably familiar with the works of H.E. Bates, I must admit that I have never read the novella upon which this film is based. It came out in 1972; another film based on a Bates novella, "Dulcima", had appeared the previous year.

The story is set during World War II somewhere on the chalk downlands of Southern England. Alice Charlesworth is a farmer's wife left to run the farm on her own during her husband's absence on military service; we learn that he is being held prisoner by the Japanese. She meets a young soldier named Barton, himself a farmer's son knowledgeable about both agriculture and mechanics, who is able to help her around the farm.. (We later learn that his initials are J.L. but never discover what those initials stand for). The two become first friends, then lovers, and finally Barton, who has never had any liking for military life, decides to desert from the army.

Alice agrees to shelter him, but realising that the sudden appearance of a young man in civilian clothes on the farm will give rise to suspicion, persuades him to disguise himself as a woman. She is able to explain away the sudden appearance of a young woman by saying that this is her sister Jill. (Barton, not liking the name Jill, subsequently renames himself Cathy). A complication arises when a sergeant from a nearby military base takes a fancy to the supposed "Cathy". Alice, terrified that Barton will give himself away, insists that he stays inside as much as possible, but he soon tires of this lifestyle and risks going out in his female disguise. The climax of the film comes, when, against Alice's wishes, he insists on attending a Christmas party being held at the local barracks.

Pauline Kael pointed out the sexual role reversal that lies at the heart of this film. Both Barton and Alice begin to take on characteristics more traditionally associated with the opposite sex. With Alice, this is more obvious from the beginning, as she has been forced into the "masculine" role of farm manager by her husband's absence. Barton initially does not seem at all "feminine", but once forced into the role of "Cathy" begins to act more like a woman, while Alice, who wears the trousers both literally and figuratively in their relationship, becomes more domineering. This is a situation which requires some subtle acting, and it is provided not only by Glenda Jackson, a leading star of the British acting profession before she gave it up to go into politics, but also by the lesser-known Brian Deacon, an actor I had not come across before.

The third member of this sexual triangle is Oliver Reed's sergeant, and this is a role which seems to call for some very unsubtle acting. (And nobody could do unsubtle like Reed). The sergeant is a vulgar lout of a man-, bullying, swaggering and lustful, and arrogant enough to believe that no woman could possibly resist his doubtful charms. He might, at least on one interpretation of the film, be seen as representing heterosexual masculinity at its crudest. Deacon, however, for all his feminised behaviour, never makes a very convincing woman in visual terms, which made me wonder if the sergeant, at some subconscious level, realised that "Cathy" is really a man and was attracted to him/her because of some latent homosexuality. On this interpretation the sergeant's rage when he discovers the truth would be not just anger at having been tricked but also self-loathing on account of his hidden homosexual tendencies. Reed's performance, therefore, may be less unsubtle than it initially seems.

I think that there is a reason why the sergeant has to be so unpleasant. We have to aware just how reprehensible the behaviour of Barton and Alice would have seemed in wartime. By deserting, Barton has betrayed his country, his comrades and the cause of freedom for which they are fighting. By sheltering him Alice has not only made herself complicit in his treachery but has also betrayed her husband who is suffering great hardship for his country's sake. (British prisoners held by the Japanese were treated much more harshly than those held by the Germans). It is, however, necessary for dramatic purposes that the audience should have some sympathy with the erring couple, so their antagonist has to be as unsympathetic as possible.

Director Michael Apted makes good use of the English countryside, here seen in one of its bleaker moods. (The film was shot in Wiltshire, a country dominated by bare, open chalk downlands). The 1970s were not the greatest period in the history of the British cinema, but we were occasionally capable of producing decent films, often with a historical setting, and this is one of them. (Another is Joseph Losey's "The Go-Between" from two years earlier). This film is not particularly well-known today, but in my opinion it deserves to be. 8/10

A goof. During a scene set in springtime, we hear a radio broadcast giving news of the Battle of El Alamein. This battle, however, was fought during the autumn, in October and November of 1942.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Peculiar, small-scale story.
barnabyrudge21 May 2003
The Triple Echo is, for want of a better word, queer. It's hard to see what commercial appeal the film ever had, if indeed if ever had any. It is also hard to see how the production team and the actors ever felt that it could have much merit as art or entertainment. That's not to say that it is a bad film, for it has plenty to recommend it; it just seems necessary to point out that it is a truly odd project to have been considered for the big screen.

The story tells of a widowed woman living on a farm during WWII. A deserting soldier appears on her property seeking shelter; she takes a liking to him (he is, after all, helpful and energetic around the farm) and eventually decides to help him to evade capture by disguising him as her sister. However, a crude army officer from the nearby garrison starts to fancy "her", until he realises that "she" is actually a "he".

The three principle performances are very good, and the English countryside is painted lovingly throughout. The ending contains a genuinely surprising and jolting twist. There's even a brief dash of sex and bad language to give the film a bit of that typical 70s realism (though, obviously, the story is set during the 40s). What damages this film is the fact that it is such a thin and directionless story. This would have made a splendid 60 minute TV drama, but as a feature length theatrical release, there is simply not enough material to keep you intrigued, interested and entertained for an hour and thirty three minutes or so.
9 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Creepy twists make this uncomfortable to watch.
mark.waltz16 June 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I'm not referring to the sight of awol World War II soldier Brian Deacon in drag, but the characterization of Army officer Oliver Reed who not only ogles Deacon but makes sickening physical and verbal gestures in his efforts to get Deacon (whom he assumes to be a woman) to go out with him. Every gesture he makes reveals a vile and coarse man, and the threat of Deacon being exposed for his disguise brings on the fear of violence from the obviously unbalanced character that Reed plays. On the other side of the spectrum is Glenda Jackson as the farm woman whose husband is being held inside a Japanese prison camp, having helped hide Deacon and ending up in an affair with him. She's naturally protective of Deacon, both for her feelings for him, but his disguised female identity as well, threatening to kill Reed until Deacon all of a sudden announces that he/she is going out with Reed regardless of whether Jackson likes it or not.

One of those weird, artsy dramas that obviously didn't create much of a stir, in spite of the fact that Jackson was hot stuff at the time, having appeared with Reed in "Women in Love", winning an Oscar for it. Certainly, it's not a stretch of the imagination that a soldier would attempt such a disguise, and Deacon dressed as Jill is certainly a lovely facade. But the film just gets really odd once Reed pops up on the scene, his character just too reprehensible to even enjoy hating. The rural setting adds to the believability of Jackson's loneliness, and she's terrific as always, absolutely mesmerizing. The direction by Michael Apted also aides in giving this an ugly, depressing viewpoint with an ending that obviously had the audience walking out without a soud. I saw this in my early 20's, found it depressing and bizarre then, and the past three decades haven't altered that. There isn't so much a conclusion as there is an ending that doesn't make the film seem complete, the result of an indecisive script and the fact that the writers didn't seem to care about the audience.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
"Dippy, Dippy, Dippy."
RatedVforVinny5 November 2019
If you have ever seen this cult classic, you will have already understood my title and its meaning. Oliver Reed is magnificent in this movie and the prime reason I'm rating it a lofty nine. He's the embodiment of evil, although this is not a horror film of the supernatural. It is though a very well acted and highly disturbing drama; that once seen will never be forgotten. Possibly a reason why it never gets shown on T.V, or took an absolute age even to get a DVD release. I really wonder what a modern audience would actually make of it!?
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed