|Page 1 of 2:|| |
|Index||17 reviews in total|
15 out of 16 people found the following review useful:
Very Strange, but has it's Moments, 23 February 2003
Author: richard winters (rwint) from Chicago, Illinois
Much maligned film is really not as bad as it's reputation states. Yes
the scenes and scenarios are at times awkward and stilted. The sets and
color schemes run from being drab to horribly garish. The music and is loud
and obnoxious and doesn't fit the mood of the film at all. Also despite
having the name in it's title and being all about rhinos you never actually
see one. Sure it's low budget, but even some stock footage of one from
"Wild Kingdom" would have helped.
Yet even with all this the film still has it's moments. It's based on the Eugene Ianesco play and involves everyone getting turned into a rhinoceros. Mostel, Wilder, and Black all resist, but slowly unravel to the 'peer pressure' and wanting to be 'part of the crowd'. The outrageous premise is simply a front to examine the human phenomenon known as conformity, both on those that do and those that don't. It is rare that anything tackles this subject with any seriousness study, yet this one does. The observations are, believe or not, quite interesting and accurate. Besides Wilder really does make a terrific non-conformist.
The best part though, may actually be one of filmdom's most bizarre scenes ever. It features Wilder and Mostel alone in a room, where Mostel slowly turns into a rhino. The scene goes on for well over twenty five minutes and features no special effects or makeup. It relies totally on Mostel and his acting range to pull it off. He gives it an amazing amount of energy and seems more than up to it's weird demands. Definitely worth a look for this scene alone.
14 out of 15 people found the following review useful:
You'll get a charge out of it., 26 July 2004
Author: Prof_Lostiswitz from Cyberia
Rhinoceros is not the best of American Film Theatre's films, but it does
grow on you. When I saw this in the cinema, I had already read Ionesco's
play, so I was in a mood to be critical of every change
notably the change
Over the years, I have come to see that Ionesco can be transmogrified, and that most of the changes work quite well. Zero Mostel and Gene Wilder turn in dynamite performances, and the rest of the cast does nicely as well. Karen Black actually has the hardest job, turning her sweet and sexy character into a rhinoceros, but she carries it off gracefully. This is real acting!!
The most objectionable part comes with political references, like a picture of Richard Nixon, or a "Remember Pearl Harbor" lapel button. Not only is all this too heavy-handed, it dates the movie unnecessarily. The music is also quite low-quality 70's kitsch, especially the song "What did you do to yourself?". This song however accompanies a great dream-sequence. I must also say that the theme accompanying the final scenes is quite moving.
Ultimately, Rhinoceros is one of the great dramatic works of the twentieth century, and this movie will be for most people their only chance to see it (now that it can be bought on video). For those who don't know anything about it, it's about a town where the citizens start getting a strange malady that turns them into rhinoceroses. It starts out as a slapstick comedy of manners, but this is Ionesco's way of softening us up so we're more vulnerable to the horrific elements later on. Those of you who enjoyed Dr. Strangelove and Brazil should get a charge out of this.
13 out of 15 people found the following review useful:
An absurd film from a "Theatre-Of-The-Absurd" play., 19 April 2005
Author: Jonathon Dabell (email@example.com) from Todmorden, England
The Theatre-Of-The-Absurd was a style of experimental play-scripting
that was practised in the '50s and '60s by playwrights like Samuel
Beckett, Arthur Adamov, Jean Genet and Eugene Ionesco. When first
devised, the Theatre-Of-The-Absurd movement was rather unpopular
because audiences were left bewildered by the intentionally illogical
and plot less story lines. A particular rule of absurdist plays is that
they have no dramatic conflict, instead dealing with logically
impossible situations and having the characters speak about irrational
things as if they are perfectly rational. Also, the main character in
an absurdist play is usually significantly out of key with everyone and
everything around him. Eugene Ionesco's "Rhinoceros" is one of the most
famous of all the absurd plays. This film version is set in urban
America and is a deliberately subversive, surreal experience with
strong comic performances. It is not, however, as multi-layered as the
original play (which was set in France and had strong political and
historical connotations about the Nazi occupation). This presentation
of Rhinoceros is mainly a story about conformity and, in particular,
those rare few who refuse to conform.
Depressed, bored accountant Stanley (Gene Wilder) spends his week-days crunching numbers and his weekends drinking himself into a haze. His friend John (Zero Mostel) disapproves, but still meets Stanley every Sunday lunchtime to talk to him about the error of his ways. One particular Sunday, their lunch is interrupted when a stampeding rhinoceros charges down the street outside the restaurant. Soon, more and more rhinoceroses are sighted in town and Stanley gradually begins to realise that the entire population is turning into these huge pachyderms. More alarming still is that everyone that Stanley counts on to "remain" human seems to be switching to rhinoceros form too - his work colleagues (Joe Silver, Robert Weil, Percy Rodriguez), his dream girl Daisy (Karen Black), and even his best friend John. Stanley is determined not to conform, but as the human numbers dwindle and the rhinoceros population soars, will he be able to resist?
One of the main problems with this film version of Rhinoceros is that it doesn't use the possibilities of film to "open-up" the constraints of its stage-bound play origins. For instance, during the scene where Mostel's character transforms into a rhinoceros, Wilder keeps commenting on the bump appearing on his forehead and the greyness of his skin, but there's no bump or greyness visible. Here was an opportunity to use the visual advantages that film has over the theatre stage, but it remains an unused opportunity. In fact, at all points the film refuses to become cinematic and constantly has a feel of "filmed theatre" about it. However, in other ways Rhinoceros is quite well done and credit needs to be given where it is due (Maltin rated this film BOMB, which shows how wide of the mark Maltin is prone to be). Wilder and Mostel interact brilliantly, relishing the play's enigmatic and often self-contradictory dialogue. Mostel's transformation sequence - done without make-up or visual effects, as noted earlier - is almost compensated by the sheer outrageous energy that Mostel invests in it. And, by removing the historical and political subtext of the original play, I think they've actually made it more timeless by focusing more on the themes of conformity (after all, don't we all relate to how it feels to spend our lives conforming, losing more and more of the animal-like freedom that was a characteristic of primitive man?) Transforming into a rhinoceros could be viewed as a metaphor for any type of conformity - doing drugs because all your peers do them; being promiscuous because it's the norm; voting for a particular political party because everyone else on your street is in favour of that party; etc.
Not a complete success, then, but definitely a worthwhile and thought-provoking piece of cinema.
8 out of 10 people found the following review useful:
Not to be forgotten, 23 May 2004
Author: steve49er from California, USA
As with others that commented on this film, I first saw Rhinoceros because it starred Gene Wilder. At the time, in the mid 1970's, Wilder was near the peak of his popularity. The film was a complete surprise to me. Very bizarre, nothing that I expected. Years later, I remember that I was quite disappointed with the movie and wondered just what it was that Wilder was doing. Years later, however, I find that the memory of this film has never left me. The premise of the movie, that of all the towns-people turning into Rhino's, escaped me. Today, I relate this film, in some ways to the novel 1984. I see the resemblance of the Rhino to sheep and/or cattle. This Wilder film is not comical. It is, however, a strangely unsettling satire that is difficult to forget. I, for one, am looking to purchase a copy of this film on DVD. I'm sure that it's meaning will be more apparent to me today than it was when first viewed 40 years ago.
4 out of 4 people found the following review useful:
A great lost movie! Zero Mostel gives an INCREDIBLE performance!, 25 December 2001
Author: David Johansson (firstname.lastname@example.org) from New York City
I have not seen this movie since the mid 70's but back then I watched it at least 20 times when it was shown on cable. Now it appears it is virtually lost, as they were unable to find a print of it for the Ionesco festival in New York this past year. If you are able to catch it on tv, do not miss it. A truly strange and unusual film, involves Gene Wilder as a man who seems all alone in the world as everyone else has started to catch a strange flu, which starts with bumps on there foreheads and then eventually turns them into raving lunatics, and finally into a Rhinocerous. Zero Mostel turns in a great performance as Wilder's friend, who goes beserk inside a building and literaly tears it apart in a rampage. The film goes on to explore whether or not Wilder is the sane one, or the odd man out, as he is the only one who has not conformed. He meets Daisy (Karen Black) who has not yet turned. They do everything they can to keep themselves from turning into what they fear, and the film really turns from comedy into psychological horror at this point. Some strange imagery, and perhaps Gene Wilders only nude scene on film, happen all before the climax. Truly a unique gem from the minds of people who defined the 60's! Tom O'Horgan directed Hair and Jesus Christ Superstar on Broadway, and was involved with experimental projects with Robert Downey Sr. So you can imagine this is something of a rare find! Good luck on tracking it down!
3 out of 3 people found the following review useful:
I thought I'd dreamed this..., 1 June 2006
Author: Dewhistle from United States
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
I saw this movie on TV when I was a child. That was my parents'
mistake. I found Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory disturbing as a
child, so deciding I wanted to see Rhinoceros because Gene Wilder was
in it was plain wrong.
The whole thing seemed like a horror movie to me at the time. Having found it confusing to fit in with other people, maybe the movie spoke most directly to me. I have had a horror most of my life of blind conformity. Nevertheless, it was the stuff of nightmares at the time. My clearest memories of it are of Zero Mostel's transformation (the horror of finding one of the last hold-outs was lost) and seeing Gene Wilder huddling against a building out on a ledge high above a writhing mass of rhinos... I confess, I don't know whether that was really in it, just that if there were so few actual rhinos seen in it, as other reviewers suggested, my childish imagination must have filled them in. I would call that effective film-making... giving the mind what it needed to perceive the vision.
From the sound of things, this is a movie I should see as an adult to see whether it tends more to be horrifying or funny. Not much of a review, I admit.
2 out of 2 people found the following review useful:
Joining The Herd, 10 February 2009
Author: bkoganbing from Buffalo, New York
The short lived American Film Theater in its few years of existence
produced and preserved so many good theatrical works that might never
have gotten filmed they deserve the gratitude of all who appreciate the
best in plays. One of the best and most interesting preserved work is
French playwright Eugene Ionesco's absurdest work, Rhinoceros. It's a
very funny work with a strong moral message about individualism.
Ionesco knew a little something about zoology in that he picked of all the creatures in the animal kingdom, the Rhinoceros is the one he chose. Rhinoceros is an animal with a thick hide, a small brain relative to its body, good hearing, great sense of smell, but absolutely limited vision. Their tempers are quick to arouse when they perceive a threat and once charging they're hard creature to stop. It's a good thing they're herbivores, if they were carnivores, they not the lion would be king of the jungle. And they travel in herds, when not in their usual mud habitat, chewing on their cud.
And Rhinos are what people are gradually turning into in this small town which was set in France, but could easily be any small town in the world. They are a great deal more provincial and the chances of finding folks who are individualistic are slimmer. My guess is that Ionesco lived in small towns in his formative years and hated it.
Rhinoceros ran for 240 performances on Broadway in 1961 and starred Zero Mostel and Eli Wallach in the part that Gene Wilder plays in the film. The casting of Wilder was obviously done to exploit the chemistry Mostel and he demonstrated in Mel Brooks's The Producers.
Mostel like in The Producers by dint of his stronger personality tries to get Gene Wilder to change his ways. Wilder is a mousy little man who has a dead end job in a newspaper, can't get to first base with the object of his affection, Karen Black, and likes to drink a little too much more than is good for him.
But while Zero is giving Gene his spiel about straightening out, the first of many Rhinoceros make their appearance outside the café they are lunching at. Gradually one by one the whole cast turns into these creatures, the whole town does except poor Wilder who is left sheepishly alone.
Mostel won a Tony Award for his role in the original Broadway production, but it really is Wilder's film, he definitely has more screen time. Wilder definitely should have gotten more acclaim for what he did in Rhinoceros.
The theater of the absurd is not to everyone's taste, but for those that do appreciate it, this production of Rhinoceros should fill your bill.
2 out of 2 people found the following review useful:
Underrated....but not perfect (includes minor spoilers), 24 November 2000
Author: creep-weirdo from Loughborough, England
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
I stayed up very late one night to see this film, largely because the idea
interested me and also because it had Gene Wilder and Zero Mostel in
Producers is another of my favourite films). I was pleasently surprised,as
the TV guide had slated it. In a nutshell, this film concerns a town which
is overrun by a plague of sorts, which causes people to turn into
Rhinoceroses (Rhinocerii???). Why this is happening is never properly
explained, though at least one explanation is implied.
This film presents the central themes of conformity and pack mentality pretty well, and becomes quite powerful towards the end. However, its main flaw is trying to present some segments of it as a comedy. This does not work, it is a piece of absurdism, and just does not work as a farce. The whole thing could have done with being played far more deadpan, for instance, the scene where the woman's husband (now a rhinoceros) besieges the office, and the scene where Gene wilder and the girl(whose name escapes me)are in the flat together, near the end. Still, despite all this, it manages to be a very good and underrated film. Gene Wilder and Zero Mostel both give excellent performances, especially Mostel. His descent into Rhinocerosness and the loss of his dignity mange to be funny and horrifying at the same time.
1 out of 1 people found the following review useful:
Whether or not you like it just depends on your tolerance for absurdism., 6 May 2012
Author: planktonrules from Bradenton, Florida
The French/Romanian writer Eugène Ionesco wrote this VERY strange story
for The Theatre of the Absurd. Now if you are the sort of person who
likes their stories very literal (or semi-comprehensible), you will
most likely have no interest in this film. In fact, MOST people would
probably have no interest in this movie!! Despite this, it was a
reasonable hit on Broadway--running for 240 performances (very good
back in the 60s) and earning Zero Mostel the Tony.
There are other films that are absurdist and most often they are French (such as "Buffet Froid"). The trademark of these stories are bizarre situations but even more bizarre are the reactions or lack of serious reactions by the actors. Here in "Rhinoceros", people inexplicably start turning into rhinos!! It's totally weird. But weirder still is that folks aren't all that upset about it and although they react, it's completely out of proportion. While there SHOULD be panic and terror, folks take it very much in stride. Other really odd bits are the dream sequence 2/3 of the way through film where Karen Black in orange crepe dances about with Mostel (who at this point has already turned into a rhino but he's not a rhino in the dream)--while Gene Wilder looks on from inside a cage marked 'Human'. You may be tempted to keep watching--just so something is eventually revealed that makes it all make sense. But this is NOT something you very important in truly absurdist films--as they WANT to provoke the audience and confuse them. Some have interpreted all this craziness as a reaction against Fascism, Communism, conformity, modern life or WWII or whatever. I doubt if this was the intention...who knows.
The bottom line is that even if you are a huge fan of the Mostel/Wilder combination (they were BRILLIANT in "The Producers"), this still probably will be a very tough movie to like. I am not saying it isn't without merit (a bit of the comedy is funny--such as when Mostel tells his friend to take in some culture--such as seeing a Eugène Ionesco play--and he's the guy who wrote "Rhinoceros"!). For me, it was very hard going even if it was, in an odd way, well written and acted.
nose-horned conformity, 21 November 2011
Author: Lee Eisenberg (email@example.com) from Portland, Oregon, USA
Tom O'Horgan's "Rhinoceros" is based on Eugène Ionesco's play. An
exercise in the theater of the absurd, the play was intended as an
indictment of Nazism, showing how everyone simply acquiesces to events
around them. I guess that the movie doesn't really focus on the
political aspect as much, but it's still a funny movie. Zero Mostel and
Gene Wilder basically reprise their roles from "The Producers", only
this time it's a world in which all the people are turning into
odd-toed ungulates. Nothing can stop the transformations!
Admittedly, it's a totally outlandish idea. But, that's a characteristic of the theater of the absurd. We don't actually see any members of the family Rhinocerotidae, we just hear their snorts. Nonetheless, I was laughing almost the whole time. Wilder is particularly funny as the uptight office clerk who falls apart as he watches all his acquaintances change. Zero Mostel's transformation is the best, while Karen Black's character is the most dynamic in the whole movie.
|Page 1 of 2:|| |
|Plot summary||Ratings||External reviews|
|Parents Guide||Plot keywords||Main details|
|Your user reviews||Your vote history|