Yes, dialectics can break bricks, if they are integral to a radical
subjectivity. Otherwise, no...that is, if dialectics remains in the
realm of abstraction, then NO, dialectics cannot break bricks.
BTW, I have a DVD copy of this film which is translated correctly. And
indeed, the boy child, revolutionary martial artist does reject the
girl who is following him because she is still enamoured of Castroism.
There are many enemies of radical subjectivity: capitalists, landlords,
bureaucrats, priests, in short, ruling class elements and their
ideologies. Reified thinking/reversal of the subject-object
relationship is something to be shunned. Thus, the rejection of the
girl who is still hopelessly tied to yet another bureaucratic ideology.
In "Can Dialectics Break Bricks" we have two fundamentally opposed
forces at work: the people who serve the bosses and vamp on the proles
and the proles themselves who stand up to the bosses and their hired
serviles. The radical subjectivity of the proles doesn't need the dead
hand of an ideology to motivate them to action. No, these proles are
acting for themselves; they are acting as a class for itself; they've
said good-bye to dead time. And they won't be happy until the last
bureaucrat (even ones claiming to be 'communists') is hung by the guts
of the last capitalist. There's no room for manipulators of and
apologists for wage-labour when being confronted by class conscious
workers who want EVERYTHING. Nope, no way. There will be no peace
between these two classes until classes themselves are abolished. As
hard as the bureaucrats in this film try to co:opt these class
conscious martial artists with promises of crumbs and hierarchical
power, the proles refuse. When offered the job of foreman, one of the
radical proles spits saying, "I don't want to be a petty boss."
This film is an example of "detournment", a form of Situationist
intervention in the society of the spectacle which involves taking
film, advertising or really any piece of standard ruling class media
and turning it into its opposite, a work of liberation against usual
ideological domination. What's used here is a standard martial arts
movie with all its gratuitous, relatively content-less violence. And it
works! What is originally meant to be taken seriously becomes a satire,
a filmic bullet in the heart of the sadistic domination of the ruling
ideas of the era, including those spouted by "official" left-wing
critics e.g. Foucault as ideology gets a slap in the face, along with
the landlords, capitalists and Marxist-Leninist bureaucrats and
dominators in general.
Get your kicks: see "Can Dialectics Break Bricks"!
Own the rights?
Buy it at Amazon Rent it at blockbuster.comDiscuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
La dialectique peut-elle casser des briques? (1973) More at IMDbPro »
Yes and no and sublation, 16 December 2007

Author: (swillsqueal@yahoo.com.au) from Perth, Australia
Yes, dialectics can break bricks, if they are integral to a radical subjectivity. Otherwise, no...that is, if dialectics remains in the realm of abstraction, then NO, dialectics cannot break bricks.
BTW, I have a DVD copy of this film which is translated correctly. And indeed, the boy child, revolutionary martial artist does reject the girl who is following him because she is still enamoured of Castroism.
There are many enemies of radical subjectivity: capitalists, landlords, bureaucrats, priests, in short, ruling class elements and their ideologies. Reified thinking/reversal of the subject-object relationship is something to be shunned. Thus, the rejection of the girl who is still hopelessly tied to yet another bureaucratic ideology.
In "Can Dialectics Break Bricks" we have two fundamentally opposed forces at work: the people who serve the bosses and vamp on the proles and the proles themselves who stand up to the bosses and their hired serviles. The radical subjectivity of the proles doesn't need the dead hand of an ideology to motivate them to action. No, these proles are acting for themselves; they are acting as a class for itself; they've said good-bye to dead time. And they won't be happy until the last bureaucrat (even ones claiming to be 'communists') is hung by the guts of the last capitalist. There's no room for manipulators of and apologists for wage-labour when being confronted by class conscious workers who want EVERYTHING. Nope, no way. There will be no peace between these two classes until classes themselves are abolished. As hard as the bureaucrats in this film try to co:opt these class conscious martial artists with promises of crumbs and hierarchical power, the proles refuse. When offered the job of foreman, one of the radical proles spits saying, "I don't want to be a petty boss."
This film is an example of "detournment", a form of Situationist intervention in the society of the spectacle which involves taking film, advertising or really any piece of standard ruling class media and turning it into its opposite, a work of liberation against usual ideological domination. What's used here is a standard martial arts movie with all its gratuitous, relatively content-less violence. And it works! What is originally meant to be taken seriously becomes a satire, a filmic bullet in the heart of the sadistic domination of the ruling ideas of the era, including those spouted by "official" left-wing critics e.g. Foucault as ideology gets a slap in the face, along with the landlords, capitalists and Marxist-Leninist bureaucrats and dominators in general.
Get your kicks: see "Can Dialectics Break Bricks"!
5 comments in total
Add another comment
Related Links