11 out of 11 people found the following comment useful :- A Timepiece, 6 February 2004
Author:
zoombazee from Anywhere, USA
I rented this for the same reason people went to see it when it was
filmed:
I'd heard about the sex & nudity and I was curious. I got a lot more than
that; it's a time capsule.
The video was made from a closed-circuit TV recording at a live theater
performance. I can only assume it's a fairly honest reproduction of the
real thing. It's a few nude dance numbers along with quite a few skits.
The skits are comedic, nearly all involve nudity, and are all about sex in
one way or another. Topics range from masturbation to swinging to kinky
toys and more. They're at least as amusing as, and only slightly more
sophisticated than, your basic Benny Hill Show. On face value alone it
was
worth the $1 rental (as long as you're not one who takes his theater
experience too seriously).
Its real value comes from its representation of the sexual revolution.
It's
hard to imagine that it had problems with obscenity laws considering
what's
available from a wide variety of sources today. It was controversial
simply
because people talked freely about sex and were naked. When the actors
were
naked, they neither hid nor flaunted it; they simply were, and appeared
happy to be so. They cheerfully acted out skits that portrayed sex as
neither serious nor dirty but just plain silly and fun. Compared to the
modern business of sex, this is a breath of fresh air which made me long
for
a simpler time that I barely remember (and may not have ever actually
existed).
The same day I saw this was the Janet Jackson/SuperBowl brouhaha, later
described as "a perfect opportunity to both sell sex and condemn it." Oh!
Calcutta! does neither. The closing number has the cast stripping to nude
and dancing gleefully to a song whose chorus is "I don't care what you say
/
I'll do it anyway / Because it's mine!" That's the sexual revolution in a
nutshell; for us to deny ourselves the pleasure our bodies bring us is to
remove a large part of the joy of living. But today it's just one more
thing for sale.
Cast member and choreographer Margo Sappington has gone on to become a
somewhat influential figure in the world of dance.
11 out of 13 people found the following comment useful :- Revolutionary! Sign of freedom and changing times., 6 September 2001
Author:
tiggerhans from indonesia/holland
I was 10, hiding under the dining table, while my parents thought I was
asleep, I was watching Oh! Calcutta on the Dutch tv. It was an eyeopener
for
me, and though it caused a lot of upheaval in the media the next day, it
showed that times where changing and that people no longer let there lives
be ruled by others but made choices for themselves.
In some ways, Oh! Calcutta was just fun. And the music was definately good.
It is only a few years ago that it was first shown in Israel...a sign that
in some countries of the world you are not as free as in others. Where
gay marriage is normal in Holland, and gays are put to prison or to death
in
some other countries, sexual freedom is also not the same everywhere. Oh!
Calcutta was a clear sign of the times, and still is a pleasure to watch.
6 out of 6 people found the following comment useful :- A fun bit of groundbreaking history, 19 August 2005
Author:
emdoub (emdoub@gmail.com) from United States
First the film, then the stage production: Okay - this was filmed long
before anyone had a home video system - it was back when videotape was
a fairly new phenomenon, the player/recorders were far too expensive to
be considered for home use, and electronic manipulation of the images
was sparkly and new. There are some annoying transition special
effects, some cute double-exposure shots, a scene that takes place in a
forest glade instead of on-stage, and a scene that's not shown at all -
you see a long cut of the outside of a building while you hear what's
happening on stage - presumably because of simulated intercourse,
though that's apparently not an issue later in the play.
Side note to cinematographers who film plays - just show the audience
what they'd see if they were watching the stage production. That's what
they expect - it won't disappoint them. A split screen is okay if it's
not overdone - but don't cut to the audience during anything but
closed-curtain time, don't show closeups of a couple of actors when the
whole ensemble is on-stage and moving, and please, please, don't show a
line of Celtic dancers from the waist up, ignoring the footwork.
There - had to get that off my chest. Sorry.
Most of the camera-work here is actually pretty good - the annoying
parts happened in editing, and the incomprehensible decision to take
the one scene away from the stage and put it elsewhere - I'd rather
have seen what the actual audience saw.
The stage production - a series of dance numbers and skits about sex -
the pain of it, the joy of it, the general absurdity of how it's dealt
with in our society. There's some pathos, lots of comedy, some dirty
gleeful joy, and some of it falls flat - but some will hit you where
you live. By 2005 standards, it's really pretty tame - by 1972
standards in the USA, it was outrageous and shocking. Much of the
reason that it's pretty tame now is that it dared to be shocking in
1972 - those who enjoy sexual freedom today owe the folks who dared to
do this then. Some of the songs were interesting, but the music was
largely forgettable - not everyone has a hit every time out.
As social history, it's interesting. As entertainment, it's spotty, but
very fun in parts - well worth an evening. It was really much more fun
than I'd expected.
8 out of 10 people found the following comment useful :- A long time ago in a galaxy called the 60's., 25 July 1999
Author:
anonymous from San Diego, California
If you're into nostalgia for the 60's and 70's this film of the stage play
is a good choice. Like a 60's commune or "house" you will find a
make-shift
family looking to explore their sexuality safely amongst those they can
trust. The actors are naked much of the time and the play is about sex,
however it is packaged with statements about choice, freedom, and trust.
With these three virtues, nudity and sex lose their sense of taboo. In
fact, I found the characters respecting each other more when they were
undressed! The filmed audience seemed like explorers wondering what this
was all about and walked away at the end of the show somehow a little
relieved that it wasn't as pornographic as they had thought it would be.
Not just clothes were removed in Oh! Calcutta, but taboos
too.
In the early eighties I was in a revival-sequel called Calcutta Revisited!
with a small experimental theater group. Looking back I believe most of
the
actors got involved because we wanted to see each other naked. We were
all
closet exhibitionists who wanted a chance to see what it was like to be
nude
on stage with strangers, family, and friends looking on. The audience was
an equal mix of the avant garde art house crowd weened on female
performance
artists smearing peanut butter on their breasts, lesbians who heard about
my
passion filled kissing scenes with two other actresses, nerdy guys who
read
about the play in the weekly reader, and of course our friends, family
members, co-workers from our day jobs, roomies, and neighbors. The
audience
walked away a little disappointed that it wasn't a bit more pornographic.
Full frontal nudity was no longer enough even with the addition of the
lesbian scenes.
So please rent Oh Calcutta! (if you can find it) and visit a period of our
past that wasn't so bad.
5 out of 5 people found the following comment useful :- A witty naked satire of sexuality, 8 January 2000
Author:
rlcsljo from Hollywood, ca
This move is a mostly funny mostly naked satire of sexuality of the times,
circa 1970, that still holds up today.The bodies are perfect and most of
the gags are right on the money.It was written by some of the best writers
of this century and the acting is superb.The dance numbers are some of the
most innovative ever choreographed and the people are naked--isn't that
what
your always wanted to see in a modern dance routine anyway!Be sure to
check out the "Sex Clinic" sketch, it will leave you in
stitches!
6 out of 7 people found the following comment useful :- San Francisco Theater Production, 20 February 2006
Author:
sactokat from United States
I saw the original stage version of Oh! Calcutta! when they performed
in San Francisco in the early 1970s. We didn't know what to expect and
were a little hesitant about going to a play that was often raided!
We paid a princely sum for our tickets - $35 and that wasn't for the
first row! Our seats were second row-center and those rows were very
narrow! You can imagine our surprise at being so close to the action!
As soon as the production began, several people in the front row stood
up and left the theater, which only made our seats that much better!
It was a great play! We loved it and laughed through most of it. The
only tense part of the play was when we heard the sirens of emergency
vehicles in the street outside of the theater! For a moment, we thought
it was one of the raids! We held our ground and remained seated and
were the richer for it!
See the movie and see a part of our sexual history! I know I will!
1 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :- Editor of this movie, 27 November 2008
Author:
frank herold from United States
Oh Calutta was edited at Teletape Studios in New York City. I was 28
years old when I edited this video. It was edited on 2 inch tape using
the first electronic editing system called Editec. We spent many days
and nights working on the piece. I remember my car was towed away twice
during the edit sessions. The video was to be shown on closed circuit
video projection to a number of theaters around the country but many
had to cancel because of protests. A poor quality film was made from
the video tape and shown in theaters along with "Fritz the Cat". I was
surprised when I discovered the video had been made into a DVD. Where
was the original tape all these years?
10 out of 22 people found the following comment useful :- Yuck. Sweaty naked people., 14 April 1999
Author:
anonymous
Filmed record of the live stage play (complete with an upscale audience
arriving confused and leaving bored). It begins behind the scenes just
prior to curtain with the male and female actors in the dressing room
completely naked applying body make-up to various body parts and
discussing
if they should invite relatives to the play which will feature scenes in
which the entire cast is...naked. The play begins with the actors lined
up
across the stage slowly dancing...naked. What follows is a series of
comedic musical sex skits (mostly unfunny) with many of the
players...naked.
After you see the actors cavort naked together the rest is anticlimatic
and
boring. Bill Macy of TV's "Maude" dangles his privates as if he were
playing percussion instruments. If that's not enough to avoid this film I
don't know what is. Raina Barrett and Samantha Harper are cute and nice
to
look at though. Nudity was a brave new world to off-Broadway and the
actors
were all pretty brave to risk exposure (sorry for the pun) to ridicule.
It
is obvious that the nude actors find support and comfort appearing in mass
with the other nude actors. More than once we see them in a
huddle. I saw a revival a few years back and that same uneasiness did not
exist (the lead female was an ex-Dallas Cowboy Cheerleader and
centerfold).
Each of those actors were of the new breed which would be comfortable
soloing nude on stage. The audience was expecting a strip show, and got
it.
Oh Calcutta! can not be revived anymore than the sixties can. The
pioneers
of nude theater were pioneers but looking back there's really not much to
see. Oh Calcutta! still exists, without the male actors, in strip joints
across America.
Own the rights?
Buy it at Amazon Rent it at blockbuster.comDiscuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
Oh! Calcutta! (1972) More at IMDbPro »
11 out of 11 people found the following comment useful :-
A Timepiece, 6 February 2004
Author: zoombazee from Anywhere, USA
I rented this for the same reason people went to see it when it was filmed: I'd heard about the sex & nudity and I was curious. I got a lot more than that; it's a time capsule.
The video was made from a closed-circuit TV recording at a live theater performance. I can only assume it's a fairly honest reproduction of the real thing. It's a few nude dance numbers along with quite a few skits. The skits are comedic, nearly all involve nudity, and are all about sex in one way or another. Topics range from masturbation to swinging to kinky toys and more. They're at least as amusing as, and only slightly more sophisticated than, your basic Benny Hill Show. On face value alone it was worth the $1 rental (as long as you're not one who takes his theater experience too seriously).
Its real value comes from its representation of the sexual revolution. It's hard to imagine that it had problems with obscenity laws considering what's available from a wide variety of sources today. It was controversial simply because people talked freely about sex and were naked. When the actors were naked, they neither hid nor flaunted it; they simply were, and appeared happy to be so. They cheerfully acted out skits that portrayed sex as neither serious nor dirty but just plain silly and fun. Compared to the modern business of sex, this is a breath of fresh air which made me long for a simpler time that I barely remember (and may not have ever actually existed).
The same day I saw this was the Janet Jackson/SuperBowl brouhaha, later described as "a perfect opportunity to both sell sex and condemn it." Oh! Calcutta! does neither. The closing number has the cast stripping to nude and dancing gleefully to a song whose chorus is "I don't care what you say / I'll do it anyway / Because it's mine!" That's the sexual revolution in a nutshell; for us to deny ourselves the pleasure our bodies bring us is to remove a large part of the joy of living. But today it's just one more thing for sale.
Cast member and choreographer Margo Sappington has gone on to become a somewhat influential figure in the world of dance.
11 out of 13 people found the following comment useful :-

Revolutionary! Sign of freedom and changing times., 6 September 2001
Author: tiggerhans from indonesia/holland
I was 10, hiding under the dining table, while my parents thought I was asleep, I was watching Oh! Calcutta on the Dutch tv. It was an eyeopener for me, and though it caused a lot of upheaval in the media the next day, it showed that times where changing and that people no longer let there lives be ruled by others but made choices for themselves. In some ways, Oh! Calcutta was just fun. And the music was definately good. It is only a few years ago that it was first shown in Israel...a sign that in some countries of the world you are not as free as in others. Where gay marriage is normal in Holland, and gays are put to prison or to death in some other countries, sexual freedom is also not the same everywhere. Oh! Calcutta was a clear sign of the times, and still is a pleasure to watch.
6 out of 6 people found the following comment useful :-

A fun bit of groundbreaking history, 19 August 2005
Author: emdoub (emdoub@gmail.com) from United States
First the film, then the stage production: Okay - this was filmed long before anyone had a home video system - it was back when videotape was a fairly new phenomenon, the player/recorders were far too expensive to be considered for home use, and electronic manipulation of the images was sparkly and new. There are some annoying transition special effects, some cute double-exposure shots, a scene that takes place in a forest glade instead of on-stage, and a scene that's not shown at all - you see a long cut of the outside of a building while you hear what's happening on stage - presumably because of simulated intercourse, though that's apparently not an issue later in the play.
Side note to cinematographers who film plays - just show the audience what they'd see if they were watching the stage production. That's what they expect - it won't disappoint them. A split screen is okay if it's not overdone - but don't cut to the audience during anything but closed-curtain time, don't show closeups of a couple of actors when the whole ensemble is on-stage and moving, and please, please, don't show a line of Celtic dancers from the waist up, ignoring the footwork.
There - had to get that off my chest. Sorry.
Most of the camera-work here is actually pretty good - the annoying parts happened in editing, and the incomprehensible decision to take the one scene away from the stage and put it elsewhere - I'd rather have seen what the actual audience saw.
The stage production - a series of dance numbers and skits about sex - the pain of it, the joy of it, the general absurdity of how it's dealt with in our society. There's some pathos, lots of comedy, some dirty gleeful joy, and some of it falls flat - but some will hit you where you live. By 2005 standards, it's really pretty tame - by 1972 standards in the USA, it was outrageous and shocking. Much of the reason that it's pretty tame now is that it dared to be shocking in 1972 - those who enjoy sexual freedom today owe the folks who dared to do this then. Some of the songs were interesting, but the music was largely forgettable - not everyone has a hit every time out.
As social history, it's interesting. As entertainment, it's spotty, but very fun in parts - well worth an evening. It was really much more fun than I'd expected.
8 out of 10 people found the following comment useful :-
A long time ago in a galaxy called the 60's., 25 July 1999
Author: anonymous from San Diego, California
If you're into nostalgia for the 60's and 70's this film of the stage play is a good choice. Like a 60's commune or "house" you will find a make-shift family looking to explore their sexuality safely amongst those they can trust. The actors are naked much of the time and the play is about sex, however it is packaged with statements about choice, freedom, and trust. With these three virtues, nudity and sex lose their sense of taboo. In fact, I found the characters respecting each other more when they were undressed! The filmed audience seemed like explorers wondering what this was all about and walked away at the end of the show somehow a little relieved that it wasn't as pornographic as they had thought it would be. Not just clothes were removed in Oh! Calcutta, but taboos too.
In the early eighties I was in a revival-sequel called Calcutta Revisited! with a small experimental theater group. Looking back I believe most of the actors got involved because we wanted to see each other naked. We were all closet exhibitionists who wanted a chance to see what it was like to be nude on stage with strangers, family, and friends looking on. The audience was an equal mix of the avant garde art house crowd weened on female performance artists smearing peanut butter on their breasts, lesbians who heard about my passion filled kissing scenes with two other actresses, nerdy guys who read about the play in the weekly reader, and of course our friends, family members, co-workers from our day jobs, roomies, and neighbors. The audience walked away a little disappointed that it wasn't a bit more pornographic. Full frontal nudity was no longer enough even with the addition of the lesbian scenes.
So please rent Oh Calcutta! (if you can find it) and visit a period of our past that wasn't so bad.
5 out of 5 people found the following comment useful :-

A witty naked satire of sexuality, 8 January 2000
Author: rlcsljo from Hollywood, ca
This move is a mostly funny mostly naked satire of sexuality of the times, circa 1970, that still holds up today.The bodies are perfect and most of the gags are right on the money.It was written by some of the best writers of this century and the acting is superb.The dance numbers are some of the most innovative ever choreographed and the people are naked--isn't that what your always wanted to see in a modern dance routine anyway!Be sure to check out the "Sex Clinic" sketch, it will leave you in stitches!
6 out of 7 people found the following comment useful :-

San Francisco Theater Production, 20 February 2006
Author: sactokat from United States
I saw the original stage version of Oh! Calcutta! when they performed in San Francisco in the early 1970s. We didn't know what to expect and were a little hesitant about going to a play that was often raided!
We paid a princely sum for our tickets - $35 and that wasn't for the first row! Our seats were second row-center and those rows were very narrow! You can imagine our surprise at being so close to the action! As soon as the production began, several people in the front row stood up and left the theater, which only made our seats that much better!
It was a great play! We loved it and laughed through most of it. The only tense part of the play was when we heard the sirens of emergency vehicles in the street outside of the theater! For a moment, we thought it was one of the raids! We held our ground and remained seated and were the richer for it!
See the movie and see a part of our sexual history! I know I will!
1 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :-
Editor of this movie, 27 November 2008
Author: frank herold from United States
Oh Calutta was edited at Teletape Studios in New York City. I was 28 years old when I edited this video. It was edited on 2 inch tape using the first electronic editing system called Editec. We spent many days and nights working on the piece. I remember my car was towed away twice during the edit sessions. The video was to be shown on closed circuit video projection to a number of theaters around the country but many had to cancel because of protests. A poor quality film was made from the video tape and shown in theaters along with "Fritz the Cat". I was surprised when I discovered the video had been made into a DVD. Where was the original tape all these years?
10 out of 22 people found the following comment useful :-
Yuck. Sweaty naked people., 14 April 1999
Author: anonymous
Filmed record of the live stage play (complete with an upscale audience arriving confused and leaving bored). It begins behind the scenes just prior to curtain with the male and female actors in the dressing room completely naked applying body make-up to various body parts and discussing if they should invite relatives to the play which will feature scenes in which the entire cast is...naked. The play begins with the actors lined up across the stage slowly dancing...naked. What follows is a series of comedic musical sex skits (mostly unfunny) with many of the players...naked. After you see the actors cavort naked together the rest is anticlimatic and boring. Bill Macy of TV's "Maude" dangles his privates as if he were playing percussion instruments. If that's not enough to avoid this film I don't know what is. Raina Barrett and Samantha Harper are cute and nice to look at though. Nudity was a brave new world to off-Broadway and the actors were all pretty brave to risk exposure (sorry for the pun) to ridicule. It is obvious that the nude actors find support and comfort appearing in mass with the other nude actors. More than once we see them in a huddle. I saw a revival a few years back and that same uneasiness did not exist (the lead female was an ex-Dallas Cowboy Cheerleader and centerfold). Each of those actors were of the new breed which would be comfortable soloing nude on stage. The audience was expecting a strip show, and got it.
Oh Calcutta! can not be revived anymore than the sixties can. The pioneers of nude theater were pioneers but looking back there's really not much to see. Oh Calcutta! still exists, without the male actors, in strip joints across America.
Add another comment
Related Links