| Page 1 of 2: | [1] [2] |
| Index | 18 reviews in total |
13 out of 14 people found the following review useful:
Definitely not "Buffy, the Vampire Slayer", 5 March 2005
Author:
lazarillo from Denver, Colorado and Santiago, Chile
This is not Jean Rollin's best film, but it might be his most essential
one for fans because it combines the moody visuals of films like
"Fascination" and "Two Orphan Vampires" with the perverse softcore sex
of films like "Bacchanales Sexuales". Two teenage virgins run away from
a school party (which in the strange Rollin universe somehow involves
dressing as clowns, having a shoot-out with police, and disposing of
the body of their dead male accomplice in a burning car). After a
bizarre accident while walking through a graveyard that almost results
in one girl being buried alive, they arrive at a deserted castle and do
what any two virgins would do in a 70's Eurohorror/sex movie--strip off
all their clothes for some hot lesbian action. Soon though they meet
the occupants of the castle who are, of course, vampires. Freely
rewriting the vampire rulebook, Rollin's vampires in this movie can not
pass their curse on to anyone except virgins. Any non-virgins are
chained to the wall while the monstrous man-servants have their way
with them in gratuitous sex scenes before the female vampire suck their
blood from their breasts and the male vampire changes into a bat to
commit an act of bestiality that no pervert in the world would find
erotic (you have admire the sheer audacity of Rollin if nothing else).
The conflict happens when one girl decides to lose her virginity while
the other decides to preserve hers and join the ranks of the living
dead. But the bonds of love and friendship are not easily broken. This
movie addresses some real themes of coming-of-age and friendship
(albeit in a fantastical and at times ridiculous milieu), but no one
will confuse it with "Buffy, the Vampire Slayer". If you're looking for
sex,on the other hand, you certainly won't be disappointed, but unlike
all the erotic vampire movies they churn out these days, this is a
vampire film with a lot of sex, not a sex film with vampiric trappings.
And there is something very personal and obsessive about Rollin's films
that the modern-day hacks can never hope imitate. This movie contains
all manner of memorable images--preserved human arms holding candles,
posed skeletons dressed in clerical robes, a girl in a mini-skirt lying
on a coffin being buried alive by oblivious gravediggers, a girl
clamoring around the ruins of a Gothic castle dressed in nothing but
knee socks. Good or bad, Rollin is definitely a one-of-a-kind
filmmaker.
7 out of 9 people found the following review useful:
a Lesbians vampire tale, 26 June 2006
![]()
Author:
Prof-Hieronymos-Grost from Ireland
Marie and Michelle are two girls dressed as clowns and on the run from
someone with a grudge, this is at least where the film begins with a
shoot 'em up car chase through the french countryside. There male
companion gets killed in the crossfire and the girls decide to hide out
in a seemingly deserted Château where they indulge themselves in some
Lesbian sex before they discover they are not alone .The last surviving
Vampire and his followers want to enrol the two girls in to the realms
of the living dead, but not before they get the girls to lure some
fresh blood to the château with the promise of sex.
Rollin's imagery is superb,two wonderfully colourful clowns wandering
through barley is quite an exquisite scene,in this often ponderously
slow film, the vampires look cool except for some dodgy fangs, there
isn't too much of a plot really and I can readily see why some would
hate Rollin's work. Rollin seems to my eyes to have his own unique
language of film which he sticks to till the bitter end. My main
problem with the film is that it was cut to bits, The DVD sleeve said
88mins where in actuality it was a paltry 76mins,IMDB says 95mins so
I'm not too sure what I've missed and how badly the continuity was
hampered by this, a lot I would guess.Not my last Rollin film,I'll
certainly watch some more
7 out of 10 people found the following review useful:
Surreal film, 24 March 2000
![]()
Author:
Anyanwu from Los Angeles, CA
This film was rated higher by others than I would have thought. Vampires usually do a lot of biting and blood sucking. There was more erotic virgin handling and molestation than biting and the like in this one. The use of silence in the film gave it a surreal quality. The whole movie was dream-like. The lure of the victims was not captured. The chase and seduction is the best thing about vampires but those subtleties were lost here. But, I must admit, the film did remind me of Vampyros Lesbos and, to a lesser extent, Suspiria. I must state that vampire films do not have to be bloody etc. But a little blood at the bite would have been welcomed. Not a bad watch if you seek those who walk at night.
3 out of 3 people found the following review useful:
Stream of Consciousness Nuttiness from France's Foremost Nutcase, 25 July 2007
![]()
Author:
MetalMiike from England
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
Initially, this incredibly simplistic film may look like a step
backwards for Rollin after the highly experimental Rape of the Vampire
and the highly strange The Nude Vampire but it could also be argued
that it is, in fact a precursor to the dream-like The Iron Rose. It
looks like it was shot over a long weekend and, indeed, would perhaps
have worked better as a short film. The plot, what there is of it,
concerns two girls (dressed as clowns) on the run after killing a
would-be rapist. After their getaway driver is killed, they stumble
upon a castle in which resides the last of the vampires and his
servants. Aside form the odd diversion (one of the girls meets a man in
a graveyard and offers him his virginity so as to remain free of the
vampire's curse) that's about it.
Upon first viewing the film, there is very little to get out of it
aside from the odd bit of S+M imagery (chained up naked girls attacked
by bats, a kinky lesbian whipping scene) but ones whole perspective
changes when one discovers that Rollin wrote it in ONE NIGHT. For those
unfamiliar with Rollin, this would simply re-enforce the notion that
what they are watching is complete crap but for those familiar with his
work, it provides and excellent insight into the man's unconscious.
Rollin's work is all about repressed sexual desire; his films are
essentially adolescent fantasies, which is why many of them feel like
fairy tales; they disguise their true meaning through the circumstances
under which the images are presented. This is a true relic of the
60's/70's, a time in which Western culture was going through its own
adolescence. Perhaps part of the problem with cinema today is that it
has none of the innocence of that sexually uncertain time.
5 out of 7 people found the following review useful:
I've finally seen a Jean Rollin movie., 11 January 2007
![]()
Author:
Lee Eisenberg (eisenberg.lee@gmail.com) from Portland, Oregon, USA
I would imagine that few Americans can identify Jean Rollin. But
Portland's video/DVD store Movie Madness has a whole shelf of his
movies. From what I saw in "Vierges et vampires" (aka "Requiem for a
Vampire"), I would derive that his movies involve gore and full-scale
erotica. Specifically, this one has two hot teenage girls running away
from school and ending up in a castle inhabited by sex-obsessed
vampires. By sex-obsessed, I mean that there's a scene where the
vampires torture some prisoners, and much of the whole sequence
consists of shots of women's naked bodies.
So, since I haven't seen any of Rollin's other movies, I'll have to
assume that his movies consist of this...and I LIKE IT! As far as I'm
concerned, this is what horror movies were meant to be! If there's any
guiltier pleasure, I'm not sure that I want to know about it.
Specifically, this is the sort of movie that I'd like to experience.
So, I recommend this movie. If, having not seen this movie, you thought
that you knew to what extent the French are into love and sexuality,
then you ain't seen nothing yet! Because I must repeat: those girls
were REALLY hot!
1 out of 1 people found the following review useful:
Strange, beautiful, and sensual - It's Jean Rollin!, 13 November 2008
![]()
Author:
Anthony Pittore III (Shattered_Wake) from Los Angeles, CA
After escaping an auto shootout, two sexy female clowns (yeah) stumble
upon a mysterious old castle full of classy vampires and some giant
viking-type men. There, they bear witness to the vampyric rituals and
are forced to remain as vampires, but they must lose their virginity
first to become a real vampire.
Like many Jean Rollin films, Requiem pour un Vampire is a very erotic,
dreamlike film that utilizes limited dialogue and unlimited sexy French
women. . . even though more than a few of them actually do have hairy
armpits (I'm not just stereotyping!). Rollin includes more than a few
fantastically cool ideas. . . especially the vampire bats that
performed oral sex on the captive women. It's very well shot, Rollin's
direction is superb in this picture. And, while it does lack a bit in
the story, it still maintains a very enjoyable and likable
fairytale-like quality. As any fan of this type of erotic horror will
tell you, as long as you've got plenty of hot people getting
acquainted, some blood, and a pretty setting. . . you're all set.
There's really not too much to say about this film other than. . .
enjoy it.
Final verdict: 7.5/10.
Vive La France!
-AP3-
3 out of 5 people found the following review useful:
Requiem for a Vampire, 29 November 2007
![]()
Author:
Scarecrow-88 from United States
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
Two "teenage virgins", Marie & Michelle(Marie-Pierre Castel & Mireille
Dargent)have escaped from I'm guessing a reform school. Their driver
was killed as another car's inhabitants(I'm guessing the police)blast
out their vehicle's back window with gunfire. Hiding away from those
hunting them and burning the car(..and dead driver), Marie and Michelle
hide out temporarily in a cemetery(..in one weird scene, Michelle trips
into a freshly dug grave knocking herself out on the casket while a
member of the grounds almost buries her alive!)until their safety is
assured. There's seemingly abandoned greystone ruins of a château near
the cemetery surrounded by massive trees and an idyllic countryside for
which Marie and Michelle decide to hopefully inhabit for the time
being. What they don't expect is a female vampiress, Erica(Dominique
Toussaint)who has a barbaric entourage of hunters as servants who rush
them. When the girls try to flee, bats hanging from tree branches
"hypnotise" them enabling Erica to capture them as she plans for
Michelle and Marie to meet her master, the last full male vampire whose
powers have weakened over the ages. Erica isn't completely a vampire
despite her fangs and blood-drinking..she can still tolerate sunlight
and isn't a true member of the undead. Her blood sister Louise(Louise
Dhour)is even less a vampiress for she doesn't have the luxury of
fangs. Louise is the type of vampire sister who hands down the orders
from her lord and plays the piano; she's also the one who watches her
master's casket. Michelle and Marie are introduced to the last male
vampire as he bites them from behind. Michelle and Marie try to escape
the next day but run around in circles it seems..despite following
different paths hoping to escape, they always return to the château
with a skull at the door. Louise informs Michelle and Marie that they
are to be initiated into the vampire fraternity having received the
"divine bite of the vampire", but first must lose their virginity to
him. Louise points out that you can not be a virginal vampire. They
wish for Michelle and Marie, before their initiation, to lure male prey
to the château by nightfall. Marie meets, falls in love with, and loses
her virginity to a man walking the cemetery one day named Frederick.
She later tries to save him from being a victim of Erica's. The older
man who Michelle lures(thanks to a striptease & drawing him by giving
chase)isn't so lucky. Michelle must find out where Marie has hidden
Frederick for he threatens the vampire whereabouts and identity(..this
leads to a whipping torture as Marie hangs with stripes down her back
and Michelle, devastated for what she has done, with tears staining her
cheeks). Will Marie be seduced into the way of the vampires? Will Marie
give up her love's hiding place(where he is hidden is certainly an
interesting place)? Will the last male vampire's legacy live on through
his blood daughters?
If you are familiar with Rollin, this film carries his various
signatures..beautiful french countryside, atmospheric cemetery, Gothic
greystoned ruins of a castle where rows of steps are endless and halls
echo, skulls make their mark throughout showing up near tombstones,
places marking the vampires' lair, etc., limited dialogue and back
story, fluid camera-work capturing the entire landscape squeezing every
bit of ambiance available, an abundance of nudity and sex, and a jazzy
organ score in the background. The version I watched had gratuitous
extended scenes of sexual molestation as Erica's barbaric servants rape
and abuse various enslaved nubile females, chained within a pit, as she
takes a few bites for good measure. This might serve as titillation for
many(there's also a scene where Marie and Michelle grope each other),
but I yawned through most of this. I thought Dominique Toussaint was
striking(she seemed to have such a presence that leaps from the
screen)as Erica, wearing a clinging gold dress and purple cape that
swings open..the way she opens her cape might be theatrical to many,
but I lapped it up(..*woof*..*woof*). She really looks like something
out of a comic book..now I do not mean this as an insult, far from it.
I think Erica just looks incredible and Dominique just runs with it,
easily overshadowing the weary last male vampire who is in the film
mere minutes and looks as if his powers were weakened. This film's
strength is some truly stunning uses of the château(the way Rollin
shoots overhead as Marie and Michelle try to flee Erika, and when
Michelle leads the horny old man on a wild goose chase through halls &
up steps, are really thrilling set-pieces), the vibrant green and red
colors Rollin uses in the last male vampire's mausoleum, the cemetery
bright blue skyline at dawn as Marie(believing she had lost her love to
the last male vampire forever)woefully walks across with various
crosses in the distance, and the windy green covering the cemetery
grounds as Marie and Michelle comb the area in search of refuge from a
shady past. My favorite scene(other than when Erica appears)is when
Marie and Michelle hear organ play from within the château cathedral
believing cloaked monks await inside..only to find skeletons behind
those very cloaks and Louise, the vampiress playing the tune they
heard. Don't expect a satisfying story or a quickened pace..Rollin
isn't the type of filmmaker that worries about moving anything too
fast. I don't even think we see the first vampire until thirty minutes
into the film and the sexual sequences in the bondage chamber go on
forever it seems.
3 out of 5 people found the following review useful:
S10 Reviews: Requiem for a Vampire (1971), 10 April 2006
![]()
Author:
suspiria10 from The Void
Two lovely ladies are on the run (why? I'm not sure} and find shelter
in a rather Gothic, sprawling castle in the French countryside. They
soon run into the lord of the manor, an aged vampire looking to use
their luscious, virgin (yeah, right!) bodies as vessels for his
progeny. A lot of flesh, a bit of bondage and a touch of lesbianism
punctuate another erotic horror masterpiece from French filmmaker Jean
Rollin.
It's somewhat hard to recommend a Rollin film to the uninitiated. Often
surreal but almost always beautiful, thanks in part to the lovely
ladies frequently in the buff and the photography pf the locations.
Rollin clearly has an eye for beauty. However the plots and story lines
are often very slight. Heck there is hardly any dialogue in the first
thirty to forty minutes of 'Requiem'. But man does he have an eye.
4 out of 7 people found the following review useful:
decent enough Rollin from his peak period, 12 May 2001
Author:
Matt Moses from Brooklyn, NY
One of Rollin's best, although lacking the stylish gaudiness of his earlier masterpieces. However, considered as the work of an impressively productive director with about as many misses as hits, this film holds a high ranking in his oeuvre. He starts smash dab in the middle of obviously complicated unexplained criminal events, with the two female protagonists done up in ludicrous clown costumes. After the death of their fellow fugitive, they set fire to their car and wander off into the woods. Dark, young beauty Mireille Dargent stumbles into an open grave and ends up covered in opened dirt as nearby Marie-Pierre Castle watches, too scared to speak. Once unearthed, she and her friend find a seemingly abandoned castle with a decomposing body in the basement. Some uninspired vampires bring the girls to their dungeon of depravity. Dying vamp Philippe Gasté, the last of his kind in great need to make more with the help of vamp pal Anne-Dominique Toussaint, gives them a wee bite. They're somewhat uncertain about this idea of slowing turning into the blood-sucking undead, but things head in unexpected directions from here in typical Rollin style, if typical can be described as such. Although many of Rollin's women find themselves thrust unexpectedly into a world of evil, a close inspection of their characters from the beginning suggest a previous loss of innocence. Rollin's women do not succumb to these influences - indeed, they generally escape from their perilous situations - but it's important to remember that this sort of behavior may well not be old hat to them. Requiem uses extremely effective pacing, which many mistake as boring. Some extremely long takes contain little distinguishable action, denying the audience a passive film experience. This style of filmmaking instead demands total audience involvement, with only occasional instances of the glossy seduction suggested by the film's pretext. Rollin's decision to spend so much screen time on seemingly aimless wandering evokes a misguided spiritual quest, with obvious sexual connotations in the form of vampires. The experimental score by Pierre Raph, who worked with Rollin on the notorious Démoniaques, compliments this uncertain, possibly confused journey. In stark contrast to these rather profound elements stands the unnecessarily graphic sexual torture that goes on the castle's dungeon. This goes to an unnecessary extreme - I can't, for example, imagine anyone enjoying the image of a bat nestling in a woman's vagina. However, movies do need a target audience and Rollin could easily have chosen a worse genre into which to work his ideas. After this film, Toussaint began her career as a producer.. Dargent and Castle, prototypical Rollin girls, appeared in several other of his films.
Requiem for a Vampire, 15 October 2011
Author:
Michael_Elliott from Louisville, KY
Requiem for a Vampire (1973)
*** (out of 4)
Erotic-horror from French master Jean Rollin about two fugitive girls
(Marie-Pierre Castel, Mireille Dargent) who are on the run from the law
and end up in a creepy castle where many young women are chained in the
basement. The girl's learn that vampires run the castle and they want
the two ladies to join the undead since they are virgins. With
countless horror and porn titles under his belt, to me this is the best
that Rollin has to offer as his art-house style perfectly blends in
with the erotic nature of the subject matter and best of all is that
the film never once feels too long nor does the pacing have any issues.
One might say THE LIVING DEAD GIRL is the best the director has to
offer due to how violent and gory it is but I think on the whole this
here is the best. I think what works so well is once again that
beautiful atmosphere that the director is able to bring. The movie
really does feel as if you're watching a nightmare as there's this
quiet, still atmosphere that really makes you feel as if you're in the
land of the dead. I thought the opening fifteen or twenty-minutes is
where the director really works his magic because we see the girls on
the run, going through the county side and eventually arriving at this
castle. I thought Rollin did a very good job at building up this
atmosphere and things just turn downright crazy once the vampire enter
the picture. The highlight of the film is a rather long sequence where
several of the male vampires go into the basement and attack the women
that are chained up. Full nudity galore as this sequence clocks in at
nearly ten-minutes and it's nothing more than the men groping the woman
and I'm certain this was done so that the male viewers could get more
than just a eye-full. This sequence is tinted in this strange pink/rose
color and it really adds to the film and the downright surreal nature
is just untouched by anything else in the film. The rest of the movie
deals with the women trying to decide if they should give in or not and
of course there's more violence and nudity. I thought both Castel and
Dargent were very good in their roles and the supporting cast isn't too
bad either. They're all certainly a lot better than you'd normally see
in a film like this. Those unfamiliar with the work of Rollin will
probably find this one of the easiest of his films to get into and
those just wanting to see some nudity and erotic stuff will find plenty
here.
| Page 1 of 2: | [1] [2] |
| Plot synopsis | Amazon.com summary | Ratings |
| External reviews | Parents Guide | Plot keywords |
| Main details | Your user reviews | Your vote history |