Sometimes a Great Notion (1970) 6.9
A family of fiercely-independent Oregon loggers struggle to keep the family business alive amidst changing times. Director:Paul Newman |
|
| 0Share... |
Sometimes a Great Notion (1970) 6.9
A family of fiercely-independent Oregon loggers struggle to keep the family business alive amidst changing times. Director:Paul Newman |
|
| 0Share... |
| Cast overview, first billed only: | |||
| Paul Newman | ... |
Hank Stamper
|
|
| Henry Fonda | ... |
Henry Stamper
|
|
| Lee Remick | ... |
Viv Stamper
|
|
| Michael Sarrazin | ... |
Leeland Stamper
|
|
| Richard Jaeckel | ... |
Joe Ben Stamper
|
|
|
|
Linda Lawson | ... |
Jan Stamper
|
| Cliff Potts | ... |
Andy Stamper
|
|
|
|
Sam Gilman | ... |
John Stamper
|
| Lee de Broux | ... |
Willard Eggleston
|
|
|
|
Jim Burk | ... |
Biggy Newton
|
| Roy Jenson | ... |
Howie Elwood
|
|
|
|
Joe Maross | ... |
Floyd Evenwrite
|
|
|
Roy Poole | ... |
Jonathan Stamper
|
|
|
Charles Tyner | ... |
Les Gibbons
|
|
|
Bennie E. Dobbins | ... |
Bit Part
(as Bennie Dobbins)
|
Hank Stamper and his father, Henry Stamper own and operate the family business by cutting and shipping logs in Oregon. The town is furious when they continue working despite the town going broke and the other loggers go on strike ordering the Stampers to stop, however Hank continues to push his family on cutting more trees. Hank's wife wishes he would stop and hopes that they can spend more time together. When Hank's half trouble making brother Leland comes to work for them, more trouble starts. Written by Anonymous
I have read Kesey's novel several times over the last 30 years or so. While I see some merit in this movie version, I'd like to see someone have another go at it. The movie only captures the novel in broad strokes. It hits the major point (brother returns to hometown to exact revenge on older sibling), but misses a lot of the flavor. I think Paul Newman, Henry Fonda and Lee Remick were perfect, as were many of the supporting cast. But Michael Sarrazin didn't quite do it for me. Maybe it was the hair, idunno. I always pictured a sort of geeky-looking, bespectacled, beatnick-looking guy with scruffy hair, but still fairly short, and sideburns. Sarrazin probably could have pulled it off, but back in the early 70s, actors were into looking like people from the early 70s.
But more to the point, the movie needed more back-story. We needed to see Johah Stamper "heading west" with young Henry and his brother. We needed to see Jonah fail and surrender to the dampness of the Pacific Northwest and desert his family. We needed to see young Henry take charge ("we're gonna whup her") and begin the logging business that becomes the crux of the story. Also missed were a lot of great scenes when Henry and Leland were children (Henry rescuing Leland from the Devil's Stovepipe, for one). Also missed was the passing of narrative from character to character. One small portion of the novel is actually narrated by a dog. The novel is written, mostly, in the first person from various points of view. There is a little second person narrative at the beginning of most chapters that pull the reader out of the story to offer additional flavor for the surroundings. Obviously, a novel needs to be pared in order to fit into the standard movie length. It would have to be a rather long movie, three hours or so, to portray the texture presented in the novel. But I'd like to see another go at it, maybe even starring Paul Newman as Henry.