| Index | 5 reviews in total |
13 out of 14 people found the following review useful:
Well worth checking out, 12 August 2003
![]()
Author:
zetes from Saint Paul, MN
Excellent early Fassbinder about two shiftless young men who decide, seemingly on the spur of a moment, that the next big step in their lives will be an extended expedition for treasure in Peru's Rio das Mortes region. One of their fiancées (Hanna Schygulla, as gorgeous and as great as ever) finds the notion stupid and wants to put a stop to it. It's a droll comedy and has a ton of great sequences. This is the first film in a Fassbinder bender I'm going on. I'm planning on seeing all of the films of his that have recently been released on DVD. I've been thinking a lot about this particular auteur lately. I don't think that enough time has passed since his untimely death to allow his career to be taken into proper perspective. Fassbinder reminds me a lot of Rohmer, Ozu, Godard and Bresson. He's in his own little world in his films (a world which changed a lot in the 13 or so years during which he was active), and a lot of people are still misunderstanding it as overly theatrical, or stilted, or otherwise. The more films one sees by him, the more one gets adjusted to this universe. I think Rio das Mortes is best appreciated by Fassbinder's fans, and is unlikely to make any new converts (start with Ali: Fear Eats the Soul, Fox and His Friends, and The Marriage of Maria Braun).
6 out of 7 people found the following review useful:
For Fassbinder completists, 20 September 2003
Author:
armagnac23 from San Francisco, CA
This is a good film which will appeal to the realist Fassbinder fans but does not in any way rank with his best gritty works (Merchant, Herr R., Ali)perhaps because of its unrealistic proceedings: The story develops somewhat slowly and predictably, and none of the characters have much development. The acting is good yet primitive, and definitely has an repertory feel to it--one of the beauties of RWF's movies: it was almost comforting to see Gunther Kaufmann, Hanna Schygulla, and Harry Baer together. Michael Konig also puts in a good role as Michel. I thought the best scenes of the movie are when Gunther and Michel seek financial assistance from Hanna's relative.
3 out of 3 people found the following review useful:
Male mythic dreams, female alarms, 27 September 2008
![]()
Author:
jaibo from England
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
After the heavy-handed Brechtian devices of a number of his early
films, Fassbinder really begins to get going in this made-for-TV piece
about a couple of working class men who share a boyhood dream to search
for treasure in Rio das Mortes in Peru. The dream they share is a
typical storytelling "call to adventure" and the film delineates their
deadbeat and usually hopeless attempts to raise the money for the
venture - their economic situation is too hopeless for them to save,
selling their possessions and cashing in their inheritances doesn't add
up to much and attempts to finance the trip as a business venture and a
research expedition fail due to their hopeless inabilities. But luck
arrives in the form of a widow with more money than sense, who stumps
up the finance and so off they go. What we've seen of them doesn't
inspire much hope for their adventure...
All the while, their male story is ironically counterpointed with the
hopes, dreams and aspirations of the live-in girlfriend of one of the
men, played by the extraordinary Hanna Schygulla. She goes to college
and takes part in a feminist theatre-piece (the conclusion of which is
"women's own behaviour is the best evidence of their oppression") but
learns little, as she dreams of placating her nagging mother by
marrying and having lots of kids. All of that is made nonsense of by
the dream-journey of the men, which she almost kiboshes by nearly
shooting them at the end, a quirk of fate saving them.
Fassbinder, to my mind for the first time successfully, moulds his
early obsession with the homo-social exclusion of the female in male
friendships into a contemporary melodrama of some verve and wit. His
story, a classic "quest myth", is ironically set in a society seething
with casual misogyny, violence, class contempt, economic want and
ignorance. Gritty realism is used to undermine the high-falutin dreams
of the men, but the film suggests that lucky twists of fate might save
a dream - all Fassbinder leaves men with is faith in turns of a
friendly card; all he leaves women with is incompatible hopes of
settling down with their menfolk, who shaped the patriarchal world in
which they're subservient to ideals to which men's inmost dreams are
opposed.
0 out of 2 people found the following review useful:
Et Ad Rivum Mortuorum Ego, 31 December 2009
![]()
Author:
hasosch from United States
In Fassbinder's published manuscripts, interviews, notes and his own work as a playwright, poet, film critique, including philosophical writings, there is practically nothing to be found about the possibly highly interesting relationship between Fassbinder and Herbert Achternbusch (in 1971, Achternbusch's first big novel had appeared). Achternbusch must have taken up "Rio Das Mortes" thematically in his film "Das Letzte Loch" (1982) and in the novel "Das Haus Am Nil" (1981), respectively. Thereby, it does not matter if the Nil is in Egypt or not - the Nil is the protagonist, best a personification of an abstract concept "Nil" - and like is bearer basically unbound. And so is the Rio Das Mortes - by the way, it is not in Peru, but in the state of Minas Gerais in Brazil. Nietzsche wrote his famous passage about Mexican Oaxaca - needless to say the had never been there and the name and his concept have not much more than a phonetic reality. Such use of landscapes, cities, rivers, etc. have a good and long tradition in German literature, going back at least down to Goethe's Arcadia: Et in Arcadia ego.
0 out of 4 people found the following review useful:
The emperor has no clothes..., 5 June 2010
![]()
Author:
planktonrules from Bradenton, Florida
Rainer Werner Fassbinder is a writer/director whose body of work varies
more widely than just about any other. Some of his films, such as
"Mother Küsters Goes to Heaven", are brilliant and some are absolutely
terrible and self-indulgent ("Querelle" comes to mind). There just is
no categorizing of this enigmatic man's work. Yet, oddly, there are
also some disciples of the man who talk about his films like they are
ALL brilliant works of art--even though the average viewer would never
sit through many of his films. Imagine Joe Average watching AND
ENJOYING such Fassbinder films as "The Bitter Tears of Petra von
Kant"--it just isn't going to happen! And, because practically every
film he made is adored by a small but loyal crowd, I am reminded of the
tale of the Emperor's New Clothes! In the case of "Rio das Mortes",
it's official--Fassbinder is, so to speak, absolutely naked!
While I realize that the production quality of Fassbinder's films are
not usually up to Hollywood standards (partly, I think, because he made
so many, many films so rapidly in succession), even by Fassbinder
standards "Rio das Mortes" looks cheap. The print is ultra-grainy and
the film looks as if it was filmed with an 8 or 16mm camera. It was
steady (fortunately), but it just had poor resolution.
As for the acting and story, unfortunately, they were actually much
worse than the poor camera-work. The acting, in many cases, was
terrible--with actors doing about as well as you'd expect from
community theater--but no better. There also was a pretty meaningless
fistfight that made me laugh--as the blow obviously never connected! As
for the plot, it never engaged, as you really never cared about these
two fist fighting friends. Part of it was the script and part of you
just wondered why these two flakes with absolutely no training wanted
to sell everything to move to Peru to try to find some Incan treasure
(though sometimes the idiots referred to it as 'Mayan'!). As for the
film's ending involving the Robert Plant-like leading man and his sexy
but screwy girlfriend with a gun, it just made my brain hurt.
Frankly, there's nothing to like about the film. Nothing.
| Plot summary | Ratings | External reviews |
| Main details | Your user reviews | Your vote history |