| Page 1 of 6: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] |
| Index | 51 reviews in total |
42 out of 44 people found the following review useful:
Blistering tale of love and pain, 22 December 2001
Author:
Vince-5 from Pennsylvania
This afternoon, the Fox Movie Channel ran the trailer for The Panic in
Needle Park. I was intrigued, and when the movie followed (uncut--accept
nothing else) I watched. I am still stunned. This livid, documentary-style
look at a faction of society that most people prefer to ignore of simply
lock up is a brutal and powerful piece of cinema.
It is a film devoid of simple black and white categorizations. Bobby and
Helen, deeply in love and deeply addicted to smack, are not bad people;
rather they are people in a very bad situation--screwed up, screwed over,
strung out, and doing whatever they can to survive. We watch as they go from
"just chipping" to crippling, $80-a-day dependency. They steal, deal, hook,
and shoot the profits into a scarred vein. A tone of bleak, tragic
inevitability infuses their lives and the film. We care about them, but all
we can do is watch; there are no offers of help, no outstretched hands. In
an extremely telling moment, Helen says she wants to move out of Needle
Park, to which Bobby simply responds, "It's where I live."
Panic has such a natural, improvisational feel that those existing on a diet
of super-glossy cash-cow cinema may be put off. It is only slightly more
polished than Andy Warhol's Trash, which it resembles by turns--from the
camera that loses focus and trembles ever so slightly to the close-ups of
needles sliding into veins. The gritty city is perfectly captured, with a
tremendous atmosphere of desperation and misfortune. As Bobby, Al Pacino is
marvelous (as usual), but I was really impressed by Kitty Winn in the role
of Helen. I'd only seen her in The Exorcist, where she was mostly relegated
to the background. Here, her portrayal is gut-wrenching, courageous, and
unforgettable. I can say without a doubt, Needle Park is a must-see. It may
not be pretty, but it's life.
35 out of 43 people found the following review useful:
deeply disturbing, 28 January 2001
Author:
azeffer from Brooklyn
This is one of the most disturbing films I have ever seen. It is very real and grisly looking, not polished with the horrible artificial lighting you see nowadays in films. Bobby and Helen are addicts whose lives are going nowhere, they just can't get out of their destructive lifestyle. The scenes of the characters shooting up, tricking, and hanging in the brutal streets of 1970's New York are very realistic. Makes "Trainspotting" look like a Disney cartoon.
29 out of 33 people found the following review useful:
A great portrayal of a relationship between two drug addicts., 5 August 2004
![]()
Author:
Jacob Østergaard from Denmark
This movie is not for people with sensitive nerves. Its harsh realism
is very breathtaking, at times almost overwhelming. It concentrates in
showing what drug addiction does to people in a relationship and
succeeds in doing that. That's also the reason for its timelessness and
artistic value.
Al Pacino and Kitty Winn, who plays the two main characters, Bobby and
Helen, are very realistic in showing the ups and mostly the downs in
the life of a drug addict. Especially the way they at times put their
craving for drugs above each others needs.
The first time I saw the film I was 15. It was shown at my school and
it made a very strong impression on me, especially its portrayal in the
miserable life of a drug addict. I can therefore, among other things,
recommend it as a preventive film for young people.
24 out of 30 people found the following review useful:
Great first performance, 11 November 2004
![]()
Author:
bones-56 from Los Angeles
When I first saw this film, Al Pacino was an unknown actor, yet to play
in the Godfather. I usually just enjoy the movie, but I was surprised
by how fine an actor the star was. I wondered why I had never seen this
guy before.
Pacino has made many fine films, but this one is actually one of his
best..and very few people have ever heard of it. It used to be
available on VHS, but has been out of print now for about twenty years.
I was finally able to get a very expensive used copy from an internet
vendor specializing in hard to get film.
I just hope that this comes out in DVD.
14 out of 17 people found the following review useful:
One of the best films I've ever seen., 21 August 2005
![]()
Author:
MovieAddict2012 from UK
So I was scrolling through a Borders outside of London one day, looking
at all the expensive R2 DVDs I didn't have enough money for, when I
spotted a movie I had never even heard of starring Al Pacino - "The
Panic in Needle Park." It had the same front cover (style-wise) as
"Scarface," which was an obvious marketing ploy. It had a quote from
Francis Ford Coppola, which claimed he chose Pacino for "The Godfather"
after seeing the film and screening it to Paramount execs.
It had piqued my interest and it was only five pounds (roughly ten
dollars) so I thought, "Why not? If it's awful it's still only five
pounds." I bought it, went home later that night and watched it.
I was blown away because it was easily one of the more interesting
character studies I'd ever seen. It's got unlikable characters, for
sure, but there's still a connection to them which allowed me, at
least, to relate to their struggles. (And no, I don't use heroin.) The
film stars Al Pacino in one of his very first roles as a heroin addict
living in New York City, an era dubbed "Needle Park," where all the
junkies hang out. (I believe I saw the exact same park in another drug
movie released the same year, called "Born to Win," starring George
Segal and Robert De Niro.) Pacino gets a girlfriend and gets her hooked
on heroin. Essentially the film just examines her downfall from
prosperity to hellish misfortune - they both live for their next hit.
The movie is unflinching. It's raw, brutal, and uneasy. (I recall
reading they actually hired heroin addicts for the "shoot-up" scenes,
something that would never be allowed today.) I can understand how some
people might be put off by the slow pace of the movie and say, "How can
I be expected to enjoy a movie with such vile characters?" However, I
thought it was handled well - it's on the verge of exploitation
sometimes (primarily the scenes which show the junkies shooting up) but
for the most part manages to walk a careful line between exploitation
and study.
Pacino's performance is one of his best ever, which is a shame because
he never receives credit for it. It's one of the only roles where he
isn't in control and although he does yell a few times, for the most
part he's more calm and subdued - Michael Corleone as a drug addict.
"The Panic in Needle Park" is a great, underrated film and I highly
recommend it to anyone who thinks they can handle the content. It's not
a rewarding experience in the typical sense but after spending two
hours with miserable heroin addicts, it will make you feel better about
your own lifestyle.
12 out of 16 people found the following review useful:
Specter of Bergman, 27 December 2003
Author:
harry-76 from Cleveland, Ohio
Director Jerry Schatzberg's style looks remarkably like Ingmar Bergman's in
works like "Scenes From a Marriage." Using no music background only real
life sounds, abrupt scene cutting and cross-cutting, highly realistic style,
and copious closeups, the Bergman influence is apparent.
Schatzberg fashioned a piece that has a timeless look and feel. While Verdi
Square (Needle Park) may not be quite as rich with denizens today and that
W. 72nd subway exit not as peopled with thick crowds, it's still bustling
mid-Manhattan--like no other place on earth.
And no better actor to play the street savvy slicker than Al Pacino in only
his second film appearance. He, Kitty Winn and a host of sharp protogees
from the Strasberg seminars breathe life into the scenario.
It remains one of Mr. Pacino's best efforts, and a film that paved the way
for a new realism in gritty subject material.
19 out of 30 people found the following review useful:
Haven't seen anything similar for years, 6 January 2003
![]()
Author:
bakovljev (slb@alnista.com) from United Kingdom
The film is a real throwback to the 1970's. It captures the pervasive
feeling of nihilism perfectly well, particularly on the subject of drugs.
The not so great colour and sound strangely add to the experience in
making
the film seem more documentary than a tale of two young people caught in
the
vortex of addiction.
Pacino and Winn both play remarkably believable leads.
It may not be an uplifting experience to watch the film, but in watching
it,
you cannot help feeling that it's a privilage to watch such mastery of
directing and acting.
9 out of 12 people found the following review useful:
A Depressing Slice of Life!, 14 January 2003
Author:
jlrayfield from USA
This is probably one of Al Pacino's best films. I would say that it is even better then "The Godfather" because you almost want to reach out and help the characters but you can't. They all have the same problem. That problem is heroin addiction and it has caused a multitude of problems in their lives. This is a great film. It is usually not shown on television (I did see it on PBS a few years ago but I think that was a rare exception) I think however, because of its realistic content most stations try not to air it. If you can find it on video I highly recommend it.
10 out of 15 people found the following review useful:
Great movie. Thank you, 20 January 2003
![]()
Author:
(varvo@libero.it) from Pinerolo, Italy
I think this movie as one of the most beautiful films of ever. I think that for more than one reason : for the first thing Al Pacino is my favourite actor, and in this movie he's simply at his best, he's cool and fast, reactive and thirty years in the future on the look. The co-protagonist, Helen, is wonderful and her look expressions fill the empty minutes of silence, you'll be attracted in a deep, magical and intimal atmosphere of love between her and Bobby. The story is simple as nice, true and there are no spectacular surprises, effects or a prevedible ending...just them, just looks, feelings, dynamics. The italian version is wonderful, my thanks to Ferruccio Amendola (Bobby's voice), he'll live with us forever. Thank you Al, thank you Helen, thank you.
4 out of 5 people found the following review useful:
A street level exercise in decay and survival., 12 December 2002
![]()
Author:
John Dennison (jtdurden@hotmail.com) from Cardiff, Wales
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
The Panic In Needle Park is a gritty, often uncomfortable 110 mins in the company of lowlifes, pimps, prostitutes and dope addicts. *Possible Spoilers* The film itself is quite uncompromising, no morals, no redemption, just a street living couple who cannot decide whether they love smack or one another more. No doubt if this film was made today we'd have the rehabilitation programme and the tearful reunion once the two protagonists were 'clean' and ready to rejoin society. However, this is not for this film. The Panic In Needle Park is decidedly bleak, and offers us a slice of reality that not many of us see from our normal suburban lives. Jerry Schatzberg directs this movie with a documentary feel, and this, coupled with outstanding performances by Pacino and Winn, gives a very natural, flowing experience. Where Schatzberg did so well and many directors fail is in giving the viewer well sketched characters that you will genuinely get to know and empathize with, as you watch them flush their lives down the toilet. Of course it helps if you have Pacino and Winn playing them, and they really breathe life into the tragic lives of Bobby and Helen. Definitely one worth watching, unless you are depressed or have an aversion to seeing lengthy shots of half dead people putting dirty needles in their veins. But then I doubt heroin addiction is as hip as a sharp suited John Travolta jacking up and listening to cool tunes in Pulp Fiction.
| Page 1 of 6: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] |
| Plot summary | Ratings | Awards |
| Newsgroup reviews | External reviews | Parents Guide |
| Plot keywords | Main details | Your user reviews |
| Your vote history |