Up 19,995 this week

Ginger (1971)

 -  Action | Crime | Drama  -  March 1971 (USA)
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 3.1/10 from 344 users  
Reviews: 10 user | 12 critic

A rich society girl is recruited to go undercover and expose a drug/blackmail/prostitution ring in her small town.



0Check in

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 1552 titles
created 26 Jan 2012
a list of 960 titles
created 12 Nov 2012
a list of 1196 titles
created 28 Nov 2012
a list of 69 titles
created 8 months ago
a list of 29 titles
created 6 months ago

Connect with IMDb

Share this Rating

Title: Ginger (1971)

Ginger (1971) on IMDb 3.1/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Ginger.




Cast overview, first billed only:
Cheri Caffaro ...
Duane Tucker ...
Rex Halsey
Herbert Kerr ...
Jimmy / Jimbo
Calvin Culver ...
David Ross ...
Michele Norris ...
Vicki Jennings
Cindy Barnett ...
Jean Oliver
Lise Mauer ...
Elizabeth Anderson / Liz (as Lise D. Mauer)
Linda Susoeff ...
Cathy Carson
William Grannel ...
Jason Varone (as William Grannell)
Clark Ames ...
Jud Philips
Jerry Allgor
Chuck Beard
Ginger's Brother (as Tracey Walters)


The police suspect that a drug and forced-prostitution ring is behind the recent spate of kidnappings and disappearances, but so far they've been unable to infiltrate the suspects gang. To break the case, they recruit Ginger, a young woman from an upper-class family to act as bait for the kidnappers and hopefully lead the police to their hideout. It may sound like a foolproof plan to the police, but Ginger's the one who has to risk it all. Written by Jean-Marc Rocher <>

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis


MEET GINGER-Her weapon is her body. She can cut you, kill you, or cure you. See more »


Action | Crime | Drama


R | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:





Release Date:

March 1971 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Ginger  »

Filming Locations:


Company Credits

Production Co:

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs


Sound Mix:



Aspect Ratio:

1.85 : 1
See  »

Did You Know?


Debut of Tracey Walter. See more »


Rodney: She's one of us, Liz; just a bored little child of the jet-set.
Liz: This afternoon she looked about like the jet-set as some scrawny alley cat would next to one of my pure-bred Siamese kittens.
See more »


Featured in Twisted Sex Vol. 19 (1998) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

A guilty pleasure - like the occasional splurge when dieting
21 November 2004 | by (Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada) – See all my reviews

When I reviewed the film 'Christina' for IMDb, I commented that it was very poorly made in comparison with many of the earlier films of the same genre, such as the early 1970's series featuring the female private investigator Ginger. Later thinking back about this spontaneous comment I found it hard to rationalise why I had hated watching Christina, but had enjoyed the Ginger series; and I began to wonder whether this was solely because I was looking back at the latter series, which I have not viewed during the quarter century since they were first released, through the rose coloured spectacles of relative youth. Many of the criticisms I had made about Christina seemed on reflection to have been equally applicable to the Ginger films. These and other films of the same genre were made on a relatively low budget for the sole purpose of bringing in good returns to their promoters; or (if we are more charitable) building up the funds required for the production of a planned future epic or Oscar winner. They are basically simple exploitation movies with an appeal based on sex and violence and with no pretensions to cinematographic significance. The promoters know that the largest cinema audiences consist of young people who typically attend in groups or pairs and who expect an interesting but not memorable screening they can enjoy together. Films such as "Ginger" or "Pepper" appeal to girls and women because they feature an unusually capable female investigator who can always deal with male colleagues or opponents on a more than equal basis. Their recipe includes enough violence and female nudity to ensure that they have an equal appeal for youths and young men; and they always show respect for the traditional values of Society - the good guys always win out in the end and there is no tolerance of either criminals or revolutionaries. Why then should I remember the Ginger films quarter of a century later, whilst most of the other films of the same genre which I have seen since have now been totally forgotten?

To answer this question I obtained copies of the first and third of the Ginger films ("Ginger" and "Girls are for Loving") to watch again, and am now submitting my comments on both to IMDb. These two sets of comments should be regarded as complimentary - probably the main difference between these films is that the first is a typical very low budget production designed to test the market, whilst the third has clearly benefited from rather less financial constraints. In these comments I am limiting myself to generalities when considering 'Ginger', but examining more specific considerations in the case of 'Girls are for Loving'.

Viewing these two films for a second time I found it very hard to identify any areas where they are significantly better in quality than 'Christina'. All these films feature violence, nudity and sexually suggestive situations, with no redeeming social message, often to the point where they would be regarded by most viewers as no more than soft porn. They are intended to provide easy viewing but not memorable fare. The Martin and Porter Guide to Home Videos makes the telling comment that it will not describe "Ginger" as the best of these three films, but rather as the least repulsive. However the Ginger films are still available as DVD's, and are presumably still selling, over 30 years after they were first released, so I am not alone in remembering them when so many of their later imitators have been totally forgotten. After watching them again I feel certain that this difference is primarily attributable to a much greater tautness in the script. Watching many other similar films, viewers encounter numerous rather boring sequences where they wonder why they are wasting their time watching such trash. Ultimately this leads to a low rating for the film in question. The problem here lies in the direction. Whilst they were no better made or acted, the direction of the Ginger films is such that the story carries the viewer forward from moment to moment in a way which leaves little time for introspection or boredom to develop. In my view this is the reason they have survived whilst so many later films have fallen by the wayside. But their appeal is purely that of a guilty pleasure, re-watching them reminded me of the appeal of splurging on a massive and rich ice cream concoction after a long period of dieting. The only reason why this may be said to be a good thing to do is that, certainly for some people, an occasional indulgence of this kind can be of enormous value in helping them to maintain the ongoing discipline of dieting over an extended period of time.

If you know that you enjoy this type of occasional indulgence, watch one or more of the Ginger films. You will probably not be disappointed.

6 of 8 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Who's the actress? Blue-59
What other films like this are there? mattvl79
Discuss Ginger (1971) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for: