Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditsAwards & Reviews
user reviewsexternal reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guidemessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summarysynopsisplot keywordsmemorable quotesDid You Know?
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
box office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsReviews & Ratings for
Patton More at IMDbPro »
| Page 1 of 22: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] ![[Next]](http://i.media-imdb.com/f86.gif){kind=small} |
| Index | 217 reviews in total |
127 out of 175 people found the following review useful:
Fascinating portrait of the Allies' greatest general, 8 September 1999
Author:
Daniel R. Baker from United States
A few years ago, I had the pleasure of reading "The Patton Papers," a
collection of Gen. Patton's diary entries and letters edited by Martin
Blumenson. Having seen the movie, I think that no actor has ever better
captured the spirit of a man better than George C. Scott, nor has any movie
better portrayed that spirit than PATTON.
Patton was a man who lived for war. World War II was the high point and
culmination of his life. He didn't fight for any principles, he didn't
fight to defend freedom or democracy or any abstract idea; he fought because
he loved fighting. In his diaries you can read of his fear of flunking out
of West Point; the prospect terrified him because he was certain that he
would never be good at anything except being a general or a leader of a
country.
As a leader of men, he was exceptional. His speech at the beginning of the
movie is vintage Patton, an almost exact reproduction of a speech Patton
actually gave to Third Army. It's tough, and no-nonsense; Patton lets you
know in no uncertain terms that he is here to win, to destroy the enemy, and
by God you'd better be too. I don't know if Patton actually directed
traffic on the roads as he is shown doing in the movie, but it was a very
Pattonish thing to do. Patton did on at least one occasion get out of his
staff car and join a squad of G.I.'s in heaving a vehicle out of the mud.
Try to imagine Montgomery doing that; the very thought is
hilarious!
Patton's character explains his treatment of his men. To those who had been
wounded fighting for him he was always kind and considerate. But to those
whose minds could not stand the horrible strain that war imposed on them, he
was merciless; he could not comprehend the fact that other people didn't
share his love of violence for violence' sake. PATTON shows this aspect of
his character very well.
Karl Malden's Omar Bradley is shown in an almost father-like role; he sees
and recognizes Patton's immense talents as a general, and uses them in spite
of Patton's natural ability to antagonize everybody around him. Not shown
in the movie is Patton's unloveable characteristic of turning on his
subordinates once they surpassed him in their careers. Patton had nothing
but good to say about Bradley, until Bradley was promoted over Patton's
head, whereupon Patton savaged Bradley in his diary. Patton did the same to
Eisenhower.
A general can have no higher compliment than the fear and respect of his
adversaries, and as PATTON demonstrates, Patton was more feared by the
Germans than any other Allied general, at least on the Western front. As
one German officer observes all too prophetically, "the absence of war will
destroy him [Patton]." And although mankind's single greatest stroke of
good fortune in the 20th century was that Russia and America never came to
blows, it is still hard not to feel sorry for Patton as he desperately seeks
his superiors' approval to carry the war on eastward into the Soviet Union -
anything, just to have a war to fight. Patton is like an addict to a
destructive drug.
Hollywood has rarely given us such a textured and human portrait of a great
man: cruel, often foolish in his relations with others, rude, and
psychopathically attached to violence, but brave, dedicated, and loyal.
Certainly those who, like myself, have Jewish blood, or who were otherwise
marked for death by the Nazi state, all owe him a great debt of gratitude
for his pivotal role in destroying that state. And yet, had he been born
German, Patton would surely have fought just as devotedly for the Nazi side.
I'm glad he wasn't.
Rating: **** out of ****.
83 out of 105 people found the following review useful:
A film about the man not the war, 20 April 2003
Author:
kevin-caprani from United Kingdom
Oliver Stone has said this film glorifies war, i disagree, what it does is show a man {Patton} who gloried in war, the war is shown through his perspective,and to Patton war is glorious and he revels in it.The performance of George c scott as Patton is brilliant, it shows a complex and demanding character riddled with contradictions ,who believes he was born to be a leader of men,the supporting cast is very good particularly karl Malden who plays general Bradley a calm experienced soldier with no dreams of glory, the perfect foil to the maverick Patton, the combat scenes are well shot and are never more than is necessary to support the narrative,the film rises above being very good to excellence due to George c Scotts intuitive grasp of the character.
85 out of 110 people found the following review useful:
Outstanding work by George Scott, 20 March 1999
Author:
Clothahump from Houston, TX
The best comment on this film was made by my father. This was the last movie he saw in a theater. He had served under Patton in WW2 and said that Scott had nailed Patton's character and mannerisms so perfectly that halfway through the opening speech, he expected Scott/Patton to look down and say, "$@%#$@, Sears, get a haircut - your hair's too &#%#$%@ long!"
101 out of 152 people found the following review useful:
"When the going gets tough, they call for the sons of bitches"...Adm. Ernest King, 5 November 2003
Author:
Puck-20 from Bannana Republic
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
Patton is a movie about a man who on one hand was one of America's
greatest
generals, and on the other hand was only marginally saner than Gen. Jack
D.
Ripper.
According to several vets I got to talk to (who actually served under the
real Patton!), George C. Scott's portrayal was spot-on. A few observations
on the movie:
Even when I was a kid, seeing Patton when it came out in 1970, I was
suspicious of the tanks used in that battle scene in North Africa. Even
then, they didn't look like
the classic German tanks...Patton's speech in the beginning of the movie
was
edited for content. If you ever read the original version of his speech,
it
makes the movie version sound like a church sermon.
I also wished that the movie had pointed out that in WW1, Patton commanded
the first ever American tank battalion, and was severely wounded in
battle,
yet kept fighting until he just about passed out from loss of blood. I
thought this should have been brought out that he had practiced what he
preached... Gen. Omar Bradley: portrayed in the movie as Patton's "buddy",
he was nothing of the sort. Jealous of Patton, the real life Bradley would
go to Eisenhower behind Patton's back to stymie George's success.
Monty: Sorry, Monty fans, but the movie points out one historical fact.
Monty usurped needed gas and supplies from Patton in September of '44 for
his disastrous "Market Garden" attack (watch Richard Attenborough's "A
Bridge Too Far" as a companion movie to "Patton"). Thanks to Monty, the
war
went on much longer than it probably would have if Patton had been allowed
to drive into Germany. Patton's arrogance helped win battles. Monty's
arrogance gave us the Battle of the Bulge, the fire bombing of Dresden,
not
to mention countless Jewish lives lost. Patton had the Germans reeling in
the fall of 1944, and, as the movie pointed out, had the army in just the
right place at the right time to end it. Unfortunately, thanks to Monty's
political pull and crappy generalmanship, the war went on longer than it
should have...
57 out of 68 people found the following review useful:
Favorite war film . . ., 2 December 2003
Author:
jaywolfenstien from USA
. . . and it's not even about the war. There's no wall to wall action. In
fact, World War II is merely the setting – a backdrop so to speak – and the
battles are all downplayed in favor of giving the audience a glimpse into
the brilliance (or insanity) of the historically significant character,
Patton. From the script on up, everything plays out wonderfully to bring
the famous general to life on screen, and after watching George C. Scott
deliver his Oscar-worthy performance, I find it hard to believe there were a
number of actors on the list above his name.
George C. Scott's performance of Patton is one I consider the greatest given
of any war film. Patton is a champion for freedom while sometimes equally
as much of a tyrant as the ones he's trying to put down, he's a monster and
a hero, and neither he nor the filmmakers give a damn about political
correctness. I found the character to be an overly harsh prick, myself, but
in some strange way, very likeable and sympathetic, and when watching the
movie again I don't look at the screen and say, `Hey, there's George C.
Scott.' Instead it's, `Hey, there's Patton.' Not very many film characters
have a personality strong enough to overtake the actor playing them. I
appreciate that depth and that degree of realism, this attention to detail
on the parts of Scott and Schaffner.
Schaffner surprised me by somehow managing to capture my interest on a
subject matter I'd ordinarily write off as too silly (Planet of the Apes);
two years later, he applied that same technical know how, craft, and
intelligent storytelling towards a film whose subject appeals to me from the
get go, and once again I'm impressed. There are some great war films out
today; however, Schaffner's take pursued the most unique perspective in all
realms, and captured my imagination with such ease . . . I can't help but
come back to it over other war films.
And I have to comment on the score, which is not only one of my favorite
Goldsmith scores but also one of my favorite war-film scores. Jerry
Goldsmith matched point for point the brilliance of Franklin Schaffner's
vision, the depth of George C. Scott's performance, and somehow managed to
captured the essence of both musically. A good music score is one that
tells the story of the film in its own unique voice. Goldsmith's score has
such a prominent voice in the experience of Patton, that to remove it would
be the equivalent of removing Schaffner's direction or George C. Scott.
Lastly, how accurate is the film? Not a clue, and even if it is completely
false, I don't care. I've never been about writing history papers based on
cinema experiences. All I know for certain is that Patton is a very
entertaining and well balanced movie that holds up very well thirty years
later, and it's a film that can be admired for its craft.
58 out of 72 people found the following review useful:
A fine epic about a "pure warrior.", 21 October 2002
Author:
ironside (robertfrangie@hotmail.com) from Mexico
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
The war epic was revived with Franklin Schaffner's admirable 'Patton.'
Schaffner's control of his film is impressive, and the various campaign
sequences are strikingly photographed through an audaciously wide
lens...
George C. Scott was commonly referred to as a 'character actor' in view
of his remarkably extensive range... Oddly for a character actor, Scott
was almost always the same person on screen vigorous to the point of
pugnacity, acting with his chin the way other actors do with their
eyes-yet revealing, in his own eyes, unsuspected depths of humor and
intelligence...
Now few actors have ever been so convincing in such a powerful and
colorful character... Only Peter 0'Toole's eccentric T.E. Lawrence
comes immediately to mind... Both, he and Scott, create their
characters out of complementary contradictions... Lawrence detests the
savagery of war but embraces it... Patton cannot separate the conduct
of war from his own personal glorification, and both actors are given
large canvases upon which to work...
Screenwriters Francis Ford Coppola and Edmund H. North and director
Franklin J. Schaffner introduce a 16th-century warrior lost in
contemporary times... He is a brilliant and military historian, with a
hazardous speech...
Magnificently uniformed, and wearing his ivory-handled pistol, George
S. Patton steps up, against a backdrop of the Stars and Stripes, before
an unseen gathering of soldiers defining himself in unambiguous terms
as a man who revels in war... The scene is cut to a close shot of two
scorpions crawling across the body of a dead soldier at the Kasserine
Pass, Tunisia... The camera then pulls back to reveal a harsh look at
American casualties with dozens of Arabs busily stripping more
bodies...
The American Army has just suffered its first defeat at the hands of
the Germans... Patton's first job is to restore the morale and
discipline of the dispirited troops of his new command... His
experience with tanks led General Dwight Eisenhower to place him in
charge of one of the three task forces invading North Africa in 1943...
According to his theory of war, Patton would drive all the way to
Palermo on the northern coast of Sicily, slicing the island in half...
But his finest moment comes during the massive German counteroffensive
in the Ardennes... By the time the Germans feared him above all other
Allied generals...
Schaffner turns to the Germans for comments on Patton's abilities...
They expect him to lead a major invasion... When he was sent to
Corsica, the Germans were convinced he would lead an invasion of
southern France... When he was sent to Cairo, they feared for an
invasion through the Balkans...
Patton is seen reprimanded by Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower for indiscreet
political statements... As an able tactician who promotes himself to
three-star general before it's officially approved by the U.S. Senate,
Patton proves himself as the most effective American field commander of
the European war... Behind his audacity lay an imaginative planning and
a shrewd judgment... Patton knows that loyalty to a leader would
inspire his men to take on objectives against all odds... His strict
discipline, toughness, and disregard of classic military rules,
contributed to his advance across France and Germany...
The modest and conscientious Omar Bradley, commander of the U.S. 12th
Army Group, who had served under Patton in Africa and Sicily as a
deputy commander, found Patton to be a superb combat general, but
hotheaded, profane, and unpredictable... Bradley ends now as Patton's
superior... It was soon apparent that the two make a superb team...
Patton's dash and drive in the field is a perfect complement to
Bradley's careful planning...
With the help of Bradley, Patton prepares to re-engage German Field
Marshal Erwin Rommel... After he defeats Rommel's 10th Panzer Division
at El Guettar thanks to his analysis of Rommel's published strategies,
he shouts one of the greatest lines in war films: "Rommel, you
magnificent bastard, I read your book!" At the same time, his rivalry
with his Field Marshal Montgomery (hero of El Alamein) becomes more
intense... Patton was motivated by a pride to reach his target before
his British colleague, sometimes not for the purpose of the Allies...
Karl Malden has the film's only other significant leading role, as the
most capable, yet unpretentious general... Malden could be deduced from
the number of major directors with whom he has worked... These include
Cukor, Hathaway, Kazan, King, Preminger, Milestone, Vidor, Hitchcock,
Brooks, Mulligan, Daves, Brando, Frankenheimer, Ford, Quine and
Schaffner... In his best and most personal work he has succeeded in
exploring depths of moral ambiguity rare in commercial cinema...
Schaffner illuminates various sides of Patton's remarkable personality,
presenting a dashing extrovert and attractive general, with a
compassionate side...
Touring an evacuation hospital in Sicily, Patton slaps an enlisted
soldier twice calling him a 'yellow,' and threatens to shoot him,
before two men forcibly remove him from the tent... The incident occurs
because Patton's views of bravery and cowardice are so severely
limited... The fighting general who has the imagination to write poetry
and to believe that he has been reincarnated, in ancient Greece, at
Carthage, and Moscow, cannot conceive of a psychological wound that he
cannot see... The incident occurred after he prays at the bedside of
one man severely injured... Patton whispers some words in his ear which
the audience doesn't hear, then lays a medal on his pillow and gives
him a gentle touch on his head... The portrait is so compelling that
it's easy to overlook Patton's own final words in the film, "All glory
is fleeting."
Franklin J. Schaffner's motion picture reveals an effective portrait of
three men: Patton, Bradley, and the unseen Dwight Eisenhower... The
film is a fine epic about 'a pure warrior, and a magnificent
anachronism,' who loved war...
The Academy Awards saluted 'Patton' capturing eight Oscars, including
best picture, best director, best actor (Scott declined his well
deserved Oscar), best screenplay, best editing, and best production
design...
67 out of 94 people found the following review useful:
A fine tribute to a great patriot and fearless warrior, 9 July 2000
Author:
tim.riley from Seattle, Washington USA
I am a fan of both General Patton and the movie that captured a portion of his duty in WWII. It exposes Patton's incredible strengths and vulnerabilities. George C. Scott gives one of his best performances. It leaves the viewer with the impression that Patton unnecessarily risked GI lives to "make a bigger splash" with his peers and the media. Statistics show that his aggressive "hold 'em by the nose and kick 'em in the ass" strategy actually resulted in lower casualties. Watched in conjunction with "The Big Red One" and "Saving Private Ryan" gives one an initial sense of the horror and sacrifice in the European Theatre. As a mini-biography, as an introduction to WWII, as a lesson in leadership under tremendous adversity or just for pure inspiration, Patton is one of the great films of my lifetime.
43 out of 49 people found the following review useful:
The Classic War Movie, 24 June 2004
Author:
nabor7 from Texas
Not much can be said of this movie that already hasn't been said. It captures the war, the man, and the conflict of the two. I thought the movie was very nicely tied together and I thought the reflections of Patton on the past was very necessary. Patton believed in reincarnation so in looking back at historical battles you can see how Patton developed his strategy. He was a student of great leaders and commanders and the movie developed that thought really well. The movie presented the characters, the actual war history, and the Germans extremely well and it is no wonder this movie received the awards it did. After watching this movie over and over again, I'm convinced that no one could have played Patton any better than George C. Scott. You can tell from the movie that he put everything he had into the character. My father-in-law was an officer under Patton in the 3rd. Army and has said over and again how realistic the movie is. I would recommend this movie to anyone looking for an excellent re-telling of WWII history.
41 out of 49 people found the following review useful:
A great war film, 4 May 2005
Author:
arthurclay from Italy
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
And the best performance from an Actor in history. George C. Scott is General Patton, the greatest General of World War II and the most controversial. Scott gives the performance of a lifetime if Patton watched this film he couldn't tell the difference himself. Scott portrays him the way he was, not the way he should be or the way we would like him to be. Patton is Patton, tough, resilient, fearless, sarcastic, angry, witty, cultured, charming, bull-headed, uncompromising, temperamental, and more patriotic than Uncle Sam on the 4th of July. The speech at the beginning with him in front of the American flag sets the tone. It's his way or the highway. And Patton is driving. His antics tick off the high command and rankle his subordinates but they all can't argue with his success. Karl Malden is his good friend and at times adversary General Bradley who is as resourceful as Patton is eccentric and they make a great pair. Every time Patton has a victory he screws it up by way of his gargantuan mouth. But he keeps going. When disaster strikes he always manages to pull defeat out of his rear and strike a blow for the 2nd Corps or the 3rd Army or whatever army he's commanding. His soldiers love him, his soldiers hate him, but his soldiers fight for him regardless because they know he's the best. Patton's rise is like Patton's fall, momentous. His last line is the most telling of all. "They remind us that glory, like everything else, is fleeting." Glory may be fleeting but this movie won't be. Perhaps the best war movie in history.
46 out of 61 people found the following review useful:
Scott Delivers Memorable Performance, 14 June 2006
Author:
ccthemovieman-1 from United States
This is a long but interesting character study of a real-life person:
General George S. Patton, who also was a real "character." Gen. Patton
was one of the most famous military men of World War II, a super
gung-ho leader who admittedly had an intense passion for battle.
How much of this story is fact and how much is fiction, I don't know.
Knowing Hollywood and knowing when this was made - during the heyday of
the anti-war (Vietnam) movement - I have my suspicions, but for the
sake of the review, I will assume all of this is true.Whatever
political bias a filmmaker might have, Patton made for a good movie
subject anyway and the story is interesting all the way, thanks to the
acting of George C. Scott, who was astounding as Patton and gives one
of the more memorable performances ever by an actor.
Not only is Scott's acting superb, the widescreen photography is also
good. Thank goodness DVDs came out so films like this could be seen in
the aspect in which they were filmed. I can't imagine viewing this on
formatted-to-TV images. I think much of this movie was filmed in Spain.
I think the filmmakers also did a nice job of not overdoing the action
scenes. When overdone, violence can get boring. The explosions and
machine-gun fire was realistic, especially for a film that is now 36
years old.
Going back to what's true and what isn't, if it was then Patton was a
poor excuse for a Christian, which he claims to be here. For one thing,
Christians don't believe in re-incarnation at Patton claims he did in
the film. There are other comments, too, which shed a poor light on his
"religion," something Hollywood loves to point out.
Nonetheless, if you enjoy character studies, this is one of the best.
Patton's opening 6-minute speech before this huge American flag is a
famous scene in movie history. That, and the rest of his performance
and this movie in general, is one you won't forget.
| Page 1 of 22: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] |
Related Links
| Plot summary | Plot synopsis | Ratings |
| Awards | Newsgroup reviews | External reviews |
| Parents Guide | Plot keywords | Main details |
| Your user reviews | Your vote history |
Copyright © 1990-2013
IMDb.com, Inc.
Conditions of Use | Privacy Policy | Interest-Based Ads
An 
company.