Joe (1970)

User Rating:

6.8/10   

Director:

John G. Avildsen

Writer:

Norman Wexler (written by)

Release Date:

15 July 1970 (USA)

Genre:

Drama

Tagline:

Keep America Beautiful

Plot:

Bill, a wealthy businessman, confronts his junkie daughter's drug-dealing boyfriend; in the ensuing argument...

Plot Keywords:

Bar | Drug Dealing | Factory Worker | Bathtub Scene | Hospital

Awards:

Nominated for Oscar.

Cast

Peter Boyle	...	Joe Curran
Dennis Patrick	...	Bill Compton
Audrey Caire	...	Joan Compton
Susan Sarandon	...	Melissa Compton
K Callan	...	May Lou Curran (as K. Callan)
Patrick McDermott	...	Frank Russo
Tim Lewis	...	Kid in soda shop
Estelle Omens	...	Woman in bargain store
Bob O'Connell	...	Man in bargain store
Marlene Warfield	...	Bellevue nurse
Mary Case	...	Teenage girl buying drugs
Jenny Paine	...	Teenage girl buying drugs
Reid Cruickshanks	...	American bartender
Rudy Churney	...	Man in bar
Robert Emerick	...	TV newscaster

Also Known As:

The Gap (USA) (working title)

Runtime:

107 min

Country:

USA

Language:

English

Color:

Color

Aspect Ratio:

1.85 : 1

Sound Mix:

Mono

Certification:

Iceland:16 | Canada:R (Ontario) | Australia:R | New Zealand:R16 | Australia:MA (cable rating) | Finland:K-18 | Norway:18 | Sweden:15 | UK:15 | USA:R

Filming Locations:

New York City, New York, USA

Trivia:

Lynn Lowry auditioned for the role of Melissa Compton.

Goofs:

Boom mic visible: Microphone briefly visible over Joe's head in phone booth.

Quotes:

Joe: Forty-two percent of all liberals are queer, that's a fact. The Wallace people did a poll.

Movie Connections:

Referenced in Magic Time: A Tribute to Jack Lemmon (2002) (V)

Still Very Relevant

Caution-possible spoilers ahead….. Just watched 'Joe' for the second time. The first time was 30+ years ago on an Air Force Base. I was reminded of that by the Air Force overcoat with Tech. Sgt. stripes wore by the boyfriend/dealer; we airmen had quite a laugh the first time that appeared on the screen because that is a 'lifer' rank. Over the years I have carried several other images from the film. Foremost was the absolutely beautiful and vulnerable daughter of the executive. As someone else commented, you could not take you eyes off her. I did not realize until now that this was a 20-year old Susan Sarandon in her first movie. What a loss that she did not do more movies when she looked like that. I also recall the irony of having a counterculture hero like Peter Boyle playing the title role of a right-wing gun nut. Not unlike George C. Scott playing generals in Dr. Strangelove and Patton. And of course the shocking ending made a lasting impression.

30+ years ago it was the most talked about movie that ever played on the base. We thought it was a great film then and I have been reluctant to see it again because I was afraid that it would be as disappointingly dated as Easy Rider. But watching it today I was amazed at how well the film has held up. It is a very strong script with few holes although you have to wonder about the boyfriend immediately getting out of the bathtub when Sarandon gets in with him.

Searching for an explanation of why this film is still so entertaining I have to think it has something to do with the perfect physical casting. Boyle was physically believable as Joe (as others have pointed out his portrayal would inspire the Archie Bunker character a few 'years later). Did Ted Knight model his 'Caddyshack' character-Judge Smails after the Dennis Patrick's advertising executive in 'Joe'? They look alike and sound alike. Patrick was totally believable as the wrapped-too-tight upper middle class executive. And Sarandon's doe-eyed innocent with the Raggety Ann doll still evokes a protective response from all male viewers-perfect casting.

The nude and drug scenes actually hold up (they were very provocative for their day) and are as explicit as anything to be found in 'Thirteen'. About the only thing that dates this film is that the violence is not realistic or graphic. 'Joe' was about the same time as 'The Wild Bunch', and the tone of movie violence had a just begun to change.

Another reason this film holds up is that events in the past couple of years have brought back the relevancy of the theme and context of this film. In the film both types of 'conservatives' are portrayed as full of fear and hate toward the unconventional ways of the counterculture; and filled with envy at their free and hedonistic lifestyle. The counterculture is portrayed as mocking the straight culture; and although paranoid toward conservatives (legitimately so given that this was just a couple months after Kent State) they cannot resist flaunting their lifestyle in an attempt to antagonize. The political landscape is not all that different 30+ years later. I'm not sure conservatives envy young people and liberals as much as 1970, but they fear and hate them more.

An excellent film that surprisingly is as relevant now as it was in the early 1970's.