IMDb > Cromwell (1970)
IMDb Holiday Movie Guide

Overview

User Rating:
6.8/10   1,588 votes
MOVIEmeter: ?
Down 17% in popularity this week. See why on IMDbPro.
Director:
Ken Hughes
Writer:
Ken Hughes (screenplay)
Contact:
View company contact information for Cromwell on IMDbPro.
Release Date:
16 September 1970 (France) more
Genre:
Biography | Drama | History | War more
Plot:
Disgusted with the policies of King Charles I, Oliver Cromwell plans to take his family to the New World... more | add synopsis
Plot Keywords:
more
Awards:
Won Oscar. Another 1 win & 4 nominations more
NewsDesk:
Everett To Play King Charles I In New U.K. Costume Drama
 (From Studio Briefing - Film News. 5 December 2001)
User Comments:
What happened to the warts? more (59 total)

Cast

  (Cast overview, first billed only)

Richard Harris ... Oliver Cromwell

Alec Guinness ... King Charles I
Robert Morley ... The Earl of Manchester
Dorothy Tutin ... Queen Henrietta Maria
Frank Finlay ... John Carter

Timothy Dalton ... Prince Rupert
Patrick Wymark ... The Earl of Strafford
Patrick Magee ... Hugh Peters
Nigel Stock ... Sir Edward Hyde
Charles Gray ... The Earl of Essex
Michael Jayston ... Henry Ireton
Richard Cornish ... Oliver Cromwell II
Anna Cropper ... Ruth Carter

Michael Goodliffe ... Solicitor General

Jack Gwillim ... General Byron
more
Create a character page for: ?

Additional Details

Parents Guide:
View content advisory for parents
Runtime:
USA:139 min
Country:
UK
Language:
English
Color:
Color (Technicolor)
Aspect Ratio:
2.20 : 1 more
Sound Mix:
70 mm 6-Track (70 mm prints) | Mono (35 mm prints)
Certification:
Iceland:12 | Singapore:PG | Australia:PG | West Germany:12 | Finland:K-11 (re- rating: 2001) | France:U | Finland:K-12 | Ireland:PG | UK:U (original rating) | USA:G | UK:PG (video rating) (1985)
Filming Locations:
Hatfield House, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, England, UK more
Company:
Irving Allen Productions more

Fun Stuff

Trivia:
'Peter Bennett ' was cut out of this film more
Goofs:
Factual errors: Cromwell's dismissal of the Rump Parliament happened before he was offered the crown, not afterwards. more
Quotes:
John Pym: We would as much go back to our homes and our farms as pursue this mockery of a government one more day. more
Movie Connections:
Referenced in The 100 Greatest War Films (2005) (TV) more

FAQ

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Comments

   (Comment on this title)
24 out of 27 people found the following comment useful.
What happened to the warts?, 31 August 2006
8/10
Author: benbrae76

Being a lay student of these times I was naturally interested in this movie, and to a great extent I found it to be thoroughly enjoyable, but what happened to the Battle of Marston Moor? Was history wrong and the battle never fought? Cromwell was depicted as the over all commander of the New Model Army (i.e the "Roundheads") at the battle of Naseby. He wasn't, Sir Thomas Fairfax was. Cromwell was the commander of the cavalry.

The Civil War was not a conflict over religion, although it played it's part. It was about "the divine right of kings", against the governance of, by and for the people, i.e. Rex v Parliament. Divided loyalties and opinions were split right across the board.

The capital charges of treason brought against the king was, to my mind, not altogether trumped up, and had some validity. However it was of course a "show trial", and to bring it about the laws had to be changed rapidly. There was no edict at the time that allowed anyone to put a monarch on trial. Issac Dorislaus (a Dutch lawyer) came to the rescue of Parliament. He wrote an order that would enable it to set up the court. This order was based on an old Roman law which stated that a military body (in this case the Parliamentary forces) could legally overthrow a tyrant. Naturally Charles I did not agree, either to this law, or that he was a tyrant. He was still the King, still the Head of State, and as such, above the law. He could do as he wished, and was answerable only to God. For him it was an unfortunate way of looking at things.

The casting of this movie was extremely well thought out, but with one exception. Cromwell himself. I'm not criticising Richard Harris in any way. He played the role superbly, but Cromwell was a short stocky man, not tall and athletically built. Neither, I'm sure, did he have a Irish accent. Also he had some extremely noticeable warts on his face which Richard Harris did not. Had the make-up artists gone on vacation? To his credit Richard overcame this miscasting, and acquitted the characterisation of the brusque, complex, and religiously enigmatic Oliver Cromwell with great fervour and passion, and I doubt if anyone else could have done it any better.

On the subject of accents, I wonder whether or not the Scottish accent adopted by Alec Guinness was apt. As Charles I left Scotland at the age of 4, and lived in England until his death, surely he would have cultivated an English one? True he had a Scottish tutor, but I'm still left to wonder. Perhaps someone could set me right.

(Just as a byline, I find it curious that Richard Harris, being an Irishman, accepted the part. In the greater part of Ireland the very name of Oliver Cromwell is loathed and reviled, and for good reason, so it says much for Harris's devotion to the acting profession that he actually did.) Being a musician, I was highly amused at seeing (and hearing) bugles played on horseback during a 17th century battle, reminiscent of the US 7th cavalry. Such instruments weren't developed to such an advanced stage until late into the following century (the 18th).

As another reviewer has noted, Cromwell was certainly not one of the "Five Members" who were to be removed from the House and arrested. These were: John Pym, John Hampden, Denzil Holles, Sir Arthur Haselrig and William Strode. A sixth man, Lord Mandeville (the future Earl of Manchester) was also to be taken.

There are quite a few more historical mistakes and omissions on which other reviewers have remarked, and I don't intend to repeat them. But in defence of the producers it must be said that "The English Civil War" was a momentous stage in British, perhaps even world history, and to illustrate it all in a couple of hours is impossible. Much as Shakespeare, when writing "Henry V", managed on a small stage to capture the flavour of Agincourt and events leading up to it, so this production coped well with a similar task on film. Therefore if certain liberties were taken, and artistic licence used, I think they can, in this case, be excused. Should it have encouraged one student to scuttle towards the history books (or now websites), to learn more about the whole period, then I would say it was a job well done.

Was the above comment useful to you?
more (59 total)

Message Boards

Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for Cromwell (1970)
Recent Posts (updated daily)User
Ironic Irishman. chunkychop
Alec Guiness was awesome as king but Cromwell sucked anyone agree? clasikrcomafia
Great film NForest
name of german prince? ohiowaslovers
Oliver Cromwell is a hardass. nounparalle
Did you like the music? anneandwalt-1
more

Recommendations

If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
- - - - -
Gandhi Nicholas and Alexandra Alexander A Man for All Seasons Land and Freedom
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
Show more recommendations

Related Links

Full cast and crew Company credits External reviews
News articles IMDb Biography section IMDb UK section
Add this title to MyMovies

You may report errors and omissions on this page to the IMDb database managers. They will be examined and if approved will be included in a future update. Clicking the 'Update' button will take you through a step-by-step process.