Down 14,798 this week

Tchaikovsky (1969)
"Chaykovskiy" (original title)

 -  Biography | Drama  -  January 1972 (USA)
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 6.6/10 from 269 users  
Reviews: 7 user | 2 critic

Add a Plot

0Check in

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 250 titles
created 26 Apr 2011
a list of 32 titles
created 09 Aug 2012
a list of 132 titles
created 29 Oct 2012
a list of 10000 titles
created 8 months ago

Connect with IMDb

Share this Rating

Title: Tchaikovsky (1969)

Tchaikovsky (1969) on IMDb 6.6/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Tchaikovsky.
Nominated for 2 Oscars. Another 2 wins & 1 nomination. See more awards »


Credited cast:
Innokentiy Smoktunovskiy ...
Antonina Shuranova ...
Natalia von Meck
Kirill Lavrov ...
Vladislav Strzhelchik ...
Evgeniy Leonov ...
Maya Plisetskaya ...
Bruno Frejndlikh ...
Alla Demidova ...
Yulia von Meck
Evgeniy Evstigneev ...
Liliya Yudina
Rest of cast listed alphabetically:
Ervin Knausmyuller ...


Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis


Biography | Drama


See all certifications »




Release Date:

January 1972 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Tchaikovsky  »

Company Credits

Production Co:

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs


Sound Mix:

(70 mm prints)| (35 mm prints)|



Aspect Ratio:

2.20 : 1
See  »

Did You Know?


Version of Heavenly Music (1943) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Soviet "classic" garbage
18 October 2009 | by (NY, USA (mostly)) – See all my reviews

I always regarded this opus as a rare piece of trash. There is close to nothing from real Tchaikovsky in this movie, just a glossed Stalinist version of the composer, the kind they indoctrinated in every music classroom to every youngster - that he was a progressive genius whose works fit socialist realism and Lenin's ideas about socialist culture very well. By the way, a vast majority of ignorant Russians are still offended by the notion of him being a homosexual. The composer's letters and reputable biographies are published in minuscule circulation, this film is seen by millions. Here's the power of indoctrination even in post-communist era. On top of that, the society is generally extremely homophobic. They used to send people to prison for homosexuality up to 1994, and every year there is a discussion in their parliament on resurrecting this law as part of criminal code. So here is your cultural backdrop...

Now, the movie has its own little merits, but the underlying total lie and poor director's thinking and probably general grasp of the subject make the better parts totally worthless.

Soviet cinema had its glorious moments, especially in the great escape of great patriotic war movies, where things were black and white, at least where the real evil was. The biographies - there were few interesting ones (Tsiolkovsky's, Pavlov come to mind), but always castrated by the intricacies of either Stalinist or post-Stalinist era.

I'd love to ramble on, but I think I got the main message clear - the film is a great lie, and on film merits alone is not a good work either. So to those first few folks who put there rave 10 star reviews

  • what planet are you from? Start from reading books, including
composer's own letters. Then compare what you learned with what you see. Otherwise, Lenin still wins his micro battle in your consciousness, and the bastard doesn't deserve this, and you neither.

It would be great to make a true biographical movie or better yet mini-series about composer's life. His life was full of tremendous drama, add real music scores that make sense - and it could be something worth watching. Hollywood can't do it, its mostly prostituting pure trash, the French or Germans might. Russians could have, when the country and its cinematography was free for a fairly brief time, not these days of self-censorship, return of government control and new rules. And to say the composer was gay is a faux pas. How would one film a biography without this basic fact.

PS Regarding subtitles - never expect a decent work from Russian video publishers, it's in best case scenario a sloppy translation (heck, the translation of Tarkovsky's Andrey Rublev is simply horrible at times, and that's criterion edition). Few exceptions are fairy tales.

7 of 16 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Who can explain the 'The Little Tiger' reference? Rheli
Discuss Tchaikovsky (1969) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for: