| Stéphane Audran | ... | Hélène Desvallées | |
| Michel Bouquet | ... | Charles Desvallées | |
| Michel Duchaussoy | ... | Police Officer Duval | |
| Maurice Ronet | ... | Victor Pegala | |
| Louise Chevalier | ... | Maid | |
| Louise Rioton | ... | Mamy, Charles'mother-in Law | |
| Serge Bento | ... | Bignon | |
| Henri Marteau | ... | Paul | |
| Guy Marly | ... | Police Officer Gobet | |
| François Moro-Giafferi | ... | Frederic | |
| Albert Minski | ... | King Club owner (as Albert Minsky) | |
| Dominique Zardi | ... | Truck driver | |
| Michel Charrel | ... | Policeman | |
| Henri Attal | ... | Man in cafe | |
| Jean-Marie Arnoux | ... | False Witness | |
| Stéphane Di Napoli | ... | Michel Desvallees | |
| Donatella Turri | ... | Brigitte | |
| rest of cast listed alphabetically: | |||
| Anne-Marie Peysson | ... | TV announcer (uncredited) | |
Directed by | |||
| Claude Chabrol | |||
Writing credits(in alphabetical order) | ||
| Claude Chabrol | writer | |
Produced by | |||
| André Génovès | .... | producer | |
| Felice Testa Gay | .... | producer | |
Original Music by | |||
| Pierre Jansen | |||
Cinematography by | |||
| Jean Rabier | |||
Film Editing by | |||
| Jacques Gaillard | |||
Art Direction by | |||
| Guy Littaye | |||
Costume Design by | |||
| Maurice Albray | |||
Makeup Department | |||
| Louis Bonnemaison | .... | makeup artist | |
Production Management | |||
| Alain Belmondo | .... | unit manager | |
| Georges Casati | .... | production manager | |
| Patrick Delauneux | .... | unit manager | |
Second Unit Director or Assistant Director | |||
| Jean-François Detré | .... | assistant director | |
| Jacques Fansten | .... | assistant director | |
Sound Department | |||
| Guy Chichignoud | .... | sound | |
Camera and Electrical Department | |||
| Roger Robert | .... | key grip | |
| Claude Zidi | .... | camera operator | |
| Pierre Zucca | .... | still photographer (uncredited) | |
Music Department | |||
| André Girard | .... | musical director | |
Other crew | |||
| Claudine Gaubert | .... | script supervisor | |
| Recent Posts (updated daily) | User |
|---|---|
| So Disappointing | film_ophile |
| It's so barren here... | fergdeff |
| Plein soleil allusion? | Vittorius |
| Femme Infidele, La | wylecoyote0321 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Kings & Queen | When Did You Last See Your Father? | Mildred Pierce | Lantana | Bad Timing |
|
IMDb User Rating: |
IMDb User Rating: |
IMDb User Rating: |
IMDb User Rating: |
IMDb User Rating: |
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| News articles | IMDb Drama section | IMDb Italy section |
What Michel Bouquet does in his role as the husband to Stephane Audran's title character can only be described as an acting tour-De-force. MAGNIFICENT!
Audran is not bad herself, but a notch less than stellar. Or maybe her performance just pales in comparison to her co-star. As does pretty much everything else in the film. From a certain point onwards, it is Bouquet who becomes the co-auteur, as for as the viewer is concerned.
The film has a very remarkable score, which Chabrol uses effectively as if both checking, and challenging the Hitchcockian legacy of pronounced scores in the thriller realm.
With unmistakable, (still his kind of) nouvelle-vague elements, the film admirably reflects director's familiarity with the classic genre and its (then) modern subversion.
With unmistakable, (still his kind of) nouvelle-vague elements, the film admirably reflects the director's familiarity with the classic genre and its (then) modern subversion. The economy and brilliance of shots is such that viewer cannot take eyes off screen, not for one sec. The last shot alone informs a good lot more than an average novella. And demands a separate essay I am not gonna write. However, it becomes quite clear early on that this auteur, unlike some others, is not at all that keen on subversion for the very sake of it.
La Femme Infidele has all the bearings of a rebellion forgone, if you please. It definitely looks like the work of an auteur, but not just a rebel kind, but a mature mind, someone well on his way to become a real master of the medium: already he affords to be audacious, or flexible, every which way to fulfill demands posed by his art. This audacious flexibility in turn provides the auteur opportunity to comment, in his fashion, if not alter the rules of the genre that he is seen, here as well, rebelling against and compromising with.