Home
search
more | tips
IMDb > The Best House in London (1969)

The Best House in London (1969) More at IMDbPro »

Photos (see all 3 | slideshow)

Overview

User Rating:
4.5/10   126 votes
MOVIEmeter: ?
Down 15% in popularity this week. See rank & trends on IMDbPro.
Director:
Philip Saville
Writer:
Denis Norden (writer)
Contact:
View company contact information for The Best House in London on IMDbPro.
Release Date:
June 1969 (UK) more
Genre:
Comedy more
Tagline:
From top to bottom ... it's the best place in town !
User Comments:
Uncomfortably funny more

Cast

  (Cast overview, first billed only)
David Hemmings ... Benjamin Oakes / Walter Leybourne
Joanna Pettet ... Josephine Pacefoot
George Sanders ... Sir Francis Leybourne
Dany Robin ... Babette
Warren Mitchell ... Count Pandolfo
John Bird ... Home Secretary
William Rushton ... Sylvester Wall
Bill Fraser ... Inspector MacPherson
Maurice Denham ... Editor of 'The Times'
Wolfe Morris ... Chinese Trade Attache
Martita Hunt ... Headmistress
Arnold Diamond ... Charles Dickens
Hugh Burden ... Lord Tennyson
George Reynolds ... Lord Alfred Douglas
Jan Holden ... Lady Dilke
more
Create a character page for: ?

Additional Details

Runtime:
105 min | USA:97 min
Country:
UK
Language:
English
Color:
Color (Eastmancolor)
Aspect Ratio:
1.85 : 1 more
Sound Mix:
Mono
Certification:
Canada:PA (Manitoba) | Canada:PG (Ontario) | Canada:R (Nova Scotia) | UK:X | USA:X
Filming Locations:
London, England, UK more

Fun Stuff

Trivia:
The last feature film of Martita Hunt. more
Movie Connections:
Referenced in The Magic Garden of Stanley Sweetheart (1970) more
Soundtrack:
MY LITTLE PUSSY more

FAQ

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.
4 out of 5 people found the following comment useful:-
Uncomfortably funny, 23 April 2008
Author: sandra small (sandi_small@muchomail.com) from gateshead,tyne and wear, england, uk

From today's perspective, The Best House In London is potentially uncomfortable viewing in an era of political correctness. Therefore what this film illustrates is that for all its good intentions political correctness hampers debate on sensitive issues such as that of prostitution which in current English law can only be a label applied to a woman who is perceived by a police officer as soliciting for such an activity.

More to the point the film illustrates the double standards of English society and its discomfort with the street variety as opposed to prostitution in general. What this further illustrates is that society is concerned more with being exposed to its double standards and how it perceives street prostitution without regard to the women involved who as the film portrays, are happy to participate in the profession. This point is illustrated in the film within context of the lack of opportunities for women to escape their impoverished lives in which there is no other options open to them.

The 'double standards' of the discomfort over street prostitution among the Victorian middle classes is illustrated via the character Josephine Pacefoot, (Joanna Pettet) who is in fact a satire of the famous Josephine Butler. Josephine Butler (1828 - 1906) was an upper middle class 19th Century philanthropic feminist who espoused the radical liberal tradition of the then Whigs as her Father did before her. Josephine Butler concerned herself with those deemed to be and as such labelled 'fallen women' giving street prostitutes a negative label by default. Butler was keen to rescue the so called 'fallen women' many of whom were criminalised via the Contagious Disease Acts of the 1860s. These acts permitted any unmarried woman to be subject to a 'virginity test'. If the woman failed the virginity test she was ostracised by society and prevented from gaining legitimate employment. This left many unmarried women vulnerable to men any of whom could request they have a virginity test for the purpose of recruiting them into prostitution if they failed and thereby trading these women. This point is illustrated in the film.

It is interesting that the 19th Century Contagious Disease Act affected women at the time of the rise of feminism in England. What The Best House In London illustrates is that feminism has a double edged sword. This double edged sword of feminism means the cause is a middle class one premised on liberation, the endeavours of which leave many poor and working class women vulnerable to exploitation, which in this film is illustrated via street prostitution. But it veers into all manner of legitimate employment as women are in most cases cheaper to employ as they're more likely of accepting lower wages that men reject.

The Best House In London is a series of sketches thread together via the issue of 'street prostitution' It seems that the original intention of the film was to reference as many as possible of the Victorian luminaries who shaped modernity and its attitudes.

For the issues it raises and the debate it permits, then The Best House In London is an interesting film produced in the style of Monty Python. In other words it's silly. It therefore illustrates that 'silly' is a positive as it exaggerates issues to express the point and as such is a clever method of comedic genre and satirical expressionism to coin a phrase.

Was the above comment useful to you?
more

Message Boards

Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for The Best House in London (1969)

Recommendations

If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
- - - - -
Those Magnificent Men in Their Flying Machines or How I Flew from London to Paris in 25 hours 11 minutes The Statue An American Werewolf in London Les poupées russes Cool It Carol!
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
Show more recommendations

Related Links

Full cast and crew Company credits External reviews
IMDb Comedy section IMDb UK section Add this title to MyMovies

You may report errors and omissions on this page to the IMDb database managers. They will be examined and if approved will be included in a future update. Clicking the 'Update' button will take you through a step-by-step process.