IMDb > A Midsummer Night's Dream (1968)

A Midsummer Night's Dream (1968) More at IMDbPro »

Photos (see all 4 | slideshow)

Overview

User Rating:
6.2/10   287 votes
MOVIEmeter: ?
Down 6% in popularity this week. See why on IMDbPro.
Director:
Writer:
Contact:
View company contact information for A Midsummer Night's Dream on IMDbPro.
Release Date:
September 1968 (UK) more
Genre:
Awards:
Nominated for Primetime Emmy. more
User Comments:
THE BEST...period. more (23 total)

Cast

  (Cast overview, first billed only)

Additional Details

Runtime:
124 min
Country:
Language:
Color:
Color (Eastmancolor)
Sound Mix:

Fun Stuff

Trivia:
First film of Michael Jayston. more

FAQ

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.
14 out of 16 people found the following comment useful.
THE BEST...period., 21 August 2005
10/10
Author: paybaragon from Cheshire, CT

This is not only the best version of the play available on film, it is easily one of the five best Shakespearian films of all (at least in English).

The fact that it was made on less than a shoestring budget is totally irrelevant. Whether or not there are any special effects, the photography by the renowned Peter Suschitzky ("Dead Ringers", "Empire Strikes Back", "Spider") is excellent. It's not only pictorial, but contributes greatly to the spontaneous, irreverent, slapstick-esquire approach to the whole production, which Peter Hall and his marvelous actors worked so hard to achieve. The locations are also ideal, given the modernized, anglicized look of the production.

Director Hall's interpretation of the play comes as close to 'perfection' as an enthusiast of the Bard could possibly ask for. He refuses to reduce the play to an erotic fantasy, as so many other have done (i.e. the 1999 film), and he rejects the even more common temptation to turn it into a loud, garish costume-ball. In other word, Hall presents the play as Shekespeare wrote it.It relies for its appeal on marvelous words and gestures, not on costumes and special effects.

As for the cast, one only need to look at the big names on the list to see that this production was literally one-of-a-kind. Actually the least famous major player in this company is the one most worthy of note: Paul Rogers, a wonderful character actor and a frequent collaborator of Alec Guinness, is quite possibly the best Bottom that most of us (in this day and age) are ever likely to see. Both Cagney and Kevin Kline were terrific in the major films, but Paul Rogers IS Bottom.

It says something about both film audiences and readers that the 1935 Warner Bros. film with James Cagney is rated more highly on the IMDb than this production. In that pretty but vapid collection of songs and dances, you could hardly hear any of Shakespeare's words, and if you could you would have to cringe, since almost none of the actors could adequately speak the lines. Cagney was good, but the rest was silence. GO WITH THIS VERSION INSTEAD! Fortunately, it was recently made available on DVD.

Was the above comment useful to you?
more (23 total)

Message Boards

Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for A Midsummer Night's Dream (1968)
Recent Posts (updated daily)User
Gollum? jtbuzz-1
Judi Dench... kathyperry2010
more

Recommendations

If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
- - - - -
A Midsummer Night's Dream Enchanted A Midsummer Night's Dream A Midsummer Night's Dream The Fairy Queen
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
Show more recommendations

Related Links

Full cast and crew Company credits External reviews
News articles IMDb Comedy section IMDb UK section
Add this title to MyMovies

You may report errors and omissions on this page to the IMDb database managers. They will be examined and if approved will be included in a future update. Clicking the 'Update' button will take you through a step-by-step process.