Down 22,415 this week

Fleshpot on 42nd Street (1973)

 -  Drama  -  10 January 1973 (USA)
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 7.3/10 from 69 users  
Reviews: 6 user | 1 critic

A street whore desperately seeks love and acceptance against the backdrop of the criminal element of early 1970s Times Square.



0Check in

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 25 titles
created 12 Jan 2011
a list of 8245 titles
created 10 Aug 2011
a list of 364 titles
created 04 Mar 2012
a list of 473 titles
created 19 Aug 2012
a list of 122 titles
created 5 months ago

Related Items

Connect with IMDb

Share this Rating

Title: Fleshpot on 42nd Street (1973)

Fleshpot on 42nd Street (1973) on IMDb 7.3/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Fleshpot on 42nd Street.


Cast overview:
Laura Cannon ...
Dusty Cole (as Diana Lewis)
Neil Flanagan ...
Cherry Lane (as Lynn Flanagan)
Bob (as Bob Walters)
Paul Matthews ...
Earle Edgerton ...
M.A. Whiteside ...
Susie Simmons
Dorin McGough ...
Sally Simmons
Richard Towers ...
Tony (as Joe Powers)
Daniel Dietrich ...
Billy (as Dan Dietrich)
Ron Keith ...
Fred J. Lincoln ...
Joe (as Fred Lincoln)
Tony Johnson ...
Ken Hill ...
Frank Corso ...


A street whore desperately seeks love and acceptance against the backdrop of the criminal element of early 1970s Times Square.

Add Full Plot | Plot Synopsis


The Today Film That Goes All the Way See more »




R | See all certifications »




Release Date:

10 January 1973 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Flashpot on 42nd Street  »

Filming Locations:


Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs


Sound Mix:



Aspect Ratio:

1.85 : 1
See  »

Did You Know?


Dusty Cole: Listen, have you seen Hal around anywhere?
Cherry Lane: Hal? Didn't you hear?
Dusty Cole: Hear what?
Cherry Lane: He's in jail. He got five years.
Dusty Cole: For what?
Cherry Lane: He hit a cop!
Dusty Cole: Hal?
Cherry Lane: Yeah! One night we were all standing around in front of Grants minding our own business when all of a sudden this cop comes along and tells us to move along. We say that we aren't doing anything and Hal comes up and tries to be nice to the prick. Then the cop, for no reason, gives him a shove. You know that Hal can't stand for anyone to give him a shove... ...
See more »


References The Vampire Lovers (1970) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Not bad at all, in a scuzzy kind of way
6 December 2002 | by (California) – See all my reviews

Knowing Andy Milligan's reputation, and judging from the video box cover, I really wasn't expecting much from this film. To tell the truth, I wasn't expecting ANYTHING from it. I rented it because I had never seen a Milligan movie and wanted to see if he was as lousy a filmmaker as his reputation says he is. Well, judging by this film, he isn't.

That's not to say that it's any kind of masterpiece, or even particularly good, or even particularly competent. Although the IMDb technical specs for this film say it was shot in 35mm, it has the grainy, poor color quality and lousy sound of 16mm, which is what it really appears to be. The acting is nothing special but not completely incompetent. Neil Flannagan as a drag queen hooker is sort of charming in a pathetic way, and has a scene where he gets into an argument in a bar that is actually pretty funny. Diana Lewis as the young girl who's the centerpiece of this isn't particularly impressive, but she gets by. Harry Reems tries too hard to be the boy next door type and doesn't really pull it off, but he's at least watchable. Amazingly for a Milligan film there's actually a coherent story line about the kinds of people who inhabited the seamy area of Manhattan known as Times Square way back before Disney bought it up and sterilized it, and Milligan actually does a pretty good job of conveying the seediness, depravity, debauchery and general scuzziness that typified the area at that time. What really sets this movie apart from others of its type that I've seen, however, is the way it treats its characters. It's not judgmental of them at all, and doesn't romanticize them as poor pathetic victims or portray them as vicious, depraved victimizers. It just shows them as people who don't have a whole lot going for them and try to get by as best they can with what they've got, doing whatever it is they have to do to make it through to the next day. In other words, they're not much different from anyone else. It took me a while to realize what he was saying with this movie because of the film's technical and narrative shortcomings--for all the good intentions he seems to have brought to this project, Milligan is still a terrible director--but the area and the subject matter were apparently close to his heart, and if Andy Milligan can be said to have made a "personal" film, this is probably it. It's worth a look to see what Times Square was really like back in the early '70s, and the film itself is actually, on the whole, pretty interesting. Check it out.

6 of 7 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Availability? ggracchus25
When Can We Expect A DVD Release? thundercub1
Milligan at His Best? dbuskirk7
Discuss Fleshpot on 42nd Street (1973) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for: