6 user 6 critic

Decline and Fall... of a Birdwatcher (1968)

M | | Comedy | 26 January 1969 (USA)
A naive young man, sent down from university, blunders through a series of bizarre adventures in which his participation is always innocent, although others don't think so.



(adaptation), (additional scenes) | 2 more credits »




Cast overview, first billed only:
Robin Phillips ...
Paul Pennyfeather
Solomon Philbrick
Robert Harris ...
Sir Humphrey Maltravers
Captain Grimes
Margot Beste-Chetwynde (as Genevieve Page)
Paul Rogers ...
Chief Warder
The Prison Governor
Dr. Augustus Fagan
Arthur Potts
Patience Collier ...
Flossie Fagan
Otto Silenus
Kenneth Griffith ...
Mr. Church


A naive young man, sent down from university, blunders through a series of bizarre adventures in which his participation is always innocent, although others don't think so.

Plot Summary | Plot Synopsis


"See that diamond-crusted, double-breasted bird over there?...that's mother. She wants to meet you."




M | See all certifications »




Release Date:

26 January 1969 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Decline and Fall  »

Company Credits

Production Co:

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs


Sound Mix:

(Westrex Recording System)


See  »

Did You Know?


Evelyn Waugh's original novel is simply called "Decline And Fall". It was reported at the time, in all seriousness, that the title had been altered for this film in case people thought it was some sort of Roman historical epic. See more »


Maniac: I like to read the Bible. There's a lot of killing in the Bible.
See more »


Referenced in Brewster McCloud (1970) See more »


Men of Harlech
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Extraordinary attempt at adapting Waugh
29 May 2015 | by (United Kingdom) – See all my reviews

When choosing to adapt this film, why would you throw away many of the gifts (easy wins, five-yard tap-ins, call them what you will) that Waugh's novel offers the film-maker? The dialogue sparkles on the page, and the set pieces come thick and fast, but the film misses much of the good stuff out, particularly early on in the action, or simply botches it. Waugh's characters also offer plenty of scope for effective adaptation to the screen, but the film makes a rather mushy attempt at most of the character portrayals too, despite the efforts of a strong cast.

Waugh's biting humour is dulled and debased from the start, reaching almost "Carry on"-like levels of simplicity. Paul is spuriously turned into a birdwatcher for about four seconds at the start of the action for the purpose of making smutty hints at a sex comedy that the film doesn't deliver (see also the publicity posters). The potential for sexual transgression that shimmers under the surface of Waugh's writing is also botched; the film spells it out rather demurely (this was the 1960s, when censorship was still very strict), while aiming desperately for superficial titillation.

There are so many simply baffling choices in terms of character and action that it's hard to know where to start. That's not to say a film can't be successful if it doesn't stick close to the source - of course it can, but it has to add something new or interesting or unusual, or stand on its own two feet as a piece of art. This extraordinary effort does none of these things.

The film is almost rescued by some of the settings (but not the ludicrous prison, with its gurning, overacting warders), by the luminous Genevieve Page, and by the occasional neat touch. But surely it's time for somebody like Stephen Fry to show (again) how a Waugh adaptation should be done? A film to watch for Waugh completists only,I'm afraid. Just shield your eyes from the worst of the butchery.

0 of 1 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for: