MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Down 7,798 this week

A Man Vanishes (1967)
"Ningen jôhatsu" (original title)

 -  Documentary | Drama | Mystery  -  1974 (USA)
7.0
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 7.0/10 from 259 users   Metascore: 92/100
Reviews: 3 user | 21 critic | 5 from Metacritic.com

Director:

0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 3595 titles created 2 months ago
 
a list of 510 titles created 3 days ago
 
a list of 3989 titles created 4 months ago
 
a list of 29 titles created 03 Jan 2012
 
a list of 220 titles created 14 Sep 2011
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: A Man Vanishes (1967)

A Man Vanishes (1967) on IMDb 7/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of A Man Vanishes.
1 win. See more awards »
Edit

Cast

Credited cast:
Yoshie Hayakawa
Shôhei Imamura
Shigeru Tsuyuguchi
Edit

Storyline

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis


Certificate:

See all certifications »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

1974 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

A Man Vanishes  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Aspect Ratio:

1.37 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
A Man Vanishes
4 June 2009 | by (Greece) – See all my reviews

While many directors work hard to maintain the illusion of the silver screen as a self-contained world unto itself, Imamura not only films what is a essentially a fiction film disguised as a documentary but debunks it several times along the way. A MAN VANISHES pretends to be a documentary about a man named Tadashi Oshima who suddenly vanished two years ago without a trace, a popular habit with disgruntled Japanese office workers (Imamura reports 91,000 Japanese were reported missing that year - again, fact or fiction?), which in reality is a film essay that masquerades as a documentary to make and prove its point, and to make that point (that absolute truth coming from a subjective observer is impossible and that by extension how can we trust our senses to tell us what is real from what is not) it has to debunk its own status as a documentary.

The problem with the film is that the plot becomes entangled in the drudgery of the characters' lives as they try to separate truth from fabrication to discover what really happened to Tadashi. After a pre-ending, which if Jodorowsky didn't rip off wholesale for the ending of his HOLY MOUNTAIN then let's just say it's a stroke of absurd coincidence, it goes on for another 15 minutes in a redundant scene where the argument between two sisters and an eye-witness who allegedly saw Tadashi with one of the sisters two years back continues unabated in the middle of a crowded street, while Imamura is keen to remind us again that it's a dramatized version we're watching. You can almost feel him chuckling gleefully "Doesn't it look so real?" (and it does), "well, it isn't!". Right down to the ending that recalls the film-within-a-film device of the ending of his previous film THE PORNOGRAPHERS, A Man Vanishes remains an interesting film essay, a great pseudo-documentary, but not a very good film.


6 of 15 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Discuss A Man Vanishes (1967) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page