| Page 1 of 2: | [1] [2] |
| Index | 14 reviews in total |
10 out of 12 people found the following review useful:
Another hallucinogenic Franco classic!, 20 January 2002
Author:
Infofreak from Perth, Australia
I must immediately make clear that the version of 'Succubus' I watched was
the American one with the shorter running time. I have absolutely no idea
what has been cut and how different this is from what Jess Franco originally
intended. Even so, this is a remarkable movie, and one of the most
interesting Franco movies I have seen.
The beautiful Janine Reynaud plays Lorna Green, an enigmatic erotic dancer
cum performance artist who stages odd, sadomasochistic events at a
nightclub. She is plagued by hallucinations (?) and begins to confuse
fantasy and reality, a common Franco scenario. I have to admit by the half
way point I didn't have a clue what was going on, or who was who, but I
didn't mind. Plot in 'Succubus' is secondary. Atmosphere, aesthetics, babes
and surreal dialogue which name-dropped everyone from Stockhausen to
Spillane to Mingus to De Sade, make this movie essential viewing. Reynaud is
stunning to look at, there's some tasty jazz on the soundtrack, and there's
the added kick of seeing the legendary Howard Vernon, a Franco regular who
also appeared in everything from Godard's 'Alphaville' to Polanski's 'The
Ninth Gate'.
Beginners should check out 'Vampyros Lesbos' first, still the most
satisfying Franco I've seen, but make 'Succubus' a close second. You'll see
nothing like it anywhere!
8 out of 11 people found the following review useful:
SUCCUBUS (1967) ***, 10 October 2004
Author:
MARIO GAUCI (marrod@melita.com) from Naxxar, Malta
This was an early color film for Franco but he seems to have mastered
the new process with relatively little problems, here utilizing a
decidedly Bava-esque palette (the famous scene with the mannequins, for
instance). SUCCUBUS is considered a transitional film for Franco
because, from here on in, the emphasis on eroticism will become much
more pronounced until it almost turns into pornography sometime during
the next decade. I haven't watched any films from the latter category
but this film certainly pushes the issue as far as it was permissible
at the time! Here, too, because of its dream-like nature (as was also
to prove the case later with A VIRGIN AMONG THE LIVING DEAD [1971]) the
film's narrative lapses and general 'incoherence' are easier to accept
than in, say, EUGENIE DE SADE (1970) where one does not really expect
to find such liberties though I am beginning to realize that, with
Franco, virtually anything goes!
Even though he does not receive credit for writing the screenplay, it
is hard to imagine that Franco had no hand in its actual conception, as
the themes the film explores are certainly in keeping with the rest of
his oeuvre (right from the very first scene, the sleazy nightclub act,
which reappears over and over in his films). While the plot is not easy
to follow (it actually pays to read about it beforehand, because
otherwise it would be practically impossible to make head or tails of
anything!), it copiously references noted figures from the various arts
paintings, literature, cinema, music which apparently pre-occupied
Franco during this period. Unfortunately, most of it is probably beyond
the reach of most audiences (myself included) but I must say that I was
very pleased to learn that Franco, through a line spoken in the film by
Janine Reynaud, held Bunuel, Lang and Godard as the epitome of cinema
three film-makers whose work is unmistakably linked (Bunuel chose film
as his creative métier after watching Lang's DESTINY [1921]; Lang
appears as himself in Godard's CONTEMPT [1963]) and all of whom clearly
influenced Franco in the initial phases of his career. In particular,
there is a brief repeated scene where Michel Lemoine, looking straight
at the camera, describes Reynaud as 'a devil on earth' which reminded
me of a similar 'gimmick' used by Bunuel in THE EXTERMINATING ANGEL
(1962).
The film has some very striking imagery (not least of all, the two S&M
scenes that were pretty much taboo at this point) with the soft-focus
and often sensual dream sequences being particular highlights; another
key scene finds Reynaud and Jack Taylor going up to her castle and he
recounts the tale of Faustine, a Succubus, to her. But, even in this
shortened version of the film, one still has to contend with banal
passages like the drugged costume party sequence and other moments
where the pace drops. Also, I have a quibble regarding the film's
latter stages: why did Jack Taylor all of a sudden want to do away with
the Janine Reynaud character (the irony of his unconsciously 'hiring'
the Devil himself to do this is interesting but it remains
frustratingly unexplained).
The music, as is customary for a Franco film, provides the perfect
counterpoint to the onslaught of visual and narrative ideas; special
care is also taken with the sound effects which are meant to illustrate
Janine Reynaud's disorientation (and, with her, the viewer's). The
casting of the main roles is appropriate as well: Reynaud may not rank
among Franco's loveliest leading ladies but it is arguable whether
anyone could have essayed the part with more conviction and, in any
case, her sensual body is certainly utilized to the hilt throughout;
Jack Taylor is commanding enough as her shady manager/lover; Michel
Lemoine makes for a mysterious and sinister Mephistophelean figure;
Howard Vernon's brief appearance is a natural, and typically
professional.
Obviously, I would love to see the original full-length German-language
version of the film released as a SE DVD, but one wonders whether that
will ever come to pass. At least, my VHS copy was a one-up on the
now-OOP R1 Anchor Bay DVD, as the film was presented in its correct (I
assume) widescreen ratio! The film's silly pan-and-scan theatrical
trailer (for the U.S. version) was also included.
6 out of 8 people found the following review useful:
Another yesterday's movie for tomorrow, 2 December 1999
![]()
Author:
KuRt-33 (kurtaerden@yahoo.com) from Antwerp, Belgium
I haven't seen all of Jess Franco's movies, I have seen 5, I think, and there are more than 180 of them. So maybe it's a bit early to say so but "Necronomicon Geträumte Sünden" (better known as 'Succubus', but that is the cut version) is according to me if not the best, certainly on of Franco's best. Franco is best known (although 'known' might be slightly exaggerated) for "Vampiros Lesbos", a weird cultish movie that got more acclaim in the mid 90's when people found out Jess Franco was also an interesting composer. Through the soundtrack a happy few discovered the man and found out what was to be expected after seeing the video clip of 'The lion and the cucumber' ('Vampyros Lesbos OST'): Jess Franco is an overwhelming director. When the phone rang during 'Vampiros', I let it ring. I just wanted to see more of the movie. Since that moment Franco never could grip me that much. But then I stumbled on this movie. It is even better than "Vampiros Lesbos", I think. Franco is looking for what he can do with a story and a camera. We find out he can do a lot. I certainly didn't expect to find "Necronomicon" that great: its beginning didn't impress me at all. Remember, I had seen "Vampiros Lesbos" before (although chronologically that came only three years later) and both movies kinda start the same. But then the story went on, puzzling and gripping, beautiful camera work and the stuff you would like to see Godard do if he weren't so occupied with spreading his political messages. Later on in the movie I heard a dialogue about which art was or wasn't old-fashioned. The man says that all movies have to be old-fashioned because it takes weeks before the audience sees what got filmed. But the girl replies that "Bunuel, Fritz Lang and Godard yesterday made movies for tomorrow". Janine Reynaud is an interesting lead actress and of course Howard Vernon, a Franco regular, is also there. Luckily the acting is good (something that can spoil a lot of Franco movies for you, but not this one). But certainly watch out for the dummy scene. The erotic tension, the wild directing and the fact that it's a yesterday's movie for tomorrow make it a movie a lot of people should see. The fact that it is a bit more accessible than "Vampiros Lesbos" certainly helps.
3 out of 3 people found the following review useful:
Rated "X"...For "Experimental"? "Exorbitant"? "Excessive"?, 15 February 2011
![]()
Author:
ferbs54 from United States
Hoo, boy, I don't even know where to begin with this one! Jess Franco's "Succubus"--his first of four films in 1967 alone, in a career oeuvre that as of this date contains around 190 (!) pictures--takes a sharp turn from the director's previous pictures, many of which ("The Awful Dr. Orloff," "The Sadistic Baron von Klaus," "Dr. Orloff's Monster" and, especially, "The Diabolical Dr. Z") had been perfectly lucid, imaginatively shot, beautifully photographed B&W minimasterpieces. "Succubus" is a film that is almost impossible to synopsize, much less figure out...even more so than Franco's "Venus in Furs" (1968). The only other films I can compare it to, in my limited experience, as far as surrealism, "trippiness" and the ability to both dazzle and frustrate the viewer are concerned, are Jaromil Jires' "Valerie and Her Week of Wonders" (1970) and perhaps Alejandro Jodorowsky's "El Topo" (1971). But "Succubus" is a much lesser film than those other two, and infinitely more boring and pretentious (capital "P"). The film seems to concern an S&M nightclub performer named Lorna (played, it must be granted, with some authority by model Janine Reynaud) who may or may not be a hell-sent succubus or perhaps merely a psychotic serial killer. Or perhaps Lorna is only dreaming. Or fantasizing. Really, it is hard to say for sure, and anyone who speaks with great authority regarding this film is full of hooey, as even Franco himself, during a 22-minute interview on this fine-looking Blue Underground DVD, admits to not understanding his own movie! He excuses this, though, by remarking that Jean-Luc Godard once told him that a picture does not have to be understood to be successful. Oy gevalt. Making matters worse is the fact that Reynaud herself is a completely unsympathetic/unattractive performer, although still kinda sexy (perhaps future Franco muse Soledad Miranda would have worked better here). Among the assorted bits of strangeness that the film dishes out are some weird word-association games, a pianist playing his instrument while looking at a math book, an LSD party, some very mild lesbianism in a room full of mannequins, and the fact that the picture seems to have been edited with an eggbeater. On the plus side: some dreamlike soft-focus photography, pretty scenery of Portugal and Berlin, and some strikingly beautiful images, such as lovers viewed through a fish tank (but signifying what?). Equal parts tedious and fascinating, the film was slapped with an "X" rating in the U.S. back in '69 ("X" for "Excruciating"? "Exhausting"? "Extremely hard to follow"?), its trailer proclaiming "The most unusual picture of the year...perhaps, of years to come." In a picture filled with so much ambiguity, that statement, at least, is decidedly true. Get some ergot-based derivative inside you and see for yourself!
5 out of 7 people found the following review useful:
Surreal genius, 22 November 2001
![]()
Author:
Wolfgang Manera from Lisbon, Portugal
Franco proves, once again, that he is the prince of surreal & erotic cinema. True, much of his work can be viewed as entertaining sleaze but with Succubus (Necronomicon) he shows what he is truly capable of when he lets his warped creativity run riot and gives us a film that is both hypnotic and enigmatic whilst still maintaining the delirious eroticism intrinsic in his work. Jerry Van Rooyen's splendid score pulsates as the viewer is thrown from one bizarre scenario to another as we follow the trials of a striptease artist (Reynaud) who may be schizophrenic, or may indeed (as one mysterious character states) be a devil, attempt to come to terms with the world she inhabits. A beautiful and enigmatic piece of cinema highly recommended to anybody with even a passing interest in alternative cinema.
6 out of 9 people found the following review useful:
Sexy and surreal? Yep. Coherent? Don't bet your life on it., 24 February 2007
![]()
Author:
TimothyFarrell from Worcester, MA
As you probably already know, Jess Franco is one prolific guy. Hes made
hundreds upon hundreds of films, many of which are crap. However, he
managed to sneak in an occasionally quality work amongst all the
assembly line exploitation. "Succubus" isn't his best work (thats
either "The Diabolical Dr. Z" or "Vampyros Lesbos"), but it has many of
his trademarks that make it a must for anyone interested in diving into
his large catalog. He combines the erotic (alternating between showing
full-frontal nudity and leaving somethings left to the imagination) and
the surreal seamlessly. This is a very dreamlike film, full of great
atmosphere. I particularly liked the constant namedropping. Despite
coming off as being incredibly pretentious, its amusing to hear all of
Franco's influences.
Still, there are many users who don't like "Succubus" and I can see
where they're coming from. Its leisurely paced, but I can deal with
that. More problematic is the incoherency. The script here was
obviously rushed, and within five minutes into the film I had
absolutely no idea what was going on (and it never really came together
from that point on). Those who want some substance with their style,
look elsewhere. Also, if its a horror film, it never really becomes
scary or even suspenseful. Still, I was entertained by all the
psychedelic silliness that I didn't really mind these major flaws all
too much. (7/10)
2 out of 2 people found the following review useful:
One of Jess Franco's most outré and interesting films, 26 November 2010
![]()
Author:
Woodyanders (Woodyanders@aol.com) from The Last New Jersey Drive-In on the Left
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
Nightclub striptease artist Lorna Green (ravishing redhead Janine Reynaud in peak sultry and enigmatic form) performs a racy S&M act that threatens to become a deadly reality. Pretty soon Lorna is having trouble distinguishing fantasy from reality. Is Lorna some kind of agent for Satan? Or is she just going mad? Director Jess Franco, working from an oblique, yet intriguing script by Pier A. Caminecci, delivers an artful blend of elegance and decadence that along with the languid pace, tasteful, but still highly arousing nudity and kinky sex stuff, a supremely hip and groovy jazz score by Friedrich Gulda and Jerry van Rooyen, a nifty array of eclectic literary and cinematic references, and an extremely abstract narrative that keeps you guessing right up until the end exactly what is going on all combine together to create a heady and hypnotic mind trip that casts its own singularly off-kilter spell and radiates its own heavy and unique psychedelic vibe. This movie is a true work of boldly unconventional and experimental avant-garde cinema that plays by its own decidedly obscure and esoteric rules, with a wealth of gorgeous visuals courtesy of the vibrant color cinematography by Jorge Herrero and Franz Xavier Lederle and such inspired moments of sheer weirdness as a bunch of people at a posh party acting like dogs and mannequins that for some inexplicable reason come to creepy life. The insanely lovely Reynaud looks positively smashing in fancy dresses and even better in the buff. Moreover, there are fine performances by Jack Taylor as Lorna's suavely evil manager William Francis Mulligan, Adrian Hoven as concerned psychiatrist Ralf Drawes, and Michel Lemoine as the sinister Pierce. Howard Vernon briefly pops up in a neat bit part as the flaky Admiral Kapp. An admirably bizarre and uncompromising little curio.
5 out of 8 people found the following review useful:
Beautiful and mesmerising, 12 January 2007
![]()
Author:
christopher-underwood from Greenwich - London
Delirious, near plot-less mood piece and if it's more LSD inspired than the Devil then we must remember when it was made! After a startling SM opening (which even itself is not what it seems) we move to soft focus and dream or imaginings or remembering . Lots of literary and cinematic references and indeed this is the Franco film that Lang himself praised. Beautiful and mesmerising the film unfolds at a leisurely pace but has a richness within each fold. A rare movie to languish within. Old Jess could make 'em when he tried. Fine central performances too including the indomitable Jack Taylor and Howard Vernon. I haven't even mentioned the Lisbon locations - ah!
2 out of 3 people found the following review useful:
Succubus, 12 February 2008
![]()
Author:
Scarecrow-88 from United States
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
Lorna Green(Janine Reynaud)is a performance artist for wealthy
intellectuals at a local club. She falls prey to her fantasies as the
promise of romantic interludes turn into murder as she kills those who
believe that sex is on the horizon. It's quite possible that, through a
form of hypnotic suggestion, someone(..a possible task master pulling
her strings like a puppet)is guiding Lorna into killing those she comes
across in secluded places just when it appears that love-making is
about to begin. After the murders within her fantasies are committed,
Lorna awakens bewildered, often clueless as to if what she was privy to
within her dreams ever took place in reality.
If someone asked me how to describe this particular work from Franco,
I'd say it's elegant & difficult. By now, you've probably read other
user comments befuddled by what this film is about, since a large
portion of it takes place within the surreal atmosphere of a dream.
Franco mentioned in an interview that he was heavily influenced by
Godard early in his career, as far as film-making style, and so
deciding to abandon a clear narrative structure in favor of trying to
create a whole different type of viewing experience. And, as you read
from the reaction of the user comments here..some like this decision,
others find the style labouring, dull, and bewildering. I'll be the
first to admit that the film is over my head, but even Franco himself,
when quizzed by critics who watched "Succubus", admitted that he didn't
even understand the film and he directed it! Some might say that
"Succubus" was merely a precursor to his more admired work, "Venus in
Furs", considered his masterwork by Franco-faithful, because it also
adopts the surreal, dreamlike structure where the protagonist doesn't
truly know whether he/she is experiencing something real or imagined.
In a sense, like the protagonist, we are experiencing the same type of
confusion..certainly, "Succubus" is unconventional film-making where we
aren't given the keys to what is exactly going on. And, a great deal of
the elusive dialogue doesn't help matters. "Succubus" is also populated
by beatnik types and "poet-speak", Corman's film, "A Bucket of Blood"
poked fun at. My personal favorite scene teases at a possible lesbian
interlude between Lorna and a woman she meets at a posh party..quite a
bizarre fantasy sequence where mannequins are used rather unusually.
Great locations and jazz score..I liked this film myself, although I
can understand why it does receive a negative reaction. Loved that one
scene at the posh party with Lorna, a wee bit drunk, writhing on the
floor in a gorgeous evening gown as others attending the
shindig(..equally wasted)rush her in an embrace of kisses.
9 out of 17 people found the following review useful:
Maybe if you're in a trance too..., 5 November 2004
![]()
Author:
Coventry from the Draconian Swamp of Unholy Souls
Even though there's a repertoire of over 180 films to choose from, this 'Succubus' is often named as THE best Jess Franco film. Heck, even the legendary filmmaker Fritz Lang counts 'Succubus' among his personal favorites. So, maybe it's me but I thought this was a dreadfully boring and overly confusing movie. The opening is great, though, and shows Janine Reynaud performing an SM act on stage. It's all downhill from here, unfortunately. Reynaud's character is a maneater who eventually kills her lovers in some sort of trance. Franco had a decent budget to work with and spends it well on nice locations, beautiful photography and a mesmerizing musical score. This COULD have been his greatest film indeed, if it wasn't for the lame and uninteresting story. It's supposed to be psychedelic but I'd say sophomoric is a better term to describe what's shown here. Half of the time, you don't have a clue what's going on or what exactly is said so even the short running time of 80 minutes seems to last ages. This most certainly isn't Franco's best film according to me. I wouldn't even recommend it to die-hard exploitation fans. If you're looking for more superior Jess Franco film, try to get your hands on 'Las Vampiras', 'The awful Dr. Orloff' or 'Female Vampire'.
| Page 1 of 2: | [1] [2] |
| Plot summary | Amazon.com summary | Ratings |
| External reviews | Plot keywords | Main details |
| Your user reviews | Your vote history |