I Am Curious (Yellow)
(1967)
|
|
| 0Share... |
I Am Curious (Yellow)
(1967)
|
|
| 0Share... |
| Complete credited cast: | |||
|
|
Lena Nyman | ... |
Lena
|
|
|
Vilgot Sjöman | ... |
Vilgot Sjöman
|
|
|
Börje Ahlstedt | ... |
Börje, Lena's boyfriend
|
|
|
Peter Lindgren | ... |
Lena's Father
|
|
|
Chris Wahlström | ... |
Rune's Woman
|
|
|
Marie Göranzon | ... |
Marie, Börje's mistress
|
| Magnus Nilsson | ... |
Magnus, Lena's school friend
|
|
|
|
Ulla Lyttkens | ... |
Ulla, Lena's friend
|
| Rest of cast listed alphabetically: | |||
|
|
Anders Ek | ... |
Exercise leader
|
| Martin Luther King | ... |
Himself
|
|
|
|
Yevgeni Yevtushenko | ... |
Himself
|
Lena, aged twenty, wants to know all she can about life and reality. She collects information on everyone and everything, storing her findings in an enormous archive. She experiments with relationships, political activism, and meditation. Meanwhile, the actors, director and crew are shown in a humorous parallel plot about the making of the film and their reactions to the story and each other. Nudity, explicit sex, and controversial politics kept this film from being shown in the US while its seizure by Customs was appealed. Written by Molly Malloy <mailcall@ansel.intersource.com>
I've read one comment which labeled this film "trash" and "a waste
of time." I think this person got their political undies tugged a bit
too much.
I just rented the new Criterion DVD's of both Yellow and Blue.
These films--although hardly great--have at least become of
historical interest as to the so-called "radical student
political-social movement"of the late '60s.
I hadn't seen either picture and from their notorious reputation, I
was expecting some real porn (there isn't any.) There is frontal
nudity (including the still verboten frontal male nudity (automatic
NC-17--the Orwellian-X) in the U.S. But I wasn't expecting the films
in-your-face democratic socialist message.
Though it tends to the simplistic , I thought it occassionally made
its points well. Both films occassionally had me laughing out loud
and the director's commentary made it clear there was plenty of
parody in the film. Especially the supposedly "pornographic" sex
scenes. The first such scene is very realistic. The lead couple is
clumsy, inept, funny and endearing in their first copulation scene.
The second--which caused the most complaints--has faked
cunnilingus and fellatio. And the last is the end of an angry fight,
that is believable.
The extras include an informative introduction to the film, an
interview with the original American distributor and his attorney,
excerpts from trial testimony in the U.S. and a "diary" commentary
by the director on some scenes.
This is the film that "blue noses" wouldn't let alone and led to the
pivotal "prurient interest with no social redeeming value" standard
that, thankfully, still stands.
Those with an interest in the quirks of history will find this a must
see.