MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Down 1,734 this week

Chelsea Girls (1966)

 |  Drama  |  November 1968 (Denmark)
6.5
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 6.5/10 from 758 users  
Reviews: 14 user | 11 critic

Lacking a formal narrative, Warhol's art house classic follows various residents of the Chelsea Hotel in 1966 New York City, presented in a split screen with a single audio track in conjunction with one side of screen.

0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 36 titles
created 07 Jun 2012
 
a list of 39 titles
created 09 Mar 2013
 
a list of 44 titles
created 5 months ago
 
a list of 42 titles
created 3 months ago
 
a list of 23 titles
created 1 month ago
 

Related Items

Search for "Chelsea Girls" on Amazon.com

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Chelsea Girls (1966)

Chelsea Girls (1966) on IMDb 6.5/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Chelsea Girls.
Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

Vinyl (1965)
Sci-Fi
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.1/10 X  

Warhol's strange interpretation of "A Clockwork Orange." Includes Gerard dancing to the Martha and the Vandellas classic "Nowhere to Run" and being tortured by professional sadists.

Director: Andy Warhol
Stars: Tosh Carillo, Larry Latrae, Gerard Malanga
Blue Movie (1969)
Drama | Romance
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.2/10 X  

Viva (playing herself) and Louis Waldon (playing himself) spend an idyllic afternoon together in an apartment in New York City.

Director: Andy Warhol
Stars: Viva, Louis Waldon
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4.3/10 X  
Director: Andy Warhol
Stars: Brigid Berlin, Ondine, Pat Close
My Hustler (1965)
Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.5/10 X  

Filmed on Fire Island, this two reel, 70 minute Warhol film covers the activities of the "Dial A Hustler" service, as an older man seeks a young hustler for a companion.

Directors: Andy Warhol, Chuck Wein
Stars: Paul America, Joseph Campbell, Genevieve Charbon
Kiss (1963)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.2/10 X  

Close-ups of couples kissing for three minutes each.

Director: Andy Warhol
Stars: Rufus Collins, Johnny Dodd, Fred Herko
Flesh (1968)
Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.7/10 X  

A man desperate for money and no income, turns prostitute and interplays with a variety of clients and hustlers.

Director: Paul Morrissey
Stars: Joe Dallesandro, Geraldine Smith, Patti D'Arbanville
**** (1967)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.4/10 X  
Director: Andy Warhol
Stars: Brigid Berlin, Tally Brown, David Croland
Tub Girls (1967)
Romance
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.8/10 X  

"Tub Girls" features Warhol superstar Viva lying in a bathtub with different people of both sexes, including Brigid Berlin (as Brigid Polk), who appeared fully clothed in the tub.

Director: Andy Warhol
Stars: Brigid Berlin, Alexis de la Falaise, Abigail Rosen
Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.3/10 X  

Ondine is a gay man attempting to re-adjust his sexuality via various encounters with different women. After trying his luck with three women, Ondine becomes a background character in a ... See full summary »

Directors: Paul Morrissey, Andy Warhol
Stars: Ondine, Brigid Berlin, Joe Dallesandro
I, a Man (1967)
Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.1/10 X  
Directors: Paul Morrissey, Andy Warhol
Stars: Tom Baker, Nico, Valerie Solanas
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.1/10 X  

A young, jobless woman stays in bed, reads, talks on the phone, smokes cigarettes, makes fresh coffee, and tries on some clothes from a large wardrobe.

Director: Andy Warhol
Stars: Edie Sedgwick
Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
Brigid Berlin ...
Herself - The Duchess (as Brigid Polk)
Randy Borscheidt ...
Himself
Ari Boulogne ...
Himself (as Ari)
Angelina 'Pepper' Davis ...
Herself
Dorothy Dean ...
Herself
Eric Emerson ...
Himself
Patrick Flemming ...
Himself
Ed Hood ...
Himself
Arthur Loeb ...
Himself
Donald Lyons ...
Himself
Gerard Malanga ...
Son
Marie Menken ...
Mother
Mario Montez ...
Transvestite
Nico ...
Herself
Ondine ...
Himself - Pope
Edit

Storyline

Lacking a formal narrative, Warhol's art house classic follows various residents of the Chelsea Hotel in 1966 New York City, presented in a split screen with a single audio track in conjunction with one side of screen.

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Drama

Certificate:

See all certifications »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

|

Release Date:

November 1968 (Denmark)  »

Also Known As:

Chelsea-lányok  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Aspect Ratio:

1.37 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Mary Woronov's mother, on seeing the film, sued Andy Warhol, as she had not signed a release allowing Warhol to use footage of her in the film. Warhol then paid the actors $1000 each for their releases. See more »

Quotes

[last lines]
Himself - Pope: By the way, "The Bride Of Frankenstein" is the greatest movie ever made. It's just fabulous... Isn't it?
See more »

Connections

Featured in Nico Icon (1995) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
remarkable
22 September 2007 | by (United Kingdom) – See all my reviews

There's two film experiences this year that standout as arresting for me in the way that they changed my perception of cinema. One was Bela Tarr's masterwork, The Man From London. Tarr uses settings as powerful players, almost like characters. It challenged the way I approached watching film, the visual experience. The other evening I went to a special showing of Andy Warhol's Chelsea Girls. This is not a film one could call 'polished' in any sense of the word. But it opened up so many ideas in my head. I felt as if I had had a three-hour masterclass in the techniques of film, particularly the ways film is manipulated to alter what goes on in the minds of the viewer.

I'll try to tell you why I found it so mesmerising. Then you can decide for yourself whether to watch it.

The screening was sold out. I should explain that the cinema had borrowed the rare print from the Museum of Modern Art in New York. They installed two 16mm projectors side by side. The film comes as 12 separate reels – it's a sort of soap opera of the lives of some of Warhol's people that lived at the Chelsea Hotel in the 60's. Although the running order has now become more or less accepted, the original instructions were that the projectionist should choose the sequence and the sound levels for each. Additionally, two projectors are used simultaneously, projecting different reels on opposite sides of the screen.

The effect is a bit like being at a party where you can choose which conversation to tune in to. But sometimes you are just left with one person for a few minutes. You can almost ignore one section for a bit. But then, when something interesting happens, you already have the background gossip on it that you've followed with one ear. Your tangential interest has been aroused. When people hear the film described, the think, "How can you follow two things at once?" But this is what we do all the time. Every minute of our lives. We just alter the emphasis.

There's not much in the way of narrative. But we develop our own kind of narrative as we link up individuals from different reels. Often they are shown in a different light – sometimes literally. Everyone, as in many of Warhol's films, plays themselves – or rather a dramatised persona of themselves. An attractive vamp from one black-and-white reel turns out to be a quick-witted transgendered woman when we hear her with the sound turned up in another. Both reels are in black and white but with different co-actors. When we see her in a third reel, in colour, some of the mystery that black-and-white lent has drained away. She seems more human and less mysterious. We make our internal narrative, choosing which reel is a 'flashback.' Which is the 'true' person. I think of how the classic 'vamp' is portrayed in movies, the fetishisation of femininity. And how unconscious we are of cinematic technique.

Frequently camera also makes self-conscious zooms. Almost as if the cameraman had noticed, "Oh look, isn't THAT interesting!" Was it interesting before, or is it interesting because we have seen it through the eyes of someone who sees what is fascinating about it? They are insignificant details. Yet, when we focus on them, they seem to encapsulate the mood of the scene, or reveal something new about what is happening. At other times, the camera just seems to fidget. We become aware of it as a 'character' (a bit like Bela Tarr's cityscapes).

This probably comes easier if you can see why (Warhol's) screenprints and sculptures are interesting, have endured, and been so influential. Anyone can call a painting of a soup-can trite. Fewer can explain why Warhol's 'soup cans' sold for so much money - or are still taken very seriously by art establishments. If you can find the essence of something that everyone likes but takes for granted. We look at things without seeing them. So if you can make people stop. And really look. Really see. Suddenly you've shown them something about themselves. It wasn't really anything about soup or depicting Marilyn Monroe's head in garish colours. "They see all of me but they don't see anything," intones a drug-crazed young man into a flexible mirror. His self-absorption reminds me of how I am compositing each character from their different 'reels'.

Of course, we also know this movie was banned. Is that shocking enough to keep you in your seat for three hours? Without graphic violence, graphic sex or the usual commercial chicanery? Probably not. If you're new to Warhol's art you might want to get hold of a primer first (I recommend 'The Philosophy of Andy Warhol' available in Penguin: it doesn't 'explain' Warhol but it can help you get inside his head.) If you see this film looking for all the things he's refusing to give you then you probably won't get much out of it.

Of course, if this were a real soap opera, scenes of mild bondage, catfights, sexual confessions and so on would be 'dramatised' to make them larger than life. Chelsea Girls doesn't have to go to such lengths. It already is 'real life'. Weird people, druggie drop-outs and the sort of folk that probably 'infested' Times Square before the big clean up. But their interesting essences are distilled by a great artist – yet just not in the way you might expect.

I got the feeling at times that you could have given Andy Warhol a camera that came free with the cornflakes and he would have made great art with it.

(This is a greatly shortened version of something I wrote for Eyeforfilm)


6 of 7 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
where can i buy it? psycho_devochka
Warhol DVD's paulrs001
Been looking through Warhol's films and such... iliketomooveit
How is it..... Le_Feu_Follet
Playing at MOMA gomper-1
clip? IsisChromecat
Discuss Chelsea Girls (1966) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?