| Index | 7 reviews in total |
13 out of 16 people found the following review useful:
Anna Karina est magnifique!!!, 3 February 2006
![]()
Author:
Jackstone54
When "The Nun" was released in the US in 1971, the movie generated a lot of positive reviews. Anna Karina's performance was unanimously hailed as a great one. Judith Crist of New York Magazine called it "unforgettable." Archer Winsten of the New York Post described it as "superb". Gene Shalit dubbed Anna as "exceptional" while Kathleen Carroll of the New York Daily News thus enthused: "Anna Karina gives a performance of unusual depth". Indeed, Anna's interpretation is one of her best in a career of over 70 movies. It ranks with her performances in "Vivre sa Vie", "Pierrot le Fou", "Rendezvous a Bray", "L'Alliance" and "L'Etranger". She was reunited with Rivette in the musical "Haut Bas Fragile". She is slated to direct her second movie this year in Montreal, a road movie with the composer Philippe Katerine.
9 out of 13 people found the following review useful:
Liselotte Pulver is STUNNING, nothing but STUNNING, 13 August 2004
Author:
jandewitt from Hannover
Playing a role that few people thought would ever fit her and shadowed
by vultures predicting disaster, Liselotte Pulver delivered the
surprise coup of many a cinematic season in the icily directed 'La
Religieuse'.
Ms. Pulver, the beloved eternal comedienne of the German cinema, has
taken on that most daunting role: the lesbian Mother Superior, the
ultimate debauched nun in the ultimate 'Why was the Revolution
necessary?' tale, Denis Diderot's grand tale 'La Religieuse'. Working
against type and expectation under the direction of Jaques Rivette, Ms.
Pulver has created the most complex and compelling portrait of her long
career, and she has done this in ways that deviate radically from her
former screen roles.
Ms. Pulver's Mother Superior, emerges in this adaptation with her
monumental weakness intact. But something new and affecting is
simmering within the character, a damning glimpse of self-awareness.
You get the sense that if her frantic movement stops for a second,
she'll deflate into a small and bitter creature.
In films like 'Die Züricher Verlobung' and 'Das Wirtshaus I'm Spessart'
Ms. Pulver's persona has always been that of a delectable waif, a
vulnerable creature with a heart of gold. Here she was cast against
type and rumors went that she did not get along with Mr. Rivette. And
then, halfway through the film, there she was, and for the first time
in her long career she didn't look remotely like an ingénue.
Ms. Pulver's portrait is so intimate and persuasive that you aren't
allowed to step back and think, 'What a monster she is.' That's
because, thanks to this actress's willingness to turn herself and her
character inside out, you've been inside her mind. What a sad and
fascinating place it is.
5 out of 6 people found the following review useful:
the feminine control factory of 18th century and beyond, 28 January 2009
![]()
Author:
MisterWhiplash from United States
The Nun might be just another very good, possibly excellent and
heartbreaking piece of "religion is rotten and the people in it control
people in terrible and soul-crushing ways" movie-making akin to Carl
Dreyer if not for its last third or maybe second half (it's something
of that length). For a good while Jacques Rivette's film from the book
by Denis Diderot is about Suzanne (Anna Karina), a young woman who is
passed along from her parents, one the mother wanting to go to the
afterlife "clean" without the burden of her sin which was connected to
Suzanne's father not really being her father, to a convent and forced
to say she will be celibate and devout and all that jazz. Jazz as in
life as a nun, forced to say that she believes wholly in God and will
deny herself everything in order to serve him- when he calls or feels
like it of course.
In this first half or so the film is about as close as one can get
outside of Carl Dreyer to it being about the pain inflicted upon an
innocent in a world dominated by a) a natural prejudice towards women,
in this case to go completely rigidly by the rules - or, b) for that
matter, a hell placed upon those who *dont* want to be nuns and just
want to experience something else in the world. We see Suzanne
subjected to this convent at first run by a helpful and loving Mother
Superior Mme de Moni only to die and her replacement be so hard-pressed
as to eventually see Suzanne as being possessed by a devil, keeping her
away from the other nuns, locked up without food or water, or any legal
counsel.
This part seems straightforward as does the eventual
Priests-find-out-Mme-is-unrelenting-and-transfer-her story
progression... but something very fascinating happens, something that
makes The Nun from what is already a heart-rending and tasteful story
of repression and super 18th century Christian fervor into a great
film. The second convent, on first appearance, is total bliss compared
to the former one. Suzanne is treated to happy nuns, a happy Mother
Superior Simonin, and even some lighthearted revelry like playing games
outside, something that would have never happened at the previous
convent. But there's also an underlying uneasiness that is confirmed by
the Mother Superior being, how should I say, "clingy" to at first
Suzanne's story and then Suzanne herself.
It's not just enough for Rivette, by way of the book, to show religion
being domineering and cruel and at best complacent in the expected
sense, but for another look at what should be religious organization
run by caring and spiritual people to be also total kooks. It's like
Rivette puts down this section of some fun like the slightest of
reprieves and then to bring it back under the rug, and it's something
really special to see. It's a bleak story not simply because a woman
who has no rightful place in a convent of nuns is forced into it and
made into another cog in the religious machine, but for the lack of
hope conveyed in what good there is, the goodness of people devoted to
a life of faith, that is revealed. It's an incredibly precise
indictment on organized religion and society that allows how it runs as
much as captivating morality drama.
The Nun can also be read as a searing feminist statement, but going
into this part might make this too long a review. Suffice to say The
Nun, a controversial film (at the time) made from a controversial book
of its time, conveys what it wants to say in stark locations and even
starker performances from the supporting cast. The two actresses
playing the significant Mother Superiors in the story deserve credit,
yet the main reason to see the picture is for Anna Karina. She makes a
sense of purpose in every scene, a performance that is startling for it
being so removed from ex-husband Godard's usual self-conscious
comedy/dramas and into something that requires her to plunge the depths
of whatever she can handle emotionally for the character. It turns out
to be the best serious performance of her's I've seen to date outside
of maybe Vivre sa vie. Suzanne, thanks to Karina, is so sad a
character, so right in her common sense and driven almost mad by this
rigid and monstrous Christian dogma that you cant take your eyes off
her for a second. It's rare to see a performance this tender and
selfless to the dark and light in human being. A+
11 out of 19 people found the following review useful:
Jansenist, 18 May 2002
Author:
dbdumonteil
Although Jacques Rivette was labeled "new wave","la religieuse" is
actually an austere work,a bit academic,very close to the pre-new wave
generation,very close to Jean Delannoy.By far ,one of the two most
palatable works by highbrow Rivette (the other one being the umpteenth
version of Joan of Arc,thanks to Sandrine Bonnaire's
portrayal).Needless to say ,all other Rivette works are "intellectual"
works ,reserved for the happy(?) few ,and they will make yawn your head
off.
"La religieuse" caused a big scandal when it was released in the
mid-sixties.The Church insisted on calling the movie "Suzanne Simonin
,la religieuse de Diderot".
Released with a PG 18, the movie seems harmless today:yes there's a
lesbian nun ,but the crowds have seen worse since.It's a jansenist
work,with a very slow pace,faithful to Diderot's novel-which anyway
depicted an improbable situation:they did not lock the girls in
nunneries anymore ,it was a thing of the past in the XVIII th
century-,except for the ending ,but Rivette's one makes sense all in
all.
The cinematography is beautiful and anti-nouvelle vague,the actresses
convincing:Micheline Presles,a saint of a nun,Anna Karina, her cruel
mother's unfortunate victim,and Liselotte Pulver,a bon vivant character
who's got a crush on Suzanne .
2 out of 2 people found the following review useful:
The Nun's Story, 13 June 2008
![]()
Author:
Galina from Virginia, USA
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
Jacques Rivette's La Religieuse (The Nun), 1966 is the adaptation of Denis Diderot's novel (1760). The movie tells a harrowing and simple story of 16 year old Suzanne Simonin (played by incredible Anna Karina), who is forced by her mother to enter a convent where she undergoes a lot of suffering including beatings, humiliations, semi-starvation, lesbian attentions from the Mother Superior (charming Liselotte Pulver of Das Wirtshaus im Spessart) and attempted rape by a priest. Made by the acclaimed New Wave director, "The Nun" feels more like a traditional (in the best meaning of this word) film, linear, poetic, moving, and very sad. Even before the film was completed and shown to the viewers, the association of former nuns and the parents of students in "free" schools demanded a banning order. This film was met with great controversy upon its release and was banned despite initial approval. Ironically, the scandal had benefited to the increased interest for the novel - many copies of Diderot's book were sold following the banning of the movie. Despite its controversy, the movie is not so much a criticism of the Catholic Church but more a condemnation of the society in which a woman had only two choices allowed by her family - marriage or the convent.
5 out of 8 people found the following review useful:
New wave Diderot, 13 May 2002
![]()
Author:
Sorsimus from Kaarina, FInland
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
***SPOILERS*** ***SPOILERS***
In the aftermath of the French new wave, out of the Cahiers bunch of
Truffaut, Godard, Chabrol, Rohmer and Rivette, the last became the most
enigmatic filmmaker of the posse. Probably the most famous effort from
this
meticulous artist is "Celine et Julie vont en bateau", somewhat
overshadowing this little masterpiece.
And when I say little i mean, that even in its 135 form "La Religiuse" is
one of the shortest films by Rivette. It is fittingly minimalistic in
everything but emotion. Which flows in abundance. The story is obviously
packed with emotional goodies: parents "donate" one of their daughters to
a
monastery, because they cannot manage hew dowry, in the first monastery
she
is abused violently, because she obviously lacks faith and dedication, she
gets a move to another establishment where the head nun harasses her
sexually. It all ends in suicide.
This is filmmaking of the highest calibre where only what is essential is
shown. You'll know whether you'll like it!
1 out of 3 people found the following review useful:
Atypically formalist, rigorous work from Rivette is one of his greatest and most moving films, 5 May 2009
![]()
Author:
OldAle1 from United States
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
La Religieuse (The Nun) is Rivette's second feature, not finished and
shown until six years after his first, "Paris nous appartient" and not
given a significant release until the following year - and even then,
banned from being shown to anyone under 18 in France and completely
banned in French overseas possessions.
What was all the fuss about? There's no nudity, no strong language, no
violence to speak of -- what got the French censors up in arms about
was in fact one of the harshest attacks on organized religion - or at
least on Catholicism as it used to be practised in France two centuries
earlier - ever filmed. La Religieuse, based on an unfinished 1780 novel
by Denis Diderot, is the story of Suzanne Simenon, a young woman in the
problematic circumstance of being forced into convent life because of
her mother's transgressions and her father's failures in business, and
her attempts to escape this situation, which as you might imagine
required much effort in the 18th century.
Suzanne, played in an extraordinary performance by Anna Karina, is in
fact quite pious, virginal, innocent and naive; she seems to be fairly
intelligent and musically talented; but she is also very independent,
and for all her real and honest belief in God, cannot submit to the
structured life and rigorous discipline of convent life. At first, she
is somewhat comforted by a kind mother superior who admits to having
had some of the same problems of having no vocation - of having no
particularly feeling for monastic life. But her kind and understanding
leader soon dies, and is replaced by a rigorous and intolerant young
woman who despises Suzanne - despises the slightest bit of
nonconformity - from the first. Suzanne's life becomes intolerable,
more so even when she writes to a lawyer to try to be freed from the
convent; eventually some pity is taken on her once it is learned how
badly she has been treated (shunned, given no food and no change of
clothes, not allowed to pray) and that her mother superior is possibly
deranged - and Suzanne is moved to another convent.
This new location is problematic in its own way, though - at first it
seems lively, carefree and joyous, but Suzanne soon becomes the object
of a different kind of unwanted attention from the young and very
sexual mother superior, and finds that here too, "freedom" is
completely impossible. Karina manages to show the slow progression from
complete naiveté to adult understanding - and despair - without ever
seeming to lose faith in her God, though she may be losing her belief
in humanity. It's a powerful statement made mostly in the eyes, a
curled lip, shoulders - there are a couple of manic scenes, but they
are never overdone or overlong; we get what we need to understand a
spirit in torture. When, finally, she does manage to make an exit, she
finds that life on the outside world for an uneducated and moral young
woman without money is no better, and Rivette finishes the film, and
Suzanne's life, the only way possible...
Most critics will remark that this is Rivette's most conventional film,
and so it may be on the surface; the narrative is very easy to follow,
the scenes are quite fluid and the editing fairly simple, the storyline
lacks any of the fantasy, whimsy, or narrative play that most of his
other films are full of - but look closer. Certainly this is the
director's most overtly political/socially critical film - though even
here it is careful in its balance. Suzanne is not an atheist, does not
hate the church; she simply does not belong in this life and the film's
anger is at a society and a religious organization that doesn't care
about her feelings or even her life. It is anti-totalitarian, not at
all anti-spiritual.
The structure of the film is quite remarkable as well, though its most
obvious innovations or experimentations are with sound rather than
image. The score is a modernist, percussive and often harsh one, and
the sounds of nature, of the world outside the convent walls, are often
powerfully amplified. Inside is only the life of rules and orders, to
be followed without question - outside are birdsong, the howling wind,
bells and horses' hooves on pavement. Most scenes are composed of a
single shot, typically a minute or two in length; Rivette's original
design was to have both sound and image mimic the monastic cell, though
the end result didn't work out exactly as he had hoped. Still, he and
his collaborators, most notably composer Jean-Claude Eloy and the sound
department headed by Michel Fano, create a world terrifyingly powerful
in its ability to destroy a body, if not a soul, and yet still exist as
a false and beautiful incentive, never to be grasped by a young woman
without hope or ability. The further from her initial jail-like
surroundings she gets, the more she finds that she only eludes one kind
of prison for another - and the further we go in the film, the harsher
and angrier the music and the aural surrounding become.
Like every Rivette film I've seen, this improves on multiple viewings;
I first saw this on the first release of the complete uncut film in the
USA in 1990, later again video, and a third time just now. Though I'm
sure some will be put off by the subject matter or the depressing
storyline, anyone with an interest in this great director and certainly
anyone interested in the plight of women in film - Rivette's model in
many ways in this film is the work of proto-feminist Japanese director
Kenji Mizoguchi - should really see this. It stands with the best of
the New Wave, and Karina's performance proves that she wasn't just the
pretty face that she typically is in Godard's work.
| Plot summary | Ratings | Awards |
| Newsgroup reviews | External reviews | Plot keywords |
| Main details | Your user reviews | Your vote history |