MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Up 1,033 this week

Duel at Diablo (1966)

 -  Action | War | Western  -  15 July 1966 (UK)
6.6
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 6.6/10 from 1,351 users  
Reviews: 37 user | 9 critic

Lieutenant McAllister is ordered to transport several ammunition wagons to another fort through Apache territory with only a small troop of rookie soldiers to guard them. Along for the ride... See full summary »

Director:

Writers:

(screenplay), (screenplay), 1 more credit »
0Check in
0Share...

Related News

Watch Sidney Poitier play cowboy
| ShadowAndAct
The Most Savage Film In History!
| ShadowAndAct

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 2364 titles created 4 months ago
 
a list of 2000 titles created 5 months ago
 
a list of 1057 titles created 1 month ago
 
a list of 615 titles created 1 month ago
 
a list of 883 titles created 24 Nov 2011
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Duel at Diablo (1966)

Duel at Diablo (1966) on IMDb 6.6/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Duel at Diablo.
1 nomination. See more awards »

Videos

Photos

Edit

Cast

Complete credited cast:
...
Jess Remsberg
...
Toller
...
Ellen Grange
...
Willard Grange
...
Lt. Scotty McAllister
William Redfield ...
Sgt. Ferguson
John Hubbard ...
Maj. Novac
Ralph Nelson ...
Col. Foster (as Alf Elson)
...
Cpl. Harrington
...
Chata
Eddie Little Sky ...
John Crawford ...
Clay Dean
Edit

Storyline

Lieutenant McAllister is ordered to transport several ammunition wagons to another fort through Apache territory with only a small troop of rookie soldiers to guard them. Along for the ride is ex-scout Jess Remsberg who is trying to track down Ellen Grange, who, having recently been freed from Apache captivity, has mysteriously run off again to rejoin them. Remsberg frees Ellen again and leaves her with the embattled soldiers as he rides off to the fort, not only for help, but to find the man who killed and scalped his Indian wife. Written by Doug Sederberg <vornoff@sonic.net>

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Taglines:

Afraid to turn their backs on each other they fought side by side against the Indian!

Genres:

Action | War | Western

Certificate:

Approved | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

 »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

15 July 1966 (UK)  »

Also Known As:

Ralph Nelson's Duel at Diablo  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

| (Westrex Recording System)

Color:

Aspect Ratio:

1.66 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Goofs

As James Garner and others descend a rock wall via ropes under a full moon, the men each cast two shadows. See more »

Quotes

Lt. Scotty McAllister: You were a pretty good sergeant once, Toller, but now you're just another money grubbing civilian.
Toller: You used to be a pretty good sergeant yourself, McAllister, but now you're just a... rank officer.
See more »

Crazy Credits

The United Artists logo is sliced off the screen with a bloody knife, slicing an "X" across the screen, revealing the opening scene. At the end, the same knife slices the live picture away, as (sort of) a fade out. See more »

Connections

Referenced in Guns for Hire: The Making of 'The Magnificent Seven' (2000) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Enjoyable enough western that covers the weak subtext with a good cast
3 May 2004 | by See all my reviews

Out in the desert Jess Remsberg comes across Ellen Grange trying to get back to her Apache husband. He `rescues' her and returns her to her husband Willard, who is too ashamed of her to accept her back. While in town, Jess gets roped in as a scout to help Lt McAllister drive across the desert with a troupe of rookie troops to reach Fort Conchos. Horse trader Toller is also dragged along to finish breaking the horses he sold to the fort. Each has a different reason for going to Conchos - Jess is looking for revenge on the man who killed his Indian wife, Grange for trade etc. However when Chata's men attack the troop find themselves fighting for survival.

As with many viewers I imagine, I was drawn to this film by the strong list of names in the cast. From the early scenes it is clear that this film takes a sympathetic view of the Native Americans and doesn't allow them to be portrayed as barbarians and such. However after a few characters are set up who say nice things about the Indians, the film then falls into standard fare where Chata's men are murderers, torturers and without any real character to speak of within the script. Aside from the rather apologetic muddle it gets itself into, the basic plot is OK and ends up robbing most of the characters of nay of the decency that they might have had. The focus is a series of gun battles between McAllister's men and Chata, leading to the inevitable showdown and gradual picking off of each other's men. It isn't great but it does the job in a rather gaudy fashion even if it's `substance' is damaged by the poor subtext which can't decide it if wants to be PC or just brutal and with plenty of shoot outs.

Other reviewers have commented on the film's brutality but mostly that is implied. Some death scenes are brutal in your imagination but generally it isn't anything too different from what you'll else anywhere else. The direction is also pretty workmanlike and has few (if any) touches that are really clever or unique; however much worse is the score - it's very much of the sixties music and it doesn't fit the film. What does really work is the cast. Garner is good value and plays it pretty straight. His revenge plot and his anger is not very well delivered though and he gets an easy out. Poitier's casting is a little ironic as he is the only one who doesn't seem to have any rage towards other races and has no anger directed towards him for his race. He is cool and tough but has little meat on his bones. Andersson is a little wishy-washy and is only given plenty to do in the early scenes where she defends her captors. Weaver is good and unsympathetic and Travers is a weird bit of casting. Never the most charismatic of leading men, here he is a strange mix of a character and is accent is just strange and distracting - he can do `broad and heroic' though and that is all that is really asked of him.

Overall this is a workmanlike western that actually would have been more enjoyable if it had done it's apologetic subtext with more conviction. It doesn't though and actually ends up just muddling it for the first half and then falling back into more familiar territory of B-movie westerns. However it is still noisy enough to be fun and the presence of a number of famous faces help to make it feel better than it actually is.


13 of 24 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Best 'Black' westerns alfredmcclinton
dennis weavers shout alan4artg
Long Time Favorite MorganLvr
Main Theme omen2006
Credits/Title song? malificati
Tale of two hats alfredmcclinton
Discuss Duel at Diablo (1966) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?