7 Women (1966) Poster

(1966)

User Reviews

Add a Review
23 Reviews
Sort by:
9/10
Underrated
zetes19 February 2003
John Ford's swan song is very underrated. Anne Bancroft plays a chain-smoking doctor who has fled the United States (for reasons unknown, unless they were explained during the minute or so I was away to answer the phone) to work at a mission in China. Margaret Leighton plays the head of this mission, a devout Christian who controls her underlings with strict rules. Various troubles ensue, the most prominent being the threat of a cholera epidemic, a raid by Mongolian bandits, and a pregnant woman who is nearing menopause, which makes the birth a very difficult situation. It is the second problem which I mention that takes up most of the plot. The mission has heard stories of these Mongolians in the nearby areas. Leighton is sure that they will never dare attack her mission, by the grace of God and America. But they do, and they keep all the white women hostage after killing off every Chinese person in sight. They believe that they can win a ransom for them. The tough Bancroft bravely opposes them, but she can make no headway by those means. Instead, the leader of the bandits demands sex. In this way, she is able to influence the way the women are treated (especially concerning the birth). The main conflict of the film is between Leighton and Bancroft. It's very 60s, with the progressive, liberated woman fighting against the strict, sexless one. The role of religion is very interesting in the film. It's shocking that Ford, a devout Catholic, would make the headmistress so foolish. It's a very intelligent criticism of the holier-than-thou attitude of some. When death looks imminent, Leighton seems almost excited to become a martyr; and she's willing and ready to take everyone else with her. When Bancroft sees her chance to save the others, Leighton viciously attacks her for being the "whore of Babylon." The final scene is quite excellent. What a great way for the greatest director of all time end his career.
36 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
Under-rated Swan Song
stevehulett11 June 2005
"Seven Women" is the last feature film of John Ford, arguably the greatest director the United States has yet produced. After a half century of film making, Ford ended his fabled career with a wide screen feature about women in peril at a Chinese mission. Infirm and alcoholic, he filmed it on an MGM sound stage; MGM then cut it and tossed it away on the bottom half of a double bill.

Today, the film is little known and seldom seen. It is far from Ford's best work, yet there is power and believability in many of the lead performances, and power in the arc of the story. Anne Bancroft shines as a feisty New York doctor who ultimately sacrifices herself to save the other missionaries -- many whom she doesn't agree with -- from brutal deaths at the hands of Chinese bandits. Her work here is more forceful and better realized than her role of Mrs. Robinson, done two years later.

The best gift MGM/Sony could give lovers of serious cinema is a clean print of this forgotten film. Its sets are often glaringly artificial, and some of the secondary players are over the top (an old weakness of Ford's) as well as miscast, but "7W" is a far better film than Hollywood legend has told us.
31 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
9/10
Anne Bancroft stars in John Ford's last film.
For a film nut like me. 7 Women offers a plethora of pleasures. Patricia Neal was suppose to star but ill health made her unavailable. Anne Bancroft took over as the drinking, smoking, swearing saint. and all the aspects of this complex character are totally real in Anne Bancroft's face. She arrives to the Mission in China like a benevolent tornado. The spectacular Margaret Leighton is the head of the Mission and she plays it like a raw nerve, Among the other women, Flora Robson, Queen Elizabeth to Laurence Olivier's Michael Ingolby in Fire Over England, brings a voice of reason that reassure us, Betty Field , Kim Novak's mother in Picnic, among a gallery of memorable characters, plays the pregnant middle age woman who offends the Christian mission for having had sex with her husband under their roof. Mildred Dunnock, Anna Lee and even Stanley Kubrick's Lolita, Sue Lyon is part of the Mission. On the other side, the villains, that offended so many people, John Ford casts his longtime companion Woody Strode. I understand and even accept all the criticisms listed in the reviews of this pages but, somehow, I can put all that aside and enjoy the plethora of pleasures that it offers.
15 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
The final film of a great director that never lost his faith in human nature
mike-54415 September 1999
John Ford, usually with the reputation of misogynist, directed his last film surrounded by strong female characters and where the male characters are not particularly relevant. The movie is set in China, 1935, where a Civil War is taking place. Anne Bancroft, a female doctor who is also an atheist, says: "I spent years in slum hospitals. I never saw God come down and take care of anyone". Ford, with his catholic roots, allows himself to be pessimistic. Even when Margaret Leighton, a supposed strong believer is confronted by the female doctor, she says: "I've always searched for something that... isn't there. And God is not enough. God help me - He isn't enough".

The title refers to seven women, but the fact is that there are eight: What led us to believe that Anne Bancroft is excluded from the beginning? She wears man's clothes, she smokes and drinks. The loner Bancroft, condemned to always walk alone, like Ethan Edwards in "The Searchers". And what about the final scene, with a rare beauty, where the viewer isn't allowed to watch her fall? She is dressed in woman's clothes for the first time and is prepared to a truly catholic gesture, the sacrifice. "Seven Women" is a beautiful film, almost perfect. Towards the end, we become aware that Mr. Ford will live eternally.
27 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
8/10
A great swansong from Ford
Jugu Abraham17 October 2002
I wonder what feminists feel about this film. I found this work to be a fascinating look at women by a male director that can compare with two other cinematic works: Paul Mazursky's "The Unmarried Woman" and Muzaffar Ali's "Umrao Jaan". Strong women, weak women, lesbians, and immature girls, are contrasted with cardboard male characters that are never fully developed and are obviously no match to the array of women portrayed in the film. The men are painted so negatively that one begins to wonder if Ford thought Asian men had more brawn than brain--a strange view that has gained currency in Hollywood cinema.

I applaud Ford's decision to cast Anne Bancroft in this role. This is one of her strong performances. She makes even the most vapid films look elegant with her roles ("Lipstick", "Little Nikita", to name just two). Ford develops her role "7 women" on the lines of a Western gunslinger--only there are no gunfights. The woman has a weapon: sex. That weapon can down all the bad guys faster than it takes to down Mexicans, Red Indians, rustlers, bank-robbers. In this film these bad men are Chinese/Mongolian thugs. Established thespians Dame Flora Robson and Margaret Leighton are totally eclipsed by Bancroft's riveting performance.

What Ford wanted I guess was to stun the viewer with the ending--the twist preceded by the gradual softening of the Bancroft in men's clothes to the Bancroft in women's clothes and the acceptance of male superiority. Most critics have found the end facile but I found the end was powerful as it makes you review and reconsider the strength of the lead character.

The film questions established views on religion; evidently Ford was old enough to have seen enough to choose to make this film in the evening of his life. In his films, Ford's women are as interesting as any other aspect of his cinema and this film provides ample fodder for those interested in studying this element of Ford's work.

However, for a 1966 film, the studio sets for the film look too artificial for the serious cinema the film offers. If anything, the film makes the viewer think!
16 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
7/10
1 Woman
Jamie Ward17 July 2010
Finished in 1965 and belatedly released a year later, 7 Women represents director John Ford's final bow on the silver screen after a long and extremely significant foray into the world of celluloid. Existing as something of an atypical swan song for the long renowned film-maker, the feature is one that suffers from an overall lack of ideas, but which also pulls this weakness to be its central force of power. Employing a recurring theme of empowerment in the face of defeat and a defiance of authority, blind-faith and outdated ideals, 7 women is at its heart, sixties film-making at its most empowering and critical. It may not be as elegant as other works of the decade, nor as moving, but blessed with a wonderful sense of character and performance, John Ford achieves one of his most significant works here with a piece of film that all things considered, should never be as such.

I say this, mainly, because 7 Women is something of a canned movie. In this vein, the feature, like a few of Ford's previous efforts, feels like a play rather than a movie. Through this minimalist tone, Ford strikes a stern focus on character and theme, rather than obtuse action or plot—two elements which could have easily been given the spotlight by any other film-maker had they chosen to. You see, telling the story of a small missionary camp set up in a civil-war-torn China during the late thirties, 7 Women finds its roots in theatre drama, yet also mixes an element of danger into the mix too, outside of any inherent character conflict (though, one could argue such plot devices are perfunctory and only serve merely as a catalyst to explore these characters more effectively). Under the attack of a rogue gang of savage bandits known for their pillaging, torture, rape and murder of several nearby missionary outposts, Ford attempts to bring out the absolute base levels of his characters—to put them under the microscope to see who they really are. The results are interesting, albeit predictable, yet the overall experience boils down to one of subtle reflection.

As mentioned above, and indeed more than made obvious by the movie's title, key to this somewhat somber approach is in the screenplay's devotion to character rather than plot; and what a character we have here. While ostensibly telling the story of the seven women staffed by the Catholic Church to help deliver these poor souls, the central point of Ford's story here instead chooses to focus on the black sheep of the bunch, Dr. Cartwright. Cartwright, played by an endlessly captivating Anne Bancroft, is a last-resort chain-smoking, binge-drinking, foul mouthed, pant-wearing doctor who would rather talk to the bottom of her glass than to the higher being in the sky everyone else around her seems content to confide in. Straight away Ford plays her as being as the misfit malcontent that she obviously would be in this situation, yet he does well to establish her as anything but incompetent with her duties. Following this theme through right to the movie's finest point (the very last scene which in itself is worth the ninety minutes that precede it), Dr. Cartwright ends up stealing the show at every turn—sure, there are ideas here about humanitarian needs outweighing those of a clergy (most of which are needlessly heavy-handed and all too frequent with no real penetration involved), and there are more than a few other interesting characters here, but for the most part 7 Women is much more the story of 1 Woman, and well, that's probably for the best.

This isn't to say that there's not much to see outside of this wonderful pairing of Ford and Bancroft; it's just that this will be what you no doubt will take away from the feature as being its most enjoyable aspect. And with that said, it's important to stress that while 7 Women may not be as wholly enjoyable or entertaining or indeed significant as some of Ford's previous work, it nevertheless manages to stand on its own two feet—much like our beloved Cartwright—without pandering to expectations either of its audience or of its society at the time. Much like many films of the sixties, 7 Women is a daring and often compelling look at ourselves, whether through our hopes and dreams, our loves and faiths or our demons and tragedies. Not only that but it's the final statement of a director that gave cinema many of its greatest hours, and in that vein, 7 Women gains some significance without ever sacrificing its distinctly restrained and quietly contemplative mood.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
Ford's Final Film
Michael_Elliott6 September 2010
7 Women (1966)

*** (out of 4)

John Ford's final film is one you really wouldn't expect to see from him but I guess it goes to show what a great director he was as he could end his nearly fifty-year career with something fresh and original. The film takes place in 1935 China as a free-wheeling and free-spirited doctor (Anne Bancroft) comes to work at a missionary where she immediately clashes with the head of the mission (Margaret Leighton). The head doesn't agree with the doctor's way of life, which includes smoking, drinking, profane language and of course not believing in God. Soon the doctor is battling this but then a plague breaks out in the mission and then they come under attack from some rebels. I'm not sure if stunned is too strong of a word but that's what my feelings were going through this film. I've seen at least fifty John Ford movies and I never thought I'd see something like this one. The attitude of the Bancroft character just seems like something the director would stay away from and the anti-religion stance was so strong that again I couldn't believe this was something from Ford. I think if you showed this movie to the biggest of film buffs and didn't tell them who the director was I doubt they'd ever guess it was someone like Ford. I really appreciated the 60s fling thrown into the picture because you can obviously tell that they were taking a 60s woman and putting her into this situation. There's a bit about the doctor leaving America because a woman couldn't get a fair shake at a good career and again I wonder if they were standing up for women's rights. The film also has bits of lesbianism, the religious hypocrites and a strong sense of sexuality. The movie certainly isn't ahead of its time considering this was 1966 but it's still impressive stuff. Bancroft is downright marvelous here and turns in a very memorable performance. I must admit that I fell in love with her character as you have to respect the toughness that the actress brings to the role. I believed every second of it and there's just a certain fire to Bancroft that clearly shows up on the screen. Leighton is one of those love-to-hate performances and makes for a great villain. Sue Lyon, best known from Kubrick's LOLITA, turns in a fine performance. We even get Woody Strode in a small role as one of the warriors. The film's pacing is a very slow one and it feels like the movie is a lot longer than its 86-minute running time but this isn't a negative thing as I never got bored. I was certainly surprised to see how much Ford managed to cram into the short running time. His direction here contains some of his softest touches but they all work. It's a shame this movie isn't mentioned more when people discuss his career but it's certainly a good and original way for him to go out.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
A light that goes out.....
dbdumonteil21 January 2006
...what a moving last picture for Ford's swansong.Too often underrated ,"Seven woman" in spite of a sometimes weak script-too many things happen in too little time- is perhaps the most modern film in Ford 's canon.

We find one of Ford's permanent features:a group of human beings in jeopardy who's got to struggle against an enemy:"Stagecoach" is the best example .Dudley Nichols's screenplay was inspired by Guy de Maupasssant's "Boule de Suif".

Women always played a prominent part in Ford's canon.Ford's world is deceptive :it seems to be a male world but actually women are the strongest and the wisest (Jane Darwell's character in "Wagon Master" ,the soldiers' wives in "Fort Appache" ).It was only natural that Ford's last movie was an all-women film (all men,including Albert's character are caricatures.) And these women are very endearing.Anne Bancroft,one of the greatest actresses America ever had, shines all along the movie ,and even when the script verges on grotesque ,she's still beaming, fascinating ,never losing her sense of humor.Even when she "becomes Chinese" ,nobody would think of laughing at her.She's so strong an actress that we seem to know her heroine intimately,her life in NYC people dispensaries,her sad love stories.With her masculine swagger,her boots ,her cigarettes and her whiskey we see a broken woman who has lost all her illusions.She's an atheist,which is very rare in Ford's canon.

Religion is in the center of many a Ford movie ."Seven Women" takes place in a mission .All these women put their faith in God and ...in America (We're American citizens!).One of them (Margaret Leighton) is particularly interesting : a tight-lipped puritan at the beginning of the movie,she becomes,slowly but inexorably ,a mystic lunatic,mentioning Babylon and sinners.Like "Stagecoach" ,"seven femmes " borrows from Maupassant.Like his heroine,"Boule De suif" Cartwright gives her life in sacrifice so the others can survive.

Six Woman are leaving Sodom under an ominous sky :one of them is screaming about lust while the blonde schoolteacher (Sue Lyon,whose role is an equivalent of Caroll Baker's in "Cheyenne Autumn ,though it's an underwritten part ),along with the newborn child, represents hope for the future:all that she went through ,her late heroine (she was the only one to be nice with Cartwright when she arrived)might help her to carry on.But Ford's last opus,like Huston's "the dead" is a very pessimistic opus.
12 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
10/10
Powerful, Stunning Movie
Enrique Sanchez16 March 2004
I am still reeling from the powerful ending to this unspoken of movie. John Ford's last entry onto his glittering resumé stuns while it holds your interest at every turn of a scene.

It is so hard to resist talking about the ending of this movie. It seethes with so much devastating darkness. And yet, within this darkness, there is a human victory so profoundly complex as to take your breath away in resignation, anger, shock and inevitable acceptance.

Anne Bancroft has always been one of my favorite actresses. With all her celebrated roles, I still feel that the depth of talent has never been fully appreciated.

Yet, in this role, she displays her talents aplenty.

I recommend this seldomly seen movie and I hope it will be brought to VHS or DVD one day so that more will see this movie and its production will not be in vain.
22 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
8/10
a story of a woman estranged from God
didi-55 December 2008
Warning: Spoilers
'7 Women' is the story of Dr Cartwright, who dresses like a man, smokes, drinks, and swears like a trooper, and what happens when she arrives at a mission deep in a zone touched by revolution. The doctor is played by Anne Bancroft, and it probably is her best role. She's an atheist with humanity - when she eventually gives herself and her life to save everyone else in the mission from a fate worse than death, it isn't unexpected, although the women of God lose their strength and resolve in the face of fear.

Well supported by cast members like Margaret Leighton, Sue Lyon, Flora Robson, and Anna Lee, this film, a John Ford film which is still a western in its spirit like the great entries in his oeuvre. Good strong storytelling with believable characters make '7 Women' unmissable.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
8/10
A striking and intelligent film
bill-smythe4 January 2006
A jewel of a film – with superb acting in the 2 principal roles! Should be shown much more often. Failings in the set and in the minor characters are more than made up for by the vital intelligence of the presentation. The film is about religion and sex, and nothing else – and it is that simplicity that makes it fascinating. Bancroft has the role of saint and Leighton is the sinner. Is the poor exposure of this excellent film anything to do with lobbying from the churches, I wonder - after all it must be somewhat embarrassing for them to have an atheist doubling as a saint and a devout catholic doubling as a religious maniac. The saint sacrifices herself for the majority, just as Jesus was sacrificed. The sinner showed the intolerance characteristic of all religious bodies. By the way, smoking and drinking had already been established for Hollywood characters long before 1966, male and female. It was pushed by lobbying and bribery from the tobacco and alcohol industries and Bogart was a prominent and pitiful victim. So I do not see the smoking and drinking of the Bancroft character as primarily male characteristics. As for the rather muted rudeness she displayed at times, this I see as a very natural reaction to the infernal hypocrisy of the Leighton character - a 'devout catholic' who does not even believe in God – "I am looking for something that does not exist" she says. What superb realism.

The end of the film is the only part I did not think satisfying or realistic – in view of the character of the doctor. She is obviously a fighter and a very courageous woman. Her final action was cowardly and not in her character at all. All that was necessary was a few more days of cajoling the chief into sufficient liberty to get a horse to match her riding breeches - there were plenty of horses around – then kill the bastard, with perhaps a few more thrown in, and make for the main gate pronto.

In conclusion, the film shows a riveting clash of values in a theater piece that hardly needs any set. And the atheist comes out a clear winner. Good for you John Ford!
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
4/10
7 different women...7 different styles of acting
moonspinner558 September 2005
On the border of Mongolia in 1935, American missionaries suffer through starvation, cholera, a menopausal woman about to give birth, an attack by vicious bandits and the arrival of a chain-smoking, salty-tongued female doctor/atheist (Anne Bancroft) who usurps the power of the self-appointed leader (Margaret Leighton, whose nervous fascination with the minister's daughter, comely Sue Lyon, is vaguely lesbian in nature). Director John Ford's final film is brief and inexpensive, seemingly shot all on one sound-stage with few trimmings (when Lyon is told to take the children "into the fields," one wonders where exactly those fields are). So many different styles of acting are brought to the fore that it appears nobody knew how to approach this material. For his part, Ford may have been relishing the clashes (character and otherwise); his pacing tends to pick up whenever the conflicts threaten to get really nasty. I liked Anne Bancroft's straightforward, no-nonsense personality, Lyon is charmingly self-conscious, while Leighton is heinously hissable playing a completely unsympathetic "dictator" with high-flown manners (amusingly, she's never given a chance to redeem herself--and on at least two occasions is told to shut up--so that we nearly sympathize with her, but the screenwriter has her rigid and vile right up until the end). The climax is solid and satisfying, but filmed with a wink by Ford, as if to say "It's all b.s. anyway." ** from ****
15 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
3/10
It Had Potential
bkoganbing8 September 2005
Warning: Spoilers
John Ford's last feature film 7 Women marks an abrupt departure for the male misogynist director to direct a cast of primarily women. It had the makings of a classic, but it was in the hands of the wrong director.

Maybe George Cukor should have directed it. Or maybe this story should have been done a few years later when the production code was finally lifted. A lot of things could have been made more explicit.

Anne Bancroft, inner American city female doctor, gets assigned to a Christian mission in China in the early Thirties. This was when the Kuomintang government of Chiang Kai-Shek was trying to put down the Communist insurgents and various warlords and having mixed results to say the least.

One real bad warlord is Tunga Khan played by Mike Mazurki and during the course of the film he's having a lot of military success forcing the Kuomintang garrison to flee, leaving the mission helpless.

The mission is run by Margaret Leighton who's a walking rule book and a repressed lesbian to boot. She's crushing out big time on young Sue Lyons who's also a fairly new missionary assigned there. Others assigned are Mildred Dunnock and married couple Eddie Albert and Betty Field. Fleeing Mike Mazurki and his army and staying there temporarily are Flora Robson and Anna Lee of a nearby British mission.

Anne Bancroft is upsetting everything in Margaret Leighton's little satrapy. She smokes, she swears, she drinks and engages in all kinds of improper behavior for a missionary. She's not a believer though, in fact she's fled the USA after a bad love affair with a married man. She's lived in other words, not like most in the mission.

Of course Mike Mazurki and his troops take the mission and the lives of the 7 Women are hanging in the balance. What's to happen?

Anne Bancroft is the best one in the film and Margaret Leighton runs a close second. They have to be or the film would be unwatchable from the gitgo. It's their rivalry that drives the film. But they're good actresses.

That couldn't be said for Sue Lyon. Now maybe it was just Sue Lyon's part to look wide eyed and innocent, but she read her lines like she was in a high school play. Maybe she was the reason Ford quit after this film.

Eddie Albert and Betty Field are an interesting couple. They got married late in life and are now having a baby. Albert wanted to be a minister, but for financial reasons couldn't get married to Field and couldn't go to a seminary. So he's taken his wife out to China and they've conceived a child in her menopausal period of life. And the baby is born while the women are captive of Mazurki.

The warlord and his troops come off like Indians in a John Ford western. And I mean the Indians in The Searchers as opposed to those in Fort Apache. At least in that other famous flop film about missionaries in China, Satan Never Sleeps, Leo McCarey at least cast oriental players in the principal oriental parts. You'd never get away with casting Mike Mazurki as the warlord.

It's sad because there were a lot of interesting themes in 7 Women about the role of missionaries, repressed homosexuality, the politics of Kuomintang China in the film and none were really developed. Maybe John Ford wanted to show the critics he could direct a picture with a majority of women in the principal parts. He didn't make it.

Do our intrepid missionaries escape the clutches of the rampaging Tunga Khan. Well if you're interested, all I can say is think about A Tale of Two Cities.
11 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
5/10
Intelligent Film Declines into Racist Adventure Story
James Hitchcock7 September 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Contains spoilers

In this, his last feature film, John Ford moves from the Wild West which formed the setting for many of his best-known films to the Wild East. The film is set in 1935 in an American mission post in a remote area of Northern China, close to the border with Mongolia. The mission, which aims to bring Christianity to the local people, is mostly staffed by women, led by the formidable Miss Agatha Andrews. The life of the mission is disrupted by the arrival of a new female doctor, Dr Cartwright. Cartwright is very different to the pious ladies who make up the existing staff- she is foul-mouthed, smokes, drinks hard liquor, dresses in men's clothes and has no religious faith. She openly boasts of having had an adulterous affair with a married man. There is an immediate clash of personalities between her and the tough, authoritarian Miss Andrews. One of the staff is pregnant, and Dr Cartwright wants to get her to a modern hospital. Miss Andrews, however, refuses to authorise the release of mission funds for such a purpose.

Further disruption is caused by the arrival of refugees from a nearby British mission, fleeing from a gang of Mongolian bandits. A cholera epidemic breaks out, and Dr Cartwright takes charge, proving herself to be a practical and capable doctor. The epidemic abates, but the threat of the bandits persists. Miss Andrews believes that they will not dare to attack American citizens, but she is proved wrong and the gang overrun the mission. Once again it is Dr Cartwright who saves the day through her skill in managing the bandits and their leader Tunga Khan.

At the heart of the film is the clash between two different sets of values, the modern, secular values of Dr Cartwright, and the more traditional religious values of the mission staff, particularly Miss Andrews. As the title suggests, the film is largely about women- the only major male characters are Tunga Khan, an oafish barbarian, and Charles, the weak and ineffective husband of the pregnant Florrie- and these two competing world-views have very different concepts of what constitutes femininity. To Dr Cartwright, Miss Andrews and her colleagues seem repressed and ultra-conservative. To Miss Andrews, Dr Cartwright seems coarse and mannish. Paradoxically, however, although Dr Cartwright affects male dress, she seems to modern eyes (by which I mean those of 1966 as much as those of 2004) more attractive and feminine than the mission staff, all of whom, even the character played by Sue Lyon who was strikingly beautiful in real life, seem prim and dowdy. Although Dr Cartwright sees herself as a modern, liberated woman, when the mission is overrun by the bandits she is forced to use her feminine charms to deal with Tunga Khan, offering him sexual favours in exchange for more humane treatment of her colleagues. Miss Andrews disapproves of Dr Cartwright's flaunting of her sexuality, but there are hints (never fully developed) that beneath her prim exterior she herself may have lesbian tendencies. The relationship between her and her young assistant Emma certainly seems unnaturally close.

In some respects 'Seven Women' is a feminist film; Dr Cartwright is a woman trying to make her way in a male-dominated profession, and there is a suggestion that she has been held back in her career by male prejudice. Some of the symbols of female emancipation used in the film, however, seem odd today. It is strange that a female doctor should indulge in smoking and heavy drinking to demonstrate how liberated she is; feminism is not just about equal rights to contract lung cancer and cirrhosis of the liver. In this respect the otherwise reactionary Miss Andrews seems more modern and enlightened than her antagonist.

In my view, the film has a number of weaknesses. One lies in its often inappropriate casting. The best performance is from Anne Bancroft as Dr Cartwright, but many of the others seem poor. Miss Andrews takes pride and comfort in the fact of her American citizenship; it is therefore strange that the part went to a British actress, Margaret Leighton, who made no attempt at an American accent, especially as there seems to be an attempt to contrast the domineering Miss Andrews with the more genteel ladies from the British mission. Betty Field and Eddie Albert, both in their fifties when the film was made, were too old for the parts of Florrie and Charles Pether, who are supposed to be in their late thirties or early forties- a particularly glaring piece of miscasting given that Florrie's pregnancy plays an important part in the film. Sue Lyon seems wasted as the shy and repressed Emma. Tunga Khan is played by a European; a Mongolian or Far Eastern actor in this role might have been more believable.

Perhaps a more serious weakness is the way in which its potentially interesting themes are thrown away. After the arrival of the bandits, the once-strong figure of Miss Andrews declines into a hysterical fanaticism verging on religious mania; the clash between religious and secular views therefore ends in a win for secularism by default, which weakens its dramatic impact. In the second half of the film the film becomes less of an examination of two contrasting philosophies than a frankly racist adventure story in which a plucky white woman takes on a gang of despicable Oriental villains. Although the Chinese characters are treated fairly respectfully, the Mongolian bandits are ludicrous, baboonish caricatures rather than recognisable human beings.

There is a shocking, although effective, conclusion to the film, which I will not reveal here. Despite this, however, I was left with the impression that what had started out as an intelligent and unusual film had declined into a conventional one. It is ironic that a film about the clash between modernity and tradition should itself reveal some attitudes that were looking outdated even by the standards of the sixties. Perhaps the seventy-two year old John Ford's ideas about 'modernity' were still the ideas of the thirties; it would have been interesting to have seen how a younger director might have treated this theme. 5/10
8 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
4/10
A curiosity...
JasparLamarCrabb22 April 2006
John Ford's final film is a real curiosity. Anne Bancroft plays a butch doctor sent to work at a mission in China and ruffles the feathers of most of the missions, especially Margaret Leighton.

7 WOMEN is very studio bound and has a real half-hearted feel to it. Bancroft, a last minute replacement for Patricia Neal, is actually TOO strong and her character is really unappealing. Leighton is shrewish and the other women in the classy cast including Flora Robson, Mildred Dunnock and Sue Lyon barely register. And why is 53 year old Betty Field playing a pregnant woman? Her husband is the equally aged Eddie Albert. Mike Mazurki offers a cartoon character version of a savage who invades the mission and puts the disruptive Bancroft in her place. Ford may have viewed himself as a man of the Indians, but he really had no clue of how to handle women!
7 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
6/10
7 Women Derails At the End **1/2
edwagreen27 July 2007
Set in civil war torn China in 1935, the film boasts several great actresses in it.

Will someone please tell me how Sue Lyon was cast in the picture. She didn't look the type to get into mission work. We have the dependable Mildred Dunnock, as stern as ever but a heart geared toward understanding, unlike the head of the mission, Margaret Leighton, in a fabulous performance, as a strict-Christian adherent, who falls apart when the mission is over-run by savages.

Anne Bancroft notches another excellent portrayal as a unhappy doctor, common, vulgar, with a no nonsense approach to life. To think, Mrs. Robinson was only a year away!

Eddie Albert is basically wasted as a preacher-like minister who is killed off early. Bette Field, who played his pregnant wife, is just too old to be pregnant, even by today's standards. Nonetheless, Field brings plenty of tension, in a fine supporting performance.

The ending is unsatisfying here as Dunnock finally breaks with the over-bearing Leighton, as they and several others flee the warlords.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
Oh dear, poor Norah
mmsbk26 February 2007
This isn't so much a review- indeed I didn't know the film existed and I haven't seen it - as a lament for the late Norah Lofts , a writer of great power and subtlety. I can't begin to say how much it looks like Ford mangled her stirring and poignant tale (surely he was the last director on earth who should have been tackling an intricate female-nuanced situation! ) Suffice to say that Loft's Dr Cartwright, far from being some sort of pseudo man-imitating, girl-cowpoke,and American to boot, was actually an Englishwoman of education and compassion, whose outsider status derived from her non-religious stance and relatively 'liberated' attitude to personal freedom. Words fail me as to the ending ......
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
Female doctor in a male's world
velebilje9 December 2002
I have to admit that the ending of this film really stunned me. In the first part we see a female doctor, very determined, ready to work in the harsh condition. It is hard to her to be female doctor, she couldn't even get the decent office back in her country. The title of the film is "7 women", but actually there are 8. Why? It seems that the main character is excluded. Is that for the fact she wears man's clothes, drinks and smokes and most importantly that she is a doctor? In our society it is considered a compliment when the woman is told she was like a man (brave like a man, determined like a man, has brain like a man..) even today. But, despite her man's clothes she looks more appealing than the rest of women in their all women clothes who look like dry broomsticks.

From today's point of view it is inappropriate for the doctor to smoke so much and even get mad when is told not to, but as we know in the past women were not allowed to smoke, not for health reason, but only for the fact they were women, we could see it as her rebellion against this attitude.

For all the above the ending came as surprise. I think that Ford made for the main character a typical female destiny. Something like that: Dear ladies, you could try to be like a man, but in the end you couldn't avoid your female destiny. Is this a bottom line of the film? Later we see her dressed like a geisha. How sad to see her in that outfit when we know how she loves to wear man's clothes for practical reason. If the main character was a man,I am sure Ford would intend for him typical man's (male's)ending. He would fight to the last drop of his blood even if it would be hopeless. What is the point of her sacrifice? She saved 8 lives, but with her determination and skill as a doctor she could have saved 8 thousands lives if she had stayed alive. Also it was not pleasant to see Chinese depicted as brutes with disgusting eating habits who mumble instead of talking. Obviously some see the world like this: We are in the middle and the rest of the world is made of savages, brutes who constantly fight with each other. I'm sure this wasn't Ford intention; he just followed the pattern. Nevertheless, it is a good film, which makes you think.
4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
4/10
wooden
deschreiber22 April 2013
I don't understand all the gushing in these reviews of "Seven Women," much of which seems to be spillover from a general worship of John Ford's other movies, but some reviewers actually seem to be impressed. I, on the other hand, was not impressed in the least. It was pretty much a waste of time. The plot line was pedestrian, much of it predictable from the outset, the conflicts between characters stark and artificial, as if written by an amateur, the dialogue stagey and unnatural. Again and again a short scene developed only so that a single line could be delivered, and that line was always burdened with carrying some overdone bit of poignancy or deep significance. The final scene was total, schlocky melodrama that brought to my mind some bad old silent movie, just one small cut above The Perils of Pauline. Don't get your hopes up if you're reading these reviews before watching.
4 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
10/10
One of Ford best movies
bjorn bennike16 October 2006
Seven women was John Fords last- and one of his very best color movies. Strange and beautiful - about the fate of a group of women - during the boxer rebellion in China hundred years ago. It was a kind of a swansong (1966) for him - and he was very happy (and proud) about it - but its characters might be to strange and challenging for many movie lookers?? It is at least very underrated! I hope it will change in the future, so we can buy it on DVD. The acting and all situations in the movie are appealing and absolutely astonishing!!

Quotes from the review in New York Times May 5, 1966:

"Imagine a bunch of isolated, pristine mission ladies captured by bloodthirsty Mongolian bandits—this, mind you, under the great director, John Ford. Add a heady, female bevy of players like Margaret Leighton, Flora Robson, Mildred Dunnock, Betty Field and, emphatically, Anne Bancroft in the role begun by the stricken Patricia Neal...

Mr. Ford's picture, which gets off to a graphic, arresting start (with some ripe Elmer Bernstein music) tapers off to a stark, bony melodrama of female hysteria and mayhem...

And Mr. Ford has gotten professional performances, in the main, from his tense, but transparent study of violence besetting an American mission in 1935. But the story edges to a grim, foregone conclusion, underscored by nagging, neurotic yowling, led by Miss Leighton and Miss Field...

What steadies the film and almost severs it, in fact, is a sizzling, earthy performance by Miss Bancroft, as a profane hard-bitten doctor whose arrival tilts the mission even before the barbarians roar into view. Miss Bancroft, a little mannered heretofore, is simply wonderful, from her first bleak appraisal of the premises to the obvious, tragic fadeout, by which time the mission seems like an Oriental East Lynne..."
4 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
1/10
What a piece of crap
handel-422 April 2007
I love Ann Bancroft. And I like many of Fords movies. But this one is awful from it's title to The End. The story is happening in China before the cultural revolution. A missionary is run by women, with only one wannabe male priest.

So where does it go wrong? I guess the movie is just too short. Too many characters are gathered together and there is not sufficient time to develop them. So they look like some cartoon figures rather than a story from a country where there is going to be a revolution. Non-Christian Chinese are all killers, only sexually depressed women will work at a mission and doctors do anything to save life, even killing non-Christians.

Sad. One of the last movies of Ford, became his worst.
6 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
9/10
Mongol?
wbdinsmoor23 April 2013
These "Mongol" bandits speak (rather poor) Mandarin Chinese rather than Mongolian, and the wrestling scene showed absolutely nothing of the famous Mongolian wrestling style. Other than that, I enjoyed the movie (shown on the Turner Classic Movies channel). It was a bit disappointing that Ford did not choose an East Asian to play the main "Mongolian" role - just as actresses like Katherine Hepburn played Chinese in movies like The Good Earth - but given the facts of Hollywood life at that time, this is understandable. An interesting subplot runs between the doctor and the head of mission: who is more Christ-like, she who talks the talk or she who walks the walk?
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
Solid.
Fedor Petrovic (fedor8)12 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
The first half is drama, while the second a strange mix of drama and cheap-50s-Genghis-Kahn-like-JackPalance/YulBrynner-type movie. It's unrealistic that such a small group of bandits could be terrorizing village after Chinese village with even the army running away. Even more interesting is how racially mixed this gang is; we have Chinese, we have Turk-like guys, and even the occasional suspiciously European-looking character. It also seems absurd this gang didn't simply rape Sue Lyon. Men throughout history, in such situations, have been known to rape 90 year-old women, let alone someone as perfect-looking as Sue Lyon! Her presence made this movie enticing, but also Anne Bancroft's, who is charismatic and plays a character with refreshingly atheistic overtones. In fact, the entire movie seems to be quite critical of religion, and this is somewhat of a surprise. In the end, the atheistic Bancroft not only sacrifices her freedom (and vagina) to save others, but even gets to poison Tunga Khan.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews