| Page 1 of 6: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] |
| Index | 56 reviews in total |
54 out of 60 people found the following review useful:
Sand: A metaphor for "usualness" generating "mental inertia.", 28 January 1999
![]()
Author:
Prion from Washington DC, USA
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
In early 1966, when the annual Oscar nominations for best director of the
year were announced, Teshigahara might have even made a wry smile. What is
surprising to me today is not that a Japanese filmmaker almost unknown in
the US was nominated, but that the Motion Picture Academy in 1966 had such a
keen aesthetic sense as to appreciate his radical work.
"Woman in the Dunes" (Suna no onna) was far ahead of its time, radiating
Absolute Beauty.
An entomologist (Eiji Okada) seeks lodging for the night in the dunes, and
is led by the villagers to the bottom of a sandpit where he finds a widow
(Kyoko Kishida) living in a shack. Next morning he discovers he can no
longer climb out. He is expected to remain there and to live with the woman,
who needs a man's help. Because the sand drifts into the shack without
cease, shoveling sand away from the sandpit is her primary daily routine.
After all attempts to escape the situation fail, he becomes accustomed to it
and finds another way of life.
It is almost meaningless to try to ascertain any scientific or economic
logic beneath the surface of this allegorical story (written by Kobo Abe).
Such hairsplitting will only make you lose the merit of this work. The
primary subject of the story seems to lie in a certain passive mentality to
be called "mental inertia," mental acclimation, conformity, or something
like that. "Mental inertia" is caused by "usualness" (or "dailiness"), and
comes to dominate the subconscious in due course. Abe and Teshigahara
metaphorically depict such "usualness" as the character of sand -- usualness
formed in an unusual situation.
The woman has a strong mental attachment to the status quo around her;
despite the cruel fact that the sand has killed her husband and daughter,
she prefers to stay there and not to change her life. This is the "mental
inertia" of the work.
The entomologist, too. He at first thinks the whole situation surrounding
the woman absurd, and tries to escape it. However, he becomes accustomed to
the situation day by day, and accepts such absurdity after
all.
By whom is he forced to do so? The villagers? No. Himself! He chooses to
return to the sandpit and stay there even when he becomes free to leave. He
becomes a captive in the dunes by "mental inertia" just as he has been in
the city.
After seeing this work, I came to feel that many variants of "invisible
sand," which might dominate our "free will," are drifting and accumulating
around us without cease, whether or not we realize it.
Pictures are great.
The sand is living here, showing various expressions. Surely it "acts" as a
main character in several impressive scenes, including an unforgettable love
scene where the couple is caked with it.
And, music! -- if we may call this incomparable sound work so. It not only
enhances each scene fully, but also gives life to things that are not
expressed in image alone.
From barbaric drum music through sensual sound like the sand's "breathing,"
Takemistu-sound is full of imagination and magic.
A perfect fusion of Image, Sound, and Subject.
See "Woman in the Dunes" and die.
41 out of 49 people found the following review useful:
Profound without being pretentious, 9 December 2004
![]()
Author:
miszel
This classic film is one of the few to still live up to the name of
"perfect film". Everything in the film is perfectly controlled and at
the same time so natural.
The story involves an amateur entomologist captured in a giant sand pit
somewhere on the coast of a small Japanese island. He tries to escape
but a mysterious woman and some nasty villagers keep pulling him back
in.
Despite being made in the early sixties this film still packs a dose of
eroticism that most contemporary filmmakers pray to achieve. The black
and white cinematography is absolutely haunting (watch out for poor
video copies which are way too dark, there is a new DVD out which shows
what the original print intended)
This is about as close as you can get to a perfect film. There is
nothing that could ever be improved upon.
27 out of 30 people found the following review useful:
Spellbinding and creepy, 9 March 2004
![]()
Author:
jonr-3 from Kansas City, Missouri, USA
I'd wanted to see this movie for years, and finally got around to it,
on DVD. What a treat! I was glad to discover that the erotic element,
though important, is not the predominant draw here; typically, some
references to the film make it sound as though it were some forbidden
erotic romp, or full of perverse sexuality. Instead I found myself
wrapped up in a creepy suspense-thriller sci-fi-fantasy carried off
with wit, style, and extraordinarily interesting photography (including
one scene that, at least on my set, was completely black for a couple
of minutes).
I voted "nine" for this wonderful film, in part because it left me with
a lot to think about, in part just for how well it was made. The music
by Toru Takemitsu is absolutely perfect for the task, too.
This is just about my favorite kind of film: one that raises important
questions about human life, but not at the expense of entertainment.
It's as close as I'll probably ever come to having my cake and eating
it, too.
Update, January 2007: I finally obtained my own DVD of this film, one
with much higher quality photographic reproduction. I now marvel even
more at the extraordinarily creative photography. Be sure, if you view
this on DVD, not to boost your set's brightness: I can assure you the
film is very, very dark on purpose. If possible, see it on a
high-definition monitor. Today, I'd vote "ten."
29 out of 34 people found the following review useful:
An extraordinary movie that you won't EVER forget!, 26 October 2003
Author:
Infofreak from Perth, Australia
'Woman In The Dunes' is a superb film adaptation of a fascinating novel by Kobo Abe. Abe was heavily influenced by Kafka and wrote several very strange and unforgettable books, but this was his masterpiece. He scripted the movie himself, and the director Hiroshi Teshigahara obviously "got" the material, so the film is also a masterpiece. It includes some of the most striking visual imagery I've ever seen, and I would have to say this movie is among the very best I've watched. Yes, it's THAT good. The two leads (Eija Okada and Kyoko Kishida) both give superb performances and there are some genuinely erotic (though not explicit) scenes between them. Okada plays an insect collector on holiday who finds himself stranded overnight in the country. Kishida is a local woman who agrees to lodge him for the night. However she lives in most unusual circumstances - in a shack surrounded by sand dunes which continually invade her home. To say anything more about what happens would be to spoil the extraordinary movie that follows. You can read it as an allegory or take it as a filmed nightmare, it's up to you, but believe me you won't EVER forget 'Woman In The Dunes'!
33 out of 43 people found the following review useful:
Zen and the City, 6 August 2005
![]()
Author:
kristbauer from United States
In my interpretation this movie is a reflection on Zen philosophy: Just
like Zen monks that sweep the courtyards of monasteries and devote
themselves to the most humble tasks to find inner harmony, Niki finds
inner rest in the daily work of removing the sand, solving water supply
problems and living a confined live. The movie suggests the modern
lives we live in the big cities isolate us from our needs and
ourselves. Just like a Zen garden, that is designed to mirror nature
and men, the people in the dunes reflect our daily struggles and
confinements. The surreal setting is a necessity to convey the message
of the film. There is nothing goofy about the pits and how people
behave in there. It is just hard for us western people to see the
transcendence there.
I watched this movie on a Japanese Film Festival in Berlin in 1993. I
can't remember all the details but the movie really mesmerized me. It
is a very unique work and I wonder why it doesn't have the cult status
of other movies.
24 out of 30 people found the following review useful:
Collected Insects, 29 May 2002
Author:
tedg (tedg@FilmsFolded.com) from Virginia Beach
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
Spoilers herein.
Here is the rare example where knowledge of the filmmaker enhances the
enjoyment of the work. At least that is true for this North
American.
Teshigahara was one of a now large class of intellectuals rooted in Japanese
traditions but seriously exploring fusion with `western' ideas -- ideas
about abstraction, narrative and perception. That class is large now, but
was very small in the early sixties, the superficial intoxication with
postwar, promiscuous exploration of western style having by then been
abandoned.
It borrows heavily from what Teshigahara thought was the Nabokov style:
pervasive symbolism, floating perspectives on reality, self-imposed
confinement. The notion of `bugs' and collecting is a bow to Nabokov himself
who was rather famous in butterfly circles.
(The few mazelike drawings in the title sequence almost certainly influenced
Greenaway's `A Walk through H' which explores most of the same notions from
the same perspective.)
I saw this first in 1965 and was awed. This film is anti-Kurosawan -- the
philosophy used for the camera eye is opposite from Kurosawa's. Kurosawa's
notion revolved around a wholeness. Each shot was composed as a harmonious
unit -- the action of a bystander in the background was as important (more!)
than that of the foreground. No such differentiation was made between
foreground and background. It was all of one whole.
Teshigahara's eye is different. He makes a clear distinction between the two
characters and the environment. (The villagers are part of the environment.)
As much attention is given to the dynamics of each separately. Much is made
of the annoyance each causes the other. Transitions between skin (usually
the woman's) and the surface of the sand are not to note a symmetry, but a
dis-symmetry.
This is very much in line with the famous school of icheban (flower
arrangement) that Teshigahara's father founded (and which Teshigahara
himself later headed). Traditional icheban has always depended on the
`missing center,' the implied elements whose absence is as important as
those present. This new school makes that more explicit, with radical
assymetries among placed elements. What is seen is made more important by
what they imply, which is a quite different matter than implication by
absence. Inference by presence rather than inference by absence. Radical in
that day -- and it fits in a rough way with mature notions of western
narrative symbolism, where certain things represent others, especially
Nabokov's notion of frangible, constructed symbolism. That means that each
symbol's meaning does not come from context and culture (as many would later
and popularly claim) but from the mind of the narrator existing in the mind
of the reader.
Twenty years later Teshigahara made a documentary on the architect Gaudi.
Gaudi is the one architect who exploits this same notion of inferred
reality.
This is worth watching. And Teshigahara is worth learning
about.
22 out of 28 people found the following review useful:
Best film analysis of existentionalism., 12 July 2001
![]()
Author:
Invariable Self
Harsh and beautiful analysis of existentionalism. All the Sartrean trappings along with an element of Camus are presented in this film better than any other I know. The realization that life is absurd leads the main character to venture towards trying to make meaning out of what is essentially meaninglessness. The intersubjective relationship between man and woman is examined both erotically and violently while the villagers play the crucial role of the everpresent Other. Disturbing ending only underlies the overpowering presence of the sand dunes. The sand being the strongest metaphor in the film, illustrating the belief that life is nothing but a giant and endless egg-timer flowing sand down upon us. Highly recommended.
16 out of 19 people found the following review useful:
A brilliant tale of the changing Japan, 2 April 2005
![]()
Author:
Atavisten from Tellus
I get more and more impressed with the classics of Japanese cinema and
this is def a highlight. Mesmerizing and artsy it portrays a
etymologist and 'the woman of the dunes' trapped in sand. The trap
itself obviously symbolizes the trap a certain desert beetle digs to
lie in the midst of it waiting for prey which cannot help but sliding
into it. Its the same for him, he cant climb the sand walls, the more
he struggles the more the sand runs a little like the woman who in fear
of the outside continues her sisyfosan existence.
The psychology between the two is excellently depicted. The tension is
intensified trough images of sweaty skin and running sand. The
cinematographer is a master in filming this. Lots of black. Editing
also is sharp and very well done. Sound is minimal and fits the images'
bleak and deserted dunes.
Much can be said about this movie, it is one for repeated viewings for
sure.
15 out of 19 people found the following review useful:
Haunting, erotic, unforgettable...., 19 January 2005
![]()
Author:
nicholas Chin from United States
After watching this movie, my idea of what a good movie, had changed. The imagery is utterly beautiful, and the emotion of the relationship is intense. While other movies rely on acting, or emotion to capture the audience this movie is very special because how the director, and the screenwriter(kobe abe, also wrote a book by the same title), let the viewers develop their own ideas and perspectives. Having seen this movie with other people and looking at different comment about the movie, each person had a different opinion of the movie. In a complex world full of vice, and danger, it is sometimes the simplest things that can make a man beg for mercy. The everlasting sand, can bring you to love, or to destruction...
13 out of 16 people found the following review useful:
Transformative, 17 May 2000
Author:
Estebanico from Fort Collins, CO, USA
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
Is there any meaning in the world? We see a man who has fled from his meaningless job in Tokyo to gather beetles in a remote desert. If he finds a unique beetle, he will get his name in the insect book. This will bring meaning to his life. Instead, he is tricked into spending the night with a woman in a sand pit. She lives in a slave labor village shoveling sand from the bottom of her pit to keep from being submerged in blowing sand. The most memorable scene of the film occurs near the end, after several escape attempts, he finds that the jailers have mistakenly left the rope ladder down into the pit. He climbs out and sees the ocean crashing onto the desert, the same ocean for which he has been begging to see for years. But he looks around, looks at the ocean for a few seconds, and calmly retreats to the pit. Where was he to go? His life in Tokyo was certainly not more fulfilling than that in the pit. He was lost in the desert, and the ocean had lost it's appeal. He had become his own jailer, for his pit was certainly no worse of a jail than the rest of his life had been. After seven years and repeated failed escape attempts, the man accepts his fate. He has brought new meaning to his life by discovering a way to pump water into a barrel from the sand. My friends and I debated for an hour whether his pride in his invention was pitiful or triumphant. Does one take pride in an interesting but mundane achievement in a world without meaning, or does one reject false salvation? After all, he's still stuck doing slave labor in the pit. Watch this movie with friends and you will have endless hours of discussion. A film that reinvents itself in each individual's mind, as great cinema should.
| Page 1 of 6: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] |
| Plot summary | Ratings | Awards |
| External reviews | Plot keywords | Main details |
| Your user reviews | Your vote history |