MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Down 4,119 this week

Of Human Bondage (1964)

 -  Drama  -  4 July 1964 (Japan)
6.5
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 6.5/10 from 564 users  
Reviews: 31 user | 2 critic

A medical student becomes obsessed with his faithless lover.

Directors:

(as Kenneth Hughes) , , 1 more credit »

Writers:

, (novel)
0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 41 titles
created 19 Oct 2011
 
a list of 75 titles
created 20 Dec 2011
 
a list of 899 titles
created 11 months ago
 
a list of 141 titles
created 7 months ago
 
a list of 74 titles
created 3 months ago
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Of Human Bondage (1964)

Of Human Bondage (1964) on IMDb 6.5/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Of Human Bondage.
Nominated for 1 BAFTA Film Award. Another 1 nomination. See more awards »

Videos

Photos

Edit

Cast

Complete credited cast:
...
...
...
Siobhan McKenna ...
...
Jack Hedley ...
Nanette Newman ...
Ronald Lacey ...
'Matty' Mathews
Olive White ...
Griffith's Girlfriend
Norman Smythe ...
Cadaver Room Attendant
David Morris ...
Edit

Storyline

Medical student Philip fall in love with Mildred, a waitress. Although she is a flirt, they have a love affair. But when Philip is told about her constant infidelity, they break up. Mildred quits her job and becomes a prostitute. But Philip is still in love with her. Written by Mattias Thuresson

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Taglines:

SOME WOMEN CAN'T HELP BEING WHAT THEY ARE! See more »

Genres:

Drama

Certificate:

Approved | See all certifications »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

4 July 1964 (Japan)  »

Also Known As:

W. Somerset Maugham's of Human Bondage  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

(Westrex Recording System)

Aspect Ratio:

1.85 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Sue Lyon was mentioned for the female lead before Kim Novak was cast. See more »

Connections

Featured in We All Loved Each Other So Much (1974) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

See more (Spoiler Alert!) »

User Reviews

 
I Waited Years To See This Version
5 October 2007 | by (Richmond, Virginia) – See all my reviews

I read the book many years ago and it has remained one of my favorite novels. For many years since I read the book, whenever the film was shown on television, it was always the 1934 version with Bette Davis. Don't get me wrong, Bette Davis was a great actress, but for me she failed to come across as the writer Somerset Maugham had intended Mildred to be. The first time I caught the Davis version, I could only watch a few minutes of it before I gave up and could watch no longer, lest it ruin the impression of Mildred the book provided for me. Finally after many years of waiting, I caught the 1964 version and I wasn't disappointed. Someone on the message board mentioned that Somerset Maugham was most pleased with the way Kim Novak played the role and I could understand why. Immediately when I began watching Kim Novak, I was transfixed by her and felt that I had at last found Mildred as the writer intended her to be - not some shrill shrew, but an emotionally damaged beauty, still a child that had somehow made it to adulthood. It was easy to see how Philip, played perfectly by Laurence Harvey could have fallen in love with her - vulnerable, lovable, innocent, unsophisticated, always forgiving yet at the same time mean, selfish hateful, irresponsible, helpless, ignorant and vindictive. Aren't those the same characteristics we find in children? Some might question describing Mildred as innocent. Because of her promiscuous flirtatious nature, some might understandably dismiss her as a whore as Philip's best friend Griffiss continually tries to remind him. But this film is set in England of the Victorian era and some allowances can be made for that. And with Novak's great acting skills we see that Mildred was very complicated and we can't easily condemn her on the basis of her sexual misbehavior. This is what makes Novak's adaptation so appealing, that she can take this role and actually make us empathize with Mildred, if not actually see ourselves, like Philip, falling into the abyss by falling in love with her ourselves. This is what Kim Novak succeeded in doing and Bette Davis never even attempted. Bette Davis never developed the character to the degree that Novak did where we could see if she could pull it off. We could never feel much for the character Davis portrayed, but we could with Novak's - in spite of those same flaws that each of the actresses had to work with in the character of Mildred. Philip did in this saga come across other women with the best of qualities, and without those flaws found in Mildred though certainly not her beauty. But it was Mildred that would always be his great love -whether it destroyed him, as it nearly does, or finally her, as it does in the end. Only by her death could he ever escape the hold she had upon him. Kim Novak captured Mildred perfectly. Don't be put off by the IMDb's low rating for this movie relative to the Davis version. Read the book and you'll see right away that this was Mildred as the writer intended.

This film was set in Victorian England and it was perfectly suited for black and white format. It would have made as much sense to have made this movie in color as to have made the movie The Elephant Man in color. By using black and white, the film had the look and quality of that same movie, also set in Victorian England. Indeed, the story lines were similar in a sense - one of a good and gentle man trapped in a hideously deformed body that ultimately kills him. And in this, we have a cripple, and as Mildred herself often refers to him, a gentleman, who is also trapped, but unlike John Merek of the Elephant Man, in a relationship from hell that nearly destroys him as well. Philip as he confides to a friend when asked to describe his relationship with the now dead Mildred: "It is like a disease has burned through me. But not like one that one can see." Some might see parallels between the Elephant Man and Philip Carey. They are there.

Particularly sad to watch was the end of this movie. People sometimes note movies for their tear jerker quality - movies like Madam X, Imitation of Life, The Elephant Man and others. But this movie, because of the ending especially should be rated up there with any of those. In this movie, trains and train stations figured prominently in the most happiest of times in the relationship between Philip and Mildred. The final scene where Mildred is being lowered into her grave, a train passes, on a berm above this sad scene, probably the same train they had once ridden together happily in life and in love. The train seems to be saying good bye to her as we hear the rumble of train across the tracks and the mournful cry of the train's whistle. This happens as Philip turns his back on her for the last time to walk from her and to his new love waiting just outside the wrought iron gate of the cemetery. We can't but wonder if this new love he has found can ever release him from the grip that Mildred, if only her memory must still have upon him. This scene can't help but be emotionally emotionally wrenching for anyone who sees it. This is a great movie and a great credit to a great novel by Somerset Maugham and a great actress, Kim Novak who made it come alive for me. This film belongs way up there among the IMDb's 250 best movies of all time.


39 of 41 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
better than the Davis-Hward version jaykaybuck
Name of theme music for this film? ijdelahoy
movie didn't deliver muchado
When will DVD be made available? kathy5353853
goof candelman4
Vote for the DVD at TCM spotted-owl
Discuss Of Human Bondage (1964) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?