8.0/10
560
9 user 7 critic

I Am Twenty (1965)

Mne dvadtsat let (original title)
Russia's answer to the French New Wave - following three lifelong friends who return to Moscow after military service, we see their aspirations juxtaposed against the harsh realities of ... See full summary »

Director:

Writers:

(as M. Khutsiev), (as G. Shpalikov)
Reviews

Watch Now

$0.00 with Prime Video

WATCH NOW
2 wins & 1 nomination. See more awards »

Photos

Add Image Add an image

Do you have any images for this title?

Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

July Rain (1967)
Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.7/10 X  
Director: Marlen Khutsiev
Stars: Evgeniya Uralova, Aleksandr Belyavskiy, Yuriy Vizbor
Romance
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.6/10 X  

A newly appointed Russian literature teacher develops a strong connection with one of her flagging students.

Directors: Marlen Khutsiev, Feliks Mironer
Stars: Nina Ivanova, Nikolai Rybnikov, Vladimir Gulyaev
Comedy | Romance
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.1/10 X  

Young Siberian writer Volodya meets Kolya in the Moscow metro in his visit to a famous author. Volodya and Kolya's friend Sasha adventure their love interests in their own way, while Kolya sets out to help them.

Director: Georgiy Daneliya
Stars: Nikita Mikhalkov, Aleksei Loktev, Galina Polskikh
Wings (1966)
Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.7/10 X  

A fascinating and human portrayal of a once-famous fighter pilot and loyal Stalinist named Nadezhda Petrovna. Now a 41-year-old provincial schoolmistress, she has so internalized the ... See full summary »

Director: Larisa Shepitko
Stars: Mayya Bulgakova, Sergey Nikonenko, Zhanna Bolotova
Nachalo (1970)
Comedy | Drama | Romance
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.9/10 X  

A film-in-film story set in a provincial town in Russia. Pasha (Churikova) is an amateur actress who plays a witch at a local club, but her dream is to play Joan of Arc. In a strike of luck... See full summary »

Director: Gleb Panfilov
Stars: Inna Churikova, Valentina Telichkina, Tatyana Stepanova
Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.8/10 X  

Two young scientists are exploring new fields of nuclear physics. Dmitry Gusev and Ilya Kulikov are good friends, but rivals in love. Dmitry marries Lyolya and they live happily together. ... See full summary »

Director: Mikhail Romm
Stars: Aleksey Batalov, Innokentiy Smoktunovskiy, Tatyana Lavrova
Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8/10 X  

The story about people who gathered for debauchery.

Director: Vasiliy Shukshin
Stars: Lidiya Fedoseeva-Shukshina, Vasiliy Shukshin, Ivan Ryzhov
Drama | Romance
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.1/10 X  

Ilya Semenovich Melnikov is a history teacher in an ordinary Soviet high school. He is a very good teacher and his students and colleagues treat him with a great deal of respect. However, ... See full summary »

Director: Stanislav Rostotskiy
Stars: Vyacheslav Tikhonov, Irina Pechernikova, Nina Menshikova
Infinity (1992)
Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.9/10 X  

Reflecting on meaning of life, the hero of the movie involuntarily becomes the real participant of own memoirs. His fellow traveler - he 20 years ago, the young young man who isn't burdened... See full summary »

Director: Marlen Khutsiev
Stars: Vladislav Pilnikov, Aleksei Zelenov, Marina Khazova
Seryozha (1960)
Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.9/10 X  
Directors: Georgiy Daneliya, Igor Talankin
Stars: Boris Barkhatov, Sergey Bondarchuk, Irina Skobtseva
Romance
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8/10 X  
Director: Tatyana Lioznova
Stars: Tatyana Doronina, Oleg Efremov, Vyacheslav Shalevich
Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.1/10 X  
Director: Marlen Khutsiev
Stars: Vasiliy Shukshin, Nikolai Chursin, Tamara Syomina
Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
Valentin Popov ...
Sergei Zhuravlyov
Nikolay Gubenko ...
Nikolai Fokin
Stanislav Lyubshin ...
Slava Kostikov
Marianna Vertinskaya ...
Anya
Zinaida Zinovyeva ...
Olga Mikhailovna Zhuravlyova
Svetlana Starikova ...
Vera Zhuravlyova
Lev Prygunov ...
Second Lieutenant Aleksandr Zhuravlyov
T. Bogdanova ...
Lyusya Kostikova
Lyudmila Selyanskaya ...
Conductress
Aleksandr Blinov ...
Kuzmich (as Sasha Blinov)
Lev Zolotukhin ...
Anya's Father
Pyotr Shcherbakov ...
Chernousov
Gennadi Nekrasov ...
Vladimir Vasilyevich
Nikolay Zakharchenko ...
Friend
...
'Turnip' Jerk Guest at Anya's Party (as Andrey Tarkovskiy)
Edit

Storyline

Russia's answer to the French New Wave - following three lifelong friends who return to Moscow after military service, we see their aspirations juxtaposed against the harsh realities of everyday life in 1960 Soviet Union. (Russian with English subtitles).

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Plot Keywords:

number in title | See All (1) »

Genres:

Drama

Certificate:

See all certifications »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

18 January 1965 (Soviet Union)  »

Also Known As:

Zastava Ilijcha  »

Company Credits

Production Co:

 »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

| (cut)

Sound Mix:

Aspect Ratio:

1.37 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

gorgeous depiction of the good side of 1962 Moscow
14 December 2001 | by (Austin, Texas) – See all my reviews

This film was shot in 1962, which saw Kruschev face off with Kennedy over the placement of nuclear missiles in Cuba. It is considered part of the "New Wave" of Soviet cinema because at this time the arts community felt a reprieve from the absurd, very often brutal (the list of artists perished under Stalin is countless). and totalitarian treatment of their work under Stalin. They once again felt like they had a certain amount of freedom to explore the human condition rather than simply crank out bland polemics about the glory of communism.

Because of extensive reworks by the censors, the film was shortened from nearly 3 hours down to barely an hour and a half when it was not finally exhibited until 1964.

The film deals with three school chums, Sergei, Slava and Nikolai. Sergei is returning to Moscow from his hitch in the Army to find that "you can't go home again" Slava is married and has a toddler. Nikolai is doing research at a scientific institute. Nikolai offers to find Sergei a job at the Institute, but Sergei decides to follow in his deceased father's (killed in battle at age 21 in 1943 during the Great patriotic War, aka WWII) footsteps and work at the local power plant.

Sergei finds that his relationships to people have changed. Slava is distanced from them by his marriage and family commitments, but still tries to be "one of the boys" Nikolai works hard, and flirts shamelessly in exchange. Sergei feels alone and uncomfortable, never really sure what he should be doing. He still lives in the same flat with his mother and younger sister, he goes to work each day and studies to be an engineer at night.

Sergei spies a lovely woman on the street car, and begins a long chase across Moscow, where he follows her from place to place, in the markets, on the Metro, always catching, then avoiding her eye, but never working up the courage to speak to her. Eventually he finds himself at the door to her building, watching her ride away in the glass elevator, kicking himself for not having more courage.

Sergei meets the same woman, months later, at the May Day parade. He is able to lure her away from her friends with some assistance from Nikolai and Slava. The two gradually fall in love, but Anya turns out not to be a very stable character. The romance builds, and Sergei is introduced in turns to her estranged spouse, who she is divorcing, and to her father, who expects that she will never settle down and will remain forever in the family apartment. Both consider her flighty and reckless.

Sergei's despondency eventually leads him to a dream where he meets his father, who died in battle never knowing that he had a daughter. He asks his father for guidance, and is told simply "live" because his father was cut down so young.

As the film progresses, it asks the usual passel existential questions common to "youth angst" films like "why am I here, where am I going, what is it all for?" The film never seems to approach any answers to these questions. Slava's discontent at losing his freedom to marriage, Nikolai's being asked to become an informer at work, which would make Nikolai into a collaborator with the Communist regime that he thinks he is slowly gaining freedom from, Sergei's inability to fit in, are all exposed, but never concluded. It is an open question for me whether this lack of resolution came about because the director chose not to answer these questions (in order to make the viewer think, rather than pour pabulum down the his throat), or because Khutsiev felt that his answers would never get past the censors.

Despite its dark and troubled subject matter, this film is filmed in a very bright and artistic style. The camera work for the film is most impressive. During the long chase scene across Moscow, the camera often took the point of view of the actors, catching glimpses of each other through someone's crooked elbow on the streetcar or over a stack of books at a street vendor. In other scenes the scope is large and there are many beauty shots of central Moscow, Lenin's Tomb, the Kremlin, parks and so on to show the inherent loveliness of Moscow. The distinctive flared shape of the cooling towers of a nuclear reactor is worked seamlessly into the background, rather than as a jarring set piece demonstrating the progress of the great Soviet Society. The director's choice of camera angles and the setup of the shots is definitely arty without feeling forced or over the top.

The director clearly is in love with Moscow and its people. The tenor of the film is very Hollywoodesque: The streets are always clean. Newly fallen snow is always pure and white, not covered in soot and ash. The streets have no potholes. There are no drunks lolling in the street. People go to parties, drink and talk without making asses out of themselves from too much vodka and bad singing. Communal apartments are quiet, brightly lit and inviting rather than the dank and noisy holes that most people equate with Soviet planned communities. The actors are all tall, strong and handsome, the actresses are all slender and model beautiful. All are impeccably dressed in the latest (for 1962) fashions: coats and ties for the men, skirts and heels for the women. The contrast between the actors and reality is never stronger than the scene where the lovely leads watch a Comsomol choir singing. The true faces of the proletariat contrast with the scrubbed and primped actors in a most striking way.

The film is shot in gorgeous black and white, with terrific contrast and depth. I have often asserted that to film THINGS , use color. To film PEOPLE use black and white, and the subtlety and shading of the lighting and camera work in this film back that assertion up quite nicely.

Some of the scenes are very touching and speak to feelings that most of us have had at one time or another. We ache for Sergei and Anya to get together and be happy. We feel the tension and hurt feelings between the young men as they realize they are growing apart as they grow up.

For all of its beauty the film has some distractions. The actors themselves are convincing enough but much of the dialog, especially in scenes such as where Sergei meets Anya's father, and later his own father in the dream, or when Sergei offers a toast to the humble potato for saving their lives from hunger during the war, fall flat because of ineffective dialog. Granted, I was watching the translation via the subtitles, but it seemed to me that if the subtitles were even 1/2 accurate, that the dialog could have been more incisive and illuminating. Sergei is portrayed as a deeply thoughtful character who can't quite get his ideas together, with an internal monologue which mixes Puskin, Mayakovski and his own misgivings throughout the film, and yet when he gets a chance to really explore those thoughts with Anya's father, he says virtually nothing, and when he has a crisis of friendship with Nikolai, Nikolai and Slava can't help but think Sergei's droll truisms about humanity are simply jokes in poor taste. Both scenes could have been masterstrokes of exploration of the angst that has so clearly taken hold of the three boys, and yet the dialog again lets us down.

I truly enjoyed the film for its portrayal of 1962 vintage Moscow, if only the glitzy side of it. It truly is a tribute to the director's view of Moscow. Like many Soviet films, it is overlong and almost painfully slow in places. Still, I consider it a good experience to have seen it, and recommend it as an example of the Soviet New Wave.


14 of 16 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Discuss I Am Twenty (1965) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?