Down 3,177 this week

The Battle of Culloden (1964)
"Culloden" (original title)

TV Movie  -   -  Drama | History | War  -  24 May 1968 (USA)
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 7.9/10 from 778 users  
Reviews: 19 user | 16 critic

A reconstruction of the Battle of Culloden, the last battle to take place on British soil, as if modern TV cameras were present.



0Check in

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 46 titles
created 14 Dec 2010
a list of 30 titles
created 20 Dec 2011
list image
a list of 234 titles
created 07 Mar 2012
a list of 25 titles
created 6 months ago
a list of 35 titles
created 3 weeks ago

Connect with IMDb

Share this Rating

Title: The Battle of Culloden (TV Movie 1964)

The Battle of Culloden (TV Movie 1964) on IMDb 7.9/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of The Battle of Culloden.


Credited cast:
Olivier Espitalier-Noel ...
George McBean ...
Alexander McDonald
Robert Oates ...
Private Alexander Laing


A reconstruction of the Battle of Culloden, the last battle to take place on British soil, as if modern TV cameras were present.

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis

Plot Keywords:

battle | butchery | death | soldier | army | See more »


Drama | History | War






Release Date:

24 May 1968 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

The Battle of Culloden  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs


Sound Mix:

Aspect Ratio:

1.33 : 1
See  »

Did You Know?


What the film refers to as "grapeshot" is more commonly referred to as "canister"; bags full of musket balls fired from cannon, like a gigantic shotgun. "Grapeshot" is usually used to refer to much larger shot in a container that breaks up when fired; the name comes from its fancied resemblance to a bunch of grapes. See more »


Narrator: [introducing the Jacobite military command] Sir Thomas Sheridan, Jacobite military secretary. Suffering advanced debility and loss of memory. Former military engagement, 56 years ago. Sir John MacDonald, Jacobite captain of cavalry. Aged, frequently intoxicated, described as 'a man of the most limited capacities.' John William O'Sullivan, Jacobite quartermaster general. Described as 'an Irishman whose vanity is superseded only by his lack of wisdom.' Prince Charles Edward Stuart, Jacobite ...
See more »


My Bonnie Moorhen
Sung by Colin Cater
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Raw and realistic, but a bit loose with some facts
22 August 2008 | by (New York City) – See all my reviews

This is one of the earliest examples of a "docu-drama" and one of the best. It's realism causes the viewer to feel true empathy for the participants---especially for the Scottish Jacobites.

While it's certainly true that the English and their Scottish allies were better equipped and had a more disciplined, unified command structure, the circumstances of the Highlanders weren't quite as dire as indicated. Many were indeed poor and malnourished, but generally not to the degree depicted in the film, where almost all are dressed in rags and covered in filth. It is also claimed that most didn't have firearms, yet the majority were armed with pistols or muskets of local or French manufacture. Their lack of discipline and cohesive command caused them to rely on the shock tactics that served them so well at the Battle of Prestonpens, and many dropped their muskets and charged after firing a volley. Interestingly, the English tally of captured weapons after the battle contained many more guns than swords. Swords; especially claymores; were expensive, and most of the poorer men without guns carried axes or pikes.

The contingent of French trained Scots and Irish, equipped and drilled in the same manner as the Redcoats, was larger than shown in the film. And the English forces contained significant numbers of both lowland and highland Scots. Although the English were well provided with artillery, most of their cannons were small three pounders used in urban street fighting or in the American woodlands where they were known as "grasshoppers". The standard light field gun was the six pounder. Despite these qualifications, the battle scenes are graphic and realistic.

Watkins makes it seem as if the Scots were true revolutionaries asserting their ethnic identity, when, in actual fact, Prince Charlie was simply a wannabe monarch seeking to restore the Stuarts, and probably as disdainful of the Highlanders as the Hanoverians were. The modern parallels he tries to draw simply aren't there.

Despite the above, this is a great movie that should be on every history buff and cinema enthusiast's list.

8 of 8 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
The US DVD Released Tinsethj
Re-Release in Britain?? LaMcKay
Discuss The Battle of Culloden (1964) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for: