| Page 1 of 6: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] |
| Index | 51 reviews in total |
34 out of 35 people found the following review useful:
I remain enthusiastic even 40 years later..., 4 January 2004
Author:
clore_2 from New York, New York
To this writer, the film is Roger Corman's best entry into sci-fi. Many
of his 50s efforts hold a certain campy charm, with their low-budget
effects - and this film is similar in that regard. It does not dwell on
the effects, in fact some of them are rather poor. What it does have in
its favor is a tight screenplay that gets into the story quickly, as
will the viewer - and it's engrossing enough and the characters
interesting enough that one stays involved through the episodic story.
What it has most in its favor is an excellent performance from Ray
Milland, then in his last days being top-billed, and he milks it for
all that it's worth. In some scenes Corman goes for a direct close-up
and Milland's facial reactions indicate that he took the the role in a
small-budget/tight schedule film with all the enthusiasm that he did in
one of his roles for Alfred Hitchcock ("Dial M For Murder") or Fritz
Lang ("Ministry of Fear"). Smooth, refined, but a man of immediate
action if necessary, Milland's Dr. Xavier is not your usual mad
scientist. As with Claude Rains in "The Invisible Man" or Al Hedison in
"The Fly" he's the scientist who made the mistake of being his own
subject.
Occasionally Corman goes for the cheap gag (the party sequence, where
Xavier examines the guests sans attire - but inoffensive in a typical
60s approach), but the carnival scenes and the basement healer scenes
show a maturity to Corman's direction, and these scenes are greatly
helped by the performance of Don Rickles. He's as sleazy as one can get
and admits that if he had the power, he would use it to see "all the
undressed women my poor eyes can stand" and you believe it. A scene
where Milland confronts other carnival workers who are speculating on
his "power" shows the doctor to be both introspective and world weary
at the same time. At this point even he does not know what to do with
his ability, but Rickles' suggestion of setting up a site to "heal"
others leads to the film's most revealing and almost poetic sequence.
Xavier's original intention was to help the ill, but his implication in
an accidental murder led him to seek refuge in the carnival Richard
Kimble-style.
Diana Van Der Vlis does well with her underwritten role in which at one
point she's rather quickly dropped, and then resurfaces rather
conveniently later in the story - to no great effect. This was only her
second feature film, though she had done a number of TV guest shots.
Although half Milland's age, she seems more mature than her 28 years
and they make a believable pair. A bonus is the appearance of a number
of veterans in brief roles - John Hoyt, Harold J. Stone, John Dierkes
and Morris Ankrum, as well as Corman stalwart Dick Miller. Miller
shares his scenes with Jonathan Haze, whom it appears was getting the
cheapest rate Corman could pay as he has no lines at all. He was rather
bitter about this as he revealed in an interview years later.
Floyd Crosby's cinematography belies the small budget - only $300,000
and a shooting schedule of about three weeks. According to Corman they
did rehearse a bit more than usual - and in the finished product it
shows. He claims he even went as high as four takes, which may not
exactly put him in William Wyler or Stanley Kubrick territory, but it's
a far cry from what he'd do in the 50s. Les Baxter contributes what may
be my favorite of his scores, fully complimentary to the action on
screen without overwhelming it.
There's a bit of controversy over the ending - some attribute an extra
line of dialog that never appeared in any print that I've seen, but it
is still one of the most surprising endings of any sci-fi film since
"The Incredible Shrinking Man." That it won the top prize at the
Trieste Science Fiction Film Festival would be enough for one to be
curious enough to see it even this many years later - that it has held
up so well over 40 years points to that award's validity.
18 out of 21 people found the following review useful:
X-Ray Milland, 29 June 2004
Author:
RanchoTuVu from Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico
Here is Corman at almost his best. Ray Milland was as good an actor as
Vincent Price, and this story isn't trapped in the Poe mode of rotting
flesh and dilapidated mansions. It's more in the manner of Corman's The
Trip, which was made a few years later. Dr. Xavier discovers something
that he can use to see through solid objects, but its effect is
cumulative, and by the end of the movie he's seeing all the way to the
core of reality.
Of course, he has to go on the run, and must abandon his medical
career. We see him in a carnival, reading peoples' thoughts, and later
teaming up with his x girlfriend and going to Vegas and seeing through
the cards and winning big, and finally, escaping from the police, and
as he drives through the Nevada desert, we see that he can't see a
thing. Abandoning his Lincoln Continental, he stumbles into a tent
revival meeting. The preacher, played by Royal Dano(?)is telling his
followers to throw Satan out. Filmed by Floyd Crosby, with beautiful
special effects, this is a real piece of 60's film-making by one of the
masters.
16 out of 20 people found the following review useful:
Superlative, brilliant, thoroughly engrossing sci-fi tragedywhich stands as Roger Corman's best and most impressive effort in thisfield., 12 August 1999
![]()
Author:
Jeffrey Talbot from Toronto, Canada
Science fiction which questions the very nature of existence itself is
probably the most fascinating basis for a story idea addressed. Prior to
X:
THE MAN WITH THE X-RAY EYES the only other film to explore this theme was
Jack Arnold's profound THE INCREDIBLE SHRINKING MAN (1957) and both of
these
ground-breaking films paved the way for later endeavours like Stanley
Kubrick's experimental 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY (1968).
X: THE MAN WITH THE X-RAY EYES was released theatrically on September
1963.
On network television at this time were two important sci-fi/fantasy
series
namely Rod Serling's THE TWILIGHT ZONE and Joseph Stefano's THE OUTER
LIMITS. This Roger Corman work is very much the same school of science
fiction as both of these series which places greater emphasis on strong
writing, provocative drama, outstanding performances and ensemble casting
as
the main foundation for storytelling and focus for viewer
interest.
Ray Milland as Dr. James Xavier sets the film's premise by noting that the
human eye is only sensitive to one-tenth the spectrum of light and what
would be seen if human vision developed enough to perceive the full
spectrum. Unfortunately as his range of vision increases more and more
his
sensibilities prove inadequate to cope with the indefinable apparitions
which he beholds and his radically changing perception of the physical
world
around him. The most significant and telling moment occurs when Dr.
Xavier
hiding out from the law in a tenement basement apartment (for the
accidental
murder of a colleague) peers upward with his super-vision penetrating
through the ceiling of his room and sees beyond the night sky, past the
starry heavens and beholds the very center of existence itself causing the
awe-struck researcher to cry out in anguished torment.
Later with the authorities in hot pursuit, Dr. Xavier enters the tent of a
road-show religious bible meeting and movingly tells the incredulous
throng
gathered within about what he has witnessed evocatively describing the
vision as a "great eye" at the core of the universe which sees and watches
us all.
The nihilistic ending of the film involves Dr. Xavier plucking-out his
eyeballs (now no longer recognizable as eyes) at the impassioned urgence of
a
fanatical evangelist and his congregation with the image of Xavier's
countenance freeze-framing to disclose his empty blood-red eye sockets
then
abruptly fading out to black (followed by the closing credits). This would
seem to reaffirm the timeworn homily that there are some things man was not
meant to know (or tamper with) and many critics and theatre goers
understandably found this conclusion somewhat discordant and incongruous
with the ideas and events which had preceded it. However this
restructured
ending was mandated at the insistence of the studio heads and is not the
finale that was initially filmed. The original conclusion as intended had
Dr. Xavier plucking out his eyeballs and looking around in confusion he
cries out, "I can still see!" which sheds a different light for not only
had
his expansive vision enabled Xavier to observe the infinite but his
heightened perception has now evolved beyond the need of mere eyes for
sight.
X: THE MAN WITH THE X-RAY EYES was the third of three interesting works
produced by American International Pictures (over a two year period) which
starred Ray Milland. The other two films were Roger Corman's THE
PREMATURE
BURIAL (1962) and PANIC IN YEAR ZERO (1962) which Mr. Milland both
directed
and starred in. Not surprisingly Mr. Milland gives an exceptional
performance as the ill-fated Dr. Xavier and his distinguished name and
considerable Thespian expertise certainly gives this film much prestige
and
impact. Ray Milland is ably supported by a fine supporting cast of
talented
professionals including Diana Van Der Vliss, Harold J. Stone, John Hoyt,
Don
Rickles (in a marvelous straight character role), John Dierkes and a brief
appearance by sci-fi film veteran Morris Ankrum (as a hospital board
member).
Mention must also be made of Les Baxter's hauntingly atmospheric and
unusual
music score (particularly memorable is this compelling composition's
wailing
siren-like quality) which ranks among his best. Mr. Baxter is primarily
known for his musical contributions to the early editions of Roger
Corman's
Poe series of horror films, AIP's Beach Party movies and other AIP hits
such
as William Witney's MASTER OF THE WORLD (1961) and Jacques Tourneur's THE
COMEDY OF TERRORS (1964).
X: THE MAN WITH THE X-RAY EYES is certainly one of the most important
films
in the catalogue of both Roger Corman and American International Pictures
and marked Corman's welcome return to the sci-fi genre which he had
abandoned since the late 1950's. At this point in time Roger Corman was
riding the crest of considerable artistic and commerical triumph (thanks
mainly to his renowned Edgar Allan Poe film series) and X: THE MAN WITH
THE
X-RAY EYES came in a lush period of inspiration and creativity where this
auteur director seemly could do no wrong.
16 out of 22 people found the following review useful:
Still Odd To See Someone Like Milland In This!, 21 September 2006
![]()
Author:
ccthemovieman-1 from United States
This was the typically-hokey-but fun Roger Corman film but one that
keeps your interest most the way and at least stars a famous
classic-era actor: Ray Milland. One actually wonders what an actor of
Milland's status would doing in a B Grade B-type sci-fi movie like
this. For someone who had admired Milland's work for many years, it
just seems odd for me to see him in a small-budget film. Maybe things
got tough for him near the end of his career and he would take most any
role. I don't know, and I'm not judging.....just curious why he took
this role. I do know having him in the movie elevates it and the dialog
isn't as cheesy as one would expect in a 1950-ish sci-fi horror story
made in the '60s.
Comedian Don Rickles playing a greedy criminal guy was another odd cast
selection, but, he, too, was fun to watch.
Corman was smart to keep this at a respectable 79 minutes. Had it gone
on longer, it would have started to drag. It would be interesting to
see this film done with today's special-effects.
10 out of 12 people found the following review useful:
Classic sci-fi shocker has Rickles in one of his best roles, 8 November 2002
![]()
Author:
funkyfry from Oakland CA
This is one of my favorite Roger Corman flicks. Brisk pace and many
surprises. Don Rickles as a ruthless carny exploiteer is one of them.
Milland wears more and more ridiculous sunglasses as the movie progresses.
Seriously, this is one of Don Rickles' best performances -- it shows that he
could have gone in a totally different direction than he followed for most
of his career (as an "insult comedian") if he had wanted to. I imagine that
his appearance in the film had something to do with his contract with AIP,
but I still think it's a bit of VERY inspired casting (regardless of the
financial reasons that may have been behind it).
Milland is also excellent in the type of role that suits him to a T... he
gets to be kind of a Dr. Frankenstein here, convinced he's doing good for
humanity but making himself into a monster in the process.
A memorable story with a meaning.
7 out of 7 people found the following review useful:
Do You See What I See?, 31 March 2001
Author:
BaronBl00d (baronbl00d@aol.com) from NC
A very thoughtful, engrossing, flawed film from superhuman director/producer Roger Corman. Yep, it has some problems, most primarily dealing with a limited budget. But what it lacks in dollars it has in heart and its ability to make you think about what we are missing out seeing with our vision. I am not sure that much, or even any, scientific creedence can be given to the idea behind the experiments of Dr. Xavier James and his search to see beyond what normal vision allows. Ray Milland gives a fine performance as the obsessed man out to continue his experiments even if they involve using himself as the human guinea pig. Some of the scenes and dialogue are a bit hokey by today's standards but most fit the film very nicely. The scene with Milland at a party is a real hoot and great comedic relief. I also loved the end to the film but thought it could have been plucked out a little longer. The effects are very sparse and the only ones I really thought were any good were the ones used to highlight Milland's eyes through the film. The film boasts a fine cast of stalwart sci-fi/Corman people such as Morris Ankrum, Dick Miller, Jonathan Haze, and Barboura Morris, as well as a young(and obviously talented) Don Rickles. Definitely try to see your way to seeing this film.
8 out of 9 people found the following review useful:
Awesome SF flick, 3 October 2004
![]()
Author:
Ravenus from India
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
X - The Man with the X-Ray Eyes - Roger Corman (1963)
[FULL REVIEW - LIKELY SPOILERS]
To be sincere I didn't so much expect it to be but this was one AWESOME
movie.
Written by Ray Russell, the story centers upon the brilliant if
obsessive scientist James Xavier (Ray Milland)who is intent on
expanding the range of human vision with his wonder drug 'X'. The
extent of James' obsession is revealed in a conversation with his
friend Sam.
Sam: "Only the gods see everything" James: "My friend, I'm closing in
on the gods"
James' formula works, giving him the ability to see through people's
clothing, their skin and even beyond. But disaster erupts when a
cynical committee withdraws his funding and he is returned to routine
clinical practice. A heated argument with a colleague over the
operating table gives way to a freak mishap in which he causes the
death of his friend and our brilliant researcher becomes a man on the
run. He spends his time in hiding as a cheap carnival act, only unlike
the others, his talent is no sleight of hand, no trick. Found out by
his agent Crane (a brilliant, palpably sleazy turn by Don Rickles), he
is arm-twisted into becoming a 'healer' for money.
All this while, his eyesight grows painfully more intense, perceiving
radiations beyond the pale of the visible spectrum. In place of
unaffordable fancy effects (and perhaps all for the better, although it
is interesting to fantasize about a more technically accomplished
version that would retain the soul of the original movie) the story
uses gripping and evocative dialog to convey the frightening distortion
of Xavier's vision.
Throughout the narrative there is an air of tragedy and horror. The
lead character, thanks to Russell's writing and Milland's performance,
has been etched out so well, you empathize at each moment with what
he's going through.
The climax is a shocking literal interpretation of the biblical command
"If thine eye offends thee, pluck it out"
9 out of 13 people found the following review useful:
Well worked little B-movie thriller!, 22 May 2006
![]()
Author:
The_Void from Beverley Hills, England
Roger Corman is often passed over as merely a B-movie director, but
films like this one really show his brilliance. The Man with X-Ray Eyes
is chilling, ingenious and highly original; and this becomes even more
impressive when you consider that the film was shot on a shoestring
budget of just $300,000. Because of this, Corman doesn't go overboard
with the special effects, and as such; the film concentrates on the
implications of the lead character's predicament. This actually helps
the film, as the idea behind what is happening is far more chilling
than how it has actually happened. The plot follows a doctor doing
research into the eye. After discovering a new drug that can give its
taker X-ray vision, he decides to test it on himself due to lack of
funds. Before long, he finds that he is able to see through people's
clothes (surely a useful ability), as well as walls and other surfaces.
However, this new capability soon takes its toll on the good doctor, as
he loses the ability to shut out the light, and after a tragic event;
he has to find a new way to make a living.
Ray Milland, who worked with Corman previously on the Poe adaptation
'Premature Burial', takes the lead and gives a great portrayal of the
doctor at the centre of the story. Milland is great at portraying a
strain on a character, and that ability is put to best use in this
film. The story is frightening because, as is said at one moment in the
film, we only get one pair of eyes and therefore that pair is precious.
The idea of not being able to cut out the light is frightening also, as
while many people would see X-ray vision as an asset, this film does
well in disputing that. The way that Corman portrays the 'X-ray vision'
makes best use of the budget available and actually works rather well,
as we get treated to seeing the world through the eyes of the lead
character. The way that the story pans out isn't particularly original,
but it works in that it's believable and provides a good backdrop for
the major focus of the film. Overall, The Man with X-Ray Vision is
proof that a film can work in spite of a limited budget, and while
Corman may not be the best director of all time; he certainly knows how
to make B-movies!
4 out of 4 people found the following review useful:
This movie still entrances 40+ years later, 10 October 2006
![]()
Author:
jikerbau from United States
I just (finally) saw this film a few days ago, after years of hearing
about it. The screening was the final show of a three-day SF/horror
film festival. After three days of films, most people were feeling a
bit loopy and ready for some light entertainment. As X opened, quite a
few members of the audience started treating it as an episode of
Mystery Science Theater 3000, shouting out their own (generally lame)
joke comments in response to the film. I was annoyed, because I'd been
looking forward to this film all weekend (although, in their defense,
certain lines have become unintentionally loaded in the comparatively
sexually liberated 21st century).
What I found fascinating was that, by 15 minutes into the movie, all
the commentary stopped. Once the film moved beyond the talky opening
scenes and stilted dialog, once the story really got going, everyone
was drawn into it. They actually paid attention to the movie instead of
each other.
As SF cinema goes, this is definitely one of the more entertaining,
thoughtful, and intelligent examples (and intelligent SF film is a
dying genre). This one goes well beyond the standard mad scientist
formula.
6 out of 9 people found the following review useful:
Ray Milland Classic Film!, 23 July 2004
![]()
Author:
whpratt1 from United States
Always enjoyed every picture that Ray Milland had appeared in from the very beginning of his career to his later days, where he had to appear in very low budget films like most aging actors find themselves having to perform. In this film, Ray Milland (Dr. James Xavier),"The Lost Weekend",'45 is a doctor who experiments with his eyes and experiences some very unusual things that he is able to view with his eyes, like seeing through peoples clothing! Milland gives a great performance and keeps you glued to the screen. Diana Vander Vlis,(Dr. Diane Fairfax),"The Swimmer",'58, is Dr. Xaviers assistant and also his lover who manges to rescue him from the grips of Don Rickles,(Crane),"Casiino",'95, who manages to make money from the great talents of Dr. James Zavier. Don Rickles gives a fantastic supporting role and shows his great ability to perform as an actor. This is a very enjoyable film and worth while VIEWING!
| Page 1 of 6: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] |
| Plot summary | Plot synopsis | Amazon.com summary |
| Ratings | External reviews | Official site |
| Plot keywords | Main details | Your user reviews |
| Your vote history |